MSNBC anchor, guests ignore Obama's prior condemnation of anti-Israel statements in church newsletter and by his pastor
SUMMARY: On MSNBC, Tucker Carlson described statements on the "pastor's pages" section of Sen. Barack Obama's church's newsletter as "wild," "anti-Israeli statements" and asserted: "I think Obama will feel the need to address that directly fairly soon." Later, Andrea Mitchell asked Chicago Sun-Times Washington bureau chief Lynn Sweet: "Does he [Obama] have to do more explaining? Does he have to meet perhaps once again with Jewish leaders to try to reassure them that these are not his views as well?" Sweet responded: "Andrea, yes, yes, yes, and yes on everything you're saying." But no one mentioned Obama's prior condemnation of his pastor's "views on Israel" and the church's republication of an op-ed by a Hamas official.
On the March 27 edition of MSNBC Live, senior campaign correspondent and former host Tucker Carlson described statements on the "pastor's pages" section of Sen. Barack Obama's church's newsletter as "wild," "anti-Israeli statements" and asserted: "I think Obama will feel the need to address that directly fairly soon." Later in the hour, specifically citing a column by a Hamas leader republished in the newsletter, host Andrea Mitchell asked Chicago Sun-Times Washington bureau chief Lynn Sweet: "Does he [Obama] have to do more explaining? Does he have to meet perhaps once again with Jewish leaders to try to reassure them that these are not his views as well?" Sweet responded: "Andrea, yes, yes, yes, and yes on everything you're saying. ... If you want to cut him slack and cut him a break on what he knew or didn't know about Jeremiah Wright's sermons, when you have your church bulletin print some of this stuff and you attend it over years, how could he not address it?" But no one mentioned that Obama has previously "condemned" his former pastor Rev. Jeremiah Wright's "views on Israel" in a statement to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA).
A portion of Obama's statement was published in a March 20 JTA article that quoted Obama as saying: "I have already condemned my former pastor's views on Israel in the strongest possible terms, and I certainly wasn't in church when that outrageously wrong Los Angeles Times piece was re-printed in the bulletin." In the JTA article, Obama specifically condemned the republication of an article by Hamas official Mousa Abu Marzook, originally appearing as a Los Angeles Times op-ed, in the "pastor's pages" section of the church's newsletter. By contrast, Mitchell reported on the March 27 edition of NBC's Today that "Obama told the Jerusalem Post the church was 'outrageously wrong' to reprint the article, and he denounced Hamas."
Carlson, Mitchell, and Sweet also did not mention that in his March 18 speech about race and the controversial remarks by Rev. Wright, Obama took issue with Wright's statements on Israel. In his speech Obama said of Wright's comments: "They weren't simply a religious leader's effort to speak out against perceived injustice. Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country ... a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam."
From the March 27 edition of NBC's Today:
MITCHELL: And now, even more controversy involving Reverend Wright. An Internet search reveals church bulletins over the past year with controversial "pastor pages" from the reverend. Some reprint anti-Israel writings from a range of people from Archbishop Desmond Tutu to an adviser to Elijah Muhammad and Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam and Hamas leader Mousa Abu Marzook.
One of Marzook's columns, reprinted by the church from the Los Angeles Times, says: "Why should any Palestinian recognize the monstrous crimes carried out by Israel's founders and continued by its deformed modern apartheid state?"
Obama told the Jerusalem Post the church was "outrageously wrong" to reprint the article, and he denounced Hamas.
From the 1 p.m. ET hour of the March 27 edition of MSNBC Live:
CARLSON: And if, I believe, there is another outbreak of Jeremiah Wright-related stories -- a flurry of them -- the predicate is already there, I think, and it's not clear that people will give Obama a pass a second time.
MITCHELL: Which there are already today, overnight. These church bulletins came out.
CARLSON: Yes.
MITCHELL: We went through a lot of them until the wee hours of the morning. And, in fact, some of them are deeply offensive to some people. You've been traveling.
CARLSON: Yes.
MITCHELL: You've heard some pushback even before these came out, and these are things that are not necessarily his writings, but this is the church bulletin, the "pastor's page" where he has an introductory passage and then introduces things that he is recycling, circulating to his flock. And they include writings from Hamas, and writings from the Nation of Islam, and some are mainstream. Some are Desmond Tutu, who has said some things that are offensive to large numbers of Jews, but he's a Nobel laureate --
CARLSON: Right.
MITCHELL: -- who is also, you know, a hero to many people who fought against apartheid. So it's a mixed bag.
CARLSON: The Israel question. And this has never gone away. This has been bubbling beneath the surface. We haven't spent a lot of time, I don't think, in the media talking about it. It's a problem, I believe, for Barack Obama, some very, very heavy -- wild, actually, anti-Israeli statements -- some of them are just factually untrue in -- on these "pastor's pages." And I think Obama will feel the need to address that directly fairly soon.
MITCHELL: Let's take a look at a Gallup poll.
[...]
MITCHELL: In one bulletin, the remarks of a Hamas leader were reprinted and circulated to the parish -- to the congregation, rather -- quoting the Hamas leader, "Why should any Palestinian recognize the monstrous crime carried out by Israel's founders and continued by its deformed modern apartheid state?" [U.S. News & World Report editor-in-chief] Mort Zuckerman and Lynn Sweet rejoin me again.
Lynn, how difficult is this going to be for Obama? Does he have to do more explaining? Does he have to meet perhaps once again with Jewish leaders to try to reassure them that these are not his views as well?
SWEET: Andrea, yes, yes, yes, and yes on everything you're saying. Senator Obama's been trying to spend much of the last year in shoring up his support in the Jewish communities. He had a meeting a few weeks ago in Cleveland with 100 Jewish leaders there and activists. If you want to cut him slack and cut him a break on what he knew or didn't know about Jeremiah Wright's sermons, when you have your church bulletin print some of this stuff and you attend it over years, how could he not address it?















