About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

CNN's Yellin uncritically aired unidentified woman's false assertion that Wright's "avowed interest was the elimination of the Jewish race"

May 22, 2008 6:40 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: In a report on Sen. Barack Obama's outreach to Jewish voters in Florida, CNN's Jessica Yellin aired a quote from an unidentified woman who said that Obama "was affiliated with someone whose avowed interest was the elimination of the Jewish race, and that was Reverend [Jeremiah] Wright." Yellin did not challenge or contradict the woman's false assertion.

28 Comments

In a May 22 report on CNN's The Situation Room about Sen. Barack Obama's outreach to Jewish voters in Florida that same day, Capitol Hill correspondent Jessica Yellin said that "Jewish voters in a South Florida community Obama visits today have mixed views." During the report, Yellin aired statements from four unidentified women, including one who said of Obama: "He was affiliated with someone whose avowed interest was the elimination of the Jewish race, and that was Reverend [Jeremiah] Wright, and it's a very unsavory connection." Yellin did not challenge or contradict the woman's false assertion.

From the May 22 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:

[begin video clip]

YELLIN: As Obama courts Florida's Jewish voters, he has his work cut out for him. This ad by a Republican Jewish group accusing him of anti-Israeli views is running in three local papers and critics are playing on Jewish fears.

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN 1: We know that his alliances are Reverend Wright, Louis Farrakhan, known haters of the state of Israel.

YELLIN: Yet Obama has denounced both men.

OBAMA: I pledge to you that I will do whatever I can, in whatever capacity, to not only ensure Israel's security, but also to ensure that the people of Israel are able to thrive and prosper.

YELLIN: Jewish voters tend to be reliable Democrats, but a significant minority are wary of an Obama presidency. John Kerry won 80 percent of the Jewish vote in 2004, but a recent Gallup poll shows only 61 percent say they would vote for Obama in November. Jewish concerns include Obama's past association with Reverend Wright; false rumors that he's Muslim; praise he received from a Hamas leader; and, most significantly, Obama's offer to hold talks with the leader of Iran, a sworn enemy of Israel.

OBAMA: That doesn't mean that we would not have preparation. ... But what I have said is that, at some point, I would be willing to meet.

YELLIN: Jewish voters in a South Florida community Obama visits today have mixed views.

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN 2: He was affiliated with someone whose avowed interest was the elimination of the Jewish race, and that was Reverend Wright, and it's a very unsavory connection.

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN 3: Well, you hear the people saying that he's anti- -- an anti-Semite, that he is Muslim. ... I don't feel that way. I really don't.

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN 4: I think we will find that he will be a good friend to the Jews, and he'll be a good friend to everyone.

[end video clip]

YELLIN: Now, Wolf, I'll tell you the campaign points out that the same Gallup poll I cited earlier showing Obama getting 61 percent of the Jewish vote -- that's double the Jewish vote that McCain would get. The campaign -- the Obama campaign feels very strongly that, as soon as Jewish voters learn more about Barack Obama's positions, as soon as they learn that he is Christian and not Muslim, as soon as they have a chance to talk to him, they will come around to voting for him in November. And he has a chance to talk to all these folks any minute now.

WOLF BLITZER (host): He'll be walking into this synagogue very soon. We'll go there live once he starts his remarks. Jessica, thanks very much.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by tommy (May 22, 2008 6:48 pm ET)
         

      Oh for crying out loud, cute, MMFA.  Nice way to slime the Wright issue back up here under the guise of some unidentified woman's ignorance.  How incredibly transparent.

      Hillary must have called. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (May 22, 2008 7:01 pm ET)
           
        Who was it that gave airtime to an ignorant person in a taped and edited report?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Governor (May 22, 2008 7:03 pm ET)
           
        That's a truly remarkable typo, Tommy.  How you managed to twice hit the "M" key, then "F" and then "A", when you meant "CNN" is beyond my understanding.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by deeznuts (May 23, 2008 10:01 am ET)
             

          Indeed it is amazing how some wingnuts on here can find a way to make things like this the fault of MMFA, instead of the media outlet actually responsible for the misinformation.

          Tommy is particularly good at that kind of error. 

