About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Fox News highlighted RNC accusations following Obama's WWII comments, ignored McCain's numerous foreign policy errors

May 28, 2008 6:17 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: In a segment on Sen. Barack Obama "misspeaking in a story about his, quote, uncle's role in fighting World War II," Fox News echoed a Republican National Committee talking point when it featured on-screen text that read: "Obama WWII slip: Evidence he's unfit for top job?" But at no point during the segment did on-air hosts note Sen. John McCain's series of errors during the campaign relating to foreign policy.

56 Comments

During the May 28 edition of Fox News' America's Newsroom, co-host Megyn Kelly teased a segment on Sen. Barack Obama's May 26 comments in which he referred to a relative's role in World War II, saying, "Barack Obama hitting a bit of a snag on the campaign trail, misspeaking in a story about his, quote, uncle's role in fighting World War II. The campaign says this was no big deal, but the GOP has a different take, and you'll hear it in three minutes." While she was speaking, the on-screen text read: "Obama WWII slip: Evidence he's unfit for top job?" echoing a Republican National Committee statement that claimed that "Obama's frequent exaggerations and outright distortions raise questions about his judgment and his readiness to lead as commander in chief." Co-host Bill Hemmer later interviewed RNC deputy chairman Frank Donatelli, who asserted that "we're seeing a troubling pattern of historical sloppiness from Senator Obama," which "could have grave implications for our foreign policy." At no point did Hemmer bring up any of Sen. John McCain's series of errors and falsehoods during the campaign related to foreign policy or challenge Donatelli to address them.

Fox News highlights RNC talking points on Obama's

At a May 26 campaign event, Obama said: "I had a uncle who was one of the -- who was part of the first American troops to go into Auschwitz and liberate the concentration camps." His campaign later issued a statement, clarifying that Obama's "great uncle was a part of liberating one of the concentration camps at Buchenwald. Yesterday he mistakenly referred to Auschwitz instead of Buchenwald."

Discussing Obama's remarks during the America's Newsroom segment, Donatelli asserted: "[W]e're seeing a troubling pattern of historical sloppiness from Senator Obama. I think that's born of frankly a lack of experience, in some cases a lack of judgment, which, in other circumstances, could have grave implications for our foreign policy." After Hemmer cited the Obama campaign's clarification, Donatelli said, "For this issue, we would certainly accept that. However, the pattern still is troubling. Senator Obama's lack of historical knowledge is troubling, I think for somebody that wants to be commander in chief." But Hemmer did not respond to Donatelli's assertion by noting or asking him about any of McCain's errors and falsehoods about foreign policy during the campaign. For example:

  • During a March 18 press conference in Amman, Jordan, McCain made the admittedly false claim, twice, that Iran is training Al Qaeda. After Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT), who accompanied McCain on the trip, whispered something in his ear, McCain corrected himself, saying: "I'm sorry, the Iranians are training extremists, not al-Qaeda." McCain had made a similar misstatement on Hugh Hewitt's radio show the day before.
  • At an April 8 Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, McCain asked Gen. David Petraeus, "Do you still view Al Qaeda in Iraq as a major threat?" Petraeus replied: "It is still a major threat, though it is certainly not as major a threat as it was, say, 15 months ago." McCain then asked, "Certainly not an obscure sect of -- of the Shiites all -- overall --" prompting Petraeus to reply "No," as McCain went on to finish his question: "or Sunnis or anybody else?" In fact, Al Qaeda in Iraq is a Sunni Muslim, not Shiite, group.
  • At a May 5 campaign event, McCain asserted: "We need a League of Nations. We need a group of people -- of nations who can work together and impose meaningful sanctions and modify Iranian behavior." In fact, the League of Nations was an international organization that was established following World War I and dissolved in 1946; McCain has proposed creating a League of Democracies to "harness the vast influence of the more than one hundred democratic nations around the world to advance our values and defend our shared interests."
  • During the October 21, 2007, Republican presidential primary debate, McCain said of then- Russian President Vladimir Putin, "This is a dangerous person. And he has to understand that there's a cost to some of his actions. And the first thing I would do is make sure that we have a missile defense system in place in Czechoslovakia and Poland, and I don't care what his objections are to it." But Czechoslovakia was dissolved and replaced by the independent nations of Slovakia and the Czech Republic in 1993.

From the May 28 edition of Fox News' America's Newsroom:

KELLY: Well, Barack Obama hitting a bit of a snag on the campaign trail, misspeaking in a story about his, quote, uncle's role in fighting World War II. The campaign says this was no big deal, but the GOP has a different take, and you'll hear it in three minutes.

[...]

HEMMER: All right, back on the trail right now, the Barack Obama campaign trying to fend off accusations from John McCain's camp that the candidate, Obama, needs a history lesson. In remarks to veterans on Memorial Day, he was in New Mexico when Obama spoke for the need for better psychiatric care for veterans, and then relaying a family story to make his point. Listen closely.

OBAMA [video clip]: I had a uncle who was one of the -- who was part of the first American troops to go into Auschwitz and liberate the concentration camps. And the story in our family was, is that when he came home, he just went up into the attic, and he didn't leave the house for six months.

HEMMER: Problem is, the Soviets liberated Auschwitz in the country of Poland. Obama's campaign later clarified that he was referring to a great uncle and talking about a labor camp near Buchenwald, Germany. Just a slip of the tongue or is it something more troubling? Frank Donatelli, deputy chairman of the Republican National Committee, the RNC. Frank, good morning to you.

DONATELLI: Hi Bill, how are you?

HEMMER: I'm fine. Thank you for coming back here, by the way. How do you size this up, Frank?

