About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Limbaugh falsely claimed that Obama has "never reached across the aisle as a senator in legislation"

March 28, 2008 7:23 pm ET
image

Please upgrade your flash player. The audio for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a MP3 version of the audio.

SUMMARY: Rush Limbaugh falsely claimed that Sen. Barack Obama has "never reached across the aisle as a senator in legislation." In fact, Obama was a key co-sponsor of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act. In a press release upon Senate passage of the bill, Republican Sen. Tom Coburn himself referred to the legislation as the "Coburn-Obama Bill." Obama has also worked with Republicans on other bills.

44 Comments

On the March 27 edition of his nationally syndicated radio show, Rush Limbaugh falsely claimed that Sen. Barack Obama has "never reached across the aisle as a senator in legislation." In fact, as Media Matters for America has documented, Obama was a key co-sponsor of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (S.2590) with the bill's primary sponsor, Republican Sen. Tom Coburn (OK). In a press release upon Senate passage of the bill, Coburn himself referred to the legislation as the "Coburn-Obama Bill."

Obama also worked with Republican Sen. Richard Lugar (IN) to produce the "Lugar-Obama proliferation and threat reduction initiative," which President Bush signed into law on January 11, 2007, and which received funding on June 28 of that year. The initiative, according to Obama's Senate website, "expands U.S. cooperation to destroy conventional weapons. It also expands the State Department's ability to detect and interdict weapons and materials of mass destruction."

In addition, four of the 12 co-sponsors of Obama's bill (S.2125) to "promote relief, security, and democracy in the Democratic Republic of Congo" were Republicans: Sam Brownback (KS), Susan Collins (ME), Mike DeWine (OH), and James Inhofe (OK). President Bush signed the bill into law on December 22, 2006.

From the March 27 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:

OBAMA [audio clip]: President Clinton was the one who I think decried the politics of personal destruction, so obviously he recognizes that there's a line that can be crossed -- a line that can be crossed, where you stop focusing on the American people's business and it becomes just sport. And it all becomes about winning as opposed to getting stuff done.

LIMBAUGH: What have you gotten done? You haven't gotten anything done. These people are sitting ducks for a Republican Party that has no idea to pick up the weapon and start firing at the ducks -- politically speaking, of course. They got this little carnival show and our side's gone to the carnival -- and we got the carney, got the little ducks rolling by there. You know, grab the little fake pistol, and of course the carney has all the things where you can't possibly win the big teddy bear. And the Republicans don't -- it just -- he hadn't gotten anything done. He can't unify his preacher. He's never reached across the aisle as a senator in legislation. He's a blank slate by his own admission. And Barry, this "politics of personal destruction" business? President Clinton was not saying he realizes there's a line that you can't cross -- the line -- there is a line you can't cross. He's saying there are no lines when it comes to you.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by archae (March 28, 2008 7:28 pm ET)
         

      Is Limbaugh willfully ignorant, a stinking liar, or just plain stupid?

      Or all of the above?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (March 28, 2008 7:35 pm ET)
           
        It depends on whether or not he's had his daily dose of "legitimately acquired" meds.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by MrTimPA (March 28, 2008 7:40 pm ET)
           
        All of the above. :)
        Report Abuse
      • Author by ddsharper (March 29, 2008 2:43 am ET)
           
        I think all of the above are correct, or is this a trick question? Remember, NO education. He's an idiot.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (March 28, 2008 7:42 pm ET)
         
      Focus Rush Focus!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by GlennJericho (March 28, 2008 10:39 pm ET)
         

      Wow!  That Obama...quite the Maverick.  Make it easier to receive government handouts, disarmorment, and promoting relief and security in the Congo...all major parts of the Republican platform.  He really went out of his way to reach across the aisle to the Republican party.   I think he also was a supporter of the mainly Republican-supported bill to make Pres. William H. Taft's birthday "Obesity Awareness Day."

      Show me where he supported a REAL Republican bill.

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (March 28, 2008 11:05 pm ET)
           
        As far as "REAL Republican bills," I seriously doubt that you're going to find Obama's name or support on a bill that builds bridges to nowhere, alienates homosexuals, subjugates women, denies care to veterans, denies leave of absence to active duty soldiers, removes science from public schools, provides for the corporate welfare, or makes it easier for you to own a high-powered machine gun.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by August Heat (March 29, 2008 2:43 am ET)
             
          Flawless.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by littleguypainting3248 (March 31, 2008 2:08 pm ET)
             
          Hehe, Pete, you nailed it right on the head...   A "Real" Republican bill would be designed to malign the patriotism of a political opponent, apply libelous labels to truly courageous patriots,  legislate oppression of the weak, or encourage the persecution of anyone who deviates from their supposed  "higher moral standard". . .
          Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (March 28, 2008 11:08 pm ET)
           
        And Eden's right, you're simply moving the goal posts in a pathetic effort to prop up Limbaugh's line of crap.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (March 28, 2008 11:38 pm ET)
           
        Nonsense he doesnt have to become a rightwinger to be bipartisan he HAS worked with Republicans. That is all that is necessary to show Limbaugh is lying...AGAIN
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Leftwingcenter (March 28, 2008 11:51 pm ET)
           

        If he hasn't, so much the better, since Republican policy is what landed our nation in the economic, moral, political, and military swamp into which we're sinking fast.