          Report Abuse
      • Author by Eric Jaffa (May 22, 2008 7:07 pm ET)
           
        It help Obama if media-watchdogs (like MMFA) criticize networks which broadcast false statements by random people without correcting them.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by onionhead (May 22, 2008 11:44 pm ET)
           

        I kinda agree with you here.  The actual piece of misinformation is what Yellin said while introducing these opinions: 

        "...Jewish concerns include Obama's past association with Reverend Wright;"

        Want to clarify that, Ms. Yellin? Is there any evidence that Rev. Wright is anti-semetic or has said anything anti-semetic? And is Wright's expressing anger that Israel is killing and starving Palestinians anti-semetic?

        So,  Tommy,  if you are looking for the misinformation, I helped you find.  And so ends Onionhead Jones and the Search for Ms. Information.

         

        Report Abuse
      • Author by deeznuts (May 23, 2008 9:56 am ET)
           

        Careful, Captain Above-it-all. Your stripes are showing.  

        Just when I think Tommy's comments here couldn't get any more ridiculous, he goes an outdoes himself.

        Tommy, if you really can't see the misinformation which MMFA is dutifully reporting here, then there is truly no hope for you.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (May 22, 2008 6:57 pm ET)
         

      More cause for rejoice on the part of the right-wing slime machine (including its members who are supporting Hillary).

      Too see the fruits of their labor given airtime by the "liberal" media must really give them confidence heading into the main event.  

      The more relentless they are with their smear campaign, the more people they can keep from listening to Obama's own message and the more people they can get to shove aside the kitchen table issues to dwell on crap like this.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Lynn (May 22, 2008 7:10 pm ET)
         
      I don't think those Obama is the a Muslim devil rumor campaign will have the same effect in the Jewish community. Now there may be some objection to  Obama`s policies of diplomatic engagement of Israel`s enemies and that's a valid discussion to have, but I honestly beleive that the vast majority of members in the Jewish community are too smart for this type of smear by association. I feel they will judge McCain fairly  like wise and they will judge neither of them based on those two wild and crazy guys Hagee and Wright.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Old_Benjamin (May 22, 2008 7:18 pm ET)
           
        I really hope you are right.  But it seems the Jewish community in the US is far more intolerant of anything slighlty critical of the state of Israel.  The residents of Israel do not march in lock step with their government and you will find far more critisism of Israeli government policies inside the country than you will in the US.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (May 22, 2008 9:18 pm ET)
         
      Why is it necessary for the media to focus on silly, misinformed ramblings of voters, such as in this piece and recently in West Virginia, unless the story is specifically about the dissemination of misinformation that is sticking with some voters? In that latter case, an intergral part of the story is to make clear that the information in question is indeed false. Otherwise, someone please explain to me why is it necessary to show the misinformed remarks of this woman who has obviously mistakenly conflated Jeremiah Wright and Luis Farrakhan? Would it be newsworthy to show the remarks of a senile voter who has confused the candidates, for example? And, as I said, if the story is about misinformation then at least make clear to the viewer that what they are hearing is misinformation.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by BottleBlonde (May 22, 2008 11:34 pm ET)
           

        It would be one thing to have a live interview with someone who says something stupid. It would be harder to blame CNN for that.

        In this case it's easy to blame CNN and its reporter, because this time the reporter edited her report to purposely include this woman's ridiculous comments.

        The only valid reason to include comments like this would be if you were going to contradict them with facts to demonstrate how some voters are misinformed. There's no good reason to have shown this woman's comments without correcting them.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by TadekKorn (May 23, 2008 1:55 am ET)
             

          The only valid reason to include comments like this would be if you were going to contradict them with facts to demonstrate how some voters are misinformed. There's no good reason to have shown this woman's comments without correcting them.

