About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Drudge highlighted Financial Times quote echoing false rumor about Obama's religion

May 12, 2008 1:35 pm ET

SUMMARY: The Drudge Report ran the headline "West Virginia country folk keep distance from Obama: 'I heard he's a Muslim ...' " in linking to a Financial Times article. The article quoted a West Virginia resident stating, "I heard Obama is a Muslim and his wife's an atheist." But Obama is, in fact, not a Muslim. While the article characterized the rumors of Obama's religion as "unfounded," it did so 12 paragraphs after quoting the "I heard he's a Muslim" assertion and did not report that the Obamas are both Christians.

249 Comments

On May 11, the Drudge Report linked to a May 11 Financial Times article (published in the newspaper's May 12 U.S. print edition) with the headline: "West Virginia country folk keep distance from Obama: 'I heard he's a Muslim ...' ." As Media Matters for America has repeatedly documented, Obama is, in fact, not a Muslim. The Financial Times article by reporter Andrew Ward to which Drudge linked stated: "Like most people in Mingo County, West Virginia, Leonard Simpson is a lifelong Democrat. But given a choice between [Sen.] Barack Obama and [Sen.] John McCain in November, the 67-year-old retired coalminer would vote Republican." Ward quoted Simpson stating, "I heard Obama is a Muslim and his wife's an atheist." While the article characterized the rumors of Obama's religion as "unfounded," it did so 12 paragraphs after quoting the "I heard he's a Muslim" assertion and did not report that the Obamas are both Christians.

From the Drudge Report (accessed through DrudgeReportArchives.com):

Drudge Report

From the Financial Times article, which bore the headline "W Virginia keeps distance from Obama" on the Financial Times website and "Core Democrats question Obama's love of country" in the May 12 U.S. print edition:

Like most people in Mingo County, West Virginia, Leonard Simpson is a lifelong Democrat. But given a choice between Barack Obama and John McCain in November, the 67-year-old retired coalminer would vote Republican.

"I heard that Obama is a Muslim and his wife's an atheist," said Mr Simpson, drawing on a cigarette outside the fire station in Williamson, a coalmining town of 3,400 people surrounded by lush wooded hillsides.

Mr Simpson's remarks help explain why Mr Obama is trailing Hillary Clinton, his Democratic rival, by 40 percentage points ahead of Tuesday's primary election in the heavily white and rural state, according to recent opinion polls.

A landslide victory for Mrs Clinton in West Virginia will do little to improve her fading hopes of winning the Democratic nomination, because Mr Obama has an almost insurmountable lead in the overall race.

But Tuesday's contest is likely to reinforce Mrs Clinton's argument that she would be the stronger opponent for Mr McCain in November, and raise fresh doubts about whether the US is ready to elect its first black president.

Occupying a swathe of the Appalachian Mountains on the threshold between the Bible Belt and the Rust Belt, West Virginia is a swing state that voted twice for George W. Bush but backed Democrats in six of the eight prior presidential elections.

No Democrat has been elected to the White House without carrying West Virginia since 1916, yet Mr Obama appears to have little chance of winning there in November. Recent opinion polls indicate that Mrs Clinton would narrowly beat Mr McCain in the state but Mr Obama would lose by nearly 20 percentage points.

West Virginia is hostile territory for Mr Obama because it has few of the African-Americans and affluent, college-educated whites who provide his strongest support. The state has the lowest college graduation rate in the US, the second lowest median household income, and one of the highest proportions of white residents, at 96 per cent.

A visit to Mingo County, a Democratic stronghold in the heart of the Appalachian coalfields, reveals the scale of Mr Obama's challenge -- not only in West Virginia but in white, working-class communities across the US. With a gun shop on its main street and churches dotted throughout the town, Williamson is the kind of community evoked by Mr Obama's controversial comments last month about "bitter" small-town voters who "cling to guns or religion".

"If he is the nominee, the Democrats have no chance of winning West Virginia," said Missy Endicott, a 40- year-old school administrator. "He doesn't understand ordinary Americans."

Ms Endicott was among roughly 500 people who crammed into the Williamson Fire Department building on Friday to attend a rally by Bill Clinton, the former president. He told them his wife represented "people like you, in places like this", and urged voters to turn out in record numbers on Tuesday to send a message to the "higher-type people" who were trying to force her out of the race.

Local leaders said Mr Clinton was the most important visitor to Williamson since John F. Kennedy passed through during the 1960 election campaign. Mr Kennedy's victory in the West Virginia primary that year was a crucial step towards proving his electability as the first Catholic president. Nearly five decades later, the state appears less willing to help Mr Obama break down barriers to the White House.

None of the 22 Democrats interviewed by the Financial Times at the Clinton rally would commit themselves to voting for Mr Obama if he became the nominee, and half said they definitely would not. The depth of opposition is particularly striking considering that Mingo County is one of the most Democratic places in West Virginia, having cast about 85 per cent of its votes for the party in the 2006 midterm elections. If Mr Obama cannot win there in November, he has little chance of carrying the state.

Most people questioned said they mistrusted Mr Obama because of doubts about his patriotism and "values", stemming from his cosmopolitan background, his exotic name and the controversy surrounding "anti-American" sermons by Jeremiah Wright, his former pastor. Several people said they believed he was a Muslim -- an unfounded rumour that has circulated on the internet for months -- despite the contradiction with his 20-year membership of Mr Wright's church in Chicago. Others mentioned his refusal to wear a Stars and Stripes badge and controversial remarks by his wife, Michelle, who described America as "mean" and implied that she had never been proud of the US until her husband ran for president.

Conservative commentators have questioned Mr Obama's patriotism for months and the issue is expected to be one of the Republicans' main lines of attack if he wins the nomination. "The American people want a president who loves their country as much as they do," said Whit Ayres, a Republican strategist. Obama supporters believe patriotism is being used as code to harness racist sentiment.

Josh Fry, a 24-year-old ambulance driver from Williamson, insisted he was not racist but said he would feel more comfortable with Mr McCain, the 71-year-old Vietnam war hero, in the White House. "I want someone who is a full-blooded American as president," he said.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Science101 (May 12, 2008 1:39 pm ET)
         

      Druge just links to websites who actually write and post the articles.  Drudge in no way accused or said Obama is a Muslim.  His website just provided a link to an articles based on WV people who think he is.

      Instead of going after him because hes Drudge, why not just get to the nitty gritty and condem the actual website who wrote and posted the article.

      This is about attacking a republican media source, not the actual source of the media.

      Quite sad.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by captfoster2 (May 12, 2008 1:47 pm ET)
           

        Columbus.... you self righteous clown!

        "Druge just links to websites who actually write and post the articles.  Drudge in no way accused or said Obama is a Muslim.  His website just provided a link to an articles based on WV people who think he is."

        What is true is that Drudge goes off and claims to be a journalist and the corporate owned media... especially Fox Noise uses him as a legitimate source..... so when he links to an article.... it is used by the right-wing media as a news source....

        So MMFA bringing this up here is quite legit..... and the only thing sad, is you!

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Governor (May 12, 2008 1:49 pm ET)
           
        Both Drudge and the Financial Times are advancing a false rumor about Obama's religion.  MMFA's mission is to correct conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.  It's as simple as that.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mr. l (May 12, 2008 1:50 pm ET)
           
        If a person knowingly puts out information that is false, that person is lying.  Drudge links to lies and further perpetuates lies- he's a liar.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Science101 (May 12, 2008 1:57 pm ET)
             

          However, as MM has said, the FT article did state that the beliefs of the WV people were indeed false and that he was not muslim.

          So please, tell me what misinformation there is? 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by pete592 (May 12, 2008 2:07 pm ET)
               
            MMFA clearly defines "conservative misinformation" in their mission statement.  This fits their definition of the term.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by tommy (May 12, 2008 2:11 pm ET)
                 
              Irrespective of the Financial Times', or Drudge's motives, the article clearly sets the record straight regarding Obama's religion.  Where is the misinformation then?  Is it strictly because of it's placement in the article?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by pete592 (May 12, 2008 2:24 pm ET)
                   
                Drudge is using a false rumor as a headline, and he's using it to generalize "West Virginia folk."  Yes, he is misinforming.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Science101 (May 12, 2008 2:26 pm ET)
                     

                  Its not a false rumor.  Its a direct statement from an uninformed person in WV.  Note that it is in quotations, and the article states the persons thoughts to be false.

                  Stop parsing.

                  Report Abuse
                • Author by Science101 (May 12, 2008 2:26 pm ET)
                     

                  Its not a false rumor.  Its a direct statement from an uninformed person in WV.  Note that it is in quotations, and the article states the persons thoughts to be false.

                  Stop parsing.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by snoopy (May 12, 2008 2:29 pm ET)
                       
                    Are you assuming this uninformed person formed that opinion all by hisself? You're fooling yourself if you think that. He got it directly from the media, idiots like Savage and Coulter and Hannity who keep repeating that lie adnauseum.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by pete592 (May 12, 2008 2:28 pm ET)
                       
                    Yes, it is a false rumor, and Drudge was conveniently able to do his part in keeping the rumor alive by quoting someone who is misinformed. 
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by sandss981580 (May 12, 2008 2:35 pm ET)
                         
                      has drudge ever influenced your thought about anything?  you are giving him more power and authority than he has.  he offers a portal to interesting news items, nothing more.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by open_mind (May 13, 2008 5:06 pm ET)
                           
                        Drudge has often been cited as an influential person/website.  I have no reason to doubt that.
                        Report Abuse
                    • Author by tommy (May 12, 2008 2:38 pm ET)
                         
                      You would have a point if the article did not correct the false rumor, however they clearly do.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by pete592 (May 12, 2008 2:42 pm ET)
                           
                        What about the accusation of Atheism?
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by tommy (May 12, 2008 2:49 pm ET)
                             
                          You have a point with that unsubstainted charge, granted, but the MMFA headline here focused on Obama's religion, as did I.
                          Report Abuse
                      • Author by snoopy (May 12, 2008 2:47 pm ET)
                           

                        Tommy, how does my statement that you responded to not have a point? Are you disagreeing that there are a lot of folks out there who picked up on this from tools like savage and coulter who keep repeating that lie ad nauseum?

                        I think I know where you are trying to go with your statement, but the article lost lots of credibility by not immediately debunking the guy's statement. They may not be perpetuating the lie, but they are being deceitful by seperating the lie and the fact by a significant margin.

