About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

AP's Fournier invites McCain to pile on Obama

April 14, 2008 6:04 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: During the Associated Press annual meeting luncheon, Ron Fournier repeatedly asked Sen. John McCain whether he believes Sen. Barack Obama is an "elitist," citing comments Obama recently made. When McCain replied at one point, "I don't know, because I don't know him very well," Fournier asked, "You served with him for a couple of years. Did you ever see elitist behavior from him?"

41 Comments

At the April 14 Associated Press annual meeting luncheon, referring to comments Sen. Barack Obama made on April 6, AP political writer Ron Fournier repeatedly asked Sen. John McCain whether he thinks Obama is an "elitist." Fournier asked: "You made a vague reference in your speech to Senator Obama's comments recently about working-class voters. Do you think the senator is an elitist?" McCain replied in part: "Oh, I don't -- no -- I don't -- I think those comments are elitist." When Fournier followed up by asking, "If those remarks were elitist, which you say they are ... does that make him an elitist?" McCain responded, "I don't know, because I don't know him very well." Fournier then asked: "You served with him for a couple of years. Did you ever see elitist behavior from him?"

In his March 17 "On Deadline" column, Fournier asserted that Obama is "bordering on arrogance" and that "both Obama and his wife, Michelle, ooze a sense of entitlement."

From the 10 a.m. ET hour of the April 14 edition of MSNBC Live:

McCAIN: Now before I take your questions, I'd like to respond briefly to the comments one of my opponents made the other day about the psychology and political mindset of Americans living in small towns and other areas that have experienced the loss of industrial jobs.

During the Great Depression, with many millions of Americans out of work and the country suffering the worst economic crisis in our history, there rose from small towns, rural communities, inner cities, a generation of Americans who fought to save the world from despotism and mass murder and came home to build the wealthiest, strongest, and most generous nation on Earth. They were not born with the advantages others in our country enjoy. They suffered the worst during the Depression, but it had not shaken their faith in and fidelity to America and its founding ideals. Nor had it destroyed their confidence that America and their own lives could be made better. Nor did they turn to their religious faith and cultural traditions out of resentment and a feeling of powerlessness to affect the course of government or pursue prosperity.

On the contrary, their faith -- their faith had given generations of their families purpose and meaning, as it does today. And their appreciation of traditions like hunting was based in nothing -- nothing other than their contribution to the enjoyment of their lives. In my other profession in the war I served in, the country relied overwhelmingly on Americans from these same communities to defend us. As Tocqueville discovered when he traveled America 200 years ago, they are the heart and soul of this country, the foundation of our strength and the primary authors of its essential goodness.

They are our inspiration, and I look to them for guidance and strength. No matter their personal circumstances, they believed in this country. They revered its past. But most importantly, they believed in its future greatness, a greatness they themselves would create. They never forgot who they were, where they came from, and what is possible in America, a country founded on an ideal -- on an idea and not on class, ethnic, or sectarian identity, and America must not and will not forget them.

[...]

FOURNIER: You made a vague reference in your speech to Senator Obama's comments recently about working-class voters. Do you think the senator is an elitist?

McCAIN: Oh, I don't -- no -- I don't -- I think those comments are elitist. I think that anybody who disparages people who are hard-working, honest, dedicated people who have cherished the Second Amendment and the right to hunt and the right to observe that and their values and their culture that they value and that they've grown up with and sometimes in the case of generations, and saying that's because they're unhappy with their economic conditions -- I think that's a fundamental contradiction of what I believe America is all about, that I tried to describe in my remarks. These are the people that produce a generation that made the world safe for democracy. These are the people that, today, their sons and daughters are in harm's way defending this nation. These are the people that have fundamental cultural, spiritual, and other values that, in my view, have very little to do with their economic condition but has everything to do what Tocqueville said America was all about 200 years ago and is the same today.

FOURNIER: If those remarks were elitist, which you say they are --

McCAIN: Yeah.

FOURNIER: -- does that make him an elitist?

McCAIN: I don't know, because I don't know him very well. I don't know Senator Obama very well. I can only look at his remarks, and I've seen them now several times, and say that those are certainly not the vision that I have of America and its strength and its greatness and what its fundamental values and beliefs are.

FOURNIER: You served with him for a couple of years. Did you ever see elitist behavior from him?

