MSNBC's O'Donnell issues "clarification" for falsely claiming McCain "called for Don Rumsfeld's resignation"
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
SUMMARY: A day after falsely claiming that Sen. John McCain "called for Don Rumsfeld's resignation," MSNBC's Norah O'Donnell issued a "clarification," saying: "Yesterday, I suggested that John McCain had called for Secretary Rumsfeld's resignation in the past. In fact, what McCain had said repeatedly was that he lacked confidence in Rumsfeld. But he did not directly call for Rumsfeld to step down back when Rumsfeld was still in office."
On the March 27 edition of MSNBC Live, chief Washington correspondent Norah O'Donnell issued "a clarification" to her false statement the day before that Sen. John McCain "called for [former Defense Secretary] Don Rumsfeld's resignation." In her clarification, O'Donnell stated: "Yesterday, I suggested that John McCain had called for Secretary Rumsfeld's resignation in the past. In fact, what McCain had said repeatedly was that he lacked confidence in Rumsfeld. But he did not directly call for Rumsfeld to step down back when Rumsfeld was still in office." As Media Matters for America noted, while McCain expressed "no confidence" in Rumsfeld in 2004, the Associated Press reported at the time that McCain "said his comments were not a call for Rumsfeld's resignation." Further, when Fox News host Shepard Smith specifically asked McCain, "Does Donald Rumsfeld need to step down?" on November 8, 2006 -- hours before Bush announced Rumsfeld's resignation -- McCain responded that it was "a decision to be made by the president." McCain offered a similar statement on the October 18, 2006, edition of MSNBC's Hardball, stating: "I was asked if he should resign. I said no, that's up to the president."
As Media Matters noted, The Washington Post reported in a February 9 article that McCain "regularly reminds audiences that he also criticized Bush's management of the war and called for Donald H. Rumsfeld's resignation as defense secretary." After Media Matters noted the article's failure to report that McCain's repeated assertions that he had called for Rumsfeld's resignation was false, the Post published an article reporting that McCain "overstate[d] his public position on Rumsfeld" and never called for him to resign. According to the February 16 article: "[D]uring a debate at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif., aired on CNN, McCain said, 'I'm the only one that said that Rumsfeld had to go.' A McCain spokesman acknowledged this week that that was not correct. 'He did not call for his resignation,' said the campaign's Brian Rogers. 'He always said that's the president's prerogative.' " The February 16 Post article also noted that "McCain's false account has been unwittingly incorporated into the narrative he is selling by some news organizations, including The Washington Post."
From the 3 p.m. ET hour of the March 27 edition of MSNBC Live:
O'DONNELL: And a clarification. Yesterday, I suggested that John McCain had called for Secretary Rumsfeld's resignation in the past. In fact, what McCain had said repeatedly was that he lacked confidence in Rumsfeld. But he did not directly call for Rumsfeld to step down back when Rumsfeld was still in office.
















No kudos for the press, of course.
For you and me such a thing would be a mistake, but for them it's a full time job with very high pay. If they had a tenth of the professionalism of any other profession, Media Matters would have no need to exist.
O'Donnell was shocked...shocked...really, absolutely shocked--
When the memo she used for the story---from the RNC---was not factually correct.
I'd give Noron a point or two, but she SAID it, she didn't "suggest" it. "Suggested" makes it sound less definitive.
Gee that's great.
You do realize, that in the absence of fact-checkers and other gadflies like MMFA, this beauty contest runner-up toothpaste commercial model former cheerleader, is free to repeat her spin/misinfo/lie as often as she (or her employer) likes...
But in the present environment of the Internet Wire (the People's true Press!), a citation such as MMFA's, does provoke a "clarification" such as her's, and make for a temporary stop...
That's great.
It's a small difference but it's the first step in a long journey.
This is another example of how Media Matters shows when a media source echoes what they said. They said she was wrong, she echoes their comment by admitting (well, sort of) her error.
This is the same thing they do when Keith Olbermann has his worst person in the world awards, covering it because it is repeating the same point they made.
" This is another example of how Media Matters shows when a media source echoes what they said. "
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To me it seems that Media Matters are just following up on the original story . It seems appropriate to me to announce the retraction .