About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Bloomberg report on public funding in general election ignored McCain's possible campaign finance violation

April 11, 2008 3:17 pm ET

SUMMARY: A Bloomberg article noted that Sen. John McCain "has pledged to take public financing [for the general election presidential campaign] if the Democrat does. His campaign noted that [Sen. Barack] Obama 'promised the American people' he would take public financing," then quoted a McCain adviser as saying, "Senator McCain isn't in the habit of breaking his word, and he hopes Senator Obama doesn't either." The article did not report that McCain could be breaking federal law for failing to abide by restrictions placed on candidates participating in the public financing system during their party's primary season.

14 Comments

In an April 11 Bloomberg article, reporter Jonathan D. Salant wrote that if Sen. Barack Obama is the Democratic nominee for president, he "is faced with two choices: go private, becoming the first presidential candidate since 1976 to do so, or take public money, as he pledged to do shortly after his campaign began last year." Salant added that Sen. John McCain "has pledged to take public financing if the Democrat does. His campaign noted that Obama 'promised the American people' he would take public financing. 'Senator McCain isn't in the habit of breaking his word, and he hopes Senator Obama doesn't either,' said Mark Salter, a senior adviser to the 71-year-old Arizona senator."* However, Salant did not report that McCain could be breaking federal law for failing to abide by restrictions placed on candidates participating in the public financing system during their party's primary season. Under the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, violators could face fines up to $25,000 and up to five years of jail time. Federal Election Commission (FEC) chairman David Mason has taken the position that McCain cannot unilaterally opt out of public financing in the primary without FEC approval, meaning that every day that McCain spends beyond the limits of the public financing system that he has already exceeded, he could be breaking the law.

As Media Matters for America noted, McCain may not be able to opt out of the public financing system for the primary campaign after signing an agreement in November for a loan for his campaign, which could have required him to remain in the race, regardless of whether his candidacy was viable, in order to receive matching funds to pay back the loan. Indeed, the Associated Press reported on February 21: "The government's top campaign finance regulator says John McCain can't drop out of the primary election's public financing system until he answers questions about a loan he obtained to kickstart his once faltering presidential campaign. Federal Election Commission Chairman David Mason, in a letter to McCain this week, said the all-but-certain Republican nominee needs to assure the commission that he did not use the promise of public money to help secure a $4 million line of credit he obtained in November." A March 23 Washington Post article reported that "McCain has officially broken the limits imposed by the presidential public financing system," and a February 22 article in the Post noted that "[k]nowingly violating the spending limit is a criminal offense that could put McCain at risk of stiff fines and up to five years in prison."

From the April 11 Bloomberg article:

A look at last month's fundraising underscores the point: McCain had his best period in March, collecting $15 million; Obama brought in $40 million, following a record-busting $55 million haul in February.

Moreover, about half of McCain's supporters have given the maximum $2,300, compared with only a third for Obama, according to the Washington-based Center for Responsive Politics. That means many more of Obama's record 1.2 million donors can give again and again.

Now, Obama, 46, is faced with two choices: go private, becoming the first presidential candidate since 1976 to do so, or take public money, as he pledged to do shortly after his campaign began last year.

'Creaky'

Obama told reporters today in Indianapolis that the campaign-finance system is "creaky'' and needs to be overhauled. He said nominees could raise more money through small online donations than through public funding, which would allow them to "compete in as many states as possible.''

[...]

McCain, the presumed Republican nominee, has pledged to take public financing if the Democrat does.

His campaign noted that Obama "promised the American people'' he would take public financing. "Senator McCain isn't in the habit of breaking his word, and he hopes Senator Obama doesn't either,'' said Mark Salter, a senior adviser to the 71-year-old Arizona senator.

Earlier Pledge

Obama said in November that if he won the nomination, he would participate in the presidential-financing system and "aggressively pursue an agreement'' with the Republican nominee to take federal funds.

He said today that should he win the nomination he intends "to have conversations with Senator McCain'' about how to prevent outside groups from drowning out the candidates if they take public funds.

*Update: In a subsequent version of this article, Bloomberg removed this passage: "McCain, the presumed Republican nominee, has pledged to take public financing if the Democrat does. His campaign noted that Obama 'promised the American people' he would take public financing. 'Senator McCain isn't in the habit of breaking his word, and he hopes Senator Obama doesn't either,' said Mark Salter, a senior adviser to the 71-year-old Arizona senator."

