CNN military analyst Shepperd on trip to Gitmo: "Did we drink the government kool-aid? -- of course"
SUMMARY: In the wake of the New York Times exposé on the hidden ties between media military analysts and the Pentagon, the Department of Defense (DOD) released numerous documents related to the program. One is a June 23, 2006, email containing a report written by CNN military analyst Donald Shepperd about his DOD-sponsored trip to Guantánamo Bay on June 21, 2006. In the report, Shepperd wrote: "Did we drink the government kool-aid? -- of course -- that was the purpose of the trip, to hear the U.S. government side of the story, the other side is provided daily in the media, some informed, most by those who have never been to Gitmo."
Following the publication of the April 20 New York Times front-page article on the hidden ties between media military analysts and the Pentagon, the Department of Defense (DOD) released to the public numerous documents regarding the analyst program. One of the documents released is a June 23, 2006, email from DOD official Dallas Lawrence to several DOD officials that contains a report written by retired Air Force Gen. Donald Shepperd, a CNN military analyst, about a DOD-sponsored trip he took to the U.S. military facility at Guantánamo Bay on June 21, 2006. Shepperd wrote, "I wish all of America, in fact all of the concerned world, would go [to Guantánamo Bay] because they could draw their own conclusions and stop asking me." Later in his report, Shepperd asked himself and answered a series of questions about the trip. As Salon.com's Glenn Greenwald noted, Shepperd wrote: "Did we drink the government kool-aid? -- of course -- that was the purpose of the trip, to hear the U.S. government side of the story, the other side is provided daily in the media, some informed, most by those who have never been to Gitmo." Shepperd later stated in his report, "If someone tells you Gitmo is a gulag -- that is nonsense -- they haven't been there." In sending Shepperd's report on, Lawrence wrote that "Don's reports are practically required reading by the entire CNN leadership. If nothing else this [report] will at least take away their ability to claim credibly that they 'did not know' what was really going on down there. Their own paid analyst has clearly reported in." Shepperd has appeared on CNN more than 700 times since the beginning of 2002, most recently on March 26, 2008.
As Greenwald noted, Shepperd is the president of The Shepperd Group. According to its website, "Don Shepperd of The Shepperd Group ... provides expert guidance and consulting services to defense contractors." According to his company biography page, Shepperd "performs independent consulting on defense, strategic planning, executive leadership, information technology and visioning and preparation of executive teams for the 21st century."
In the report contained in Lawrence's email, Shepperd stated, "It was my second trip to Guantanamo, the last being a year ago." Indeed, Shepperd wrote about his first trip in a July 2, 2005, "Behind the Scenes" article published on CNN.com. In the article, Shepperd wrote, "Did we drink the government 'Kool-Aid?' I don't know.":
It was a quick trip, down and back; seven hours in a military jet, plus all day at the Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, detention center -- 10 media military analysts, defense writers and think-tankers receiving briefings, visiting assigned personnel and watching interrogations.
The trip was put together in response to recent press reports of prisoner abuse at Gitmo. The Defense Department considers the criticism grossly unfair and mostly written by people who have never visited the "new" Camp Delta, which three years ago replaced Camp X-Ray.
[...]
Guards were a mixture of military police from all services. They're young kids, serious about their jobs and proud of what they were doing. Early allegations of mistreatment at Guantanamo and elsewhere were investigated, some substantiated and the guilty punished.
We saw no evidence of mistreatment, nor would one expect to on a planned visit. We didn't talk to detainees, rules prevent it, but the Red Cross does. They have unfettered access.
Did we drink the government "Kool-Aid?" I don't know. But when in doubt, I try to rely on common sense and my experience of almost 40 years in the military.
What I saw made sense: good, sincere, dedicated people doing what I would do in a tough situation. I am comforted. Keep it open. Keep a close watch on it. Guantanamo isn't a "Club Med," but it certainly isn't a "gulag."
However, around the same time, Shepperd wrote in a July 2005 National Guard article headlined "Gitmo, In and Out": "Did we drink the government 'Kool-Aid'? Of course, and that was the point of the trip, put together in response to press reports of prisoner abuse at Gitmo." Later in the article he asked, "Did we drink too much 'Kool-Aid?' ":
Did we drink the government "Kool-Aid"? Of course, and that was the point of the trip, put together in response to press reports of prisoner abuse at Gitmo.