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by tommy (May 12, 2008 2:51 pm ET)
                             
                          Snoop, I wasn't responding to you, but rather Pete.......I have no idea where this person got his false information from.
                          Report Abuse
                  • Author by open_mind (May 13, 2008 5:05 pm ET)
                       
                    What about the people who just read the headline on drudge?  Do you think they might be misinformed?  Do you expect someone to visit Drudge's to read every article to make sure they are not being misinformed by the title?  Come on?  Drudge has a basic journalistic responsibility to not mislead people with his headlines.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by heru (May 12, 2008 8:10 pm ET)
                       
                    Yeah but why quote some stupid misinformed hillbilly on anything except that it serves your propaganda
                    Report Abuse
                • Author by Governor (May 12, 2008 2:27 pm ET)
                     
                  Same goes for the Financial Times by omitting the fact that Mrs. Obama is not an atheist and that she and Mr. Obama are Christians.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by wzwriter (May 12, 2008 5:59 pm ET)
                   

                Irrespective of the Financial Times', or Drudge's motives, the article clearly sets the record straight regarding Obama's religion.  Where is the misinformation then?  Is it strictly because of it's placement in the article?

                Tommy -

                I believe that more than anything, it's because of Drudge's placement of the lie in the title on his web page.  It does not appear in the title of the FT article; it's a few paragraphs down, with the correct information buried at the end of the article.

                Since many people will skim Drudge's headlines and not follow the link to the actual article, they will not see the correct info - but they will be left with the impression that because so many people keep saying that Obama is a Muslim, than it must be true.

                Report Abuse
            • Author by Science101 (May 12, 2008 2:11 pm ET)
                 

              lol - if thats the case, they may also want to contact Webster to get the definition of "misinformation" modified a bit to be a broader general definition.

              There is no misinformation, just a group thats mad about someone putting an article in the faces of people to read, regardless that he didnt write it himself. 

              Again - this is MM vs. Drudge, not MM vs. FT for Obama article.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by snoopy (May 12, 2008 2:26 pm ET)
                   
                So, putting a note 12 paragraphs after the statement isn't deceitful? I'd say it is given the number of people out there who just scan the 1st few paragraphs and then throw it away because they think they read enough to be "informed".
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Science101 (May 12, 2008 2:28 pm ET)
                     
                  You dont read a book and know the whole story from the first page.  Quit making excuses because people do not share your views on Obama, and they may be uninformed.  But blaming Drudge for pointing the article out is stupid.  Need some better material MMFA.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by snoopy (May 12, 2008 2:32 pm ET)
                       
                    Uh, hello? Ever heard of a preface? You can get enough info from the preface to basically get what the book is about. However, this isn't about me not liking the fact that some have differing views of Obama, it's about perpetuating a lie, and this idiot from WV is proof that the right wing has been successful at disseminating a lie to the country. I know you try really hard at being an apologist for the right wing smear merchants, but you're outta your league today, sonny.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by dbeden4153 (May 12, 2008 2:49 pm ET)
                       

                    Columbus, it is widely known in journalism circles that the longer an article is, the more the readership declines in relation to the paragraphs.  In other words, most journalists subscribe to the "upside-down triangle" when writing a story.  The large part of the triangle being the most important information in the story, and it gradiates in importance from the second paragraph on.  IMO, setting the rumor straight is more important than quoting an average citizen, and I think most journalists would agree to that.

                    However, there are very little journalistic ethics when it comes to election reporting.

                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by wzwriter (May 12, 2008 3:47 pm ET)
                       

                    Need some better material MMFA.

                    And YOU need some better material between your ears, Columbus.

                    Report Abuse
          • Author by wzwriter (May 12, 2008 3:09 pm ET)
               

            However, as MM has said, the FT article did state that the beliefs of the WV people were indeed false and that he was not muslim.

            So please, tell me what misinformation there is? 

            The misinformation is in Drudge's headline, Columbus.  Many visitors to his cybersewer will simply glance at that headline and not follow the link.  In that way, Drudge's deceptive headline plants a lie in their minds as if it were the truth, which makes Drudge a liar and a purveyor of misinformation.

            Report Abuse
        • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (May 12, 2008 2:04 pm ET)
             

          What's "quite sad" is that the GOP/Media seem to be having some success at influencing this presidential race with BS that's irrelevant to the office of president; religion and displays of patriotism.

          A full-blooded American who can pull off some loud-mouthed jingoistic displays of empty patriotism and has the same opinion about the unknowable secrets of the universe as I do.That's all I want in a public servant.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by snoopy (May 12, 2008 2:27 pm ET)
               
            I was gonna offer Columbus a high paying salary position but something his best friend from high school said 12 years ago really has me concerned about whether he'd be a good fit...
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Science101 (May 12, 2008 2:29 pm ET)
                 
              Sorry Snoop...I dont want to be union.  I'll pass.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by snoopy (May 12, 2008 2:33 pm ET)
                   
                This is in Texas, no unions here. Nice stereotype though...
                Report Abuse
              • Author by wzwriter (May 12, 2008 3:52 pm ET)
                   

                Sorry Snoop...I dont want to be union.  I'll pass.

                And I checked with all of the unions, Columbus.  They all blackballed you, although the Gravdediggers Union offerrred to dig a hole for you that's larter than the hole you find yourself several times each day here at MMFA.

                Report Abuse
              • Author by sportsguydave (May 12, 2008 11:38 pm ET)
                   

                Like that 40-hour week, Chris? Like your health care? Like vacations, sick leave, all that?

                Then thank unions. Employers didn't just give you these things out of the goodness of their hearts. Working people banded together and fought for them.

                 

                Report Abuse
                • Author by wzwriter (May 13, 2008 12:08 pm ET)
                     

                  Like that 40-hour week, Chris? Like your health care? Like vacations, sick leave, all that?

                  Then thank unions. Employers didn't just give you these things out of the goodness of their hearts. Working people banded together and fought for them.

                  Well said, Sports Guy!!!!   :-)

                  Report Abuse
      • Author by seeryer (May 12, 2008 2:31 pm ET)
           
        Who do you think comes up with the headlines at Drudge?  The point is that Drudge links to an article simply to perpetuate an unfounded, interent right wing smear.  That is conservative misinformation to a tee.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (May 12, 2008 1:55 pm ET)
         

      I actually thought Drudge was taking a dig at 'West Virginia country folk'.  By this point, most voters with theirs heads not buried in the sand know that Obama is not Muslim.  Maybe he was pointing out that there are still voters with no contact with reality, living deep in Appalachia.

       

      Also - note to Josh Fry of Williamson, if you have to preface a statement with "I'm not a racist, but...", well, yes, actually you are. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Science101 (May 12, 2008 1:59 pm ET)
           

        Also - note to Josh Fry of Williamson, if you have to preface a statement with "I'm not a racist, but...", well, yes, actually you are. 

        No it doesnt.  It may mean that he is uncomfortable about talking about race because of all the race baiters who purposely take others out on context to further their agenda.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (May 12, 2008 2:19 pm ET)
             

          No, it does. It's the same as someone who says, "I'm not racist. I know 10 black people."

          If you can count the number of black people you know, or who have been in your home, you're racist as all get out.

          The funny thing is that Obama is MORE full blooded American than McCain. Why? Obama was born on American soil, McCain was NOT.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Science101 (May 12, 2008 2:31 pm ET)
               

            Wait a minute...so let me get this right.  I went to an elementary, middle, and highschool about 35 miles NE of Cleveland in a nice community.  Our HS had about 1300 people total.  There was only one black person in my entire school, and thats the only black person I never knew until I was about 20 and in college.

            So that made me a racist?

            Get off your high horse and making stupid accusations.  Just becuase you dont know many black peopel doesnt mean you are racist. 

            Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (May 12, 2008 2:36 pm ET)
                 
              My daddy always said if ya have to tell someone you're a christian, you're probably not. In my opinion, the same rule has applied to those who go out of their way telling you they aren't a racist. If you really aren't, you shouldn't have to advertise it.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Science101 (May 12, 2008 2:40 pm ET)
                   

                Maybe some people need to - because they are assumed by liberals (such as the poster above) to automatically be a racist for the sole reason that they dont know many black people. 

                Some people grow up im small towns that are predominatly, or all, white and never leave.  There is no proof that they are racist, just do not have experience with people of different races.

                Race baiting at its finest.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by snoopy (May 12, 2008 2:53 pm ET)
                     

                  Actually, I can agree with you there. I've told the story here before about my 1st experience with a black family. I never saw one in Frankfort until I was in 9th grade selling magazine subscriptions. They lived way out in the country and quite out of the way. So yes, that doesn't make one a racist, it's how you treat them when you do meet them that determines the direction you will be branded.

                  People just want to be treated with respect regardless of race, creed or sex. If you are able to tread that path, you are probably not a racist.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by magnolialover (May 12, 2008 3:38 pm ET)
                       

                    My whole point, is as others have said, if you claim to be something, or in this case, something you're not, chances are good that you are. Sort of like the guys who feel like they have to tell the world that they're not gay, and the chances are good, that they are (for examples, see certain Congressional members from the GOP).

                    Look Columbus I live in the South. I know what happens here. Racism is alive, and flourishing. The first thing I think of if someone tells me that they're not a racist, is that they're either about to say something racially insensitive, or that they're just a plain old racist bigot.

                    You growing up in a small town and only knowing one black person of course does not make you a racist, not in the least. I'm always willing to give people the benefit of the doubt, but when something like "I'm not a racist, but..." tumbles from someone's mouth, chances are good, they're a racist.

                    I heard a comedy skit once, I think it was Chris Rock. He was talking about the racist comments John Rocker, formerly of the Atlanta Braves had made about black folks, and then Rocker went on to say he's not a racist. He's had 4 or 5 black people over to my house. As the comic said, "If you've got to tell me how many black people you know, or have had over your house. You're racist as a motherf----r."

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by snoopy (May 12, 2008 3:50 pm ET)
                         
                      I understand, I am only agreeing with Columbus on the scenario he presented. He did try to change the subject with the strawman he set up, and as I noted, "as my daddy always said...". Coming from Michigan, and you being in NC, sure seems to be a lot of truth to that.
                      Report Abuse
            • Author by wzwriter (May 12, 2008 6:05 pm ET)
                 

              So that made me a racist?

              No.  Your racist posts make you a racist.

              Report Abuse
          • Author by achrispage6992 (May 12, 2008 3:28 pm ET)
               

            If you can count the number of black people you know, or who have been in your home, you're racist as all get out.