In its place, the following was inserted: Obama "said today that should he win the nomination he intends 'to have conversations with Senator McCain' about how to prevent outside groups from drowning out the candidates if they take public funds. ... McCain, 71, the presumed Republican nominee, drew a distinction between honoring a pledge and talking about outside spending. 'He committed in writing to taking public financing in the general election if I would; I committed to it,' McCain told reporters in Dallas today. 'Now, all those other discussions might be interesting, and I hope over time, valuable, but the fact is that he's saying one thing and he's doing another.'" In its update, Bloomberg still did not note McCain's possible campaign finance violation.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by werner (April 11, 2008 3:26 pm ET)
         

      Okay I am an Obama supporter and I feel MMFA is nitpicking here, missing the forest for the trees and showing extreme tunnel vision.

       

      The point of the article is that Obama is doing very well. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Science101 (April 11, 2008 3:34 pm ET)
           
        Correct, the point of the report is that Obama's campaign is doing very well.  But to not report on a "possible" finance problem is not misinformation.  In fact, the information cannot even be credible unless its a "fact", not a "possibility".
        Report Abuse
    • Author by werner (April 11, 2008 3:38 pm ET)
         

      hmm..Columbus I lost you there.

       

      I was not saying that MMFA was promoting misinformation, but that they have tunnel vision.

       

      Or maybe you agree with me that this citation of misinformation is beside the point?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Science101 (April 11, 2008 4:04 pm ET)
           

        I guess Im just saying that i dont see any misinformation, in fact i think its well written as is. I, personally, dont like who they make claims about things that are "possible" and not "fact" as MMFA is stating that they did not include the "possible" problems with McCains campaign.  In fact, isnt the whole point of MMFA to cite only factual information, not "possibilities".

         

        Report Abuse
    • Author by dexteritas0071418 (April 11, 2008 3:59 pm ET)
         
      MMfA, why don't your typists save their fingers until we can talk about realities and not "possibilities".
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jeter2 (April 11, 2008 4:17 pm ET)
           

        Maybe this was meant to be the first bomb by that new Attack group to be headed up by Brock & Soros. If this is an example of what they have, I'd say it's back to the drawing board!!

        Here's some info about the group:

        Wealthy Democrats are preparing a four-month, $40 million media campaign centered on attacks on Sen. John McCain. And it will be led by David Brock, the former investigative reporter who first gained fame in the 1990s as a right-wing, anti-Clinton journalist.

        The planned campaign is the product of a shakeup in the top ranks of the struggling independent Democratic groups. Brock, now best known as the ex-conservative founder of the liberal group
        Media Matters, last month quietly assumed the chairmanship of what's expected to be the main vehicle for independent Democratic attacks on McCain, now called Progressive Media USA.

        http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0408/9514.html

        Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (April 11, 2008 4:17 pm ET)
         

      I think the subject is the failure of the media in the form of the bloomburg report. They report on a promise to be met upon nomination. Which hasn't happened and looks to be at least two months off. John's uncomfortable position with regard to the FEC is not mentioned. John is held up as a person of high morals,"Senator McCain isn't in the habit of breaking his word, and he hopes Senator Obama doesn't either."

      Why doesn't versis isn't?

      A not very intense look would say John could easily be up before a judge. I think that is passable as a news item. Of no interest to the bloomburg folk apparently.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by notanotherconservative2254 (April 11, 2008 5:56 pm ET)
         

      It think that it's more than just "possible" that this is another topic ordered by Soros and his boy Brock to be part of their multi-million dollar smear campaign against McCain.

       

       

      (check it out at politico.com) 

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by T-Hone (April 11, 2008 6:10 pm ET)
           
        When Soros says "Jump!" I ask, "how high?"
        Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (April 13, 2008 6:37 pm ET)
           
        I think it is possible you are a liar and a fool who knows very well that Soros has no control over this site. You just want to play the lying, foolish troll.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by werner (April 11, 2008 6:18 pm ET)
         

      It seems like the rightists are here on this thread.

       I do think politico is in the tank for McCain.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (April 11, 2008 6:46 pm ET)
         
      The info on Progressive Media USA is interesting. Somehow with all that the media ignores about John. Smearing would appear to be uneeded NAC. Give some evidence of a smear. The 100year war thing is as near as I can recall, and the smear call was a bit off base to the issue of to do we continue to send our children into that meatgrinder forever (until its safe for our troops!) or do we find away to stop it. It all seems so glorious to John over there. He don't get my vote.  
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mary59 (April 12, 2008 10:23 am ET)
         
      McSame gets a pass with his flip flop flipping on public financing, then trying to use it as an issue against Obama.

      Two different standards shown in the press. Obama doesn't wear a flag pin, oh my. Bushco invades a country based upon hyped up intel about WMDs. McSame confuses Sunni and Shia REPEATEDLY.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.