About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Despite having to correct Ross' false claim that McCain has released tax returns, ABC still ignored McCain in report musing about Clinton tax returns

April 03, 2008 4:22 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: On ABC's Good Morning America, Brian Ross asserted that Sen. Hillary Clinton's "delay" in releasing tax returns "has raised a lot of questions," including "whether they paid their taxes like average Americans, or like the super-rich they have become." At no point during the segment did anyone, including Ross, who has falsely asserted that Sen. John McCain released his tax returns, question McCain's "delay."

16 Comments

During the April 3 edition of ABC's Good Morning America, co-anchor Chris Cuomo noted that "[t]he Clintons are expected to release" their tax returns "sometime in the coming days," and asked, "[B]ut is there something behind the delay?" ABC News chief investigative reporter Brian Ross asserted that "[t]he delay has raised lots of questions," and that "the tax returns -- expected any day now -- will answer a lot of questions about how they made so much, and whether they paid their taxes like average Americans, or like the super-rich they have become." Despite Ross' having falsely asserted in the past that Sen. John McCain had released his tax returns, at no point during the more than four-minute discussion of Sen. Hillary Clinton's taxes did Cuomo, Ross, co-anchor Robin Roberts or ABC News chief Washington correspondent George Stephanopoulos mention McCain, much less discuss his yet-to-be-filed tax returns, and whether the McCains -- whose net worth has been estimated (subscription required) at $44 million -- and their "delay has raised lots of questions" about "whether they paid their taxes like average Americans."

As Media Matters for America documented, on the March 19 edition of ABC's World News, Ross falsely stated: "[M]ore than a year into the campaign, Senator Clinton, unlike Senators [Barack] Obama and McCain, has still not released any of her tax returns." In fact, McCain reportedly has not released any of his tax returns. ABC subsequently corrected Ross's false report. A Media Matters search of the Nexis database indicated that ABC has not reported on McCain's yet-to-be-filed tax returns since issuing the March 21 correction.

From the April 3 edition of ABC's Good Morning America:

CUOMO: Now to the race for '08. Senator Barack Obama released his tax returns months ago and has been pressing Senator Hillary Clinton to do the same. Hers would be joint returns, of course, with former President Clinton.

The Clintons are expected to release them sometime in the coming days, but is there something behind the delay? What might we see in those returns? ABC's chief investigative correspondent Brian Ross is here, and he's been looking into that. Morning, Brian.

ROSS: Good morning, Chris. The delay has raised lots of questions. From reports Senator Clinton has already filed, we know she and her husband have made well over $50 million since they left the White House. But it could be a lot more. And the tax returns -- expected any day now -- will answer a lot of questions about how they made so much, and whether they paid their taxes like average Americans, or like the super-rich they have become.

[begin video clip]

ROSS: On the campaign trail, Senator Clinton has promised to end tax breaks for the rich.

CLINTON: We are going to scrub down that tax code, so that the middle class gets the tax breaks, not the wealthy and the well-connected.

ROSS: And among the wealthy's favorite legal but controversial tax breaks -- setting up investments and accounts offshore in secretive places, like the Cayman Islands. And an examination of the records Clinton has filed reveals her husband is a partner in an investment fund --Yucaipa Global Partnership -- registered in the Cayman Islands.

JACK BLUM (Baker Hostetler attorney): No average person has interests and funds in the Cayman Islands. This is all of the above-average, non-tax-paying super-rich.

ROSS: The former president's Cayman Island investment is part of his dealings with a close friend, Los Angeles billionaire Ron Burkle. According to The Wall Street Journal, Clinton is also expected to receive a payout of around $20 million for his role as an adviser to Burkle's investment funds.

BLUM: He's selling the presidency. And it's also attracting rich investors who think, "Well, I'll get close to Bill Clinton if I buy into that fund." He's selling his charm and his ability to get other people to buy in.

ROSS: Clinton also has been paid millions as a consultant for a company run by another close friend, Indian-American businessman Vinod Gupta. Shareholders in Gupta's data collection company have complained that Gupta used company resources to ingratiate himself with Clinton and other personal friends, including the use of the company's private jet. Gupta has said it was a legitimate business expense to hire Clinton.