          Given that CNN seems to be constantly competing with FOX, neither network needs a valid reason for its choice of stories other than to satisfying its "base," a base group that thrives on stupidity.  It should surprise no-one that both these cable "news" organizations spend more time on spin than on information.  While the folks on FAUX "news" tend to be blatant liars, many of those on CNN tend to favor the misinformed with the microphones.  Nor should we be surprised that there are some not merely misinformed Jews in the Jewish community but some who don't ask questions and others downright nasty.  (We read about the four sons at each Passover Seder.  Just because we encourage some basic literacy by bar or bat mitzvah age doesn't mean that we're all bright, literate and moral! Wearing a yarmulke doesn't guarantee an intelligent mind!) 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by pithaughn (May 23, 2008 1:56 pm ET)
               
            No no no, what CNN is really doing ... They want to make sure the Obama Dem camps realize what slime is sticking so they can tailor thier ads/message to counter said slime. Everyone knows that the party that Rove is loyal too will be using every source of slime possible, sreading it on wide and thick with the knowledge that some will stick. So we, Obama supporters, should be glad Ms. Yellin and who ever produces her pieces has provided this valuble information. <half snark
            Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (May 23, 2008 11:20 am ET)
           
        Irony, I just caught a rerun of The Daily Show that I hadn't seen. Did you catch the WV voters giving their reasons for not supporting Obama? Yikes! (These may have gotten a lot of play on the tube, I just hadn't  seen them)
        Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (May 23, 2008 8:31 am ET)
         
      The irony here is that the Evangelical Knuckledraggers (like Hagee) who comprise the GOP base only pretend to love Israel because they think that supporting Israel will hasten the return of Jeeezzzzzzzuuuuuussssssss and jumpstart Armageddon. Of course, they also believe that Israel will be consumed and most Jews will end up in Hell. Why isn't this eagerness for Israel's destruction considered "anti-Semitic"?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (May 23, 2008 8:38 am ET)
           
        Mind-boggling isn't it? And none of them see the contradictions.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (May 23, 2008 9:33 am ET)
             
          I guess it's okay to be a raving bigot, as long as you invoke the "will of God".
          Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (May 23, 2008 9:40 am ET)
               
            You hate to make a blanket statement and gratuitously offend people of faith...but religion could be considered a form of insanity. At least, people like Hagee, and religious extremists of all faiths, demonstrate how dangerously destructive religion can be. I cannot imagine God being pleased with organized religion...or at least the people who profess to speak on its behalf.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by nerzog (May 23, 2008 9:59 am ET)
                 
              Organized Religion has ever been used by powerful people as a means to control the masses. I don't think a serious historian could argue otherwise. When a man stands in front of a crowd, and says that God told him to tell them to give him money, or kill someone, or live a certain way.... why should those people believe him?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by deeznuts (May 23, 2008 10:01 am ET)
                   
                Boy, you done said a mouthful.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by pithaughn (May 23, 2008 2:00 pm ET)
                   
                We can all use these two attempts (Wright and Hagee) to tarnish a candidate, as a shining example of why we need to be hyper vigilant when it comes to separating church (or temple, or mosque) and goverment.
                Report Abuse
    • Author by peebs755 (May 23, 2008 3:14 pm ET)
         
      The fact that this is a recorded and edited piece says it all. Conscious  decsions (sp?) were made when they put this story together. Shame on CNN. 
      Report Abuse
    • Author by zamfir273114 (May 23, 2008 9:12 pm ET)
         
      Listen to the moronic Republican-Jews in the video. They are basically saying that any President that is not 100% supportive of Israeli policy, even if those policies are genocidal and against American interests, is NOT worthy of being a U.S. President.

      Typical neo-con trash.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by workingfull5560 (May 24, 2008 1:23 pm ET)
         

      It's easy to get someone to lie on TV these days. Lots of people are in substantial debt. She is a paid shill. 

      This woman serves the Jewish people in no way. She only serves her own interests. She is a liar.

      Shame on CNN for giving her a platform.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by leatherhelmet (May 24, 2008 6:53 pm ET)
         

      Wright has called Israel an illegal state and has called for the United States to stop support of this illegal state. Obama has said he wants direct talks with the foremost enemy of Israel, Iran -- and Ahmadinejad has called for the elimination of Israel. Then there is the Wright/Farrakhan support issue. No wonder some jews would think Obama is associated with someone who wants to eliminate the jewish race.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrB2VnIqA88

      http://english.aljazeera.net/English/archive/archive?ArchiveId=15816

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.