The Defense Department considers the criticism grossly unfair, fallacious and mostly written by people who have never visited the "new" Camp Delta, which three years ago replaced Camp X-ray, the facility often still seen in network TV footage.
[...]
Did we drink too much "Kool-Aid?" I don't know. But when in doubt, I try to rely on common sense and my experience of almost 40 years in the military. What I saw made sense: good, sincere, dedicated people doing what I would do in a tough situation. I am comforted.
Guantanamo isn't a Club Med. It also isn't a gulag.
During and immediately after Shepperd's June 2005 visit to Guantánamo, he appeared on CNN to talk about his experiences there. On the June 24 edition of CNN's Live From ..., he had the following exchange over the phone from Guantánamo with anchor Betty Nguyen (taken from the Nexis news database):
NGUYEN: We have just established a line to Guantanamo Bay, to our military analyst General Don Shepperd. He arrived there as part of a trip put together by the Pentagon in wake of that human rights report that criticized conditions at the U.S. prison for war detainees. General Shepperd on the phone with us right now.
General Shepperd, what do you see so far while being there?
SHEPPERD: Well, I tell you what, Betty, I'm seeing a lot of rain right now. I thought Cuba was dry and we're in (INAUDIBLE) rain storm. But I tell you, every American should have a chance to see what our group saw today. The impressions that you're getting from the media and from the various pronouncements being made by people who have not been here, in my opinion, are totally false.
What we're seeing is a modern prison system of dedicated people, interrogators and analysts that know what they are doing. And people being very, very well-treated. We've had a chance to tour the facility, to talk to the guards, to talk to the interrogators and analysts. We've had a chance to eat what the prisoners eat. We've seen people being interrogated. And it's nothing like the impression that we're getting from the media. People need to see this, Betty.
[...]
NGUYEN: Now, this leads me to my next question. Of course, this was a trip organized by the Pentagon. So do you feel like you're getting full access to everything there? Are you seeing a true picture of how it is?
SHEPPERD: Yes, that's always a good question. But I tell you that they are proud to have people down here, including the press, to see what we are seeing. Obviously, they're going to put their best foot forward, And obviously, no matter where you are, there will be from time to time abuses or people misusing or disobeying the regulations, no matter where you are in the process.
But I tell you, I have been in prisons and I have been in jails in the United States, and this is by far the most professionally-run and dedicated force I've ever seen in any correctional institution anywhere.
According to CNN's transcript of the appearance, neither Shepperd nor Nguyen referred to his work with The Shepperd Group.
On the June 27, 2005, edition of CNN's American Morning, Shepperd discussed his trip with co-host Soledad O'Brien (from Nexis):
SHEPPERD: I came away agreeing with what the congressional delegation just said. What we saw in Guantanamo bears no resemblance to what we are reading in the print press out there. Most of the people writing about this, I believe, have never been there.
What I saw is we have -- we have impressions of an old facility, Camp X-ray, that was closed three years ago. What we have now is a modern, well-constructed prison, guarded by very, very dedicated people, doing an extremely tough job in the midst of very, very dangerous people, Soledad.
[...]
O'BRIEN: All right. But General Shepperd, you say you had free run of the place and that you got to watch them at work, you know, pretty much unfettered for a day. Isn't it fair to say, well, if there's abuse going on, it sure isn't going to happen while the U.S. congressional delegation is coming through, and certainly not while former military people who are now analysts on TV are hanging out in town?
I mean, it seems to me that obviously you wouldn't see those things. I think that's fair to say, isn't it?
SHEPPERD: Yes, absolutely. I mean, obviously, they're on their best behavior, put their best forward food, what have you. And obviously, in any prison situation you have to continually guard against abuses.
There have been abuses at Guantanamo in the past. I think that they have been fixed. And they're constantly on the alert for them.
But again, what we saw was a bunch of really dedicated people that are really, really mad and feel attacked by the things coming out in the print press about this. They say, "I don't know where these people are getting the information. They haven't been here, and I haven't seen it going on." So...