        Go pop another handful of Oxy, Rush...

        Report Abuse
    • Author by edenscape246494 (March 28, 2008 10:55 pm ET)
         
      And then glenn shows up to move the goal posts further back
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Buzzramjet (March 29, 2008 12:46 am ET)
         

      Has Rush Osamabinlimbaugh EVER told the truth about anything? It would seem to be a fairly easy to simply start each day on MMFA with the following:

      Rush lied today constantly on his show. Pick a topic and he lied about it. Next story.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (March 29, 2008 1:26 am ET)
           
        Rush is talking in Republican terms. "Reaching across the aisle" is usually done with the goal of groping an altar boy.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by August Heat (March 29, 2008 2:44 am ET)
             
          Or looking for some viagara pills to pop.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by steve52 (March 29, 2008 9:39 am ET)
             

          To Republicans, bipartisanship means doing it their way. 100% their way. They view their fact-free ideology as a religion, and thus not open to compromise. If they say it, it is true.

          Reagan proved that deficits don't matter.

          Things are going fine in Iraq.

          The economy is doing great.

          Saddam had WMD, and conspired with alQaeda.

          Rich people are good. Poor people are bad. 

          See? It's easy! 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by MiddleLeft (March 31, 2008 9:53 am ET)
               

            To Republicans, bipartisanship means doing it their way. 100% their way.

            It was the Bush neocons and Rove who pushed the definition to the extreme limit.  If they could blackmail on or two dems to support a bill they would claim it was bipartisan. We used to think it meant they was some meaningful support on both sides for the measure.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by rumplestilskin396408 (March 29, 2008 12:44 pm ET)
           
        can you give a specific example.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by John the Elder (March 29, 2008 12:09 pm ET)
         
      Limpburger's idea of "reaching across" only takes place legitimately under a toilet stall, and that is something he is a pro at. That Obama won't stoop to Limpburger's level and that of his cronies is what ticks off this druggie comedian.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (March 29, 2008 12:17 pm ET)
         
      And where did EL FLUSHBO get his information from. His EIB(excellence in bull--it) network.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by loislap (March 29, 2008 1:55 pm ET)
         
      Who better personifies the precipitous decline in the quality of politcal commentary than Limbaugh?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by truthseeker77 (March 29, 2008 8:38 pm ET)
         

      Although Limbaugh lied by using the word "never", his lie becomes less impressive when we learn that Obama voted with his fellow Democrats 97% of the time in 2007, 96% in '06, and 97% in '05, according Congress Quarterly. He rarely reaches across the aisle.

      link

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Leftwingcenter (March 29, 2008 8:57 pm ET)
           
        If this is true, all I ccan say is good on Obama!  Republican ideas are what have landed us in the swamp in which our economy/military/international standing/moral authority/etc. etc. etc. are all sinking, so the quicker they are ditched by our leadership the better.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (March 30, 2008 7:31 pm ET)
           

        "never reached across the aisle as a senator in legislation."

        NOT VOTING!  LEGISLATING!

        You've sought out truth that has little bearing on Limbaugh's lie. 

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Cheney2012 (March 29, 2008 9:17 pm ET)
         

      You Libs need to do better than this.  Both of these bills passed by UNANIMOUS CONSENT.  I wouldn't say that St. Barack really went out on a limb here.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by interestingobserver (March 30, 2008 1:13 am ET)
           
        Regardless--Limbaugh's claim was that Obama NEVER reached across the aisle.  This is clearly contradicted by the FACTS on the ground, as Media Matters pointed out.  Stop drinking the Republican koolaid and admit when your side is wrong. 
        Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (March 30, 2008 7:32 pm ET)
           
        "Going out on a limb" was not Limbaugh's claim.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by interestingobserver (March 30, 2008 1:12 am ET)
         
      Excellent article--an example of what Media Matters should be doing more often.  Unfortunately, these pieces are few and far between here, taking the back seat to Olbermann nonesense and disingenuous pieces about what reporters "should" have included in their reporting. 
      Report Abuse
    • Author by robrob (March 30, 2008 1:38 am ET)
         

      Rush Limbaugh falsely claimed that Sen. Barack Obama has "never reached across the aisle as a senator in legislation."

      Maybe Rush used to research things but lately he's just been pulling stuff out of his a@@.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (March 30, 2008 2:09 am ET)
           
        The Republicans seem to be getting a lot more footloose with the word "never". I don't remember "I have never had sexual relations with that woman" being afforded the same slack.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by finarfin (March 30, 2008 3:10 am ET)
             

          Having voted yearly more than 90% on democrat bills is so close to "never" they might be considered one and the same. Rush's wording is indeed wrong, 'Rarely' would have fit better. Nonetheless, i am sure he got his point across.

