Fox News highlighted RNC accusations following Obama's WWII comments, ignored McCain's numerous foreign policy errors
SUMMARY: In a segment on Sen. Barack Obama "misspeaking in a story about his, quote, uncle's role in fighting World War II," Fox News echoed a Republican National Committee talking point when it featured on-screen text that read: "Obama WWII slip: Evidence he's unfit for top job?" But at no point during the segment did on-air hosts note Sen. John McCain's series of errors during the campaign relating to foreign policy.
During the May 28 edition of Fox News' America's Newsroom, co-host Megyn Kelly teased a segment on Sen. Barack Obama's May 26 comments in which he referred to a relative's role in World War II, saying, "Barack Obama hitting a bit of a snag on the campaign trail, misspeaking in a story about his, quote, uncle's role in fighting World War II. The campaign says this was no big deal, but the GOP has a different take, and you'll hear it in three minutes." While she was speaking, the on-screen text read: "Obama WWII slip: Evidence he's unfit for top job?" echoing a Republican National Committee statement that claimed that "Obama's frequent exaggerations and outright distortions raise questions about his judgment and his readiness to lead as commander in chief." Co-host Bill Hemmer later interviewed RNC deputy chairman Frank Donatelli, who asserted that "we're seeing a troubling pattern of historical sloppiness from Senator Obama," which "could have grave implications for our foreign policy." At no point did Hemmer bring up any of Sen. John McCain's series of errors and falsehoods during the campaign related to foreign policy or challenge Donatelli to address them.

At a May 26 campaign event, Obama said: "I had a uncle who was one of the -- who was part of the first American troops to go into Auschwitz and liberate the concentration camps." His campaign later issued a statement, clarifying that Obama's "great uncle was a part of liberating one of the concentration camps at Buchenwald. Yesterday he mistakenly referred to Auschwitz instead of Buchenwald."
Discussing Obama's remarks during the America's Newsroom segment, Donatelli asserted: "[W]e're seeing a troubling pattern of historical sloppiness from Senator Obama. I think that's born of frankly a lack of experience, in some cases a lack of judgment, which, in other circumstances, could have grave implications for our foreign policy." After Hemmer cited the Obama campaign's clarification, Donatelli said, "For this issue, we would certainly accept that. However, the pattern still is troubling. Senator Obama's lack of historical knowledge is troubling, I think for somebody that wants to be commander in chief." But Hemmer did not respond to Donatelli's assertion by noting or asking him about any of McCain's errors and falsehoods about foreign policy during the campaign. For example:
- During a March 18 press conference in Amman, Jordan, McCain made the admittedly false claim, twice, that Iran is training Al Qaeda. After Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT), who accompanied McCain on the trip, whispered something in his ear, McCain corrected himself, saying: "I'm sorry, the Iranians are training extremists, not al-Qaeda." McCain had made a similar misstatement on Hugh Hewitt's radio show the day before.
- At an April 8 Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, McCain asked Gen. David Petraeus, "Do you still view Al Qaeda in Iraq as a major threat?" Petraeus replied: "It is still a major threat, though it is certainly not as major a threat as it was, say, 15 months ago." McCain then asked, "Certainly not an obscure sect of -- of the Shiites all -- overall --" prompting Petraeus to reply "No," as McCain went on to finish his question: "or Sunnis or anybody else?" In fact, Al Qaeda in Iraq is a Sunni Muslim, not Shiite, group.
- At a May 5 campaign event, McCain asserted: "We need a League of Nations. We need a group of people -- of nations who can work together and impose meaningful sanctions and modify Iranian behavior." In fact, the League of Nations was an international organization that was established following World War I and dissolved in 1946; McCain has proposed creating a League of Democracies to "harness the vast influence of the more than one hundred democratic nations around the world to advance our values and defend our shared interests."
- During the October 21, 2007, Republican presidential primary debate, McCain said of then- Russian President Vladimir Putin, "This is a dangerous person. And he has to understand that there's a cost to some of his actions. And the first thing I would do is make sure that we have a missile defense system in place in Czechoslovakia and Poland, and I don't care what his objections are to it." But Czechoslovakia was dissolved and replaced by the independent nations of Slovakia and the Czech Republic in 1993.
From the May 28 edition of Fox News' America's Newsroom:
KELLY: Well, Barack Obama hitting a bit of a snag on the campaign trail, misspeaking in a story about his, quote, uncle's role in fighting World War II. The campaign says this was no big deal, but the GOP has a different take, and you'll hear it in three minutes.
[...]
