About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Ignoring McCain's reversal, Stephanopoulos let Lieberman claim McCain "was much more forward-leaning on immigration reform" than Clinton, Obama

March 30, 2008 4:01 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: On ABC's This Week, Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman claimed that Sen. John McCain "actually stepped out and was much more forward-leaning on immigration reform than Barack Obama was -- Senator Clinton wasn't involved in those negotiations." Host George Stephanopoulos did not point out that McCain abandoned his previous support for comprehensive immigration legislation during his campaign for the Republican nomination.

13 Comments

On the March 30 edition of ABC's This Week, host George Stephanopoulos asked Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (I-CT), "Can you name one other big issue aside from the war in Iraq, national security, where [Sen.] John McCain is closer to your view than the Democratic candidates?" Lieberman, who has endorsed McCain for president, responded, in part, "He [McCain] actually stepped out and was much more forward-leaning on immigration reform than [Sen.] Barack Obama was -- Senator [Hillary] Clinton wasn't involved in those negotiations." Stephanopoulos then concluded the interview without pointing out that McCain abandoned his previous support for comprehensive immigration legislation during his campaign for the Republican nomination. McCain said on January 30 that he "would not" support his original comprehensive immigration proposal if it came up for a vote in the Senate, and now says that "we've got to secure the borders first" -- a position at odds with his prior assertion that border security could not be disaggregated from other aspects of comprehensive immigration reform without being rendered ineffective. By contrast, Obama and Clinton both support comprehensive immigration reform.

McCain has also reversed his position on the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act, which would have allowed "illegal immigrants under age 30 to remain in the United States and gain legal status if they attend college or join the military." Clinton, Obama, and Lieberman all voted in favor of the DREAM Act, and all three support the DREAM Act's enactment. Indeed, the issue section of Lieberman's website notes that he co-sponsored both of the aforementioned pieces of immigration legislation that McCain no longer supports: "Senator Lieberman co-sponsored legislation to achieve comprehensive immigration reform (the McCain-Kennedy legislation), to make it easier for young immigrants who graduate high school to attend college (the DREAM Act), and to make pregnant women and young children who are recent immigrants eligible for federal heath benefits (the Immigrant Children's Health Improvement Act)."

From March 30 edition of ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos:

STEPHANOPOULOS: Can you name one other big issue aside from the war in Iraq, national security, where John McCain is closer to your view than the Democratic candidates?

LIEBERMAN: Well I can. Well, he's had the guts to come out and join me on climate change. That's part of why we have a chance to pass climate change. You can't do it with one party; you gotta do it with both. He actually stepped out and was much more forward-leaning on immigration reform than Barack Obama was -- Senator Clinton wasn't involved in those negotiations. He worked on the Gang of 14, which saved us from having the filibuster removed, and I think at least created some grounds within which the Supreme Court justice will be chosen. Hey, John McCain and I sponsored the lobbying and ethics reform bill. He was very active on that. We also sponsored the commission that created the 9-11 investigation -- legislation that created the 9-11 investigation commission and then passed the legislation that they recommended, which has made America more secure. So we've got a lot of agreements. We've got some disagreements, but that's the nature of our politics. And this man is ready to lead this country forward.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Senator Lieberman thanks very much. Take care of that cold.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mary59 (March 30, 2008 5:39 pm ET)
         
      I wonder who John McCain is and what he believes?  His shifting positions are often polar opposites of each other.  Immigration is just one example.  I heard the other day that he had spoken against military intervention back in the Clinton era. 
      Report Abuse
      • Author by eddy3957 reregistered (March 30, 2008 10:46 pm ET)
           
        "We must move forward, not backward, upward not forward,
        and always twirling, twirling, twirling towards freedom." from The Simpsons
        McCain may have been inspired by this episode. 
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (March 31, 2008 12:41 am ET)
             

          Pretty sad, Eddy, that one of the best examples of political satire on American TV in recent memory is Citizen Kang, 1/3 of a Simpson's Halloween episode.