            That could be one of the most ridiculous statements I have ever read. It assumes that one must eagerly seek out black people and have them in your home so you won't be a racist. How many black people must you know and have in your home before your not considered racist any longer Magnolia? What about those rascally over bearing racists on those reservations in this country? Is a black person considered racist if they can count the number of white people they know? Jesus man, your better than this.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by magnolialover (May 12, 2008 3:40 pm ET)
                 

              I was trying to put something in context that didn't come out so well. I apologize.

              If someone prefaces a conversation that they're having about black folks with "I know this many black people" or something like "I'm not a racist, but..." chances are good, they're a racist.

              My argument came out stupid, I retract.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by achrispage6992 (May 12, 2008 4:03 pm ET)
                   
                Fair enough. I knew something was wrong here. Your posts usually make much more sense than that. I get your drift though. Point taken.
                Report Abuse
    • Author by captfoster2 (May 12, 2008 1:56 pm ET)
         

      "Josh Fry, a 24-year-old ambulance driver from Williamson, insisted he was not racist but said he would feel more comfortable with Mr McCain, the 71-year-old Vietnam war hero, in the White House. "I want someone who is a full-blooded American as president," he said"

      How very, very sad that we have fellow citizens that can actually say this!  He believes himself not to be a racist and yet claims he wants a full-blooded American as president.....

      What I wonder.... did Mr Fry mean by that? Barack was born in Hawaii and grew up in Chicago....... how exactly is this not American enough.....

      Oh wait....... it must be that funny sounding name that the race baiting right-wing keeps bringing up to scare people into submission!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Science101 (May 12, 2008 2:03 pm ET)
           

        the race baiting right-wing

        Easy there slugger.  If you're going to make an accusation, at least do it correctly.  The far left - NAACP, NAN, ACLU, and others such as black theology preachers are the race baiters.  The far right - are typicall just racists.

        Unless, you are saying that race baiting is the same as being a racist - and that part i will agree.  "Race baiting" is just a coined term for social acceptable of black on white racism by accusing "the man" for "holding me down".

        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (May 12, 2008 2:22 pm ET)
             

          There literally is NO such thing as black on white racism.

          Why?

          Race + power = racism.

          African Americans in most situations don't have said power, so they fail to be racists.

          Can they say bad things about white people and other groups? Of course, but they hold no sway, and or power over those groups, like white people have since the inception of this country over black people.

          The simple fact that you fail to see how minorities are held down "by the man" as you state it tells me you don't know what the heck is going on in the country around you.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Science101 (May 12, 2008 2:32 pm ET)
               

            You dont need power to be a racist you moron.  All you need the hatred for another classification of people due to their skin color or beliefs.

             

            Report Abuse
            • Author by mary59 (May 12, 2008 2:47 pm ET)
                 
              Your comments have nothing to do with capt foster's point.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Science101 (May 12, 2008 2:58 pm ET)
                   

                I was commenting on Capt's claim of the "race baiting right", as well as Magnolia's assertion that you cannot be black and be racist against whites.

                Both are garbage accusations and carry about as much merit as Puff The Magic Dragon.

                But thanks for playing Mary.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by mary59 (May 12, 2008 3:03 pm ET)
                     
                  And I'm talking about Capt. Foster's post quoting the comments of the man from West Virginia to which you posted some deflections not at all about what he said. This ignoramus wanted John McCain because he was somehow "more American" than Obama.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by magnolialover (May 12, 2008 3:44 pm ET)
                 

              Yes, you do.

              At least in my opinion. Racism is a lot deeper than just not liking someone because of their skin color, or ethnic make up. It's how you lord power over someone in a minority class that is really insidious. I'm not saying that hating someone because of their skin color is acceptable, it's not, but there is also a big power play in there as well.

              I firmly believe that there are plenty of black people who hate white people, but it's not because of the color of their skin. It's because of the things that the white folks have done to the black folks over the years of being in this country, and how they have mis-used and mis-treated the black race, and other minorities as well (seems as though these days, it's better to trash hispanics).

              A lot of the times, there are deep rooted reasons as to WHY black people hate white people, and there are also lots of times there is no reason, except for skin color, as to why white people hate black people.

              I'm sure you don't see the difference.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Brabantio (May 12, 2008 3:53 pm ET)
                   
                1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race 2 : racial prejudice or discrimination I agree that most black people have reasons to dislike white people based on systemic racism, but that's far different from saying there's no such thing as black-on-white racism.  You can look at any number of individuals and their comments and say they're talking about the behavior of white people, but that doesn't mean that there can't be a black person who thinks white people are inherently inferior.  I think what you mean is that there is no systemic racism against white people, which is not the same as racism itself.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by magnolialover (May 12, 2008 3:56 pm ET)
                     
                  I stand corrected. I think what you stated, about systemic racism against white people from black, is what I was trying ham handidly to get through. You have stated what I wanted to, only better. Thanks.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by doggone-ga (May 13, 2008 10:22 am ET)
                 

              "You dont need power to be a racist you moron. All you need the hatred for another classification of people due to their skin color or beliefs."

              I agree you don't need power to be racist...but "hatred for" another group people is bigotry. Racism is bigotry against those of a different race PLUS the belief in the supriority of one's own race AND a corresponding belief in the inferiority of the despised race.

              For instance: I'm bigotted agains racists, but I'm not racist because I don't like racism of ANY kind. Plus, I don't think racists are inferior...just sadly and seriously misinformed.

              Report Abuse
          • Author by achrispage6992 (May 12, 2008 3:31 pm ET)
               
            so your telling us that there are no black people who think there race is superior to the white race? Your dead wrong there sir. The color of your skin does not indicate whether or not your a racist.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (May 12, 2008 6:09 pm ET)
           

        "Josh Fry, a 24-year-old ambulance driver from Williamson, insisted he was not racist but said he would feel more comfortable with Mr McCain, the 71-year-old Vietnam war hero, in the White House. "I want someone who is a full-blooded American as president," he said"

        What's really funny about that comment is that since Barack Obama was born on American soil, he was an American at birth.  John McCain, OTOH, was born on a Naval Base in the Panama Canal Zone, and there are many web sites out there that are disputing his eligibility for the presidency on that basis.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (May 12, 2008 2:04 pm ET)
         

      Let us correct this whole nonsense about Obamas' name right now. I think different groups should claim him as thier own and then he would get 80% of the national vote.

      OBamma---Southern guy who went to Alabama (redneck vote is secure)

      O'Bama---Irish kid from Chicago (Imagine what St. Pat's Day will be like)

      Obama----ends with a vowel (He has my people stomping the grapes )

      Hussein Obama---got the Iraq/Mid Eastern American vote tied up

      Barry H. Obama---farmer from Iowa (start husking the corn)

      B. H. Obama---that should help with the elitist vote.

      Barry Bob Obama--he wins West Virgina in a landslide.

      For anyone to care what the ever fair-minded people in the hills (have eyes) of West by God Virginia think, they should look in the mirror and repeat to themselves over and over...it is West Virginia where you can get an MBA for a low price. Last time I was in WV, I met a guy who introduced me to his wife and sister but thier was only one woman there. 'nuff said about that bigoted state.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (May 12, 2008 2:11 pm ET)
           
        Is it any surprise that West Virginia voted for Bush in 2004? Let'em eat 'possum. ;>)
        Report Abuse
        • Author by princeofwheels (May 12, 2008 2:15 pm ET)
             
          They actually have a wide-variety of roadkill to chose from...but that possum is a delicacy.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (May 12, 2008 2:19 pm ET)
               
            I hear 'possum meat is real tender...better for chewing with less than a full mouth of teeth.  ;>)
            Report Abuse
        • Author by Science101 (May 12, 2008 2:17 pm ET)
             

          And with comments like that, you wonder why gun-owning, religious people in remote areas of the eastern mountains dont vote for Obama or trust him. 

          For being against misinformation and parsing of hurtful conservative words, you sure know how to speak them against people who arent there to protect themselves or respond.

          How big of you.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by tommy (May 12, 2008 2:22 pm ET)
               

            I was wondering when the first posts would surface taking swipes at West Virginians.....after all, they are just backwards, gun toting, roadkill eatin', toothless mountain folk who deserve to made fun of, and who needs their votes anyway.

             

            Report Abuse
            • Author by magnolialover (May 12, 2008 2:23 pm ET)
                 
              That's what we think of them down here in North Carolina. But that's just "local" humor. I'm fairly certain that their jokes are about the same for North Carolinians.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by jeter2 (May 12, 2008 2:47 pm ET)
                   

                Yeah well us regular, typical, average folks here in Massachusetts refer to Liberals as Moonbats. But hey it's just local humor ;-)

                Report Abuse
                • Author by princeofwheels (May 12, 2008 3:10 pm ET)
                     
                  Jeter, seriously, what the hell is a moon bat? Something they hit the ball with on the moon? Is it a real creature? I shall go a googling..
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by princeofwheels (May 12, 2008 3:15 pm ET)
                       
                    I looked it up. Printed it out. And as usual it is a hate filled piece of trash used to describe some of the citizens of West Virginia(moon barkers). I take offense to your insinuations.  Pistols at twenty paces. Anybody here from WV can count to 20.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by jeter2 (May 12, 2008 3:33 pm ET)
                         

                      Moonbat (also "barking moonbat" and "moonbat crazy") is a term often used currently in U.S. politics as a political epithet referring to anyone that is believed to be liberal or on the left

                      My favorite Conservative radio talk show host, Howie Carr [WRKO 680 Boston] uses the term to describe Libs here in Massachusett. But I've heard it used by others to describe the whole bunch of ya nation wide ;-)

                      You'll have to come up with something else to call the West Virginians.

                       

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by magnolialover (May 12, 2008 3:46 pm ET)
                           
                        Well Jeter, when I lived in Maine, we used to refer to folks from Mass as Massholes... But, again, local humor. ;-)
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by jeter2 (May 12, 2008 4:44 pm ET)
                             
                          Massholes...I like that. It fits ;-)
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by juliajayne (May 12, 2008 6:35 pm ET)
                               
                            I take back calling you a con turd the other day. I like masshole much better :-) Really, sorry about that. I just thought you were being hard headed but I shouldn't have called you a con turd :-) Do ya forgive me?
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by snoopy (May 12, 2008 7:48 pm ET)
                                 

                              JJ, I was perty darn sure you called Jeter a "coontard" as in those droppings WV coons leave behind when they relieve themselves! ;)

                              i"m still mad that I passed out the other day and missed you taking advantage. But you did convince me to stop drinking! ;)

                              Report Abuse
                            • Author by jeter2 (May 12, 2008 8:45 pm ET)
                                 

                              Of course I forgive you, heck everyone knows I'm wrapped around your little finger :-)

                              I only get "hard headed" when I find myself surrounded by a herd of Libs that won't even consider other possibilities.