since i said i was not happy with michelle obama's proud to be an american for the first time quote, i will be fair and say she's getting a raw deal on this quote. she was talking about people of all races sticking to their own. she wasn't accusing one group.
http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2008/03/oops-she-did-it-again-michelle-obama.html
And when Wright echoes Hamas in his utter hatred for Israel and the Jews, let's try to remember that Obama was not in earshot of Wright on that particular instance and has absolutely no idea of Wright's views of Israel. And even if Obama knew that Wright hated the Jew, didn't Hillary lie about being under fire from snipers?
GO OBAMA!
Rubbish
This is where it goes too far. Questioning a candidates patriotism as opposed to appreciating their candor. Barack Obama is a US Senator, if he truly hated the USA he would be free to leave and live wherever he'd like as would his wife and Reverend Wright. As United States citizens they are enjoying their first admendment right to freedom of speech.
Anyone who can't dig that is a commie
Eden,
I doubt anyone has issues over Obama, his wife, and his former pastor having the right to free speech. It's a given. The seed has been planted that the Obamas hold a vastly different view of America than most Americans.
It seems to me there is a disconnect between Obama renouncing Rev. Wright's anti-American and anti-Semite words and his 20 year relationship with Rev. Wright. For me it just does not add up.
Obama's relationship with Rev. Wright will follow Obama throughout the campaign.
Thanks to the right-wing slime machine, it will follow him, right to the voting booth.
If and when people read their names on the ballot,
too many will see "Pastor Wright" instead of "Barack Obama,"
and too few will see "Bush II" instead of "John McCain."
Americans voting against Americans for excercising their first amendment rights...wow, what does that say about us as Americans ?
It says that there are far too many people in this country who are either too lazy or too stupid to think for themselves. And most of them believe everything they hear on right-wing talk radio, accepting all they hear as the truth. Even when it's anything BUT the truth - which is most of the time.
Where are the posters who complain that this site only defends clinton. Why is this Soros funded site defending Obama? Huh?
:-)
How vastly different ?
I'm white and I have no problem admitting I'm getting a free ride. Historically I have had the edge, hell I'm also male.
I don't think the govt created aids but I do feel, that as John Adams said, if a God blesses America for doing right that that same God can damn America for riding dirty. What's crazy about that ? The biblical God commited genocide with floods, hes damned the world before, why not a small chunk of it ?
As for Mrs. Obama, she was taken out of context, the complete qoutes are
---Speaking in Milwaukee, Wisconsin today, would-be First Lady Michelle Obama said, "for the first time in my adult life I am proud of my country because it feels like hope is finally making a comeback."
---Then in Madison, she said, "For the first time in my adult lifetime, I'm really proud of my country, and not just because Barack has done well, but because I think people are hungry for change."
I think the bolded items are great reasons to be proud of America. A lot of the things that make me proud to be an American DID NOT happen in my adult lifetime either.
Anyone can crop a quote, slap a yellow ribbon on their SUV and pretend that white people aren't at an advantage...to ignore 800lb gorillas in the room though eventually is deadly
Bumper sticker I saw on my way to work:
"You think education is expensive? Try ignorance"
You are white and you are getting a free ride? I'm white, and male, and I am not getting a free anything. Where did I go wrong?
I worked my way through college and graduate school, and still had to go into debt taking out loans. After graduate school I worked in the dairy department of a Wegman's grocery store nights, and substitute taught during the day to support my family for four years before finally landing a fulltime teaching job. Some days I spent hours in the store freezer, loading ice cream off of pallets and on to carts to roll to the frozen food section. I woke up at 3 AM every Sunday so I could get to the store and change the sales signs before the store opened. Some free ride.
Really, this Guilt Trip is just too much. If you have a problem being white and male, and you think supporting Obama is some kind of therepy to deal with that guilt, go for it, but don't expect the rest of us to join in like lemmings running off a cliff. I don't feel guilty at all. My grandparents came here from Poland, Italy, Greece and Ireland at the turn of the century. They never owned slaves or otherwise oppress anybody.
We are trying to elect a President here, not assuage your misguided sense of white guilt. The Rev. Wright is a racist. Obama spent twenty years going to his church, was married by this guy, sends his daughters to his church, named his book for one of his sermons. They are not casual acquaintances. They are bound together by choice. That's not my fault, and I will not be blamed for it.
If you want to go through life ashamed of your race, that's your problem. It's not mine, and it shouldn't be the nations, either.
JJ Just say it once, its easy
You had an advantage, so did I, it doesn't mean we hate what we are
I had to work my way through school too, I'm not rich I have to work
But see my grandfather was white and he didn't have to drink at separate water fountains or eat at separate tables, his ancestors were not slaves and when he grew up no one beat him up or called him names because of his skin color. My grandfather was able to go to school and work with no one thinking him inferior, he didn't have to live in a ghetto. In other words we didn't have to start five miles behind the starting gate and we reaped the advantage.
Do I feel guilty? No. I didn't do anything wrong. Do I understand that my race has had an easier time in this country, YES.
But hey, they were only slaves and Jim Crow was gone by 1965 so no biggie right, they all should just get over it ?
You sir, are a bad example of a liberal and Hillary is destroying the Dems chance of taking the white house by attempting to win through parlimentary loop holes since see cannot get a lead in the delegates or the states. Meanwhile McCain is chilling out and raising money, I'm sure he'll send you a thank you card.
It'll take a whole bunch more to solve this thing, but consistent open honest dialogue is the path
It seems to me there is a disconnect between Obama renouncing Rev. Wright's anti-American and anti-Semite words and his 20 year relationship with Rev. Wright. For me it just does not add up.