In addition to his consultant deals, the former president has made tens of millions of dollars giving speeches around the world -- $150,000 for this appearance in Dubai, and as much as $450,000 for a speech in London. A new accounting by ABC News found that as of June last year, Clinton had earned $47 million in speaking fees since leaving the White House.

[end video clip]

ROSS: A spokesman for the Clinton campaign says the former president and his wife pay full U.S. taxes at the ordinary income tax rate, meaning they get no special tax breaks, because the Cayman investment fund offshore doesn't give them one, they say. But with taxes, the devil is in the details, and the proof of what they really pay will come when the Clintons finally make public their tax returns sometime, they say, before April 15th -- Chris.

CUOMO: You make a good point there, Brian. We get it. They have a lot of money. But why would you have offshore accounts?

ROSS: Well, they say it's to attract foreign investors who don't have to pay U.S. taxes, but the tax experts we talked to say, "Whenever you go offshore, it immediately raises questions," and it's been one of the issues that Senator Clinton has raised during the campaign. So, these tax returns will answer a lot of questions that remain very large right now.

CUOMO: Brian Ross, thank you very much. Robin?

ROBERTS: All right. Now for the bottom line, we turn to ABC's chief Washington correspondent, and host of This Week, George Stephanopoulos. And let's pick it up here, George: Tax time and with delay from the Clintons with their tax returns, is there a concern within her campaign about this impending release?

STEPHANOPOULOS: Robin, I think they know it's going to be a distraction -- that people are going to be really interested in how President Clinton and Senator Clinton made all this money, what they did with it, how much they gave to charity. But I think they also believe this is not going to be a bombshell, that the bottom line will show that the Clintons did pay their fair share of taxes, they didn't try to evade taxation in any way, and that they also gave a fair amount to charity.

ROBERTS: Yeah, we still have a lot of time between now and the next primary -- that, of course, being on the 22nd in Pennsylvania..

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by wzwriter (April 03, 2008 4:32 pm ET)
         
      Brial Ross - either start doing your job, or resign and let someone with journalistic integrity take your place.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (April 03, 2008 4:45 pm ET)
           

        People with integrity need not apply at ABC...

        ABC...Always Butt-kissing Conservatives.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by wzwriter (April 03, 2008 5:03 pm ET)
             

          I guess it was to be expected when they were bought up by Disney...

          Report Abuse
    • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (April 03, 2008 4:33 pm ET)
         

      I wonder if McCain will ask his National Finance Co-Chair, Fred Malek, to make a list of all the Jews in the government, so that they can be demoted or dismissed.

      He did it for Nixon, why wouldn't he do it for McCain?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by werner (April 03, 2008 4:34 pm ET)
         
      A link to Brian Ross' article on abc news website about how the Clintons have made more than 50 million dollars since leaving the White House is the top story on the Huffington Post right now. I'm glad to know that but I also think that it should be reported how wealthy Cindy McCain is, she is the Teresa Heinz Kerry this year.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (April 03, 2008 4:53 pm ET)
           

        I like that analogy.  Both crazy, both married war 'heroes' with questionable records, both used their inheritances to help fund their husbands' political careers.

        The only difference I can see is that Theresa didn't have a drug problem.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (April 03, 2008 5:15 pm ET)
           

        And they should never forget to mention how Cindy McCcain used to steal painkillers from American Voluntary Medical Team (AVMT), the non-profit organization that she founded:

        From Wikipedia:

        In 1989, Cindy McCain became addicted to opioid painkillers such as Percocet and Vicodin, which she initially took to alleviate pain following two spinal surgeries for ruptured discs and to ease emotional stress during the Keating Five scandal, which involved her as a bookkeeper who had difficulty finding receipts. The addiction progressed to where she resorted to stealing drugs from her own AVMT. During 1992, Tom Gosinski, the director of government and international affairs for AVMT, discovered her drug theft. Subsequently in 1992, her parents staged an intervention to force her to get help; she told her husband about her problem, attended a drug treatment facility, began outpatient sessions, and ended her three years of active addiction. A hysterectomy in 1993 resolved her back pain.

        In January 1993, McCain terminated Gosinski's employment on grounds of budgetary reasons. In spring 1993, Gosinski tipped off the Drug Enforcement Administration to investigate McCain's drug theft, and a federal investigation ensued. McCain's defense team, led by Washington lawyer John Dowd, secured an agreement with the U.S. Attorney's office that limited her punishment to financial restitution and enrollment in a diversion program,  without any public disclosure.