                              You may refer to me as a Masshole if I can call you my little Texass?

                              Come on folks, aren't Julia & I the cutest political couple since Mary Matalin & James Carville? ;-)

                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by juliajayne (May 12, 2008 9:39 pm ET)
                                   
                                Hey, at least we ARE cute, Those two are uglier than a mud fence.
                                Report Abuse
                • Author by wzwriter (May 12, 2008 4:22 pm ET)
                     

                  Yeah well us regular, typical, average folks here in Massachusetts refer to Liberals as Moonbats. But hey it's just local humor ;-)

                  And the liberals in Massachusetts refer to the conservatives there as "freaks of nature"....  :-)

                  Report Abuse
            • Author by Science101 (May 12, 2008 2:34 pm ET)
                 
              Democrats may not need hillbilly republican votes....but republicans dont need ghetto democrat votes either. 
              Report Abuse
              • Author by snoopy (May 12, 2008 2:39 pm ET)
                   
                Now you're really proving yourself to be one of those big tent right wingers. You just alienated 60% of the country with just 3 posts.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Science101 (May 12, 2008 2:42 pm ET)
                     
                  Yeah - just evaded 60% of the population, and 5% of the tax payers lol.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by pete592 (May 12, 2008 2:39 pm ET)
                   
                Then why does the right-wing slime machine expend so much energy telling blacks that Democrats are the enemy of the black people?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Science101 (May 12, 2008 2:43 pm ET)
                     
                  Same reason as Democrats claim that they are for the "middle class", when they are really only elected because of the free handouts given to low income households.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by pete592 (May 12, 2008 2:47 pm ET)
                       

                    What "free handouts"? 

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Science101 (May 12, 2008 2:50 pm ET)
                         

                      Let me rephrase that...free to them, costly to me.

                      • Welfare
                      • Food Stamps
                      • Section 8
                      • Medicaid
                      • Unemployment

                      Need I start citing more social programs targetted at low income households who do not pay federal taxes, or pay extremely low amounts of federal taxes?

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by snoopy (May 12, 2008 2:57 pm ET)
                           
                        No, just point out the fact that minus SS and medicare, all those other "handouts" are nothing more than a drop in the bucket of our overall GDP.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by Science101 (May 12, 2008 3:00 pm ET)
                             
                          Social Program encompass a far higher % of our total budget than anything else, including military.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by snoopy (May 12, 2008 3:22 pm ET)
                               

                            That claim is only true when you add in Social Security and Medicare. All those other little programs that conservatives always allude to make up only 12% of the total budget.

                            • $586.1 billion (+7.0%) - Social Security
                            • $548.8 billion (+9.0%) - Defense[2]
                            • $394.5 billion (+12.4%) - Medicare
                            • $294.0 billion (+2.0%) - Unemployment and welfare
                            • $276.4 billion (+2.9%) - Medicaid and other health related
                            • $243.7 billion (+13.4%) - Interest on debt
                            • $89.9 billion (+1.3%) - Education and training
                            • $76.9 billion (+8.1%) - Transportation
                            • $72.6 billion (+5.8%) - Veterans' benefits
                            • $43.5 billion (+9.2%) - Administration of justice
                            • $33.1 billion (+5.7%) - Natural resources and environment
                            • $32.5 billion (+15.4%) - Foreign affairs
                            • $27.0 billion (+3.7%) - Agriculture
                            • $26.8 billion (+28.7%) - Community and regional development
                            • $25.0 billion (+4.0%) - Science and technology
                            • $23.5 billion (+0.8%) - Energy
                            • $20.1 billion (+11.4%) - General government

                            Here's the pie chart for 2007. Keep in mind that the war budget is not included, the % shown would decrease if you added in Iraq and other supplemental funding.

                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by princeofwheels (May 12, 2008 3:25 pm ET)
                                 
                              Snoopy, here you go with facts again. Shame on you. It will just force Colombus to go to some Con-type site and debunk actual government figures. Shame twice on you Snoops.
                              Report Abuse
                          • Author by princeofwheels (May 12, 2008 3:22 pm ET)
                               
                            Columbus...who do you think decided that HANDOUTS were necessary in this country? Do you honestly believe that if the social programs were not in place that riots would not take place? People will feed their children one way or another. But of course, you will have your six-shooter loaded and be ready to take action...
                            Report Abuse
                      • Author by pete592 (May 12, 2008 3:00 pm ET)
                           

                        You have no idea what you are talking about. 

                        Unemployment is not free to the recipients, at least not in my state it's not.  You have to earn your benefits by holding down a job and contributing to the unemployment fund until you lose that job through no fault of your own.  Then and only then can you claim benefits. 

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by Science101 (May 12, 2008 3:23 pm ET)
                             

                          I consider unemployment a free ride because many people, if not the majority of people on it, are very well able to do a job and get a job easily - but it does not encompass the type of work or salary they demand. 

                          I firmly believe that they can get a job making a lower wage, and keep at that, until they get a better job.  After all, it would be better than sitting around collecting a check for not going to work at all.  I would even be open to letting them collect a check in return for doing something, anything at all.  Cleaning up parks, freeways, schools, painting public buildings, anything.

                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by snoopy (May 12, 2008 3:27 pm ET)
                               
                            I'll let ya know how that works later this year when my building is closed. I mean, who doesn't look forward to switching from manufacturing test engineer with a bachelor's degree to burger flipper or some other low end job? That 90%+ cut in pay will mean nothing compared to the fact that I will be working. Woohoo!
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by magnolialover (May 12, 2008 3:59 pm ET)
                                 
                              Snoop did you say you were in Michigan? The company I work for is looking for test engineers in Auburn Hills.
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by snoopy (May 12, 2008 4:02 pm ET)
                                   
                                I grew up in Michigan, I now live in Austin Texas. What kind of company is it?
                                Report Abuse
                          • Author by pete592 (May 12, 2008 4:17 pm ET)
                               

                            "I consider unemployment a free ride..."

                            This is where your argument falls flat out of the gate.  No, it's not a free ride.  It's an insurance policy that you purchase that pays out when you lose your job and are looking for another one. 

                            "...because many people, if not the majority of people on it, are very well able to do a job and get a job easily - but it does not encompass the type of work or salary they demand."

                            Please link to your statistics that back this up.  You can't draw this conclusion based upon the experience of a couple people you may know.

                            Report Abuse
                      • Author by achrispage6992 (May 12, 2008 4:01 pm ET)
                           
                        Fact of the matter is that most income taxes are paid by the top % of earners. But most taxes in general including social security and medicare i.e payroll all the way down to city taxes are paid by the folks you despise. They make up the bulk of this nation, they are the consumers, they pay for your roads and your police forces. Like it or not, those uneducated working masses not only are the ones who seem to do all the dying everytime we go to war but they buy the goods and pay the taxes. You should give em' some slack, really.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by dbeden4153 (May 12, 2008 4:11 pm ET)
                           

                        Columbus, are you a Christian?  then no doubt you've heard the phrase "Whatever you did to the least of these, you did unto me."

                        Frankly, I'm with Warren Buffett's thinking on this.   Those who have benefited the most from our capitalist system should pay more for that privilege than those who have not benefited.  If you make a million dollars a year, but pay the same tax rate as someone who makes 30,000 a year, you're going to pay more money, but you won't have to decide between feeding your children or paying the bills.  Right now, that's not the case, and that should change.  The whole concept of "What's mine is mine" is antithetical to who we are as caring human beings.  

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by wzwriter (May 12, 2008 4:29 pm ET)
                             

                          Columbus, are you a Christian? 

                          The answer to that question is self-evident.  Since Columbus devotes most of his posts to spreading lies and misinformation, false generalizations about groups that either think or look differently than he does, or general nastiness, chances are that he IS a Christian.  And probably one of those non-denominational megachurches that devote themselves to spreading hate in Jesus' name.

                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by snoopy (May 12, 2008 4:35 pm ET)
                               
                            I would say Sunday Christian. Real Christians try not to act that way.
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by wzwriter (May 12, 2008 6:23 pm ET)
                                 

                              I would say Sunday Christian. Real Christians try not to act that way.

                              Precisely.  As the late great Ann Landers once said, "Going to church doesn't make a man a Christian any morre than going into a garage makes him an automobile."

                              Report Abuse
                            • Author by Science101 (May 12, 2008 10:13 pm ET)
                                 

                              Actually I was raised Catholic until about 8th grade, but have not practiced in about 15 years.

                              However, I dont see what someone's religious, or absence of religion, has to do with their view on unemployment benefits.

                              Report Abuse
                      • Author by pithaughn (May 12, 2008 6:55 pm ET)
                           
                        Sorry, you are all wrong about Medicaid. My Dad paid taxes for 52 years before he got a dime of Medicaid. Even with the weekly $1,700 barage of drugs that's keeps the old boy going, he will never spend anywhere near half of what he paid in. Keep the myths coming sonny.
                        Report Abuse
            • Author by pete592 (May 12, 2008 2:37 pm ET)
                 
              But you're quick to excuse Drudge for his generalization of "West Virginia folk" in his headline.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by tommy (May 12, 2008 2:40 pm ET)
                   
                Did I excuse Drudge?  Huh.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by pete592 (May 12, 2008 2:44 pm ET)
                     
                  "Where is the misinformation then?"
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by tommy (May 12, 2008 2:54 pm ET)
                       
                    I was talking about the Financial Times article, I specifically said that was irrespective of Drudge's motives.  He took a swipe at West Virginia too with his cute little headline.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by pete592 (May 12, 2008 4:24 pm ET)
                         

                      He cited a source (Leonard smoking in front of the fire station) that's not credible.  That source stated a falsehood about Obama.  Obama is a Democrat. 

                      It's false, it's not credible, it targets a Democrat.

                      It's conservative misinformation.

                      Report Abuse
            • Author by dbeden4153 (May 12, 2008 3:55 pm ET)
                 

              "I was wondering when the first posts would surface taking swipes at West Virginians.....after all, they are just backwards, gun toting, roadkill eatin', toothless mountain folk who deserve to made fun of, and who needs their votes anyway."

