About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Reuters failed to note Bush withdrew renomination of FEC chair who asserted McCain needs FEC permission to leave public financing system

May 07, 2008 2:54 pm ET

SUMMARY: A Reuters article on President Bush's nominations for the Federal Election Commission did not note that President Bush withdrew the renomination of FEC chairman David Mason, who told Sen. John McCain that he needed the FEC's permission to opt out of the public financing system in the presidential primary.

13 Comments

A May 6 Reuters article on President Bush's nominations for the Federal Election Commission noted that "[t]he FEC has been deadlocked with only two out of six members for months, therefore unable to act on key 2008 election issues such as Republican presidential hopeful John McCain's request to opt out of public financing for his bid." But the article left out the fact that President Bush withdrew the renomination of FEC chairman David Mason, who told McCain that he needed the FEC's permission to opt out of the public financing system in the primary. On January 9, 2007, Bush submitted Mason's name for reappointment to the FEC. On May 6, he withdrew that renomination, nominating three others to the commission.

As Media Matters for America has noted, Mason has taken the position that McCain cannot opt out of public financing in the primary without FEC approval, as McCain has attempted to do, meaning that every day that McCain spends beyond the limits of the public financing system -- which he has already exceeded -- he could be breaking federal law.

The Associated Press reported on February 21:

The government's top campaign finance regulator says John McCain can't drop out of the primary election's public financing system until he answers questions about a loan he obtained to kickstart his once faltering presidential campaign.

Federal Election Commission Chairman David Mason, in a letter to McCain this week, said the all-but-certain Republican nominee needs to assure the commission that he did not use the promise of public money to help secure a $4 million line of credit he obtained in November.

The loan could have required McCain to remain in the race, regardless of whether his candidacy was viable, in order to receive matching funds to pay back the loan. A March 23 Washington Post article reported that "McCain has officially broken the limits imposed by the presidential public financing system," and a February 22 article in the Post noted that "[k]nowingly violating the spending limit is a criminal offense that could put McCain at risk of stiff fines and up to five years in prison." Under the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, violators could face fines up to $25,000 and up to five years of jail time.

In contrast with the Reuters report, several other media reports on Bush's nominations for the FEC did note that Mason was not being renominated and that Mason has challenged McCain's actions. The Associated Press reported on May 6: "Bush also withdrew the nomination of current FEC Chairman David Mason, who had clashed in the past with likely Republican presidential nominee John McCain. ... Mason had informed McCain that he needed the approval of the commission before withdrawing and needed to explain the terms of a loan he obtained before he surged to victory in the early primaries. Without a quorum, the FEC was unable to act." The Associated Press further noted that Fred Wertheimer, president of the political watchdog group Democracy 21, said: "The only apparent reason for President Bush to drop Commissioner David Mason at this stage ... is to prevent him from casting an adverse vote against Senator McCain on important enforcement questions pending at the commission." Similarly, The Washington Post reported that Democrats "objected to the replacement of David M. Mason, one of two commissioners still serving on the six-member body," adding that "Mason earlier this year questioned the legality of Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) opting out of public financing." The New York Times also reported that "Bush declined to renominate David Mason" and noted that Wertheimer asserted that Mason was being removed because he questioned McCain's "ability to withdraw from the public financing system for the primaries."

The May 6 Reuters article, in its entirety:

The White House and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on Tuesday moved to break the deadlock at the Federal Election Commission, which had been without a ruling majority in a pivotal campaign year.

The FEC has been deadlocked with only two out of six members for months, therefore unable to act on key 2008 election issues such as Republican presidential hopeful John McCain's request to opt out of public financing for his bid.

To break the impasse, President George W. Bush nominated three new candidates to serve on the panel, but he refused to withdraw his nomination of Republican Hans von Spakovsky to serve on the FEC despite Democrats' opposition.

They have blocked his nomination because of his work at the Justice Department's voting division, questioning whether he tried to inject politics into the group meant to independently oversee the country's voting laws.

The White House believes he "would be confirmed by the Senate if allowed a vote," said White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten in a letter to Reid on Tuesday.

As part of the package, Bush nominated Democrat Cynthia Bauerly, legislative director to New York Sen. Charles Schumer, Republican attorney Donald McGahn, and Republican Caroline Hunter, who works on the Election Assistance Commission.