O'BRIEN: But some of it's not only coming out of the print press of journalists, let's say, who haven't had a chance to visit. I mean, we're talking about Amnesty International. They're the ones that, as you well know, called Guantanamo a modern day gulag.
The ICRC said the tactics there were tantamount to torture. The ICRC comes by frequently to check on the prisoners. I mean, they're there all the time. The same with Amnesty International, they have people who are there.
These are not journalists who are, you know, typing on their computers in another state and never have left the country.
SHEPPERD: No. The International Red Cross has access 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, at times and place of their choosing. They always recommend improvements.
According to CNN's transcript of the appearance, neither Shepperd nor O'Brien referred to his work with The Shepperd Group.
From Lawrence's June 23, 2006, email passing on Shepperd's report:
I thought you all might like to see this report filed by cnn senior military analyst Don Sheppard [sic] who was part of the analyst trip we took down to GITMO this week. Don's reports are practically required reading by the entire CNN leadership. If nothing else, this will at least take away their ability to claim credibly that they "did not know" what was really going on down there. Their own paid analyst has clearly reported in.
From Shepperd's report:
Did we drink the government kool-aid? -- of course -- that was the purpose of the trip, to hear the U.S. government side of the story, the other side is provided daily in the media, some informed, most by those who have never been to Gitmo. A visitor is at the mercy of local officials, but one also has lots of time to argue, inquire, question, disagree, exchange ideas, provide alternate views, suggestions. It is a healthy environment for an intellectual exchange. One has free access to talk to any of the staff.
From Shepperd's article in the July 2005 edition of National Guard, headlined "Gitmo, In and Out":
It was a quick trip, down and back; seven hours in a military jet, plus all day viewing the Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, detention center. Ten media military analysts, defense writers and think tankers received briefings, visited assigned personnel and viewed interrogations.
Did we drink the government "Kool-Aid"? Of course, and that was the point of the trip, put together in response to press reports of prisoner abuse at Gitmo.
The Defense Department considers the criticism grossly unfair, fallacious and mostly written by people who have never visited the "new" Camp Delta, which three years ago replaced Camp X-ray, the facility often still seen in network TV footage.
Realizing a one-day visit does not an expert make, and that the government was obviously putting its best foot forward with former military visitors more likely receptive than a more appropriately skeptical press, we launched with gusto into our visit.
[...]
The pall of Abu Ghraib hangs over our heads. The damage done by a handful of poorly trained and unsupervised jerks isn't being repeated at Guantanamo. Keep it open. Keep a close watch on it. And keep those dangerous guys off the battlefield until this war is over.
Did we drink too much "Kool-Aid?" I don't know. But when in doubt, I try to rely on common sense and my experience of almost 40 years in the military. What I saw made sense: good, sincere, dedicated people doing what I would do in a tough situation. I am comforted.
Guantanamo isn't a Club Med. It also isn't a gulag.













Columbus, if you have a basic grasp of how our country was designed, you'll understand that a "suspected" terrorist is one who hasn't been convicted of anything.That makes him innocent in the eyes of the law, just as any other person in America is.
I'm not sure what you mean by "passed drinking Kool Aid", but if you're trying to say that somebody with a respect for the principles that this nation was founded on is worse than a reporter who blindly follows government propaganda, that's a pretty disgusting display of un-American cowardice.
It depends on the detainee. If it was someone who was caught on a battlefield with a weapon &/or with the group of militants, the laws of american citizens and the judicial system need not apply.
If its someone they picked up off of intelligence, while not committing a terrorist act, then its a different story.
But I dont buy into any of this "they hung me by ropes for 3 days" crap. People complain about being in a small cell...its called JAIL fool. You dont get to live in a 4 star hotel with a DVR. I could personally care less what happens to any terrorist, anyone in connection with a terrorist regime/group, anyone who harbors terrorists, or anyone who had credible intelligence or evidence against them of being connected to or be a terrorist.
We could nail them to a cross on a platform in the middle of the Atlantic and a cable channel dedicated to it for all I care.
1492 - you could be in connection with a terrorist group, but just be unaware of it (like many other things that you fail to grasp).