          Don't blame me, I voted for Konos.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by eddy3957 reregistered (March 31, 2008 2:50 am ET)
               
            Maybe you should try your hand at it Colonel.  Send out some scripts.  You have the satire gene and you know the politics.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by worrierking (March 31, 2008 8:48 am ET)
               
            "Oh no, the dead have risen and they're voting Republican."

            - Lisa Simpson.

            I'd like to apologize to my countrymen for being a Lieberman enabler. I voted for him in his first senate race in 1988.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by carlileb5935 (March 30, 2008 9:16 pm ET)
         
      Forward-leaning-- like, let's push them off the cliff.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rgy19483361 (March 30, 2008 11:40 pm ET)
         
      Not a surprise here.... I rarely watch This Week any more. George Stephanopoulos does not ask the penetrating questions that are required of today's polititions. All of the elected officials and the news media personalities are way to familiar in their relationships. I'd rather the news media and polititians go back to a more formal setting and get down to asking the meaning questions along with riveting follow-up questions. 1984 has left our self-centered society in the dust.... Big Brother has arrived.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (March 31, 2008 10:35 am ET)
         
      This is ridiculous! When are these idiots going to realize (or realize that WE realize) that McCain'08 is not McCain'00 ?! The maverick is GONE, the moderate is GONE, the centrist is GONE, the Bush critic is GONE, the guy who kept the religious funny-mentalists at bay is GONE, the guy who beat up lobbyists is GONE. He's been replaced by a spineless, pandering VOTE-WHORE, who will do or say ANYTHING to appease the right-wing base! If that's what you want then FINE, good for you; just stop trying to convince me it's still the year 2000!!!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by draftedin68 (March 31, 2008 12:05 pm ET)
           

        Hee-hee...

        "funny-mentalists" - good one!

        And remember, St. McCain has only once  faced any real political opposition (in 2000), and he's obviously learned his version of the Texas-Transplant Rovian Two-Step from that experience.

         

        Report Abuse
    • Author by jackball (March 31, 2008 11:49 am ET)
         
      Obviously voters from both sides of the political spectrum absolutely hated McCain's amnesty. The senate switchboard virtually melted from angry calls. Besides, it was our Democrat controlled Sentate who killed McCain's amnesty bill, not McCain. It would be political suicide for McCain if he were to ignore the will of the people when it was expressed so loudly and so clearly. Leiberman makes a good point though, that McCain tried to do more on immigration than either McCain or Hillary. He's hardly abandoned anything, immigration reform is a mainstay of his platform issues. Meanwhile Hillary and Obama continue to do nothing on the issue.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by obamacan (March 31, 2008 12:35 pm ET)
         
      It's actually OK for an obvious partisan to make comments about "their" candidates - or against the "other" candidates.  No one expects a McCain (or Obama) supporter to be honest - and George S is usually diligent - but it is hard for him to challenge on every point of a partisan interview.  ON THE OTHER HAND, when Fox News has people like (ugh) Bill Kristol on the "news" pretending to be an expert - nearly everything out of his mouth is a lie!  It would be like having Rush as an expert on anything! (or pick your hated liberal commentary).  
      Report Abuse
    • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (March 31, 2008 5:12 pm ET)
         

          And everyone knows that Stephanopoulos is just a shill for the vast right wing conspiracy.

          That's ABC's and the MSM's idea of balance - hire the spokesman for the Clintons to do their 'objective' news reporting. That attitude is why Fox leads the news ratings. And that's how far off base MMFA is, they criticize Stephanopoulos as being soft toward conservatives!

          What a bunch of looney tune hypocrites! 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (March 31, 2008 5:24 pm ET)
           
        hmm you have some real interesting ideas there, if only they agreed with each other.  Perhaps that's why you might thing McCain is a straight talker.  Stephanopolos worked for the Clintons so he must be a shill; according to you.  That might be true if it was.  But it ain't.
        Report Abuse
The Fox Effect
Media Matters Connect

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.