HEMMER: All right, back on the trail right now, the Barack Obama campaign trying to fend off accusations from John McCain's camp that the candidate, Obama, needs a history lesson. In remarks to veterans on Memorial Day, he was in New Mexico when Obama spoke for the need for better psychiatric care for veterans, and then relaying a family story to make his point. Listen closely.
OBAMA [video clip]: I had a uncle who was one of the -- who was part of the first American troops to go into Auschwitz and liberate the concentration camps. And the story in our family was, is that when he came home, he just went up into the attic, and he didn't leave the house for six months.
HEMMER: Problem is, the Soviets liberated Auschwitz in the country of Poland. Obama's campaign later clarified that he was referring to a great uncle and talking about a labor camp near Buchenwald, Germany. Just a slip of the tongue or is it something more troubling? Frank Donatelli, deputy chairman of the Republican National Committee, the RNC. Frank, good morning to you.
DONATELLI: Hi Bill, how are you?
HEMMER: I'm fine. Thank you for coming back here, by the way. How do you size this up, Frank?
DONATELLI: Well, look, anybody can make a slip of the tongue. Anyone can make a mistake. I grant you that. I think the problem here is that we're seeing a troubling pattern of historical sloppiness from Senator Obama. I think that's born of frankly a lack of experience, in some cases a lack of judgment, which, in other circumstances, could have grave implications for our foreign policy. And I will cite --
HEMMER: Frank, let me stop you there. You say a pattern?
DONATELLI: Yes. I mean --
HEMMER: Give me other examples.
DONATELLI: Well, the other examples --
HEMMER: What are you referring to?
DONATELLI: The other example I would give you is the extended debate we've had for the last week over Iran, in under what circumstances should America engage and negotiate with hostile powers. Now, based on his history, Senator Obama cites a couple of examples. He cites the [Ronald] Reagan meeting with [Mikhail] Gorbachev, when, in point of fact, the preparation for the Reagan-Gorbachev meeting took over four years. Reagan did not meet with other Soviet leaders for the first four years of his presidency precisely because there was no common ground there.
The second example that he cites is the Kennedy-Khrushchev summit of 1961. But, Bill, most historians believe that that was a disaster, that Kennedy was not prepared -- maybe the situation that would obtain if Senator Obama had such a meeting -- that Khrushchev bullied Kennedy and overestimated his strength, and many historians believe that led to the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1963.
HEMMER: Frank, let me squeeze this in quickly here in the interest of time. Senator Obama -- this is the response from Obama's campaign: "The family is proud of the service of his grandfather and uncles in World War II, especially the fact that his great uncle was a part of liberating one of the concentration camps in Buchenwald. Yesterday (meaning Monday), he mistakenly referred to Auschwitz instead of Buchenwald in telling of his personal experience of a soldier in his family who served heroically."
Does that -- and I need a quick answer on that -- the fact that the Obama campaign came back so quickly, does that put this to rest now or is this something that lingers from your strategic perspective?
DONATELLI: For this issue, we would certainly accept that. However, the pattern still is troubling. Senator Obama's lack of historical knowledge is troubling, I think for somebody that wants to be commander in chief.
HEMMER: Frank Donatelli, thank you for your time.















I do believe Obama needs to be more careful when discussing his family and historical mentions such as this, it just gives fodder to Fox and others to make a mountain out of a molehill, which they will do with any little opening.
As does MMFA in aqueezing this in here, is it really about McCain, or is about Hillary?
Funny, so far no mention about how the media is overlooking McCain's gaffes in light of Hillary's RFK comments - shhhh, on that.
To think that Sen. Obama's saying Auschwitz instead of Buchenwald, in recalling his uncle's WWII Military Service, and the difficult adjustments the uncle had to make, after seeing firsthand and upclose, concentration camp horrors...
He said Auschwitz, when in fact it was Buchenwald his uncle had been to.
It's a laugh extradinaire, that this discredits in even the most infinitismal amount, anything Sen. Obama said on Memorial Day, or for that matter, anything his uncle did or saw in WWII.
You know what wouldn't be a laugh though, and wouldn't be insignificant?
If in some number of years, fifty or more, some nephew of George W. Bush's should appear in public, and start to reminisce about his uncle, and about his uncle's Military Service... and should say something like "I had an uncle who was in Vietnam"... or even "I had an uncle who showed up for his Air National Guard Service in Alabama"...
Or in fifty some odd years, George W. Bush's nephew should say in public:
"I had an uncle who marched the U.S. Armed Forces off to Iraq, to get WMDs out of that place..."