For example, you could donate to a charity. Said charity could be a front for a terrorist operation. Government gets your name off a donor list, and bam, you're on vacation at Gitmo.
No lawyers, No charges.
Why are you so scared of terrorists? Please explain it to me, because I'm more scared of being struck by lightning while golfing.
Yeah, but neither did anyone on this thread, on this site or any prominent Democrat ever defend terrorists.
The 'war on terror' that Bush has waged has actually fostered more growth in terrorism around the world. His efforts and his policies have been counter-productive, so if anyone is 'defending' terrorists, it would be your president, George Bush.
He can't.
He never really does.
It depends on the detainee. If it was someone who was caught on a battlefield with a weapon &/or with the group of militants, the laws of american citizens and the judicial system need not apply.
Says the kool-aid drinker.
You know Columbus...... its self-righteous clowns like you that make America the hated country it is around the world!
"I could personally care less what happens to any terrorist, anyone in connection with a terrorist regime/group, anyone who harbors terrorists, or anyone who had credible intelligence or evidence against them of being connected to or be a terrorist."
In a country that is supposed to follow the RULE OF LAW, mandated by OUR CONSTITUTION (You remember that stubburn piece of paper.... don't ya?)
What about those more than a few innocent men..... those that just happen to have a similar sounding name?
Or someone that just happens to look like an actual known terrorist?
Are we supposed to blythfully allow our government to detain, render, or torture in our names so that you can feel all snuggly inside, while the very fabric of our type of government is swept aside?
If you are so damn jung ho about all this..... why not go and join in the fun over in the middle east and help out in this cause, since you seem to be all for it, instead of coming in here and acting like some kind of a tough guy arm chair general!
Anyone that thinks that this is the way America should be most certainly doesn't have any love of America!
"Out of roughly 775 detainees who have come to Guantanamo, former leaders of the Pentagon's Criminal Investigation Task Force said they were able to develop credible criminal cases against only about 100." -- source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15361740/
I wish I could be as sure as you are these guys were guilty. I think it is my danged cerebral cortex getting in the way again.
That's the heart and soul of this thing, that retired Air Force Gen. Don Shepperd is a DEFENSE CONTRACTOR.
As [Salon.com's Glenn] Greenwald noted, Shepperd is the president of The Shepperd Group. According to its website, "Don Shepperd of The Shepperd Group ... provides expert guidance and consulting services to defense contractors."
...and where it says "provides expert guidance and consulting services to defense contractors", you're reading what is in essence the job description of a DEFENSE LOBBYIST.
And you have above, following transcriptions of two different appearances by Gen. Shepperd on CNN...
"According to CNN's transcript of the appearance, neither Shepperd nor Nguyen referred to his work with The Shepperd Group"
And "According to CNN's transcript of the appearance, neither Shepperd nor O'Brien referred to his work with The Shepperd Group"
That's just a single example of the many, of DEFENSE LOBBYISTS and MILITARY CONTRACTORS (and even BOARD MEMBERS and SENIOR CORPORATE OFFICERS of DEFENSE CONTRACTORS) disguised as "military analysts" on NBC and Fox News Channel (most of all), and CNN too, in Shepperd's case.
That's what it's all about... and if you think the networks and the cable outlets are being completely silent in this matter, then you're wrong: they are the ones primarily behind the "counter spin" distractionary campaign, of portraying this matter as a mere "propaganda program", instead of the far worse truth of it:
DEFENSE LOBBYISTS disguised as "military analysts", being promoted and aired by NBC and Fox News Channel et al, to sell the American People an invasion and occupation of Iraq,,, and drum up some business for themselves... and get 4,000 U.S. Troops killed... but merely as necessary "collateral damage" to getting those millions and millions of dollars in DEFENSE CONTRACTS.
DEFENSE LOBBYISTS disguised as "military analysts", being promoted and aired by NBC and Fox News Channel
Are you saying that NBC and FOX are knowingly and willingly promoting these people as Military Analyst, all while knowing that they are not?
You copied and pasted from my comment correctly. Good job.
Proof of what?
OK, I'll guess maybe you want proof of the statement that "DEFENSE LOBBYISTS disguised as "military analysts", being promoted and aired by NBC and Fox News Channel" (it seems self-evident, but it's got a simple enough proof, so why not step through it).