              Tommy, actually...they are, for the most part.  I'm saying this with direct family connections to West Virginia, and whoo boy, I can tell you some stories.

              Like, for instance, Punk Hill.  No, that's not a town, it's a man's God given name.  He's in his 80's and in jail for the rest of his life for shooting a cop in the face and running off into the woods for three months.  The only reason he was caught was because he crawled to the police station...he couldn't walk because he had gangreen up to his knees.  This was my uncle's father's best friend.

              He was also shot in the liver after his ex-wife wouldn't let him see her kids when he was smashed. 

              My uncle (my direct connection to WV) was drunk in a bar when he was 12 and saw his best friends dad shot dead right in front of him over a bar tab. 

              The first time my Aunt visited his family (around '94), they were driving through the mountains and she kept seeing people walking along the side of the road carrying gas cans.  After the 3rd or 4th person, she asked my uncle why there were so many people with gas cans.  She thought there wasn't many gas stations or this was a particularly bad stretch of road where lots of people run out of gas.  Turns out they were huffing it.

              And at least as far as my uncle's family is concerned, they really are exactly as you described them.  However, I believe they have every right to vote as I do.  Of course, most of them are felons, so only a few here and there actually can vote.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by mary59 (May 12, 2008 11:30 pm ET)
                   
                That's a mighty entertaining post. I went thru WV some years ago and do remember passing through some back country areas that had such an eerie strangeness that we couldn't wait to get moving on down the road.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (May 12, 2008 2:23 pm ET)
               
            F*** West Virginia and the dumb, hillbilly racists who live there... Got that? Any Democrat has about as much chance of winning West Virginia as winning the Powerball lottery. Let'em eat 'possum and cling to their pathetic, racist lives.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by princeofwheels (May 12, 2008 2:26 pm ET)
                 

              Irony, if you get a chance, get the recipe for blackened possum...sorry, just grilled possum.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by IRONY 101 (May 12, 2008 2:28 pm ET)
                   
                The meat is more tender around the tire marks...  ;>)
                Report Abuse
            • Author by tommy (May 12, 2008 2:27 pm ET)
                 
              It's too bad you can't see how pathetic your intolerant, bigoted and hateful anger is, perhaps you'd better work on that instead of spewing it towards an entire state of people, how sad.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by IRONY 101 (May 12, 2008 2:31 pm ET)
                   
                This is politics, Tommy. Too bad your delicate sensibilities are offended. As for West Virginia, why bother? Even the DEMOCRATS are racists??? Can you imagine what the hillbilly REPUBLICANS in West Virginia must say about Barack Obama??
                Report Abuse
              • Author by jeter2 (May 12, 2008 2:45 pm ET)
                   

                F*** West Virginia and the dumb, hillbilly racists who live there... Got that? Any Democrat has about as much chance of winning West Virginia as winning the Powerball lottery. Let'em eat 'possum and cling to their pathetic, racist lives... Irony

                 

                It's too bad you can't see how pathetic your intolerant, bigoted and hateful anger is, perhaps you'd better work on that instead of spewing it towards an entire state of people, how sad....Tommy

                 

                Now now Tommy, we all know that the Libs here only believe Conservatives are capable of intolerant, bigoted, hateful anger....what a hoot when those Liberal masks of alleged tolerance slip off...eh?

                Don't ya just love Liberal hypocrisy? ;-)

                Report Abuse
                • Author by Governor (May 12, 2008 2:50 pm ET)
                     
                  Speaking only for myself, I don't give a rat's ass what people say about people from certain states.  What pisses me off is intolerance of people based on race and gender.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by tommy (May 12, 2008 2:56 pm ET)
                       
                    Selective intolerance is a wonderfully convenient thing, how admirable.
                    Report Abuse
                • Author by IRONY 101 (May 12, 2008 2:51 pm ET)
                     
                  I am intolerant...of ignorant, redneck, racist crackers who help elect people like George W. Bush and who perpetuate the Republican Party in office. It's a joke for any Democrat to even campaign in West Virginia.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by IRONY 101 (May 12, 2008 2:51 pm ET)
                     
                  I am intolerant...of ignorant, redneck, racist crackers who help elect people like George W. Bush and who perpetuate the Republican Party in office. It's a joke for any Democrat to even campaign in West Virginia.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by princeofwheels (May 12, 2008 2:51 pm ET)
                     
                  Whose angry?
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by tommy (May 12, 2008 3:07 pm ET)
                     

                  Yes Jeter, it is amazing.  And what is even more amazing is that those same liberals who hate WV because they are redeck racists usually don't stop their intolerant hatred at just one state's border, whereever they can stereotype another group, or state where people who don't share their "inclusive" big tent ideology, they will find other disparaging insults to further display their elitist attitude. Many people can see right through that.

                  Intolerance and bigotry have very fluid boundaries. 

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by IRONY 101 (May 12, 2008 3:11 pm ET)
                       

                    "...disparaging insults to further display their elitist attitude."

                    Disparaging insults directed towards ignorant racists (who helped elect George W. Bush) is an elitist attitude? If denouncing ignorant racists is elitist I'm proud to be an elitist.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by tommy (May 12, 2008 3:14 pm ET)
                         
                      Oh please, you are not denouncing racists or racism, you are insulting an entire state of people and showing your incredible intolerant bigotry because they voted for a different candidate than you did.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by IRONY 101 (May 12, 2008 3:25 pm ET)
                           
                        Tommy, did you even bother to read the article? Did you read my remarks? Have you ever been to West Virginia? IMO, West Virginia is a predominantly racist state. A predominantly Republican stae, too (Not that it matters because the Democrats are racist too.) I denounce West Virgina and all the ignorant racists who live there. Those West Virginians who aren't ignorant racists? I suggest they move elsewhere.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by tommy (May 12, 2008 3:30 pm ET)
                             

                          How anyone can intelligently take a swipe at an entire state is beyond me, and then say if live there but you are not a racist, you should move.  Incredible.

                          Next time someone comes on these boards and makes a similar sweeping, ridiculous and insulting generalization I would hope you tell them how that makes perfect sense, damn straight.......

                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by wzwriter (May 12, 2008 6:29 pm ET)
                               

                            How anyone can intelligently take a swipe at an entire state is beyond me...

                            I can understand it, Tommy.  I was born in NJ and now live in Texas.  People on web boards are always posting stuff about how everyone from New Jersey is in the Mafia, and how everyone from Texas is a redneck hick.

                            Report Abuse
                        • Author by commonsenseliberal (May 12, 2008 5:32 pm ET)
                             
                          What they're not seeing, Irony, is that you're denouncing certain folks who live in WV.  It might come off as you insulting the entire state, but if there are individuals in WV who are good Democrats (not racist, etc.), you're definitely not talking about them.  Don't let Tommy, et al. corner you...
                          Report Abuse
                    • Author by Governor (May 12, 2008 3:19 pm ET)
                         
                      I’m rather taken aback by your intolerance of ignorant racists.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by tommy (May 12, 2008 3:24 pm ET)
                           
                        But I am not taken aback in the least why you condone intolerance of states, but not individuals.......it makes no sense, of course.
                        Report Abuse
            • Author by achrispage6992 (May 12, 2008 4:07 pm ET)
                 
              Wow didn't Bill Clinton (Democrat) win West Virginia and Kentucky for that matter twice?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Governor (May 12, 2008 4:16 pm ET)
                   
                Nope and nope.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Governor (May 12, 2008 4:18 pm ET)
                     
                  I'm a boob.  Yes and yes.  Very good point.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by snoopy (May 12, 2008 4:23 pm ET)
                       

                    That would be two boobs, right?

                    Hey, cutie, what are you doin'? ;)

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Governor (May 12, 2008 4:28 pm ET)
                         

                      Late shift at IHOP.  Just got fired by Hooters.

                      (2 boobs, 1 leg) 

                      Report Abuse
              • Author by IRONY 101 (May 12, 2008 4:58 pm ET)
                   
                Yes, West Virginia went to Bill Clinton in 1992 and 1996. But WV went to George W. Bush in 2000 and 2004. From what I've read WV looks like red state in 2008. Hillary Clinton doesn't poll too bad in WV but Obama is very weak there. That is consistent with the demographics of the respective Democratic candidates' support. Hillary Clinton does well with less-educated white people who earn less than $50K a year. Less-educated white people are not going to vote for Obama. I say why should the Democrats even bother with West Virginia.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by princeofwheels (May 12, 2008 2:24 pm ET)
               

            Y'all nevers bein to our state thar Mr Colombus. We don't like black peoples unless they can throw a football or shoots a basketball.

            You have got to be kidding me...you can read the hateful comments about Obama above. And try comprehending them. I am surprised nobody used the term "that colored boy". I have in the good old state of WV.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by IRONY 101 (May 12, 2008 2:38 pm ET)
                 
              Prince, the funny (?) part is that this is what West Virginia DEOMOCRATS are saying about Obama. Can you imagine what the Republican goobers say about that colored boy?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by princeofwheels (May 12, 2008 2:47 pm ET)
                   

                I am through there quite often. And it just isn't Obama. The dislike for anyone who is not "their kind" is disgusting. You should hear some of the remarks concerning Japanese, Koreans, Muslims etc. Then, no one is permitted to talk about them. Pshaw... Waiting for Colombus to say "What is the difference between your hatred and thiers?  I don't hate, they do.

                Report Abuse
              • Author by jeter2 (May 12, 2008 2:51 pm ET)
                   

                Prince, the funny (?) part is that this is what West Virginia DEOMOCRATS are saying about Obama. Can you imagine what the Republican goobers say about that colored boy?

                So you admit it's Democrats, but are suggesting Republicans are saying worse? Nah, I think those racist Democrats have it covered.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by IRONY 101 (May 12, 2008 2:54 pm ET)
                     
                  Ignorant racists from WEST VIRGINIA... correct.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by jeter2 (May 12, 2008 3:06 pm ET)
                       

                    You left out the word Democratic.

                    Ignorant Democratic racists from WEST VIRGINIA.