If we're speaking about today's republicans, in 50 years we'll be hearing them bragging about how "my daddy was a senator who had a wide stance", or "my daddy was a senator who bent over pages". Maybe "my daddy was a congressman who got away with fraud".
"Obama's frequent exaggerations and outright distortions raise questions about his judgment and his readiness to lead as commander in chief."
Yeah...... when you put this minor misspeak by Obama and side by side compare it to the numerous McCain or Bush misspeaks..... it isn't even in the same galaxy!
Normally, I would say that Fox should be ashamed of itself for being so blatantly biased..... but it's Fox..... its their job to be biased, so I won;t even bother!
Wow, worst "Hey look over there!" ever. Seriously, how could this piece have anything to do with Hillary?
But to the point- it is a fair piece and it highlights a disturbing pattern on the part of the cable news networks, including the "radical far left" MSNBC. Obama makes a goof, the Repubs issue talking points and the devoted newspuppies run with it. McCain makes a goof, the Dems issue talking points and the cable newspuppies either ignore it or, even worse, help those behind McCain in excusing and dispelling the incident.
Can you see the problem and how this media is extremely harmful to having an informed populace and a functioning democracy?
"I do believe Obama needs to be more careful when discussing his family and historical mentions such as this, it just gives fodder to Fox and others to make a mountain out of a molehill, which they will do with any little opening."
Speaking of which, has anyone seen yet if Fox News has covered the Reggie Love "teabagging" incident? Though I'm an Obama supporter, I still want to see the pics on Fox News, it'd be hilarious.
(for the record, I hate Reggie Love. Nothing against him personally, but he went to Duke, and I bleed Carolina Blue.)
btw, for those yet to see it, here's the link:
http://www.truthaboutduke.com/encyc.php?encycid=7
warning: links may be explicit.
I wonder why MMFA never reports on a media outlet reporting on McCain miss-speaks saying why didn't they also bring up a democrat miss-speak?
THIS JUST IN: Fox News has documented proof that Barack Obama wrote a check for a purchase at Wal-Mart, and he FAILED TO PLACE A COMMA BETWEEN THE DATE AND THE YEAR.
Clearly, this demonstrates that Obama is UNFIT TO BE PRESIDENT, as this is a PATTERN of errors indicating insufficient attention to details.
VOTE McCAIN ... It's your only choice, since Obama is now disqualified!
ZING!
LOL.
Funny, so far no mention about how the media is overlooking McCain's gaffes in light of Hillary's RFK comments - shhhh, on that.
Well, this item is about Fox News, but since you brought it up, here's what Liz Trotta of Fox News had to say about it:
"now we have what some are reading as a suggestion that somebody knock off Osama. Um, uh, Obama. Well both, if we could." (laughs at self)"
Fox News: treason as humor.
Who cares if a candidate puts a relative at a different, yet similar time and place in history?
I'm more concerned that the Republican candidate and the current administration failed to heed our own recent history and waged another unnecessary war. Another war that will continue to tear us apart decades after it ends.
Senator Obama's lack of historical knowledge is troubling, I think for somebody that wants to be commander in chief.
I'll take a little lack of historical knowledge over a lack of current events knowledge, such as that pesky little fact that Bush didn't know the difference between Shia and Sunni before his illegal war and occupation. I don't think McCain knows the difference either.
Fox is really ratcheting it up lately. It looks like they've figured out that nobody who can read without moving their lips still thinks Fox is a real news channel. They seem to be counting on the pinhead vote, on getting the dopiest Americans scared enough to get to the voting booths.
Anybody who hasn't caught Bill O'Reilly lately, the Factor has been amazing. BilldO is doing long commentaries on the "blatant partisanship" of NBC, and wagging his finger at them for dirtying the name of journalism. Quite amazing, even by Fox standards.
They'd be winning on the dopey front. Considering that no matter how excessive they played Obama's christian preacher ties into the dirt 11% of the country still thinks he's a muslim. And 30% still thinks Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. Fox and Bill helped create the idiot nation, now let's see how they win an election with only 30% or less of the electorate.
D-i-e-b-o-l-d,
made to steal democracy!
Priceless!
One part I'm really enjoying, Snoop, is the "Obama as Messiah/Obama Kool-Aid drinkers" theme that has been built. The win/win for the GOP and their media is that they can throw out all the meaningless BS they want (Wright, Ayers, trivial gaffes). If only the Republo-Zombies buy it, Obama's poll numbers don't suffer, and...
Proof! that the Obamabots are brainwashed, as they can't be swayed by all of these "important" issues.