Let me add it up for you, AA. It's obvious that you've bought into the right-wing smear machine propaganda about Barack Obama and Rev. Wright - why else would you parrot a question that I've heard Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Mark Levin all ask on their radio pukefests?
Barack Obama began his career as a community activist and civil rights attorney - this would require him to establish very close ties with the black community in his home town. I remember that in the town where I grew up, there was a very vibrant black community - and a lot of the activities in the black commuinty revolved around one of the two black churches in town; at times, both churches would join forces to unify the black community behind a common goal.
I went to the web site for Trinity UCC, and found a page that lists all their ministries to their community. Whether you like what Rev. Wright says or not, you have to admit that his church does a lot of outreach to its surrounding community. And that is probably why so many people (including Sen. Obama and his family) have made Trinity UCC their church, and keeps people coming back for many years.
Remember, AA - a church is more than sermons delivered by its pastor. It's also interactions with the world around it, and actions taken to make a difference in that world. Look at the list of their ministries; I've included a link at the bottom of this message. It looks like Trinity UCC is just the place for someone like Barack Obama who wants to serve his community by keeping actively connected to it.
http://www.tucc.org/ministries.htm
You eat so many of them I'm beginning to think you may be a parrot.
(Insert smily face here.)
And not even well-designed rubbish, Eden. As much play as this plop is getting, I have to wonder if Obama has to just concede a certain part of the brain-dead. Along with the 30%ers (or whatever the number is at for those who haven't been awake for the past 7+ years), there are a certain number of our fellow Americans who are violently opposed to even considering these issues at any level beneath the most superficial.
It's not very pleasant to admit, but there are people, voters even, who can be spoon-fed the idea that any criticism of America is anti-American, and any criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic.
Col.
Only if one cannot tell the difference between criticism and rhetoric like, "GD America...", and "...The U.S. of KKKA", do you have a point.
If you call quotes like those above as "criticism", then there is no need to discuss this further. We simply disagree.
The only way you'd have a point is to explain the clear, objective difference between criticism and rhetoric, and provide a good reason why you think you get to draw that line.
I've pretty much given up trying to "discuss" anything with you beyond the most childlike level you operate at, so don't worry about that. ;0)
Another how does God feel about legalized abortion in the US, how about gay marriage...do you really want me to embarass you right now by dragging the quotes of RIGHT wing preachers into this ???
How about we start with Jerry Falwell saying we deserved 9-11, he didn't lose his hotline number to Bush over that one now did he.
What you are pointing at is happening in conservative churches across the country, hypocrites, who prefer BENNY HINN to fiery social discourse
"How about we start with Jerry Falwell saying we deserved 9-11, he didn't lose his hotline number to Bush over that one now did he."
You have no problem constantly pointing out that conservative churches make similar hate filled statements over and over again. Yet, you demand that hate filled statements recanted by RW media be immediately stopped. Who is the hypocrit?!?
But, that isn't the issue, here. The issue is whether Obama has the judgement needed to be president. He attends a church that promotes hateful sentiments on social issues. He befriends a pastor who leads the hateful church. This hateful church promotes terrorist ideals by printing statements from a world-wide terrorist leader (Pres Clinton had him listed as a 'specially designated terrorist' in '95), yet Obama attended this church, continually, for over 20 years, yet now condemns virtually every statement Wright has made over that period. WHY did Obama continue to attend this church?
Let me ask your hypocritical ars a question: would you let any 20-year member of the church Benny Hinn pastors (and good friend of Benny Hinn) run for president without asking the same question I am asking??
"The point, that you seem to be missing, is that its a non story. "
You mean you WANT it to be a non-story. But, like Obama, you won't address the issue of "poor judgement" either. Because you know how hypocritical you would look trying to explain why you denegrate McCain for accepting praise from a wacko, but feel it's ok for Obama to befreind a racist. Which is it?
And, I'm not missing any point. This mmfa article clearly states that this racist church printed articles in it's weekly literature from a known terrorist and Obama acknowledged it being there and had to denounce that also. If he's going to denounce every statement that comes from that church how smart does it make him look for staying there for 20 years? How does he explain that his racist church is printing terrorist agendas? More importantly; WHY is he still a member of the terrorist supporting racist church?? You can call it 'social discourse' all day long, but it's still widely known as racism.
Please, tell me all about the suffering of white folks like us, explain in detail all that we have had to face
And why isn't Obama just apologizing for everything he has no control over, like the weather maybe
"Please, tell me all about the suffering of white folks like us, explain in detail all that we have had to face"
That isn't the issue. It isn't the issue McCain is asked to explain and it isn't the issue Obama is expected to explain.
"And why isn't Obama just apologizing for everything he has no control over, like the weather maybe"
How about Obama explain things he DOES have control over, instead. Like why he chose to stay in a church that teaches racism, over and over again. Is there a problem with asking that question?
JJ AS FAR AS YOU KNOW HE JUST MISSPOKE
Isn't that what you scorched earth Hillary diehards are accepting as an excuse nowadays when you aren't ducking from sniper fire and calling fellow Democrats Judas ?
Well, has he CLAIMED he misspoke? I have heard no such claim. Instead, I hear a lot of "hey, what he said was TRUE!"
Until he claims he misspoke, AS FAR AS I KNOW, HE MEANT EVERY WORD.
Is there anything on earth less constructive than arguing with an Obama supporter? I sure can't think of one.
But you keep on coming back I was joshing of course, I don't think he misspoke and other than a few points I don't think he's wrong.
I was just pointing out the wide berth of credibility you cats allot for the Queen ?
"If he truly hated America, he would be free to leave..."
Except of course, if he left, he couldn't become President now, could he?