                    When MMFA quotes the other side on a thread here, then you can include them :-)

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by IRONY 101 (May 12, 2008 3:18 pm ET)
                         
                      LOL...!!! Oh, yea...only the registered Democratic hillbillies (who vote Republican for President) are ignorant racists in West Virginia. Miraculously, the Republicans in West Virginia are downright LIBERAL in their wisdom and tolerance. Of course, there are no ignorant Republican racists in West Virginia...the Republicans are all well-scrubbed, educated models of tolerance. Jeter, you need to get out in the real world more,,,
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by jeter2 (May 12, 2008 3:43 pm ET)
                           

                        Jeter, you need to get out in the real world more,,,

                        I can't I'm being held prisoner here in Massachusetts by a bunch of Liberal Moonbats ;-)

                        Look Irony, I've been to several southern states, but have never traveled through or know a great deal about West Virginia. You have stereotyped an entire state. Heck maybe everyone down there are members of the KKK...but if not, maybe you shouldn't describe the entire population as a bunch of racists. No doubt there are some ignorant folks there, but that could be said about almost every state.

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by Governor (May 12, 2008 3:51 pm ET)
                             

                          maybe you shouldn't describe the entire population as a bunch of racists.

                           

                          But that's exactly what you did last week when describing Massachusetts. 

                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by jeter2 (May 12, 2008 4:19 pm ET)
                               
                            Gov, I don't think I called the entire population racists. But I can't remember the thread, so if you can tell me which one it was, I'll go check it out. And if I'm wrong, I'll admit it. But if you're full of sh#t, then it's naptime for you without your binky. Deal?
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by Governor (May 12, 2008 4:25 pm ET)
                                 
                              Do whatever you got to do to justify your generalizations. I'm out of time.
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by tommy (May 12, 2008 4:40 pm ET)
                                   
                                HAHAH!!!!  I love it when you lob an accusation you can't back up and then bolt.......c'mon Governor, let's see the link where Jeter called his entire home state racists, I missed it too.
                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by Governor (May 12, 2008 4:47 pm ET)
                                     
                                  He generalized more about Boston, but also about people in Massachusetts and he did so with regards to racism.  My only point is that he's being a little hypocritical and/or disingenuous here.
                                  Report Abuse
                                  • Author by jeter2 (May 12, 2008 4:54 pm ET)
                                       

                                    No Gov. That was August Heat who generalized about Boston. I agreed with him that Boston had a bad rep way back when, but it had improved. And I never said the entire population was racists.

                                    You are now being sent to your crib. Without your binky.

                                    Tool.

                                    Report Abuse
                                    • Author by tommy (May 12, 2008 5:00 pm ET)
                                         

                                      Jeter, I will have to weigh this he said/he said conflict between you and Governor strictly on past credibility.......gotta call this one for you, based on a narrow landslide.

                                      :) 

                                      Report Abuse
                                      • Author by jeter2 (May 12, 2008 5:20 pm ET)
                                           

                                        Tommy we gotta stop playing with little kids like Gov. It's just too easy.

                                        You change his diaper, & I'll give him a bottle & put him in his crib ;-)

                                        Report Abuse
                                    • Author by Governor (May 12, 2008 5:04 pm ET)
                                         
                                      You agreed that Boston is racist and added that it’s improving.  Sweeping statements about an entire population.  Maybe you shouldn't describe the entire population as a bunch of improving racists.  And maybe you should not resort to name-calling.  And maybe Tommy’s ready for his reach around.
                                      Report Abuse
                                      • Author by tommy (May 12, 2008 5:09 pm ET)
                                           

                                        You call someone a hypocrite and disingenuous for name calling? Gee, how does your "fcuk you" directed at me fit into that, Governor? When you dig yourself into a hole, you even become more of a cartoon.

                                         

                                        Report Abuse
                                        • Author by Governor (May 12, 2008 5:13 pm ET)
                                             

                                          You have brought my use of "fcuk off" up about 15 times now in 15 different threads.  The full quote was "If you're going to continue to insult me, then perhaps you should fcuk off"  Please stop being foolish.

                                           

                                          Report Abuse
                                          • Author by tommy (May 12, 2008 5:16 pm ET)
                                               
                                            And every time you call someone a hypocrite or scold them for name calling I will continue to do so........if it takes 15 more times, you will have to live with it....and you look foolish all by yourself.
                                            Report Abuse
                                      • Author by jeter2 (May 12, 2008 5:17 pm ET)
                                           

                                        You agreed that Boston is racist and added that it’s improving.

                                        Wrong. I agreed it once had that reputation, but it had improved.

                                        Can't see the difference? Have your mommy expain it to you.

                                        And Gov sweetie, Boston did have that reputation. Have your mommy look it up for you.

                                        Report Abuse
                                        • Author by Governor (May 12, 2008 5:20 pm ET)
                                             
                                          You have mommy issues.
                                          Report Abuse
                                          • Author by jeter2 (May 12, 2008 5:21 pm ET)
                                               

                                            You have lying issues.

                                            Report Abuse
                                            • Author by tommy (May 12, 2008 5:23 pm ET)
                                                 
                                              Correctamundo!!
                                              Report Abuse
                                            • Author by Governor (May 12, 2008 5:26 pm ET)
                                                 

                                              You claimed last week that Boston had improved somewhat over the years and that the bad race relations today were odd because it is so liberal.   It's ok to just admit that it's ok when you generalize, but you'd rather that other people not do it.

                                              Report Abuse
                                              • Author by jeter2 (May 12, 2008 5:34 pm ET)
                                                   

                                                Did I say the entire state was racist? No.

                                                Did I say the entire city of Boston was racist? No.

                                                I agreed with August Heat that Boston had a bad reputation years ago but race relations had improved. THAT you fool is a fact, not a generalization. Nor is anything else I wrote.

                                                Irony said the entire population of West Virginia was racist.

                                                Seriously Gov you must be numb as a fart if you can distinguish the difference.

                                                 

                                                Tommy he's all yours.

                                                Report Abuse
                                                • Author by tommy (May 12, 2008 5:42 pm ET)
                                                     
                                                  No thanks Jeter, he dug his own hole, I can't sink that low.....
                                                  Report Abuse
                                                • Author by Governor (May 12, 2008 6:29 pm ET)
                                                     
                                                  Do whatever you got to do to justify your generalizations about the entire city of Boston.
                                                  Report Abuse
                                                  • Author by juliajayne (May 12, 2008 6:46 pm ET)
                                                       
                                                    Geeze, I thought my exchange with Eden this weekend was stoopid. You guys beat us out hands down. Well done :-0)
                                                    Report Abuse
                                                    • Author by Governor (May 12, 2008 7:05 pm ET)
                                                         

                                                      Agreed, but Jeter and Tommy won. 

                                                      (they need to hear that)

                                                      Report Abuse
                                                    • Author by jeter2 (May 12, 2008 7:07 pm ET)
                                                         

                                                      Hey Tommy, Gov & I were auditioning a comedy act to rival the 3 Stooges ;-)

                                                      Gov is our Curley.

                                                      So my sweet Julia did we pass the audition? Should we take our show out on the road aka other forums?

                                                      P.S. I'd like to read your exchange with Eden, which thread was it on?

                                                      Report Abuse
                                                      • Author by juliajayne (May 12, 2008 7:19 pm ET)
                                                           

                                                        Ah, forget it. Eden was using lots of words as usual, I was dumb enough to try and defend Dem02020 because I though his point valid. But Eden uses lots more words than I do and he's exhausting. Unless you are trying to become exhausted, really, don't go there.

                                                        As far as yer comdey act, mate,  eeeehhhh, it just wasn't that funny. Dirty nappies just aren't that amusing :-0) But I love it when you and T Rex go off your nut :-0 ,just using a Jeterism - did you see my apology for calling you a con turd?  

                                                        Report Abuse
                                                        • Author by Governor (May 12, 2008 7:27 pm ET)
                                                             
                                                          You kids really like this chat room, huh? 
                                                          Report Abuse
                                                          • Author by juliajayne (May 12, 2008 7:32 pm ET)
                                                               
                                                            Almost as much as you and your honey, Tommy :-0) Come on dude, you have to give me that!
                                                            Report Abuse
                                                            • Author by Governor (May 12, 2008 7:37 pm ET)
                                                                 

                                                              He's still gonna have to loose at least 25 pounds.

                                                              Report Abuse
                                                              • Author by juliajayne (May 12, 2008 7:40 pm ET)
                                                                   
                                                                I thought you liked him a little beefy. Or is that 25lbs needing to come off of his fat head? :-0) Just joking, T.
                                                                Report Abuse
                                                        • Author by jeter2 (May 12, 2008 7:40 pm ET)
                                                             

                                                          Yeah Lady Julia, I agree the diaper & binky humor could use some retooling ;-)

                                                          But it's better than referring to Gov as a retard. Which he is.

                                                          I usually ignore Eden unless I'm high on caffeine & have nothing to do for several hours...one needs energy & time. I'd rather not waste either on Eden, having been there, done that...with no plans to bother ever doing that again. I usually ignore Gov. But when he posts a fabrication or distortion of something I've written, I find it hard to let that pass.

                                                          I didn't see your apology for calling me a Con Turd. Hey sweetie that wasn't a nice thing to say! Was it on one of the old threads? Which one? I was busy all weekend & never got back here till this morning & didn't even go bother to go read Friday threads. Hey I was right about Obama giving old man McCain a dig ...the rest of you were wrong, so what was the point? ;-)

                                                          However I'll go check out the old threads to get your heartfelt gracious apology [cough]

                                                          Report Abuse
                                                          • Author by juliajayne (May 12, 2008 7:45 pm ET)
                                                               
                                                            It's on this thread. About post 80-100 or so. I wouldn't make ya go back to the weekend posts. Miss you on the weekend though. I hope you didn't go away just because of that Heru guy talking some smack about not having a life. I can't get here much during the week. Give Gov a break, man. Besides he's Tommy's squeeze. And he keeps Tommy busy so he doesn't mess up others threads as much (thanks Gov).
                                                            Report Abuse
                                                            • Author by jeter2 (May 12, 2008 8:51 pm ET)
                                                                 

                                                              Ok Julia I found the post. I left you a love note there :-)

                                                              Actually I do occasionally post here on weekends & some weeknights [like now] but I do most of my posting from work. Don't tell my boss :-O

                                                              Nothing Heru says matters to me. The guy has a chip on his shoulder.

                                                              Leave Gov alone? Nah. When children act up you have to discipline them.

                                                              Report Abuse
                                                          • Author by Governor (May 12, 2008 7:47 pm ET)
                                                               
                                                            You are a complete ass to use a dig at me to mock the mentally disabled. 
                                                            Report Abuse
                    • Author by snoopy (May 12, 2008 3:33 pm ET)
                         
                      Jeter, are you baiting Irony? You seem to have become a master baiter... ;)
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by IRONY 101 (May 12, 2008 3:37 pm ET)
                           
                        I can handle myself, Snoop...I am a cunning linguist.  ;>)
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by jeter2 (May 12, 2008 3:47 pm ET)
                           

                        It's Monday Snoop.