"...11% of the country still thinks [Obama]'s a muslim. And 30% still thinks Saddam had weapons of mass destruction." --snoopy
I'm just guessing but I'd bet good money there's some overlap there.
Col
You love Fox news, just like the rest of America. They have been #1 for 77 straight months now.
http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/may_ratings_fnc_stays_on_top_85816.asp
Fair and balanced wins again
POV,
If popularity equaled quality of product, McDonald's would be the top restaurant in America.
Fair and balanced wins again?
LOL... Yea, right... All FOX's numbers mean is that they have been successful in keeping the hard-core right wing base from wandering off the reservation by feeding the idiots a constant stream of misinformation designed to keep them pissed off. Dumb is still dumb regardless how you crunch the numbers.
You love Fox news, just like the rest of America. They have been #1 for 77 straight months now.
Their #1 ratings are still dismally far behind the lowest rated broadcast network shows. But, you are correct using the numbers 1 and 77. That's been their ratio of truth to lies ever since they started. 1 for 77.
Obama has been making gaffe after gaffe after gaffe. And you bash Fox News for even reporting it? Well then, if you want to watch a news network that is in the tank for Obama, you can watch MSNBC.
McCain’s New Iran Gaffe: If The ‘Average American’ Thinks Ahmadinejad Is In Control Of Iran, Then So Do I
Gotta love those AZ moments...
MSNBC?
Home of Tucker Carlson, Matt Lauer, Chris Matthews, Tim Russert and Joe Scarborough?
Eh...pass.
Out of almost 100 anchors and correspondents, Keith Olbermann is the only one you could even remotely call "in the tank" for Obama.
You suck at math.
A misstatement about which camp his great uncle went into isn't that big of a deal especially since his campaign corrected the information. It isn't substansive enough a misstep to give me any pause. What Obama said doesn't really change the basic point.
Now McCain not understanding the players in the current conflict IS a big deal. In the BIG picture of things it is a far more serious mistake. His statements were repeated at least 3 times and he has exhibited other problems with understanding this conflict.
But of course this is par for the course. McCain gets a pass, Obama is held up to much greater scrutiny. I guess these media people are scared that John McCain can't pass muster under scrutiny. That's of course a kind assessment.
You mean you can't talk bad about about a REPUBLICAN ex-military. There was certainly no issue about talking bad about John Kerry, John Murtha or Max Cleland - not even a problem to directly criticize their service, or in the case of Kerry claim that the Purple Hearts, the Bronze Star and the Silver Star he received as recognition for his service should not have been awarded to him.
But of course, they are Democrats, so that's allowed.
Ah, the ever-delightful statement in the form of a question for semi-plausible deniability
Fox News echoed a Republican National Committee talking point when it featured on-screen text that read: "Obama WWII slip: Evidence he's unfit for top job?"
They didn't say that it was evidence that he's unfit for the job. They only asked if it was evidence that he's unfit. There's a world of difference between those two things.
Isn't there?
A.k.a. the "Cavuto":
http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=117466&title=the-question-mark
"Obama's frequent exaggerations and outright distortions raise questions about his judgment and his readiness to lead as commander in chief."
Can anyone explain how accidentally switching names of Nazi internment camps affects in any way Obama's story of how the war affected his (Grand) Uncle?
Out of curiosity, what was FOX News' opinion on the "frequent exaggerations and outright distortions" of the Bush administration leading up to the war in Iraq?
From Obama08
http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/samgrahamfelsen/gGB74D
Hope the link works. As far as being "edited", I think you are mistaken, but probably not for the first time. He sees dead people.
And more comedy from GW, "....working hard to put food on your families."
FAWLTY:
Don't forget, the "news" outlets not only REPORT the mistake, they extrapolate that it renders Obama UNFIT FOR OFFICE.
It's a theme that's been obvious for over a decade now: In "our" Media, verbal errors, gaffes, and mistakes make Democrats UNELECTABLE and UNFIT FOR OFFICE, while the same errors, gaffes, and mistakes add to the "everyman down-to-earth charm" of Republicans.
It's called BIAS, and it's both BLATANT and is reflected across the wide spectrum of ALL Media.
Ran accross a bit in a Terry Prachett book that Fox might consider modifying slightly as a new motto.
"Neither Deluge Nor Ice Storm Nor The Black Silence Of The Netherhells Shall Stay These Messengers About Their Sacred Business. Do Not Ask Us About Saber-Toothed Tigers, Tar pits, Big Green Things With Teeth, Or The Godess Czol."
The Best informed news veiwers watch The Daily Show.
Brilliant!