I'll tell you what I'm sick of. I'm sick of allegedly intelligent people telling me that if I would just understand the CONTEXT of what the Rev. Wright is saying, I would realize it's not racist. How anyone can say that there is a context for "the US Military bulldozed six thousand Iraqis into open graves while they were still alive" or "the US Govt created AIDS to kill black people" which makes those statements "understandable" and "not racist" is beyond my understanding.
And no, I'm not especially interested in being told how I just "dont get it." That argument makes you all warm and happy and self-satisfied and Superior, and nabs Obama exactly two states, if he's lucky, in November.
Then again, maybe these are the droids you're looking for.
Yes of course, its all about Right Wing Radio Inventing fake "news" stories.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go back to Air America Radio, which is currently in it's 37th consecutive hour of it's Hillary Lied About Her Experience in Bosnia Marathon.
The most frequent criticism of Hillary that I hear on Air America is that she's adopting the tactics and talking points of the Troglodyte Talk Radio liars to kneecap Obama.
The Reverend Wright "Story" is being spoonfed to you by the Right Wing Propaganda machine.... like it? Do you drool every time you hear a bell ring?
But O'Reilly, Hannity, and Rush have lots of hours of programming to fill. What better to endlessly opine about than religion, especially a "black" church that none of these lilly white idiots have ever seen in person.
If they had any morals, they would say that the reverend said some questionable things, but what does that really have to do with the price of gasoline and our brave soldiers risking their lives every day?
NOTHING!
Oh please, you are being so dishonest. Air Obama has beaten the Hillary-Bosnia Gaffe Story to DEATH.
Oh, and yes, they've talked about the Rev. Wright story a lot- THEY USE IT TO PRAISE OBAMA for his "courage" in "talking about race." You left that little nugget out of your post. An accident, I'm sure.
According to the Hillarynuts like JJ Lieberman here all the Liberals are wrong except them
Olbermann is wrong
Huffington is wrong
Daily Kos is wrong
Move on is wrong
Ted Kennedy is wrong
Richardson is not only wrong, he's Judas
Everyone is wrong except Hillary, yep, thats mental patient wing logic for you...everyone is out to getcha
1. That's hardly a complete list of "all Liberals" now, is it?
2. Yes, all those you listed ARE wrong.
"Escaped mental patient mentality?" Ah yes, another famous example of Obamabot Raising the Level of Discourse. Good thing only Hillary supporters are tearing down the other side.
You guys are such a joke, it's not even funny anymore. You are just deluded, sad little dunces. Enjoy your crushing loss in November. Of course, it will be All Hillary's Fault, like everything else.
No not a complete list but it is growing Before Hillary went nuclear Obama had the delgate lead and was 10 states ahead, even the media was behind him, a wave like that would have crushed the Wright sideshow and obliterated McCain, now yes, maybe not so much.
Face it, Republicans will crawl over broken glass to vote against Clinton and she has lost the anti war left...she only has you DNC fat cats left
So lets see, who threw race into this...well Bill Clinton likened Obama to Jesse Jackson, Ferraro said he was only where he was because he was black, Wolfson and company have been very particular about down playing states wirth heavy black populations...
And what about the Rovish 3am ad, and calling Richardson Judas, how about her semi endorsement of McCain, her harping on the correct way to admonish Farrakhan, her distortion of his health care plan, and her use of the Wright story to take cover from sniper fire
How low can you go and still support this ?
"Ferraro said Obama got where he was only because he was black..."
Ferraro said that being black was a benefit to Obama, and Obama's own website agrees.
"All Hillary has left is DNC fatcats..."
How many party bigwigs have to endorse Obama before you guys give up that one? The DNC that refuses to seat Michigan and Florida- that's the DNC that Hillary has in her pocket, huh?
By the way, Hillary has won 47% of the total vote to Obama's 49% so far- the "so far" means that there are ten contests left, as much as you'd like to pretend it's over. Quite a landslide there. Yeah, no one is behind Clinton anymore.
Day is night, black is white, and Obamabots make sense. The weirdness never ends with you clowns.
Getting mighty lonely around here, huh JJ?
And whats this total vote crap, is it like the big states goal post move Hill tried pulling That dog didn't hunt either
BTW Wasn't too long ago you were in full agreement with those you call Obamatons now...yeah, Hillary stretching this race out isn't hurting anything
Give it a rest crybaby.
is beyond my understanding.
True.
To his former professor, congregant, and friend, Jeremiah Wright has been both
By MARTIN E. MARTY
Through the decades, the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. has called me teacher, reminding me of the years when he earned a master's degree in theology and ministry at the University of Chicago — and friend. My wife and I and our guests have worshiped at Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, where he recently completed a 36-year ministry.
Images of Wright's strident sermons, and his anger at the treatment of black people in the United States, appear constantly on the Internet and cable television, part of the latest controversy in our political-campaign season. His critics call Wright anti-American. Critics of his critics charge that the clips we hear and see have been taken out of context. But it is not the context of particular sermons that the public needs, as that of Trinity church, and, above all, its pastor.
In the early 1960s, at a time when many young people were being radicalized by the Vietnam War, Wright left college and volunteered to join the United States Marine Corps. After three years as a marine, he chose to serve three more as a naval medical technician, during which time he received several White House commendations. He came to Chicago to study not long after Martin Luther King Jr.'s murder in 1968, the U.S. bombing campaign in Cambodia in 1969, and the shooting of students at Kent State University in 1970.
Wright, like the gifted cohort of his fellow black students, was not content to blend into the academic woodwork. Then the associate dean of the Divinity School, I was informally delegated to talk to the black caucus. We learned that what Wright and his peers wanted was the intense academic and practical preparation for vocations that would make a difference, whether they chose to pursue a Ph.D. or the pastorate. Chicago's Divinity School focuses on what it calls "public ministry," which includes both conventional pastoral roles and carrying the message and work of the church to the public arena. Wright has since picked up numerous honorary doctorates, and served as an adjunct faculty member at several seminaries. But after divinity school, he accepted a call to serve then-struggling Trinity.
