MSNBC's O'Donnell falsely claimed McCain "called for Don Rumsfeld's resignation"
SUMMARY: On MSNBC, Norah O'Donnell falsely claimed that Sen. John McCain "called for [former Defense Secretary] Don Rumsfeld's resignation." In fact, McCain did not call for Rumsfeld to resign; he said the decision about whether Rumsfeld should leave was the president's.
On the March 26 edition of MSNBC Live, chief Washington correspondent and host Norah O'Donnell falsely claimed that Sen. John McCain "called for [former Defense Secretary] Don Rumsfeld's resignation." In fact, as Media Matters for America has documented, McCain did not call for Rumsfeld to resign. While McCain expressed "no confidence" in Rumsfeld in 2004, the Associated Press reported at the time that McCain "said his comments were not a call for Rumsfeld's resignation." Further, when Fox News host Shepard Smith specifically asked McCain, "Does Donald Rumsfeld need to step down?" on November 8, 2006 -- hours before Bush announced Rumsfeld's resignation -- McCain responded that it was "a decision to be made by the president." McCain offered a similar statement on the October 18, 2006, edition of MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews, stating: "I was asked if he should resign. I said no, that's up to the president."
As Media Matters noted, The Washington Post reported in a February 9 article that McCain "regularly reminds audiences that he also criticized Bush's management of the war and called for Donald H. Rumsfeld's resignation as defense secretary." After Media Matters noted the article's failure to report that McCain's assertion that he had called for Rumsfeld's resignation was false, the Post published an article reporting that McCain "overstate[d] his public position on Rumsfeld" and never called for him to resign. According to the February 16 article: "[D]uring a debate at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif., aired on CNN, McCain said, 'I'm the only one that said that Rumsfeld had to go.' A McCain spokesman acknowledged this week that that was not correct. 'He did not call for his resignation,' said the campaign's Brian Rogers. 'He always said that's the president's prerogative.' " The February 16 Post article also noted that "McCain's false account has been unwittingly incorporated into the narrative he is selling by some news organizations, including The Washington Post."
Following the Post's February 16 article, The New York Times' Elisabeth Bumiller wrote that "McCain has overstated his original position on Mr. Rumsfeld. ... [U]nlike a group of retired generals who called for Mr. Rumsfeld's resignation in the spring of 2006, Mr. McCain never did."
From the 3 p.m. ET hour of the March 26 edition of MSNBC Live:
O'DONNELL: John, isn't it true that John McCain does want to continue the president's course in Iraq?
JOHN LEHMAN (McCain campaign national security adviser): John McCain is -- has been criticizing the Bush administration policy for many years. Finally, the Bush administration adopted his recommendations, which was to put sufficient forces in there to establish the kind of security --
O'DONNELL: We know that. He has criticized Don Rumsfeld. He called for Don Rumsfeld's --
LEHMAN: Right.
O'DONNELL: -- resignation. But he was before -- for the surge before anybody else. Answer the question, though, how it's different that his course would be different from Bush in terms of continuing on this path, continuing the failed policies, as Hillary Clinton says.















The McCain campaign has corrected the candidate's misstatements on the topic:
"McCain has rewritten that history a couple of times lately. While campaigning in Fort Myers, Fla., on Jan. 26, he told a crowd: "In the conflict that we're in, I'm the only one that said we have to abandon the Rumsfeld strategy -- and Rumsfeld -- and adopt a new strategy." Four days later during a debate at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif., aired on CNN, McCain said, "I'm the only one that said that Rumsfeld had to go."
A McCain spokesman acknowledged yesterday that was not correct. "He did not call for his resignation," said the campaign's Brian Rogers. "He always said that's the president's prerogative." Asked specifically about the senator's statements in Florida and California, Rogers said, "I think he's really just pointing out that he's the only one who really called out the Rumsfeld strategy, and that is certainly true again and again."
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/02/14/mccains_rewrite_of_his_antirum.html
Misstating facts, to put it kindly, has become a feature of the McCain campaign that has been seriously underreported to this point.
If you had a relative in their 70s who was becoming forgetful or confused wouldn't you be concerned enough to get them checked out to make sure it's not symptoms of something more serious?
The presidency is far too important a position to gloss over the fact McCain may be showing signs of advanced aging.
Let's get his medical records out in the open before we have another situation where the president doesn't seem to know what's going on in his own administration a la Reagan and W. Bush.
Perhaps the idea is to have Dick Chaney be selected as Vice President. I suspect he does not want to lose his current job...
This kind of hit-and-run journalism relies on there being no record of stupid statements and outright lies being made by these "news" people. In the era of the Internet this cannot happen, but they keep on behaving as if their words will not be challenged.
There's a reason she's called "Noron."
See here, here, here, here, and here.
I will be 73 in May. Several months ago I was asked to chair a political group whose goal was to investigate and discuss various trends in voter abuse. Naturally, I was very
flattered, as would any 73 year-old appreciating positive attention. But I have been having a few "senior moments" and certainly not as sharp as I would like to think. I,
of course, turned them down, explaining that they deserved the best chairman they
could find and I was not at my best. If Senator McCain had SOME of my insight and
could accept his "less-than-best" abilities, he would have the grace to step aside. BUT, Jess-uss CHRIST, WHO would take his place? I have no heart disease, but that thought is enough to send me into an aortic seizure.
For what its worth...... Whether McCain endorsed / demanded or had nothing to say about the resignation of Rummy, has no relevance in how useless McCain is anyways.
His 'bomb, bomb, bomb, Iran" singing has relevance
His several "mistakes" of claiming Al Qaeda being trained in Iran and going back to Iraq does too
So does his admitting that he hasn't a clue about finance or the economy
While I agree that it is misinformation that they ''report'' this stuff this way.... in the end.... in the immortal word of Dick Cheney..... "So"