                        I'm always extra cute on Mondays ;-)

                        But seriously, no I'm not baiting Irony. I like the guy. I'm just pointing out that if West Virginia is full of racists, they are from both parties.

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by IRONY 101 (May 12, 2008 3:53 pm ET)
                             

                          "I'm just pointing out that if West Virginia is full of racists, they are from both parties."

                          JETER, I'm saying the same thing. Even the Democrats in West Virginia are racists. My point is why should the Democratic Party even bother with West Virginia. The Democrats in West Virginia vote Republican for President. Politically speaking, "F" West Virginia!

                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by jeter2 (May 12, 2008 4:21 pm ET)
                               
                            Ha! You're correct Irony, we do agree. Don't mind me, on Mondays I'm not only extra cute, I'm in a mental fog ;-)
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by IRONY 101 (May 12, 2008 4:26 pm ET)
                                 

                              You're correct Irony, we do agree.

                              Thanks, Jeter...I'm glad someone else shares my "F" West Virginia sentiment. Now, let's get to work on Tommy. ;>)

                              Report Abuse
      • Author by Dem02020 (May 12, 2008 2:57 pm ET)
           

        PrinceOfWheels, you have something there... I think it's true, that the derivation of Sen. Obama's name does truly come from "O'Bama"...

        He is, he's an O'Bama... his heritage traces back to Ireland (I believe), to the small villiage of Bama (hence, his ancestors are "Of Bama", or simply O'Bama)...

        That's the truth! (I believe)

        And of course, those folks from the small villiage of Bama, Ireland, are themselves from somewhere else, and named their villiage from that place: Alabama...

        ...having left the United States (and Alabama) when Paul "Bear" Bryant passed... having left because they believed that upon Bear's passing, The Tide would never Roll again... but everything that ebbs, flows again (the tide demonstrating this truth, twice daily), and Alabama football looks really good right now, in Coach Saban's second year... it's enough to bring the clan from Bama, Ireland, back to Alabama (where they truly belong), and to make Sen. Obama fess up, and admit, that he is truly one of them...

        He is truly O'Bama.

         

        As far as this nonsense goes about the man's first middle or last name... and about the foolishness of a tiny fraction of the Nation, whispering ignorantly to one another that "he's a Muslim, I think, I heard, maybe, I don't really know"...

        We're seeing some part of the hack media echo and comment on this stuff, but purely out of a small-minded malice... and as nothing more than trying to get under the skin of Sen. Obama's supporters (and perhaps under the skin of him and his campaign), and distract and annoy, and maybe even provoke them in this thing...

        But wait... stop... it's nothing really... it's just the ignorant whisperings of a tiny fraction of people, who in truth probably don't even believe it themselves, but just like to shuck and annoy folks, for the reason that they might be so shuckable and easily annoyed...

        It's a small thing, better made fun of, than taken seriously.

        So few actually think the man is a Muslim, or think the sound of his name is anything important... so few are this way now, as to say hardly any... and as to say none at all, by the time of November... maybe none by late August, when Mr. Obama addresses us from Denver...

        In the mean time, we be cool, and have fun.

        We have fun with the tide.

        All things come back to us, by way of it... even Mr. Obama may come clean with the ebb and flow of the tide, and admit the truth to us: His real name is O'Bama, and he (or his kin really) is from Ireland...

         

        And the Alabama Crimson Tide might be the best damned football team in the nation, this fall.

         

        Report Abuse
        • Author by IRONY 101 (May 12, 2008 3:03 pm ET)
             
          DEM, I was in Tuscaloosa Saturday and toyed with the idea of sticking the letter "O" before all the ubiquitous BAMA decals. And, yes, BAMA does have a good football team coached by the traitor, Nick Saban.  ;>)
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Dem02020 (May 12, 2008 3:39 pm ET)
               

             

            Ahhh, the traitor Saban!

            I think for sure you are from the bayou, but who can say, since Saint Nick left them behind in Miami (of the NFL) and East Lansing (MSU) too...

            It's a business, for sure, big-time college football coaching is... and Nick Saban has a demonstrated success in that business (as you all know in Baton Rouge, having won a National Championship with him... but also having just won one without him!)...

            And besides, as good as Saint Nick has it right now in Tuscaloosa (with a lot of returning starters on defense, and four starters returning on the offensive line, and a returning QB who's good, and a TB who's great), with all that, he and the Tide still have to go through LSU, they still have to go through Baton Rouge... on November 8, right around election week.

             

            Report Abuse
            • Author by IRONY 101 (May 12, 2008 3:58 pm ET)
                 
              Auburn, Florida and Georgia are the SEC teams to watch. All have a lot of good, key players returning. LSU just kicked their quarterback off the team.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Dem02020 (May 12, 2008 4:19 pm ET)
                   

                 

                The Tigers (the ones from Baton Rouge) have a lot of reloading to do, but they have the ammo to do it... and Coach Miles is maybe the top head Coach, in a Conference that has the best coaches (especially the best Defensive Coordinators) by far... and who knows what's up with that kid from Texas, getting kicked off the team like that... what a waste, he had so much going for him, and now who knows where he's going (maybe Jacksonville State I hear: not exactly "NFL Track" for that Texas kid... what a waste).

                As far as the other Tigers, the ones in Auburn, I don't know, we see... several of the guys they lost on defense were really good (the NFL thought so too), and they also have a new (sort of) QB to try and get behind, fast, in the way competitive SEC... yep, the Gators and the Dawgs are right there too (Georgia will probably even be annointed pre-season #1: that's an awful cozy headstart on everybody else)... there's a lot of good teams this year... Gamecocks and Rebels are going to have their say too, before it's all over.

                 

                Report Abuse
    • Author by cArn (May 12, 2008 2:05 pm ET)
         
      Why do these people think Mrs. Obama is an atheist? Because she never talks about God or church? Pretty stupid.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Science101 (May 12, 2008 2:09 pm ET)
           
        No, its because shes an ultra liberal.  Typically, its just part of the common ground territory.  An ultra liberal is typically seen as a tree hugging atheist, while the ultra conservative is seen as a crazy church going war mongerer.  Neither are quite fair.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (May 12, 2008 2:26 pm ET)
             

          Well, if we are to believe the polling numbers that say over 90% of this country believes in, and worships some form of Christianity, then even the "ULTRA" liberal people that you believe are tree hugging atheists are indeed Christian.

          Conservatives aren't the only ones who can be Christian by the way. The issue is that most liberals that I know keep their religion to themselves, and we want government to not be influenced by religion as well. It's really that simple. I know it's hard for you to wrap your mind around that.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Science101 (May 12, 2008 2:36 pm ET)
               
            You dont want the government to be influenced by religion, when the fact is the country was formed for freedom of religion, and all the people in the government at that time were religious.  So of course its going to play a major role in government. 
            Report Abuse
            • Author by IRONY 101 (May 12, 2008 2:42 pm ET)
                 

              "...and all the people in the government at that time were religious."

              What, like Thomas Jefferson who didn't belive in the divinity of Christ? Where were you educated Coumbus, Jerry Falwell's school?

              Report Abuse
              • Author by princeofwheels (May 12, 2008 2:56 pm ET)
                   
                Now Irony, you are going to be called hateful. You must remember that Liberals are not permitted to get upset and should just eat the crap that the Cons throw out. As a side note: those damn Catholics have an Action League to go after idiots and those who want to destory the Church. And guess what, they DO get angry. Guess Jesus was a liberal when he got mad at the moneychangers in the temple. Just remember, Colombus is the most BLISSFUL person here.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by anotheramerican (May 12, 2008 10:37 pm ET)
                     

                  Prince,

                  Why would you refer to Catholics in that way?  Do you have something against them?  

                  Report Abuse
            • Author by worrierking (May 12, 2008 3:15 pm ET)
                 
              Once again you show that skimming history is as useless as ignoring it.

              Our founding fathers wanted freedom FROM religion as much as they wanted freedom OF religion.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by magnolialover (May 12, 2008 3:51 pm ET)
                 
              I refer you to the document that is the basis for all of our laws, it's called the Constitution, and you might want to read through it once in awhile, because aside from the free establishment clause, there is nothing in there about religion, god, or anything of that nature, and hence why we have secular laws, and we SHOULD have a secular government.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (May 12, 2008 5:23 pm ET)
                 
              Freedom from religious persecution, not freedom of religion. Nice try at changing history though.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by princeofwheels (May 12, 2008 2:09 pm ET)
           
        Carn, the word think does not apply to these people. They are "The Listeners". This group has a unique physical attribute. Thier ears are connected directly to the base of thier tongues. When they hear something, it is just repeated by nature. Thinking isn't in the Con/Repub dictionary. I know that for a fact. I have a copy of it in my back pocket.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Dem02020 (May 12, 2008 3:29 pm ET)
           

         

        Carn, no, there's hardly anybody who even gives it a thought, truly. Religion and Faith are, right now, as irrelevant and unimportant in National Policy and politics in America, as they have ever been (as they have ever been in my memory, or anyone else's really: please see the recent Louisiana election, where Mr. Cazayoux won a U.S. House seat in a special election, in which his Republican opponent tried to make Religion and Faith the focus of the campaign). Hardly anybody's thinking that way... hardly at all is anybody thinking about Sen. Obama's Religion and Faith, with the way that IRAQ and BUSH and MCCAIN are dominating their thoughts about National Policy... dominating their thoughts to the extent of driving record numbers of voters to vote in the Democratic Primaries... what does Religion and Faith have to do with why record numbers of people participated in the Democratic Primaries so far?

        Nothing.

        So you see how little the matter of Mr. Obama's Religion and Faith truly mean in the presidential campaign so far... and by consequence, voter's true thoughts of his wife's Religion and Faith are reduced to less than nothing (if that were possible).

         

        Then why the hack media's fascination with Religion and Faith, whether Sen. Obama's or his wife's?

        Because you are witnessing the hack media's full-blown attempt to dictate and steer the Public Discourse in this presidential campaign, and perhaps dictate and steer the campaign it self.

         

        But why would they do that? Do they think by dictating and steering the campaign towards Religion and Faith, they will dictate the outcome of the election?

        Yes. But rather than say they were dictating and steering Public Discourse, and the campaign, towards Religion and Faith, it's more accurate to describe the hack media as dictating and steering Public Discourse away from IRAQ and BUSH and MCCAIN.