Trinity focuses on biblical teaching and preaching. It is a church where music stuns and uplifts, a church given to hospitality and promoting physical and spiritual healing, devoted to education, active in Chicago life, and one that keeps the world church in mind, with a special accent on African Christianity. The four S's charged against Wright — segregation, separatism, sectarianism, and superiority — don't stand up, as countless visitors can attest. I wish those whose vision has been distorted by sermon clips could have experienced what we and our white guests did when we worshiped there: feeling instantly at home.
Yes, while Trinity is "unapologetically Christian," as the second clause in its motto affirms, it is also, as the other clause announces, "unashamedly black." From its beginning, the church has made strenuous efforts to help black Christians overcome the shame they had so long been conditioned to experience. That its members and pastor are, in their own term, "Africentric" should not be more offensive than that synagogues should be "Judeocentric" or that Chicago's Irish parishes be "Celtic-centric." Wright and colleagues insist that no hierarchy of races is involved. People do not leave Trinity ready to beat up on white people; they are charged to make peace.
To the 10,000 members of Trinity, Jeremiah Wright was, until just a few months ago, "Pastor Wright." Metaphorically, pastor means shepherd. Like members of all congregations, the Trinity flock welcomes strong leadership for organization, prayer, and preaching. One-on-one ministry is not easy with thousands in the flock and when the pastor has national responsibilities, but the forms of worship make each participant feel recognized. Responding to the pastoral call to stand and be honored on Mother's Day, for instance, grandmothers, single mothers, stepmothers, foster mothers, gay-and-lesbian couples, all mothers stood when we visited. Wright asked how many believed that they were alive because of the church's health fairs. The members of the large pastoral staff know many hundreds of names, while hundreds of lay people share the ministry.
Now, for the hard business: the sermons, which have been mercilessly chipped into for wearying television clips. While Wright's sermons were pastoral — my wife and I have always been awed to hear the Christian Gospel parsed for our personal lives — they were also prophetic. At the university, we used to remark, half lightheartedly, that this Jeremiah was trying to live up to his namesake, the seventh-century B.C. prophet. Though Jeremiah of old did not "curse" his people of Israel, Wright, as a biblical scholar, could point out that the prophets Hosea and Micah did. But the Book of Jeremiah, written by numbers of authors, is so full of blasts and quasi curses — what biblical scholars call "imprecatory topoi" — that New England preachers invented a sermonic form called "the jeremiad," a style revived in some Wrightian shouts.
In the end, however, Jeremiah was the prophet of hope, and that note of hope is what attracts the multiclass membership at Trinity and significant television audiences. Both Jeremiahs gave the people work to do: to advance the missions of social justice and mercy that improve the lot of the suffering. For a sample, read Jeremiah 29, where the prophet's letter to the exiles in Babylon exhorts them to settle down and "seek the peace and prosperity of the city to which I have carried you into exile." Or listen to many a Jeremiah Wright sermon.
One may properly ask whether or how Jeremiah Wright — or anyone else — experiences a prophetic call. Back when American radicals wanted to be called prophets, I heard Saul Bellow say (and, I think, later saw it in writing): "Being a prophet is nice work if you can get it, but sooner or later you have to mention God." Wright mentioned God sooner. My wife and I recall but a single overtly political pitch. Wright wanted 2,000 letters of protest sent to the Chicago mayor's office about a public-library policy. Of course, if we had gone more often, in times of profound tumult, we would have heard much more. The United Church of Christ is a denomination that has taken raps for being liberal — for example for its 50th anniversary "God is still speaking" campaign and its pledge to be open and affirming to all, including gay people. In its lineage are Jonathan Edwards and Reinhold and Richard Niebuhr, America's three most-noted theologians; the Rev. King was much at home there.
Friendship develops through many gestures and shared delights (in the Marty case, stops for sinfully rich barbecue after evening services), and people across the economic spectrum can attest to the generosity of the Wright family.
It would be unfair to Wright to gloss over his abrasive — to say the least — edges, so, in the "Nobody's Perfect" column, I'll register some criticisms. To me, Trinity's honoring of Minister Louis Farrakhan was abhorrent and indefensible, and Wright's fantasies about the U.S. government's role in spreading AIDS distracting and harmful. He, himself, is also aware of the now-standard charge by some African-American clergy who say he is a victim of cultural lag, overinfluenced by the terrible racial situation when he was formed.
Having said that, and reserving the right to offer more criticisms, I've been too impressed by the way Wright preaches the Christian Gospel to break with him. Those who were part of his ministry for years — school superintendents, nurses, legislators, teachers, laborers, the unemployed, the previously shunned and shamed, the anxious — are not going to turn their backs on their pastor and prophet.
Martin E. Marty is a professor emeritus at the University of Chicago Divinity School and a panelist for On Faith, of Washingtonpost.com. His most recent book is The Christian World: A Global History (Modern Library, 2008).
Oh goody, another lecture by resident know-it-all Pearlene, to be quickly applauded by her condescending echochamber fans around here.
Thanks for allowing us to bask in the glory of your reflected light once again. Oh if only we could all be as enlightened as you are.
Sadly, some of us are just Typical White People.
Why so serious ?
Choosing a nominee is kind of serious, sorry.
And "why so angry?"- gee, what took so long? Every conversation I have with an Obama supporter ALWAYS ends with "gee, why are you so angry?" It's the only way you guys know how to "win" arguments- accuse the other side of being "angry."
I bet you spend a lot of time calling Air America radio hosts to tell them to stop the anger against Hillary. They are more vicious than anything I see or hear on Fox.