[audience laughter]

McCAIN: Well -- I know that positions on many of the issues that he has taken -- I don't know if you would call it elitist, but certainly are fundamentally different than mine. I mean, I am less government, less regulation, lower taxes, et cetera, et cetera. Ranging from national security to domestic issues, we are very different. That's why the American people will have the opportunity with either Senator Clinton or Senator Obama to see some stark contrasts in our vision for the future of America. And I look forward to that debate. I look forward to having that discussion all across America. I wish it wasn't so -- I wish the debate wasn't so protracted.

FOURNIER: So do they.

McCAIN: But certainly I look forward to it.

LIZ SIDOTI (AP political writer): Senator, a little straight talk here. Are we in a recession?

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by werner (April 14, 2008 6:10 pm ET)
         

      This episode has PROVEN that the media are ELITIST not Obama.

       

      Further it has proven that Hillary is a shameful opportunist.

       

      I think media matters needs to disassociate themselves from the Hillary campaign. The more negatives the media throws at her the better. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Science101 (April 14, 2008 6:16 pm ET)
           

        Further it has proven that Hillary is a shameful opportunist.

        Agreed.  But that does not disqualify Obama from doing the same thing...i'm certain you remember how Obama kept the drivers license flip flop alive in democratic debates.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by ConstanceRifleII (April 15, 2008 10:33 am ET)
             

          "i'm certain you remember how Obama kept the drivers license flip flop alive in democratic debates."

          enlighten me then, oh wise one, because I was sure that was Hillary. 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (April 15, 2008 1:03 pm ET)
               
            I think Columbus didn't quite see that debate, because he was afraid of getting too close to the edge of the world and falling off.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by ashdla (April 14, 2008 10:06 pm ET)
           
        Agreed, Both Hillary and McCain are pathetic. Obama has been saying this for at least four years, and he is absolutely right.

         http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a88wMPAWc90 

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Christie (April 15, 2008 8:38 am ET)
           
        Does anyone remember Hillary saying this: "I'm not just some little housewife sitting around baking cookies."  There are a lot of housewives who would be thrilled to be sitting around the house baking cookies rather than maybe finding time to squeeze in baking them after they get home from work.  ...  Now tell me again, how do you spot an elitist remark?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by seeryer (April 15, 2008 1:53 pm ET)
           

        Democrats are their own worst enemy.  Since 1980, Democrats have won two presidential elections (Gore did not win, if he had, W would not be our president).  Guess how many candidates not named Clinton won?  ZERO.  You can say what you want about the Clintons but without them the Democratic Party is nothing but a bunch of losers when it comes to presidential elections.  Jimmy Carter beat a man that was never elected by the citizens of this country to be their president.  And promptly lost 4 years later.  The Clinton brand is a winning brand on the national stage and it can win again for the Democrats.  However, all those folks who never got the nomination (Ted Kennedy), or never won the big prize (Gore, Kerry) are now signaling the end of the Clintons. These same folks who never won a damn thing are telling the only winners left in the party that they are no longer needed.  Obama is the hero of those who do not know the realities in Washington or of the American electorate.  The funny thing is that Hillary won't win the nomination and Obama will lose in the fall but she will be blamed by the establishment press and lefties in Washington.  The Republican Party could never win the War against the Clintons.  The sad irony of it all is that they were battered and bruised by the other side but finally were snuffed out by their own party.  A party that without them, would have become extinct 15 years ago.  Enjoy it you idiot idealists who were duped into Clinton hating.   

        Report Abuse
    • Author by zamfir273114 (April 14, 2008 6:12 pm ET)
         
      Probably because this is a big deal. No matter how much you love Obama, incidents like this show how vulnerable he would be in a general election.

      Really, why would Obama think of putting down religion or gun's as helpful? Perhaps Obama is a bit more insensitive than we know. Maybe he just has a problem with white people?

      I think I will stick with Clinton as my choice. Obama does not stand a chance when his true colors come through (oh, and that is not a pun NOR a racist comment)
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Science101 (April 14, 2008 6:18 pm ET)
           

        Obama does not stand a chance when his true colors come through

        I think the problem is that when you run for President as opposed to Senator, the amount of dirt that will be dug up is exponential.  Im certain that if he does get the nomination, that you'll see a slew of his past come back to haunt him.

        Hillary has been around a long time, and not much said about her surprises people anymore, not to mention that much of the dirt has already been brought up.

