Reuters ignored McCain's inconsistency about need for Korea-like troop presence in Iraq
SUMMARY: Reuters reported that Sen. John McCain "says the United States must stay in Iraq ... and remain there in some fashion in the years ahead as peacekeepers, much like U.S. troops have done in South Korea and Japan for decades," but it did not mention that McCain has been inconsistent on the need for a Korea-like troop presence in Iraq.
In an April 14 article, Reuters reporter Steve Holland wrote that Sen. John McCain "says the United States must stay in Iraq to help democracy take hold in the Middle East and remain there in some fashion in the years ahead as peacekeepers, much like U.S. troops have done in South Korea and Japan for decades." However, the article did not note that McCain has also previously dismissed the need for a Korea-like troop presence in Iraq. As Media Matters for America noted, on the November 27, 2007, edition of PBS' Charlie Rose, McCain was asked by Rose if South Korea "is an analogy of where Iraq might be ... in terms of an American presence over the next, say, 20, 25 years, that we will have a significant amount of troops there." McCain replied, "I don't think so." Rose then asked: "Even if there are no casualties?" McCain replied, "No. But I can see an American presence for a while. But eventually I think because of the nature of the society in Iraq and the religious aspects of it that America eventually withdraws."
By contrast, during a January 3 town hall meeting in Derry, New Hampshire, a participant said to McCain: "President Bush has talked about our staying in Iraq for 50 years -- ." McCain interjected: "Maybe a hundred. We've been in South Korea; we've been in Japan for 60 years. We've been in South Korea for 50 years or so. That'd be fine with me as long as Americans -- as long as Americans are not being injured or harmed or wounded or killed, then it's fine with me. I hope it would be fine with you if we maintain a presence in a very volatile part of the world where Al Qaeda is training, recruiting, and equipping, and motivating people every single day."
As Media Matters has documented, the media have frequently reported on McCain's attacks against Democrats for purportedly misrepresenting his January 3 remarks without noting McCain's inconsistency on the need for a Korea-like troop presence in Iraq.
From the April 14 Reuters article:
At a time when his Democratic rivals are promising a way out of Iraq, McCain is adhering to a long-held view that the United States is in a war against radical Islamic extremists and that a central battle in that conflict is in Iraq.
He says the United States must stay in Iraq to help democracy take hold in the Middle East and remain there in some fashion in the years ahead as peacekeepers, much like U.S. troops have done in South Korea and Japan for decades.
Now that a troop increase in Iraq that he had recommended has improved security, more Americans are with him and willing to be more patient, he believes.
"A significant number of Americans believe we should come home with honor, not with disgrace and genocide," he told reporters on his campaign bus recently.















>>As Media Matters has documented, the media have frequently reported on McCain's attacks against Democrats for purportedly misrepresenting his January 3 remarks without noting McCain's inconsistency on the need for a Korea-like troop presence in Iraq.
Well, of course. he changes them so often how could you represent them correctly?
Jeter, they don't call him Teflon John for nothing!
oh, couldn't resist but I just had to put another reminder out there of why the republican party is on the down and outs!
Snoop,
I'll agree the Republican party ain't what it used to be, BUT look at your own party. The Dems in-fighting between the Obamabots vs the Clintonites may end up finding you guys sitting on the sidelines...again.
And to top it off, both Obama & Clinton seem to have developed serious foot in mouth disease.
I'm not too happy about Clinton, she is making a mess. But they can still solve that problem if they end it June at the latest.
but you didn't mention my link. You didn't like the picture? =0
End the mess in June? Mmmmm me thinks that's wishful thinking on your part Snoop. Even if you have a nominee, the bitterness may not vanish. Plus Obama's recent comments have a few folks pissed. [ not me, I get what he was saying]
Yes I did forget to comment on the um, cartoon. I think it's kinda misleading. Anne's boobs are no way that big ;-)
Haha. Nah, remember Anne doesn't freak me out like she does you Libs. Sometimes I think she's funny.
Now a cartoon like that of Randi Rhodes...and I'd be screaming "My eyes! Aaaugh, my eyes!"
;-)
Says the Queen of the kingdom of The Rest Of Us ;-)
BTW, I don't think either group [Obamabots or Clintonites] will vote for McCain. I think they'll sit home. Or just not check off a vote for President.
Time will tell I guess, my sweet Julia.
I find it hard to picture these 2 groups kissing & making up....
Now home I go to my favorite meal of spaghetti & meatballs. Yum :-)
I vote for a spanking ;-)
Hehehe....
We Democrats need to destroy the party in order to save it.
How we doin' so far?
Have you noticed the candidate who won't wear a flag lapel pin has, since the Rev. Wright incident, putting flags all over his announcements. How many flags did he have in his race speech? I noticed on the tv-show "Idol Gives Back" that the flag took up alost the whole screen behind him.
Gotta love that principled stand by BO! ;-)
you do know McCain doesn't wear a flag pin either do you?
And that if you go back, Obama has had many speeches where there are American flags in the background, well before the Wright incident. Just like McCain has all sorts of flags in his background, and Clinton too. If I find the link I'll post it, but you can do a little searching and see for yourself.
Have you noticed the candidate who won't wear a flag lapel pin has, since the Rev. Wright incident, putting flags all over his announcements.
Media Matters did a post on this a few days ago. Apparently, that's a lie.
AA,
I suggest you google Obama's speeches. I think you will find flags in the background of all of them. If you need a shortcut, go to the MMFA thread about this from a few days ago. I'm disappointed you took Luntz's word without investigating for yourself.
fried,
I didn't see the Luntz piece. I picked up on it when some reporter commented on how they watched the Obama people put eight flags behind Obama for that speech.
I thought it conspicuous in the "Idol Gives Back" program where Obama had the flag and McCain and Hillary did not.
I noticed yesterday on some news segment with Obama there must have been 20 flags behind him for that photo op.
No doubt Obama is trying to subliminally sell his patriotism in an effort to counter the perceived anti-American sentiment swirling around his campaign.
He's got Maverick Immunity ;-)
Which is slightly less explosive than Pinto Immunity....
McCain was asked by Rose if South Korea "is an analogy of where Iraq might be ... in terms of an American presence over the next, say, 20, 25 years, that we will have a significant amount of troops there." McCain replied, "I don't think so." Rose then asked: "Even if there are no casualties?" McCain replied, "No. But I can see an American presence for a while. But eventually I think because of the nature of the society in Iraq and the religious aspects of it that America eventually withdraws."
So MMFA is continuing once again to try and make McCain look like he's contradicting himself because he answered th question above and also has said we might stay and maintain a peacekeeper role?
It looks like to me he was simply giving an open ended response in both cases. I think this is not sticking to "Teflon John" because there is really nothing there to stick.
Obama's bowling is an example of gutter politics at it's worst. ;-)
No - any campaign that KKKarl Rove has been involved with over the years is gutter politics at its worst.
I'd split if I saw his frame approaching me in a dark alley.
The presence of U.S. soldiers is fueling the insurgency. And then there are Shia and Sunni factions all fighting for supremecy with our soldiers in the middle.
Teflon John is being sued by the DNC over campaign finance issues. I'm sure this'll be all over the media.
DEMS get political over politics!
The shame! The angst!, The chutzpa! The, I think I'll just lie down now till the vapours pass.