Actually I can be civil and hold discourse in a proper manner any time you'd like that to start, as long as you do likewise.
We met earlier, just after coffee this morning, you called me a racist.
Reread and check the time on these threads. Who attacked who ?
My responses now would be very different had you asked for further clarification.
The why so serious was just a fun pop culture reference, the why so angry was for your attack on Pearlene, a poster whom you used to agree with
See JJ, I'm King of the Obamatons, and you knocked on my door
Called me a racist this a.m. Did you forget ?
No one else agreed with you, then you started calling names , a read through the threads makes this quite clear, the Obamas were not the aggressors
Now calm down and tell me whats wrong, why should Hillary continue without the support of the leadership of her party and more than 100 delegates behind ?
Really gotten behind Obama and helped him navigate the Wright non story
After his election she could have blazed a path in the Senate with Obama at the bully pulpit
And eight years later the country would adore her, and she would easily win two terms as President
The dialogue on race we could have had
The war we needed to end
Nope, she ran with smear ads and perched her and her people all over the Fox news shows
Sadly, some of us are just Typical White People.
Now see I didn't know you were white but thank you for proving my point that ignorance know no color.
Tucker Carlson's show got horrible ratings, and MSNBC kept trying different formats before finally canceling it.
The message to MSNBC is: we don't want to watch Tucker Carlson.
But keep they keep putting him on TV, anyway.
As for Israel they do share blame in the hostilities with Palestine, that we ham handedly chose a side is one of many reasons why we catch so much grief in the Middle East, its not and never will be antisemetic to question foriegn policy
I think this is much more important than the rantings of Rev. Wright.
Well, the right to exercise the First Amendment does not have to be Earned. It's an Inalienable right.
And the Reverend's right to say what he wants to has, to the best of my knowledge, never been challenged here. It seems to me that it's the right to disagree and criticize Wright's statements that are under constant attack on this thread.
But what do I know, I'm just a Typical White Person.
JJ, in the context of his speech, what (besides the AIDS thing which, all hyperbole aside, Reagan dropped the ball on, and abstinence-only education helped perpetuate) did he say that was not true?
Yeah Yeah, G D America is some pretty harsh rhetoric. But are you one to presuppose that God has blessed our nation? Or that God blesses any nation? I believe the old testament is full of God damning the world, and the right wing preachers have been basically saying the same thing for YEARS.
And also, which part of what you have heard is racist? How, exactly, does he portray all white people in some stereotype? In other words, racially charged and racist are two totally different things.
Finally, I'm assuming you're a Ciinton supporter. Does it not bother you that Clinton has virtually no chance of winning the nomination? Unless of course, she steals those "pledged delegates" she believes can go against the will of their district.
If she lose Pennsylvania by a point, she will suspend her campaign.
Then please urge Obama to stand by Wright and defend his words instead of tossing him under the campaign bus. Today he said that if Wright had not resigned, he would have left the church. Want to condemn Obama for being small-minded? I didn't think so.
Nope, you guys want it both ways- you want to let Obama distance himself from his friend of twenty years in the most disgraceful way, AND you want to defend what Wright said. Well, if what Wright said was accurate, then call out Obama for his cowardice in refusing to support him.
Sorry, sometimes I forget that I'm talking to Obama fans. There's no sense of logic or consistency required to be in your little herd. Whatever is good for Obama is good, period.
You already think nobody works harder than you, nobody ever gave you a damn thing, you got it all on your own. You have an endless capacity for mischief and there is no pretext you will forego to defeat your opponent. That's a textbook conservative worldview.
You can take liberalism or you can leave it, I suggest you leave it because you are no Democrat as far as I can tell.
Wow, what the hell-ever, man. I'm 46 years old and I've never voted Republican in my life, and I won't vote Republican this year either- I just won't vote for Obama if he's the nominee.
You guys are really too much- I sound like a Republican because I'm defending my right to criticize Rev. Wright, huh? Is that where you Obamatrons are taking the Democratic party? Well, you can go there without me, thanks.
I think I work harder than anyone else? When did I say that? I was responding to the "I'm white, and I know I've gotten a free ride" poster. The idea that whites get a "free ride" in this country is just obnoxious, and you should be smart enough to know that.
Meanwhile, you just go ahead and keep defending the rants of Rev. Wright in the misguided belief that you are going to convince the mass of voters that THEY are the ones with the race problem, and not the good Reverend. When Obama gets blown out in November, you can all get together and have a hand-wringing party in which you bemoan the state of race relations in this country. And blame me and Hillary for the loss.
JJ Don't let the door hit you on the way out
I hear Senator Lieberman could use the company
Sorry I gave you the impression I was leaving. I'm not. So this blog hasn't been COMPLETELY taken over by the Obamabots yet.
And Senator Lieberman? You mean that guy Barack "Best Judgement on Day One" Obama endorsed in 2006? That Joe Lieberman?
Hows Zell these days?
So now if you don't support Obama, you aren't really a Democrat. Fine with me- I'll take my 24 years of voting Democratic and my money elsewhere. I didn't know the Democratic party had become a closed shop.
The only DINOs I see are those "Democrats For a Day" who registered to vote for Obama in the "Democratic" primaries so he can get stomped by McCain in November. Hillary has consistently won the DEMOCRATIC vote in those primaries.
I can't believe I'm even bothering to continue to respond to you children. You'll get your lesson learned, but good, in November.
We children are ahead in the only thing that counts, delegates
And worry you not, a dead intern will fall from McTortures closet soon enough. Liberman calls himself an independant too, its easier to support the war that way.
Did you just suggest you were taking your ball and going home? Other than the Wright thing what have you against Obama ?
Hill is behind over 100 delegates
"Like Joe Lieberman, I too have loyalties that are greater than those to my party. Starting with Hillary. I still owe her big time."