        McCain has already run for Presidential nomination, and therefore only the last 4-8 years of history really has any new relevance.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (April 14, 2008 7:24 pm ET)
             
          McCain has never received the nomination before, though, so there could still be plenty of dirt to dig up.  Not to mention the fact he's had his nose halfway up Bush's rear the past 4-8 years.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (April 14, 2008 8:31 pm ET)
             
          Oh yeah, the last time he ran we learned he has a black love child and will become an extreme @ss kisser when defeated. What a "man".
          Report Abuse
      • Author by fawltylogic (April 14, 2008 9:53 pm ET)
           
        Obama didn't put religion or guns down. Are you nuts?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mescal (April 14, 2008 9:57 pm ET)
           

        Zamfir

        Its time for you and some of the other Hillarians here to stop embracing Republican smear tactics in your desperation to gain for Clinton the nomination that you apparently believe is hers by divine right. It makes you no better than any other right winger when you do this, as well as its legitimizing the use of cropped quotes, distortions through deliberately inaccurate paraphrasing, race baiting, and the mindless, droning repetition of false talking points. This will otherwise result to the Republicans maintaining control of the executive branch of the US government, as it will inevitably serve to irreparably fracture the Democratic Party. 

        "Columbus1492" is merely serving in his capacity as a concern troll. You have no such excuse.  

        Report Abuse
        • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (April 14, 2008 10:07 pm ET)
             
          Mescal, well said!
          Report Abuse
        • Author by seeryer (April 15, 2008 2:08 pm ET)
             

          I don't understand this primary.  Obama can say months ago, "she will do or say anything to win" but Hillary or her supporters can't say that Obama saying what he said in front of rich lefties in San Fran sounds elitist?  Guess what, even if it isn't elitist, it will be portrayed that way by his opponents.  She is just throwing batting practice to Obama, just wait until he gets a real AB.  The general will be a dog fight and all you Obama protectors will be wishing for the days of "we know what she said, but I wonder if she was trying to imply blah, blah, blah".  Give me a break and get a little shiite in your neck.   

          Report Abuse
    • Author by tommy (April 14, 2008 6:14 pm ET)
         

      Wow.  Talk about a clever ploy to get this little anti-Obama juicy story up here.  Under the guise of this thread?  Come on.

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (April 14, 2008 8:04 pm ET)
           
        What a great way to keep this little anti-Obama juicy story out there, asking John McCain the same question four times.  Under the guise of a luncheon?  Come on.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by tommy (April 15, 2008 11:42 am ET)
             

          The media does what the media does.  However since we are commenting on a media watchdog site, then we comment on the items and thread topics placed here, and offer up our own personal opinions as to why they are here, and their validity and worthiness.

          Pumping up the Obama/Wright story with nothing new forthcoming is what certain media partisans will do, aka Hannity and Colmes every damn night.....but keeping it alive here raises questions, for me.

          Obviously not for you, we disagree. 

          Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (April 14, 2008 6:18 pm ET)
         
      How clever is it?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (April 14, 2008 6:33 pm ET)
         
      well it certainly seems to have the zither and numbus all in a dither, not that they need much of an excuse to declare Obama doomed again. Is it sexual guys?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by juliajayne (April 14, 2008 6:43 pm ET)
         
      Why should the AP be forwarding a narrative and putting words into people's mouth. Would John McCain have said Obama (or his remarks) was elitist if not prompted? Maybe, maybe not. It's a narrative that's come up over and over by the press. It isn't a coincidence.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Science101 (April 14, 2008 6:48 pm ET)
           

        Would John McCain have said Obama (or his remarks) was elitist if not prompted?

        Evidence says no, he would not.  This MM article even shows McCain being prompted and still said no.  However, I would imagine that stance can change if Obama continues down the path he's currently on.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by carlileb5935 (April 14, 2008 7:04 pm ET)
             

          yes but the point remains-- the media is pushing an anti-Obama, anti Dem narrative, and to the benefit of McCain.

           

          Report Abuse
          • Author by werner (April 14, 2008 7:13 pm ET)
               

            Absolutely, Carlile.

             

            They hate Obama at this point more than they ever have hated Hillary, because they see him much more of a threat to their corporate agenda. 

            Report Abuse
          • Author by dexteritas0071418 (April 14, 2008 7:28 pm ET)
               

            Wait..THE media is doing so because of this incident? THE media is an awfully big conglomerate of several different aspects of communication.