From David Barstow's New York Times article, out of a number of instances he cites, we have:
"Two of NBC's most prominent analysts, Barry R. McCaffrey and the late Wayne A. Downing... had their own consulting firms, and sat on the boards of major military contractors."
And also from the Barstow article:
"John C. Garrett is a retired Army colonel and unpaid analyst for Fox News TV and radio. He is also a lobbyist at Patton Boggs who helps firms win Pentagon contracts, including in Iraq"
Which makes Barry R. McCaffrey and Wayne A. Downing and John C. Garrett DEFENSE LOBBYISTS.
And from those same parts of the Barstow article, we know they were promoted and aired by NBC and Fox News Channel as "military analysts".
But it was not disclosed in their on-air appearances that they were DEFENSE LOBBYISTS.
Therefore, they were DEFENSE LOBBYISTS disguised as "military analysts", being promoted and aired by NBC and Fox News Channel.
Q.E.D.
Stop it, Dem, you're killing me with facts and reliable reporting. Don't come back until you've got nothing but vague allegations and innuendo, or what Republicans call "sound information".
Randy
You know that the corporatist conservative Republican Party controlled news media isn't going to be stupid enough to leave a trail of bread crumbs leading back to them.
Even if they did leave that trail, all of the corporatist conservative Republican Party controlled news media covers up for each other these days.
Their TRUE fear is that Crooks & Liars, and/or Firedoglake, and/or Raw Story, and/or Black Agenda Report, and/or Talking Points Memo, might find and follow the trail of bread crumbs.
COLUMBUS
it was all over the news last week and not just NBC and Fox, the rest of them had your BS spreaders to, but had you taken the time to dig up the truth, you would have known it years ago
"DEFENSE LOBBYISTS disguised as "military analysts", being promoted and aired by NBC and Fox News Channel"
"Are you saying that NBC and FOX are knowingly and willingly promoting these people as Military Analyst, all while knowing that they are not?"
That's EXACTLY what Dem said. GOP-Viacom-CBS and GOP-Disney-ABC also followed the same corrupt suit as GOP-Fox and GOP-GE-NBC.
This is not only proof of corporatist conservative media bias, it's also proof of outright COLLUSION between the news media AND the Bush administration! I think we need to start thinking about impeaching the corporatist conservative Republican Party controlled news media.
"Guantanamo isn't a Club Med. It also isn't a gulag."
No one has said it was a "gulag" OTOH, what has been said is it is totally un-American to detain and torture someone for years without charges.
Rule # 1 - You can't trust CNN or Gen Shep with anything they say .
" guard against abuses " ya that's funny , it seems it was POLICY to rough up those alleged terrorists and its predicable that he would use the few bad apples excuse and it is an absolute JOKE , anybody should believe ANYTHING from a trip organized by the pentagon for a ret. General to report the wonderful things going on .
It's to be expected Shep is not going to criticize his home boys in the military , but for CNN an alleged NEWS organization to participate in this charade is appalling and an insult to everybody's intelligence .
Barry " highway of death " Cafferty , who ordered the bombing of retreating Iraqi soldiers and civilians from Kuwait , and incinerated thousands , is given the same platform for propaganda , while representing the Tank manufacturer , while giving praise on how well they operate .
Did Shep mention the several suicides , the beatings , the innocent held , or hunger strikes . Why is that SHEP , why would a person kill himself or STARVE himself in custody of America ?
i think you can only get to gitmo if the pentagon, army, whatever, arranges the trip. so, if you don't want the pentagaon to oblige the media, then you will get no coverage.
as for the highway of death comment, are you suggesting that you don't shoot at a retreating enemy? germans retreated up the italian peninsula, across france, and we followed and fought them all the way. what else would you do.
These guys on vacation at Gitmo, are getting fat and sassy. Some get sad but when we let them go, they suicide anyway, only this time including innocents as well.
http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=4805141
If only they just waterboarded our guys.
Who is to say this guy would have never been a problem if he wasn't apparently tortured for a couple of years by us?
Do you think revenge is such an odd reaction? How would you feel? Assuming you have feelings?
You don't get credit for calling the guy a monster when you just as likely made him one.