"You may not know this, but when Joe Lieberman and I joined the DLC, we swore a blood oath to always support the least progressive candidate in a race. Breaking that would be like Phil Leotardo crossing family lines by jamming that pole up Vito Spatafore's butt. Man, I can't believe we're gonna have to wait until March to see the final eight episodes because Gandolfini fell off his scooter!"
"Joe Lieberman was wrong on the bankruptcy bill, wrong on not filibustering Alito, and wrong on Terri Schiavo. But his position on the war is pretty similar to Hillary's and that's good enough for me."
"Some people say Joe Lieberman is out of touch, that he no longer knows what's good for Joe Lieberman, that he's no longer responsive to the needs of Joe Lieberman. But I disagree: I say Joe Lieberman still knows -- and does -- exactly what's good for Joe Lieberman."
"Eight years ago, Joe Lieberman took to the Senate floor and called my behavior 'immoral,' 'disgraceful,' 'harmful,' and 'damaging.' And you know what they say, slap me in the face and I'll follow you anywhere. That includes Waterbury! Go, Joe, go!"
"The last time Hillary spoke at the DLC (as she's doing today in Denver), the blogosphere gave her hell. I thought I'd pull some of that focus today, and make Peter Daou's job a little easier."
"If Joe Lieberman's daughter Rebecca can postpone her wedding to help her dad, the least I can do is take a train ride to Connecticut."
"Two DLC thumbs up -- way up!"
"Joe Lieberman: Better than Clerks II."
"Joe Lieberman has my endorsement; Ned Lamont has Carl Feen's. 'Nuff said."
I thought you were of that noble distinction who could criticize endlessly, without stain of hypocricy, those who support Obama but will not vote Hillary.
Anyhow, give me a principled reason, not tallies of wins and losses should McCain win, to vote for Hillary. Hell give me a reason why you're a Democrat. Is it just because Republicans are so damn terrible?
The only reason for voting Hillary I hear coming from you is she ain't Barack. That''s not good enough.
But don't think for a minute I'm so unaware of myself that, were you railing against a dirty Republican, I would disapprove. No. I'd probably back you up. You're not doing that though are you? You're repeating conservative frames about a fellow Democrat, you're attacking him from an unfounded rightwing position. And don't continue with this pretense that you are merely criticizing Wright. You are going after Barack with the ferocity of the most bitter Republican hack with this guilt by association plea. For what? The sweet taste of victory for Hillary. That's fine it's your right to do pro bono dirty work for the GOP. It's America afterall, home of the free. Have at it.
If you could formulate a reality based, left oriented argument against Obama's association with Wright, I would listen. All I'm hearing is Republican speak out of you and I simply don't trust a damn Republican any farther than I can throw one.
Though this is a few days later, I feel compelled to add a comment even though I'd guess nobody will read it.
The above article is a bad spin job. It may be true that Obama has NOW rejected the virulent anti-Israeli, anti-Semetic racial bigotry voiced by his church, but it is way, way to late. Such condemnation of these absolutely clear positions held by his church, only come in the context of political CYA. They didn't come when this garbage was published, in either the dam America or the ugly anti-Semetic rant. So why would one take seriously a repudiation well, well, well after the fact. One might legitimately ask oneself just what kind of values and world view Mr. Obama has instilled in his children and how his wife sees the world if many of their world values are derived, as he says, from his association with this church. It may be barely understandable that African Americans can see linkages between there own oppression and those of Palestinians. But it is a false and damaging linkage. Blacks in this country have been discriminated against culturally because of their skin color and the cultural leavings of a society that enslaved them and dehumanized them. Palestinians, on the other hand, are discriminated against in Israel because their stated purpose is to commit genocide against all Jews/Israel. They want, as a stated political and cultural goal to eradicate the State of Israel. I would venture to guess that if White America undertook as a political goal with the eradication of slavery, to wipe every living African American from the face of the United States, then those same African Americans would fight for their survival. But the bottom line here is that Mr. Obama by his own statements has belonged to this church for over twenty years. He has raised his children in this church. But he has only now, that it has been raised as a political embarrassment has he questioned the virulent anti-Semetic garbage from his church. I would suggest that in the privacy of his life outside of his political ambitions, it would seem highly questionable just what Mr. and Mrs. Obama's views of Jews actually are.
"But he has only now, that it has been raised as a political embarrassment has he questioned the virulent anti-Semetic garbage from his church."
You've got speculation, mind-reading and begging the question all in one sentence there, Alan.Aside from providing nothing to back up your starting point that this MMFA item is a "bad spin job", that big pile of logical fallacies and "bad spin" makes it difficult to take anything in your post seriously.That same stuff is going to really hinder your getting to any point of understanding on this topic.
"They didn't come when this garbage was published, in either the dam America or the ugly anti-Semetic rant."
When Obama found out about these statements, he condemned them.
Wright has been preaching for 30 years, and yet you have heard 30 second sound bites of his sermons. I've listened to hours of sermons, and I have to say he happens to be pretty spot on, if you believe in the Bible. Taking his sermons into context, or even just the one bit where he says "GD America," you may begin to understand that what he's saying is true.
It is true that our nation has killed innocent people. I do believe there is such a thing as the 7th commandment, which states "thou shall not kill." I also believe there is such a thing as the 1st commandment, which states "thou shall not have any other Gods before me." And yet, Rev. Wright was saying that America holds itself as God, as supreme over the Earth. Tell me, what exactly is untrue about that? And has God not damned our planet for violating his laws before? Hey, even Jerry Falwell said that America deserved 9/11, but did President Bush take him off his speed-dial?
Have you happened to have heard the ends of his sermons when he says "All of God's children white, black, red, yellow, male, female, all together"?
