Matthews claimed McCain "has campaigned brilliantly against Bush" -- but not according to McCain
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
SUMMARY: On NBC's Today, Chris Matthews asserted that Sen. John McCain "has campaigned brilliantly against Bush," adding, "He won this by basically running against the Bush administration." But when President Bush endorsed him on March 5, McCain said, "All I can say is that on the fundamentals and the principles of our Republican Party and most of the specifics of our shared conservative philosophy, Bush and I are in agreement."
During the March 31 edition of NBC's Today, co-host Meredith Vieira discussed a New York Times article with MSNBC host Chris Matthews, which, as Vieira put it, reported that Sen. John McCain is "having trouble getting the big donors to support him," asking, "Why is that, do you think?" Matthews responded: "[F]or the same reason he has a good shot to win the presidency. He has campaigned brilliantly against Bush," adding, "He won this by basically running against the Bush administration." But when President Bush endorsed him on March 5, McCain said, "All I can say is that on the fundamentals and the principles of our Republican Party and most of the specifics of our shared conservative philosophy, President Bush and I are in agreement."
McCain has also embraced Bush's current Iraq policy. Speaking of his endorsement on March 5, Bush stated that McCain is "not going to change when it comes to taking on the enemy. He understands this is a dangerous world." After Bush's statement, McCain said: "Thank you, sir. I don't have anything to add." Indeed, McCain's campaign website states: "Ultimately, Iraq's future lies in the hands of its people, government, and armed forces, and strengthening them is an essential requirement for bringing U.S. troops home from Iraq. Until Iraqi forces are ready, however, a precipitous U.S. withdrawal would condemn Iraq to civil war and intervention by its neighbors and energize al Qaeda and other jihadists across the globe."
McCain also supports making Bush's tax cuts permanent. While McCain voted against the final version of President Bush's $1.35 trillion tax-cut package in 2001 and, in 2003, voted against legislation to accelerate the tax reductions enacted in the 2001 bill and to cut taxes on dividends and capital gains, in February 2006, he switched positions and voted to extend the 2003 tax cuts on capital gains and dividends through 2010.
Additionally, Matthews stated of McCain: "He can say, 'I'm not for Bush, I'm not for this left-wing crowd that wants to replace him. I'm going right down the middle,' like -- guess who did it? Bill Clinton. That's -- that is clearly the McCain strategy right now." In fact, in a February 7 speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference, McCain stated, "My record in public office taken as a whole is the record of a mainstream conservative." He also said in the speech: "If I am so fortunate as to be the Republican nominee for president, I will offer Americans, in what will be a very challenging and spirited contest, a clearly conservative approach to governing." Furthermore, studies of McCain's voting record have ranked him among the most conservative members of the Senate during the current and the two previous Congresses.
Matthews follows a long line of media figures suggesting that McCain disagrees with or has campaigned against President Bush and his policies without noting some or all of the areas of agreement between McCain and Bush. Media Matters for America has also documented numerous media figures claiming that McCain is a moderate notwithstanding his record and his self-characterization as a "conservative."
From the March 31 edition of NBC's Today:
VIEIRA: Before I let you go, I want to ask you very quickly about McCain. There was an article in today's New York Times saying that he's having trouble getting the big donors to support him. Why is that, do you think?
MATTHEWS: Well, because -- for the same reason he has a good shot to win the presidency. He has campaigned brilliantly against Bush. Look at the numbers. Among pro-choice Republicans -- and there are a lot of them -- McCain wins. Among critics of President Bush, he wins. He won this by basically running against the Bush administration, which positions him to triangulate come in the fall. He can say, "I'm not for Bush, I'm not for this left-wing crowd that wants to replace him. I'm going right down the middle," like -- guess who did it? Bill Clinton. That's -- that is clearly the McCain strategy right now. This is going to be a nail-biter in November, you watch it. You think this thing for the Democrats is still tough; they're going to be clawing and scratching right up until the election day. And by the way, we can't predict who's going to win, except that the economy keeps going down, the Democrats will win.
VIEIRA: All right, Chris Matthews, thanks very much.
MATTHEWS: Thank you. Thank you.

















I'm going right down the middle
If that means voting for torture and announcing good news on a rather bloody visit to Iraq I can't wait to see what the right turns look like
"has campaigned brilliantly against Bush,"
I can't total argue with this, with his "100 years of occupation" and support of torture he is perhaps running against and to the "right of Bush" -- who only promised to leave the mess to be cleaned up by the next President. If he follows up on these promises the massive incompetence will make Bush look like an oak of statesmanship.
1. Clearly, making a claim of this type is much closer to opinion than fact. How this can constitute "disinformation" i do not know.
2. where do you guys get this stuff on mccain's support for torture? of the major republican candidates, he was the most outspoken critic of the practice. And, which all of you of course fail to cite, he authored the "detainee treatment act of 2005" which EVERY DEMOCRAT IN THE SENATE VOTED FOR over 9 opposing Republican senators, as well as the president's own objections.
3. Perhaps the most important point, whoever authored this post is equivocating between the issues. As the post notes, McCain said: "All I can say is that on the fundamentals and the principles of our Republican Party and most of the specifics of our shared conservative philosophy, Bush and I are in agreement." Agreeing on matters of principle and philosophy is surely not synonymous with agreeing on matters of policy and implementation. Merely being a conservative does not mean you are "with the Bush Administration" or share its ideas of how to apply those conservative philosophies which both McCain and Bush share in some instances.
Clearly, making a claim of this type is much closer to opinion than fact. How this can constitute "disinformation" i do not know.
Penn - to further follow up on my welcome on the "NY Times..." thread - Media Matters is not the "Media Watchdog" site they claim to be. While they do occasionally find genuine misinformation, most of the time they take opinion and twist it into a launchpad for their own political agenda.
Is he really for extending Bush's tax cuts, or does he still think they benefit the wealthy too much?
Does he still support the comprehensive immigration bill he himself authored, or does he really want to scrap it now?
Does he really want to help defrauded homeowners avoid foreclosure and reform the mortgage industry, or is his campaign run by (among others) Phil Gramm, one of the most conservative, anti-regulatory Republicans in the United States?
Does he still think Christian fundamentalists are "agents of intolerance," or is he proud to have the support of one of their most extreme examples, John Hagee?
Who knows?
I don't see anything principled about John McCain. He's the biggest opportunistic flip/flopper I've ever seen.