            Same media that shows McCain as too old to be president and Clinton to be too PMS-y?

            Report Abuse
            • Author by juliajayne (April 14, 2008 9:31 pm ET)
                 
              THE media is big time pro corporate and pro Republican. You apparently haven't been paying attention. They want McCain elected. We do not have a free press.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by tommy (April 15, 2008 11:32 am ET)
                   

                Once I get past wiping away my tears for the batttered Democrats, perhaps you can tell me how inept the media is then at promoting their Republicans.  I mean, considering the battering the Republicans took in 2006, this rightwing media is sure doing a lousy job of getting their candidates elected.

                I will go back and offer up another sigh and moan for the Democrats, how do  they hold up? 

                Report Abuse
                • Author by friedbergboy1422 (April 15, 2008 12:34 pm ET)
                     

                  Tommy,

                  Bring the Dem candidate some donuts to munch on to!  Did you see that part of the interview (the AP reporter brought McCain donuts)?  It was sooooooooooooo strange

                  Report Abuse
                • Author by mefirst (April 15, 2008 6:37 pm ET)
                     
                  tommy logic is that because the democrats gained seats in 2006, which is the normal pattern, that proves that there is no bias in the media.  but the media did the dirty work for the republicans in 2000 and 2004.  gore exaggerates, kerry is a flip-flopper.  sound familiar?
                  Report Abuse
    • Author by oscar the grouch (April 14, 2008 8:16 pm ET)
         
      I think Fournier was looking for a "not as far as I know" from JSM
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mefirst (April 14, 2008 9:21 pm ET)
           
        but to make it comparable to hillary's comment, mccain would have had to deny four times that obama was an elitist, and then call it a silly rumor.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by oscar the grouch (April 15, 2008 12:51 am ET)
             
          In reading through the transcript, Fournier came awful close to asking four time, but JSM didn't bite on two of them. Close to HRC moment.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mefirst (April 15, 2008 6:59 am ET)
               
            hillary emphatically said he was not a muslim, she had no reason to believe he was, and she took him at his word he was not.  not close at all.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Christie (April 15, 2008 8:31 am ET)
                 
              "As far as I know." was Hillary's innuendo.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by ConstanceRifleII (April 15, 2008 10:42 am ET)
                   

                yeah, after the fourth time in a row it was asked of her...

                I'm no fan of Hillary, but the "as far as I know" innuendo was completely taken out of context.  She didn't say that the first time it was asked of her, or the second time, or even the third time, each of which she emphatically said no.

                But if you still believe she said "as far as I know" to imply some sense of doubt, then that's because you were looking for something to stick to her in the first place.

                Me, I'll just go with the fact that I don't trust her and the Rovian tactics she's employed in her campaign. 

                Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (April 14, 2008 9:28 pm ET)
           

        FOURNIER: Do you think the senator is an elitist?

        McCAIN: Oh, I don't -- no -- I don't -- I think those comments are elitist.

        FOURNIER: If those remarks were elitist, which you say they are --

        McCAIN: Yeah.

         

        What the hell are these two trying to say? I think if they have to work this hard at candy-assing around actual name-calling, they may even realize they have such a lame manufactured issue that they're just feeding a small reactionary sub-group of the GOP base.

        If the next few months are going to be filled with desperate attempts to fire up this voting block, I guess we're not going to be seeing much discussion of any substance in the mainstream media.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by juliajayne (April 14, 2008 9:35 pm ET)
             
          Col., substance in the mainstream media? I know you're a jester but please. Quit with the jokes ;-)
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (April 15, 2008 1:07 pm ET)
               

            I think there is substance in the MSM.

            And the sooner we flush it away, the better. 

            Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (April 14, 2008 10:21 pm ET)
         

      I think he's trying for a Jimmy Stewart image.

      "o!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (April 15, 2008 10:05 am ET)
         

      In this context I regard the word "elitist" as a Republican slur for someone who is very smart and capable of making intelligent observations rather than utilizing superficial bumper sticker slogans in response to situations. Republicans don't like their leaders smart...just manly.  ;>)

      USA! USA! USA!...   ;>)

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

  • Associated Press
    Associated Press

    The Associated Press
    450 W. 33rd St.
    New York, NY 10001

    Main Number
    +1-212-621-1500