Already another Democratic FEC nomination is pending, Steven Walther, and if he and Bauerly were confirmed, they would join Democrat Ellen Weintraub on the panel.

"This nominations package incorporates your proposals for the three Democratic seats on the commission and provides a clear path to our shared goal of a fully functioning six-member FEC," Bolten said.

While a spokesman for Reid, a Nevada Democrat, criticized the decision by Bush to stick with von Spakovsky, he indicated a willingness to move forward on the slate of nominations.

"We will work towards the confirmation of the remaining nominees and expect to defeat Mr. von Spakovsky," Reid spokesman Jim Manley said. "We will work to ensure that the commission is constituted so that it will be able to function in this election year."

The FEC is responsible for ensuring candidates abide by campaign laws such as contribution limits and also investigate election complaints like independent groups coordinating their efforts with candidates, possibly in violation of the law.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by JLyons (May 07, 2008 3:04 pm ET)
         
      Good article MMFA!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by anotheramerican (May 07, 2008 4:12 pm ET)
         

      Assuming the story is real, (why are we hearing about it from Reuters?)  had Sen. Reid not blocked the nomination of Mason since January, Mason would be at the helm.   Once again the Democrats cut off their collective nose to spite their face.

      As for the controversy, it is a very minor disagreement since McCain did not avail himself to any money backed by the FEC matching funds.  

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by pithaughn (May 07, 2008 4:19 pm ET)
           
        AA - I don't think either party is jonesing for election year scrutiny of the money trails.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (May 08, 2008 1:01 am ET)
           
        AA, what do you mean by REid blocking Mason's nomination? Did you mean Spakovsky (sp), or are you implying that by not conceding everything to Bush, Reid is responsible for the situation?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by markcyst20051409 (May 07, 2008 4:22 pm ET)
         
      "Assuming the story is real", MM is making this up?Or is Reuters. This has been going on for a long time. McBain is trying to have it both ways
      Report Abuse
      • Author by anotheramerican (May 07, 2008 4:31 pm ET)
           

        I did a poor job of expressing myself.

        What I meant by "if the story is real" is if Mason is not being renominated because of his McCain opinion.  Since I haven't heard anything about it at all, I wondered if there might be another reason. After all, there are no quotes from Mason. (I did not read the whole thread so I could be wrong.)

        Report Abuse
    • Author by captfoster2 (May 07, 2008 5:41 pm ET)
         

      A democrat running the FEC...... oh how horrible!

      As long as McCain breaks no laws then who cares who's running the FEC.

      Give McCain double the money of Obama for all I care..... it won't matter!

      Obama/Richardson 08!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by open_mind (May 07, 2008 8:53 pm ET)
         
      McCain isn't getting much support from donors.  He will probably have to be stuck using matching funds anyway.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (May 07, 2008 9:31 pm ET)
           
        or have Mrs McCains beer empire making sure she becomes First Lady !
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Disputed Zone (May 08, 2008 9:04 am ET)
           

        I believe McCain has pledged to participate in public financing for the general election.

        Earlier in the primary though, McCain manipulated the public financing system to get a much needed loan. And, as Markcyst said above, it was an effort to have it both ways (money now, no spending limits later).

        The slimiest part is what McCain promised to do if his primary campaign had not been successful. At the behest of the bank, he would have had to stay in the race and reapply for public funds to pay off the loan.

        McCain's lawyers say they constructed the loan agreement so that it didn't violate the law. But it sure seems to violate its spirit.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (May 07, 2008 9:30 pm ET)
         
      Olbermann did not fail to notice that, about half hour ago. Cheers for the reporters with real ball$..................
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (May 08, 2008 1:12 am ET)
           

        This is being downplayed by the media, natch, as is every bit of McGrampy monkey business. Aside from the hypocrisy of a campaign reform maverick trying to send back the funds as soon as he saw a little money coming in from other sources,almost nobody's addressing the use of the funds as collaterral for a loan, or to shoehorn his way into a primary.

        Seems like "The Rules" are pretty loose with the GOP candidate.

         

        Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (May 08, 2008 10:51 am ET)
         
      Appartently McNugie's campaign staff are in daily contact with the WH, to let them know when they're going to distence them selves for shrub and share other information. Its possible they might have mentioned their problem with that pesky Mason.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.