ABC's This Week yet to correct Will's Social Security falsehood
SUMMARY: Newsweek has corrected George Will's false assertion in his Newsweek column that Social Security taxes are levied based on household income. Will made the same assertion on ABC's This Week, but ABC has yet to issue a correction on the show.
More than four weeks after ABC News commentator George Will, in criticizing Sen. Barack Obama, falsely asserted on the network's This Week that Social Security taxes are levied based on household income, ABC has yet to issue a correction on the Sunday morning show, even though Will has appeared on three broadcasts since making the false statement.
As Media Matters for America noted, on the April 20 edition of This Week, Will -- an ABC News commentator and regular panelist on the program -- said of Obama: "[O]n raising Social Security taxes -- or the body of income susceptible to the 12.4 percent rate -- he clearly says he's considering raising taxes on those making more than $103,000, much less ... than what he had at $200,000." Will later falsely asserted of Obama: "[W]hat we heard this week from the probable Democratic nominee is that he wants to raise taxes on a lot of people, beginning with those earning about $100,000 a year, a household" [emphasis added]. He added: "That's a Chicago cop and a Chicago teacher."
Will made the same false claim in his May 2 Newsweek column, in which he asked Obama: "You favor eliminating the cap on earnings subject to the 12.4 percent Social Security tax, which now covers only the first $102,000. A Chicago police officer married to a Chicago public-school teacher, each with 20 years on the job, have a household income of $147,501, so you would take another $5,642 from them. Are they undertaxed? Are they rich?"
In its May 19 edition, Newsweek issued a correction, noting, as Media Matters also noted, "because the Social Security tax is assessed individually [not on the household, as Will asserted], and the couple each earns less than the current cap, any elimination of that cap will not have an effect on their tax burden."
Will has appeared on the April 27, May 11, and May 18 editions of This Week, but his false April 20 statement has yet to be corrected on that program.
The Newsweek correction:
CORRECTION (published May 19, 2008): This column originally stated that Obama favors elminating the cap on earnings subject to the 12.4 percent Social Security tax. The tax (currently limited to the first $102,000 at 12.4 percent) of the couple cited in the column's example was assessed on their combined income. But because the Social Security tax is assessed individually, and the couple each earns less than the current cap, any elimination of that cap will not have an effect on their tax burden. NEWSWEEK regrets the error.















5/21/08
e-mail to George
Dear Mr. Will,Media Matters for America just posted the correction Newsweek posted concerning your screw up on Social Security taxes. Try to be more careful. It’s bad enough to be an elitist, ivy league, conservative. You don't want people to think that you're also a liar, do you?I never said they were synonymous????
What are you talking about?
Sue, you just called his mother the "B" word. Isn't that against the rules or something according to the Clinton thread? I thought it was, but please everyone let me in on the exceptions to the rule.
Sure it is.
He could correct it.
Carl, we both know that Liar George Will will NOT correct his own deliberate lie!
Also, since GOP-Disney-ABC is as right wing conservative as Will is, GOP-Disney-ABC may even be complicit to some degree in Will telling this lie.
That, and the fact that GOP-Disney-ABC is a right wing corporatist conservative pro-Bush/pro-McCain/pro-Republican network.
Indeed,
Blind adherence, even when they know they are wrong, is not an attractive conservative trait.
And Stephanopolous is such a wimp, you know he'll never challenge the elite, ivy league pundit.
Well, so much for Mr. Exactitude and Mr. Precision in Language.
He's as much of a flak-hack as the rest of them.
Well done Bev...
If the filthy wealthy elite in this country--who gained most of their wealth either through inheritance or raw corporate privilege--just paid their fair share of taxes, then...
...their is no "problem" at all with social security.
And our economy is stimulated by old folks having a few more dollars in their pockets to spend at the store.
Conservatives only believe in "top down" economics. That's why they've gotten us into this mess.