        Meanwhile, in early 1994 Gosinski filed a wrongful termination lawsuit against McCain, which he told her he would settle for $250,000. In April 1994, Dowd requested that Maricopa County officials investigate Gosinski for extortion. The Phoenix New Times was about to publish a negatively-cast article about the whole affair. Cindy McCain pre-empted this by publicly revealing her past addiction, stating she hoped it would give fellow drug addicts courage in their struggles: "Although my conduct did not result in compromising any missions of AVMT, my actions were wrong, and I regret them." A flurry of press attention followed, including charges by Gosinski that she had asked him to lie concerning her drug use when the McCains were applying to adopt their baby from Bangladesh and statements by past AVMT employees that Gosinski had once threatened to blackmail her. The Arizona Republic published an editorial cartoon ridiculing the motivations for her AVMT work and an award dinner in her honor was canceled citing poor ticket sales. In the end, both Gosinski's lawsuit and the extortion investigation against him were dropped.

        AVMT concluded its activities in 1995. That year, McCain founded a new organization, the Hensley Family Foundation, which donates monies towards children's programs in Arizona and nationally, but she was largely a stay-at-home mom during the balance of the 1990s.

        Source:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cindy_Hensley_McCain

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (April 03, 2008 6:48 pm ET)
             

          I had no idea that Cindy McCain was a drug addict...

          Why is this not being discussed in the media?  Have we ever had a first lady who was an out-and-out drug addict?  This is bad!  She'll be only steps away from the presidency if, god forbid, this pandering, elitist wins the presidency.

          Is John McLame on drugs as well?  This might be a reason for his violent outbursts.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by mescal (April 04, 2008 2:28 am ET)
               

            There's no novelty here. Betty Ford was an alcoholic as well as being addicted to prescription drugs. Her admission to her condition, and her willingness to accept treatment did much to relieve the stigma that came with addiction, and encouraged many others to follow suit. 

            Good for her.

            Personally, I don't give a rip about candidates' spouses. Unless someone can demonstrate to me that any potential First Lady (or First Gentleman) has used their wealth and power to exploit and/or ripoff others, then indignant revelations that they may very well hold the same sort of personal failings that we all see so commonly around us are just more media distractions from those issues that DO affect us.  

            Report Abuse
            • Author by fromthesouthland (April 04, 2008 8:59 am ET)
                 
              I agree with you about the spouses and/or other relatives of the candidates.  I have written to all the major news organizations asking that they bring forward the information about his tax returns.  Greta interviewed him last night but I haven't had an opportunity to see if she asked McCain about the tax returns.  It just another example of the press promoting their candidate and giving us selective news.
              Report Abuse
    • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (April 03, 2008 4:43 pm ET)
         

      I just sent an e-mail to ABC,

      Is this Mario Cuomo's son?  The old man oughta go over and kick his ass.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by werner (April 03, 2008 4:56 pm ET)
           

        "Is this Mario Cuomo's son"?

        You mean Christopher Cuomo the young man on Good Morning America?

        Yes, he is the son of Mario and brother of Andrew. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (April 03, 2008 5:01 pm ET)
             

          I'm so sorry for Mario,

          Mario is a great Democrat, a man of great principle who loves America and the middle class.

          His son is a corporate wimp on ABC.  How sad.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by wzwriter (April 03, 2008 5:17 pm ET)
               

            Mario is a great Democrat, a man of great principle who loves America and the middle class.

            His son is a corporate wimp on ABC.  How sad.

            Think about Mike Wallace, one of the greatest investigative journalists of the 20th Century.  How must he feel having his son Chris working for Faux News?

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (April 04, 2008 12:55 am ET)
                 
              Funny how children rebel against their parents to their own detriment. Assuming that contrarian instinct is natural in the offspring, I guess the best hand a kid can be dealt is to have real A-holes for parents. Except that so many of those decide to be chips-off-the-old-block. This could get confusing.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by Cheney2012 (April 05, 2008 7:38 pm ET)
               

            Mario Cuomo is an unprincipled left-wing demagogue who never saw an issue he couldn't lie about.  He accomplished nothing as governor of New York except to foster the state's downward spiral of mismanagement and corruption.

            Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.