And lastly, anti-semitism? How so? I mean, he said "You don't see the connection between 9/11/01 and the Israeli-Palestinian?" Now, leaving bad grammar aside, do you not believe that our support of Israel has caused the Muslim world to hate us? I mean, that's almost their whole beef with us. Osama Bin Laden has said that our foreign policy is the reason that he attacked us, and Richard Clarke has said the same thing as well.
And how is that anti-semitic? Is it really, or are you just parroting right-wing talking points?
Until we can get past this "any criticism of Israel is anti-semitic," we will never have an open and honest discussion about Israel, our foreign policy will never change, and the terrorists will continue to try to attack America/
DB, thanks for trying, I've been doing it too, but I think it's precisely that threat of an honest discussion that has the bedwetters stuck on GD America and AmeriKKKa, or whatever spinning coin they're mesmerizing themselves with to avoid any discomfort.
I'm getting the feeling that some have put way too much work into their fantasies to let anybody drag them out into the real world.
Yeah, but you gotta keep fighting. I mean, that's what this site is for, after all.
But I've come to accept that some are just not going to let it go.
So.....do you have a cogent point, or are you just here to slavishly repeat Rush Limbaugh talking points?
Let's go back and find out what hateful things White Evangelical preachers have said over the years, and what Republican politicians belong to their churches. Think FUX News will take on that investigation?
The Knuckledragging Talk Radio Troglodytes have managed to derail the discussion once again. The Iraq "Surge" is unravelling as we speak, and the the Corporate Media Whores can't stop talking about this Reverend Wright bullsh*t.
It's obscene.
I respect everyone's opinion of Obama and his pastor's relationship because it does go deeper than support of a candidate.
That being said, some of you are in denial. America had a thing called the Tuskegee Experiment in which doctors purposely gave blacks syphillis and other std's to see long term consequences. The men studied did not know what was going on and they were all black. Furthermore, when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, America drove Japanese American citizens into camps for fear of a revolt. In 1963, less than 50 years ago, Dr. Martin Luther King was murdered, John F. Kennedy was murdered and Robert Kennedy was murdered. All of these men represented change from intolerance.
Some of you find it hard that a man can make comments about America being responsible for the spread of HIV in Africa. Now I don't succumb to that ideology, but given the brief history I mentioned (and I purposely left out the many atrocities from Emmit Till to slavery in and of itself) why is it so far-fetched that our government could do hateful and shady things? I love my country, but my country has not always loved me. I do not believe in playing the race card, but I promise you, as a black man there is a huge difference between me getting pulled over by a police officer and a white guy being pulled over by a police officer in 2008. Anyone willing to argue this point is in denial.
Again, I feel compeled to to address Obama haters, who say how can we trust a man who has a relationship with a racist pastor. Stop the madness. If you don't know someone with racist views in some capacity, you're lying to yourself. The Duke rape case wasn't just about rape. Jenna six wasn't about feuding students. Michael Vicks trial wasn't about dogs and Lebron James on the cover of Vogue isn't about selling magazines.
America has a problem with race. Too many people have selective memories and choose to forget atrocities that happen everyday. Anybody remember Diallo? The Hatian guy in New York who had an object rammed up his behind by police officers - doesn't happen to white folks. But mention O.J. and some people act like 'we're all even now.' As a black man there is frustration. I have plenty of white friends, I don't walk around angry all day and blaming them for my problems, but I damn sure don't bite my tongue if something seems or is racist. If you don't understand how Obama's pastor could feel the way he does, you don't know one black person who's been honest with you! Real talk.
Meanwhile, their candidate, John McCain, is singing "Bomb bomb Iran". This is interesting, since John Hagee, whom McCain has embraced, advocates a preemptive strike on Iran to fulfill his Armageddon fantasies. Hmmmmmmm.
Personally, I find this much more compelling as a topic of conversation, yet the Corporate Media Whores who drive the public discourse can't seem to find the time.
You and I can go on all day agreeing, because again that is the real issue. Did you hear today our military had to go help Iraqi army as Shiite militias were kicking their arses. We have a real problem with the middle east, but its easier to talk about whether a black man has ties to a racist pastor. We could talk about how a white guy has ties to aN intolerant reverend, or we could focus on how a woman lied about her experiences as First Lady. NONE OF THESE THINGS HELP OUR ECONOMY, THE PRICE OF OIL OR THE 4,000 MEN AND WOMEN OVERSEAS DYING. MEANWHILE OUR VICE PRESIDENT APATHETICALLY SAYS "THEY VOLUNTEERED" WHEN QUESTIONED ABOUT THE DEATH TOLL.
That's what we should be talking about imo.
i AM CONFUSED AND PUZZLED, IN THE TWENTY YEARS THAT HE WAS INVOLVED WITH THE CHURCH AND LISTENINING TO ALL THE SERMONS , SOME OF WHICH HE NOW FINDS UNREASONABLE , WHY DIDN'T OBAMA EVER SPEAK OUT OR CRITIQUE REV WRIGHTS'S MESSAGES, ONLY UNTIL HE RAN FOR PRESIDENT AND IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT HIS MENTOR HAD BEEN MAKING DEROGATORY SERMONS ABOUT AMERICA AND OTHER RELIGIONS, NO ONE HAS ASKED HIM THIS OBVIOUS QUESTION, WHY NOT ???
"Why don't we just go back to the days when politicians kept their religions to themselves? Wasn't that better?"
Amen to that.
Nothing I've heard from Obama sounds like anything like Wright's frantically YouTubed comments (always as carefully edited as Terri Schiavo's home videos).
McCain's "bomb bomb Iran" foreign policy sounds ominously like Hagee's and Parsley's (not to mention Robertson's) premillenial dispensationalist Armagedon wet-dreams. But hey, let's talk about Jeremiah Wright some more, eh?...