         

        And why are they steering Public Discourse away from IRAQ and BUSH and MCCAIN?

        Becasue those are the things (IRAQ BUSH MCCAIN) that have driven so many voters to the Democratic Primaries, and are the things that truly count in this campaign, and are the things that will decide the election in November...

        ...unless they can steer you away from those things (IRAQ BUSH MCCAIN), by dictating and distracting you with talk about Religion and Faith.

         

        Report Abuse
        • Author by anotheramerican (May 12, 2008 10:52 pm ET)
             

          Dem,

          I disagree completely with your contention that Bush McCain are driving people to Dem's primaries.

          Rather it is the Democrats two challengers. One a woman and the other half African American. Because the Democrats and liberals for so long have practiced the politics of victimization, people feel that these two candidates because of their gender or race can speak to the issues confronting women and African Americans. However having both representations in the same election have pitted one group against another. Those identifying with percieved gender discrimination are mobilized to help Hillary. Those identifying with race discrimination feel they have a spokesperson in Obama. 

          Both sides bring out very strong passions and because of that, both sides have successfully appealed to many voters during the primaries.  Right now the Democratic Party voters could care less about McCain. They simply care about their particular candidates.  

          We should call this the Demographic Primaries. :-)  

          Report Abuse
    • Author by cArn (May 12, 2008 2:07 pm ET)
         
      By "these people", I mean those like Mr. Simpson, which I'm sure (hope) only make up a small segment of the population.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (May 12, 2008 2:17 pm ET)
           
        About 28%, according to recent polls. Unfortunately, these knuckledraggers make up a solid, unthinking GOP voting bloc, and they often take a large number of those not paying attention down with them.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by cArn (May 12, 2008 2:09 pm ET)
         
      The ACLU race baits?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by princeofwheels (May 12, 2008 2:11 pm ET)
           
        That is the best yet. I'm giving up my card.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Science101 (May 12, 2008 2:13 pm ET)
           

        Heck yeah they do. Recall not long ago they were accusing the court system & public of "hanging" michael vick because hes black, not because of what he did to dogs.

        ACLU - a-1 corrupt liberal union.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by princeofwheels (May 12, 2008 2:16 pm ET)
             
          Colo, you made a joke.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (May 12, 2008 2:18 pm ET)
             

          Umm, you had better go back, and check your facts. The ACLU never made any sort of brief, or fronted ANYTHING for Michael Vick. Why? Because it wasn't a Constitutional issue.

          I dare you to show us WHERE the ACLU came out in support of Michael Vick, and said he was getting a raw deal just because he was black. I'm willing to bet that you can't show us any of that. Why? Because it never happened.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Science101 (May 12, 2008 2:24 pm ET)
               
            Sure they did.  They chastised the american people for accusing Vick before due process and his court decision.  However, i hope you can look back far enough to see how noticably quiet they were during the drawnout Duke debacle.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by magnolialover (May 12, 2008 2:30 pm ET)
                 

              Nope. The ACLU never made any comments about the Vick case, and they never made any comment about the Duke case either.

              Give me a link where the ACLU waded into either case and I'll concede. But as I said before, you can't do it.

              You might be confused about the ACLU and NAACP, which are NOT the same group at all. In both of the cases you cited, there was not a constitutional issue, which if you were paying attention, you'd know that constitutional issues is where the ACLU gets involved. As in, when someone impedes, or takes away someone's constitutional rights, or if a law is made that abridges someone's constitutional rights.

              Show me the information about the ACLU and Vick and Duke. Again, you can't. Why? They never weighed in on other case.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Science101 (May 12, 2008 2:47 pm ET)
                   
                I concede, you are correct as I am confusing the ACLU for the NAACP.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by magnolialover (May 12, 2008 3:53 pm ET)
                     
                  There is a gigantic difference in there between the ACLU and the NAACP (which is fronted by a republican I might add before you get all huffy about them being far left liberal group).
                  Report Abuse
    • Author by cArn (May 12, 2008 2:22 pm ET)
         

      Thanks for the confirmation, Mag. I tried googling myself but couldn't find any link between the ACLU and Vicks. I think Columbo got ACLU mixed up with the NAACP, since they're both left-wing radicals.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by princeofwheels (May 12, 2008 2:29 pm ET)
           
        This Columbus could discover Shaquille O'Neal at a midgets picnic. (used before, sorry)
        Report Abuse
    • Author by cArn (May 12, 2008 2:45 pm ET)
         

      The strict sociological definition of racism is the belief that one's own race is inherently superior to another. That means you can be racist to group B and still have a beer with them or hang out at the mall. The more colloqial definition fluctuates between that and a hatred or strong dislike for a particular group based on steretypes and preconceived notions (a.k.a prejudice).

      I believe all groups can be prejudiced (e.g. all whites are racist rednecks), but racism tends to be circumstancial and as such, it isn't an equal opportunity offender that cuts evenly along color lines. And that concludes MMFA's semantics lesson for today. ;D

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mary59 (May 12, 2008 2:51 pm ET)
         
      Columbus, are you posting under more than one name, and what is your purpose here?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Science101 (May 12, 2008 3:03 pm ET)
           
        No im not, no reason to do so.  And my point is voicing my opinion while laughing like crazy as the left wing loonz
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (May 12, 2008 3:54 pm ET)
             
          Funny... We're laughing at your ignorance about, well, almost everything.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mary59 (May 12, 2008 4:28 pm ET)
               
            And his typos are more interesting than his posts: "while laughing like crazy as the left wing loonz"

            The problem with answering his posts is that he isn't serious and concerned about the country; he thinks it's all a gotcha game; he doesn't really think about the questions posed to him, and changes subjects when he doesn't want to answer something.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by juliajayne (May 12, 2008 6:57 pm ET)
                 

              "The Loons, the loons".......wasn't that in On Golden Pond? What are loonz? 

              The loonz makes me swoonz.

              I love balloonz and full moonz.

              Mary lampoonz the farcical Columbo.

               

              Report Abuse
              • Author by mary59 (May 12, 2008 7:13 pm ET)
                   
                On Golden Pond, under sylvan moonz

                Columbus calls his right wing loonz

                He honks and hoots, come play! he croonz

                ignore the horrid BushCo ruinz
                Report Abuse
                • Author by juliajayne (May 12, 2008 7:35 pm ET)
                     

                  Columbo and his band of loonz

                  Like to play with the baboonz

                  On afternoonz, they watch cartoonz

                  Of incurious Georgie and his oil tycoonz

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by mary59 (May 12, 2008 7:53 pm ET)
                       
                    Drudge-Limbaugh slobbering bufoonz

                    Dumb sexist guys and racist goonz

                    All love war mongering tunz

                    Sung by incurious George and the oil tycoonz
                    Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (May 12, 2008 3:08 pm ET)
         
      Dem, I knew that there was a person of high-intellegence here. This O'Bama thing will sweep that nation. But I must warn you, being an intolerant hater..see others posts....I must ask, are you talking about the "real" Alabama or the one in the middle of Pennsylvania?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (May 12, 2008 3:35 pm ET)
         

      Message pass on for Columbus:

      From the Fleet, Re, Neener, Punter, and St Fredda Esq.

      What's the hold up on the Salsa run?

      They're not gonna let us double park here much longer!

      Turn on your cell phone..... D*mit!

      If your not back before the navaguessor flames on again.

      We'll be.

      Not responsible!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (May 12, 2008 4:11 pm ET)
         
      COLORECTUS, your mom called.... said you can come by and pick up your laundry.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by sportsguydave (May 12, 2008 11:39 pm ET)
         

      Josh Fry, a 24-year-old ambulance driver from Williamson, insisted he was not racist but said he would feel more comfortable with Mr McCain, the 71-year-old Vietnam war hero, in the White House. "I want someone who is a full-blooded American as president," he said....

      ====================================================

      I'm going to have to make a note never to find myself in Williamson.

      I don't want anyone this stupid driving my ambulance.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by beardog321 (May 13, 2008 11:53 am ET)
         
      My Mom and Dad, who are 76 and 78 respectively and have a computer, and internet connection, have for months received misinformation from friends of theirs' who are of the republican persuasion stating the lies told about Obama.  This is ongoing, and persistent, and when I went to visit them last month we had this discussion about this misinformation.  Now, if you asked my dad, a registered Democrat his entire life, what he knew about Obama before my visit, he would have said the same thing the "Hillybilly West Virginian" did. And my dad id educated, with a graduate degree in education. I think part of the problem, especially with older folks, and some others, is that their entire life, the press, in the form of local newspapers, printed the truth, (Or so they believed.) and now the internet has taken over that role. So, if they are told, either by a headline, or information forwarded to them by a friend or family member, who they believe is truthful, and would not intentionally lie to them, well then, it must be true. They don't generally investigate the story/lie like I would do, and so it is. Then they forward this misinformation. Then there are those who thrive on anything they read that is negative for a person they already don't like, and without investigation, forward that to like minded folks, or whomever. It is sad we are still having to discuss this, but I too receive these type of e-mails, and I always try to correct the sender. And when I have, on occasion, been told not to send that kind of stuff. (They thought I was lying to them!) It is sad, but I sometimes believe that the average person should be able to vote. Yes, I know it is cynical, but it scares me sometimes.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by beardog321 (May 13, 2008 2:54 pm ET)
           
        Oops, the second to last sentence should have the word "shouldn't' instead of should. I know I will be condemned about that statement, (Probably because I am an elitist! Ha Ha!) but without an educated electorate, elections will always be skewed, which is sad. When folks buy into this misinformation, it corrupts the whole system, and combine that with voter disenfranchisement, corrupt state election systems, a conflict of interest Supreme Court, flawed voting machines, we are all in trouble. Like now! This disinformation will continue throughout this election, and elections in the future, ad infinitum. So, our job should be to educate the electorate, which is what I believe Media Matters attempts to do, along with many other venues. I have read these threads for years, very rarely posting, but entertained by many of the characters and posters, and how the threads go off topic and into ? many times.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mary59 (May 13, 2008 6:47 pm ET)
             
          Thank you for posting. I also got the Obama is a muslim e-mail a few months ago from an old friend, a devout Catholic. (she doesn't pay attention to the news, just works and goes to church.)

          I told her to really check the snopes site, sent her a link to it and mentioned, "didn't Jesus say not to bear false witness?" I also e-mailed the person who originally forwarded the e-mail from a chain of forwards and said the same thing. My friend apologised and I hope learned something.
          Report Abuse