          However, when discussing the personal integrity of a female intern with presidential integrity in the balance, "never" would  result in sufficient personal damage to said female intern. Not to mention the damage to the presidential integrity when this claim is disproved. Perhaps it would have been better if Bill used "rarely"as well.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by pete592 (March 30, 2008 8:06 pm ET)
               

            FIN: "Having voted yearly more than 90% on democrat bills is so close to "never" they might be considered one and the same."

            LIMBAUGH: "he hadn't gotten anything done. He can't unify his preacher. He's never reached across the aisle as a senator in legislation."

            Limbaugh is NOT TALKING ABOUT VOTING!  He's talking about LEGISLATING!

            FIN: "Rush's wording is indeed wrong, 'Rarely' would have fit better. Nonetheless, i am sure he got his point across."

            Righties love to throw around talking points about how Democrats never get anything done in Congress when the reality is they have nothing brag about either. 

            "Rarely" describes just about every US senator in the past ten years.  Even some of the longest standing Senators have introduced literally hundreds of pieces of legislation, only to see them get struck down in committee and never even make it to the chamber floor for a full debate or a vote. 

            In the last 10 years, John McCain sponsored over 400 bills.  65% of them never made it out of committee, only 12 were successfully enacted.

            In his two years as a senator, Barack Obama has sponsored over 120 bills.  93% never made it out of committee, 1 was successfully enacted.

            Most of the 15 members or former members of Congress who were running for president in '08 can count their successfully enacted bills from the past 10 years on one hand

            <source> 

             

             

             

             

             

            Report Abuse
        • Author by finarfin (March 30, 2008 3:14 am ET)
             

          By the way, i do not think that Rush intentionally lied, he just generalized based on the data.

          Bill Clinton however......

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Leftwingcenter (March 30, 2008 10:52 am ET)
               
            Sorry, chum, no dice.  If you use the superlative "never," any contrary example proves the statement wrong.  But hey, the OxyMoron was attacking Democrats, so I guess it's all okay with you, hmm?...
            Report Abuse
          • Author by sportsguydave (March 30, 2008 11:44 am ET)
               

            Bill Clinton, however ... finarfin

            ===========================================

            Bill Clinton has been out of office for nearly eight years.
            Time for some new material, troll.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (March 31, 2008 12:58 am ET)
                 
              SGDave, I'll plead guilty to bringing up Clinton's name, only as an example of the use of the word "never". Now that I think about it, he may have said "I did not have sex with that woman" (no "never"), so even if my point still sticks, and Fin volunteered to prove it, the exact word wasn't there.That'll teach me to use the Googles for quotes.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (March 30, 2008 3:00 pm ET)
               

            By the way, i do not think

            You could have stopped right there, and your post would have been 100% correct. 

            Report Abuse
    • Author by unitarianpatriot (March 31, 2008 12:20 am ET)
         
      Oh for crying out loud. Why does anyone ever expect Mr. Limbaugh to be saying anything that's true? The man's record is almost perfect when it comes to being wrong. He is pitiful; he is pathetic. He is on record against Sens. McCain, Clinton and Obama, so why doesn't this big coward who didn't even vote for decades either shut up or run for office himself? Answer: Because if he shut up he wouldn't be able to find other employment, and if he ran he would be slaughtered by any opponent with half a brain and equal access to a microphone. Hey, Mr. Limbaugh, here's a deal: You and I debate, on a neutral network, the following proposition: At least 90% of what Media Matters has said you were wrong about in the past five years on the radio was, indeed, incorrect. And then people vote for who wins. If I win, I get half your money, and you agree to quit the airwaves. He's a coward. He won't take the bet.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mrxenu5411 (March 31, 2008 7:45 am ET)
         
      As he mentions quite frequently, he has half his brain tied behind his back. It really prevents any progressive thought; well that and the abuse of prescription pills.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (March 31, 2008 12:19 pm ET)
         
      Bravo to UNITARIANPATRIOT. I'd love to see the big GASBAG come out from behind his radio mike and engage in a fair and open debate. But he's to much of a coward to do that.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by metapen (March 31, 2008 1:49 pm ET)
         
      On top of all this, didn't RL say that McCain would be a disaster because McCain is too willing to reach across the aisle?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by some12dancewith6706 (March 31, 2008 6:37 pm ET)
         
      Rush Limbaugh is the fat, ignorant neighbor that you try and avoid at all costs. 
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

  • Talk Radio Network
    Talk Radio Network
    Talk Radio Network
    P.O. Box 3755
    Central Point, Oregon 97502
    Phone: 541-664-8827
    Fax: 541-664-6250
  • Rush Limbaugh
    ElRushbo@eibnet.com
  • The Rush Limbaugh Show
    1-800-282-2882
    rush@eibnet.com
    fax: 212-563-9166

    The Rush Limbaugh Show
    1270 Avenue of the Americas
    New York, NY 10020