DONATELLI: Well, look, anybody can make a slip of the tongue. Anyone can make a mistake. I grant you that. I think the problem here is that we're seeing a troubling pattern of historical sloppiness from Senator Obama. I think that's born of frankly a lack of experience, in some cases a lack of judgment, which, in other circumstances, could have grave implications for our foreign policy. And I will cite --

HEMMER: Frank, let me stop you there. You say a pattern?

DONATELLI: Yes. I mean --

HEMMER: Give me other examples.

DONATELLI: Well, the other examples --

HEMMER: What are you referring to?

DONATELLI: The other example I would give you is the extended debate we've had for the last week over Iran, in under what circumstances should America engage and negotiate with hostile powers. Now, based on his history, Senator Obama cites a couple of examples. He cites the [Ronald] Reagan meeting with [Mikhail] Gorbachev, when, in point of fact, the preparation for the Reagan-Gorbachev meeting took over four years. Reagan did not meet with other Soviet leaders for the first four years of his presidency precisely because there was no common ground there.

The second example that he cites is the Kennedy-Khrushchev summit of 1961. But, Bill, most historians believe that that was a disaster, that Kennedy was not prepared -- maybe the situation that would obtain if Senator Obama had such a meeting -- that Khrushchev bullied Kennedy and overestimated his strength, and many historians believe that led to the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1963.

HEMMER: Frank, let me squeeze this in quickly here in the interest of time. Senator Obama -- this is the response from Obama's campaign: "The family is proud of the service of his grandfather and uncles in World War II, especially the fact that his great uncle was a part of liberating one of the concentration camps in Buchenwald. Yesterday (meaning Monday), he mistakenly referred to Auschwitz instead of Buchenwald in telling of his personal experience of a soldier in his family who served heroically."

Does that -- and I need a quick answer on that -- the fact that the Obama campaign came back so quickly, does that put this to rest now or is this something that lingers from your strategic perspective?

DONATELLI: For this issue, we would certainly accept that. However, the pattern still is troubling. Senator Obama's lack of historical knowledge is troubling, I think for somebody that wants to be commander in chief.

HEMMER: Frank Donatelli, thank you for your time.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by tommy (May 28, 2008 6:31 pm ET)
         

      I do believe Obama needs to be more careful when discussing his family and historical mentions such as this, it just gives fodder to Fox and others to make a mountain out of a molehill, which they will do with any little opening.

      As does MMFA in aqueezing this in here, is it really about McCain, or is about Hillary? 

      Funny, so far no mention about how the media is overlooking McCain's gaffes in light of Hillary's RFK comments - shhhh, on that. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by tommy (May 28, 2008 6:31 pm ET)
           
        aqueezing, should be squeezing.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Dem02020 (May 28, 2008 7:04 pm ET)
             

           

          To think that Sen. Obama's saying Auschwitz instead of Buchenwald, in recalling his uncle's WWII Military Service, and the difficult adjustments the uncle had to make, after seeing firsthand and upclose, concentration camp horrors...

          He said Auschwitz, when in fact it was Buchenwald his uncle had been to.

          It's a laugh extradinaire, that this discredits in even the most infinitismal amount, anything Sen. Obama said on Memorial Day, or for that matter, anything his uncle did or saw in WWII.

           

          You know what wouldn't be a laugh though, and wouldn't be insignificant?

          If in some number of years, fifty or more, some nephew of George W. Bush's should appear in public, and start to reminisce about his uncle, and about his uncle's Military Service... and should say something like "I had an uncle who was in Vietnam"... or even "I had an uncle who showed up for his Air National Guard Service in Alabama"...

          Or in fifty some odd years, George W. Bush's nephew should say in public:

          "I had an uncle who marched the U.S. Armed Forces off to Iraq, to get WMDs out of that place..."

           

          Report Abuse
          • Author by snoopy (May 28, 2008 9:43 pm ET)
               

            If we're speaking about today's republicans, in 50 years we'll be hearing them bragging about how "my daddy was a senator who had a wide stance", or "my daddy was a senator who bent over pages". Maybe "my daddy was a congressman who got away with fraud".

            Report Abuse
          • Author by NiceguyEddie (May 30, 2008 10:13 am ET)
               
            True.  At least Obama didn't get confused and start to think that the Nazi's started out in Poland, of that the concentration camps were in France or something more on the order of McCain's recent gaffes.  (Plus mistating something that happened in the 1940's to your great uncle (or whatever) is a bit less significant that getting confused about who and where your enemy is NOW when you're running for president in the middle of a war that you pledge to continue fighting!)  (Or accusing the AMERICANS of the attrocities comited by the NAZIS in Malmedy like O'Rielly did!)
            Report Abuse
        • Author by captfoster2 (May 28, 2008 10:19 pm ET)
             

          "Obama's frequent exaggerations and outright distortions raise questions about his judgment and his readiness to lead as commander in chief."

          Yeah...... when you put this minor misspeak by Obama and side by side compare it to the numerous McCain or Bush misspeaks..... it isn't even in the same galaxy!

          Normally, I would say that Fox should be ashamed of itself for being so blatantly biased..... but it's Fox..... its their job to be biased, so I won;t even bother!

          Report Abuse
      • Author by MoonbatYouBet (May 28, 2008 6:42 pm ET)
           

        Wow, worst "Hey look over there!" ever.  Seriously, how could this piece have anything to do with Hillary?

        But to the point- it is a fair piece and it highlights a disturbing pattern on the part of the cable news networks, including the "radical far left" MSNBC.  Obama makes a goof, the Repubs issue talking points and the devoted newspuppies run with it.  McCain makes a goof, the Dems issue talking points and the cable newspuppies either ignore it or, even worse, help those behind McCain in excusing and dispelling the incident.

        Can you see the problem and how this media is extremely harmful to having an informed populace and a functioning democracy?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by dbeden4153 (May 28, 2008 6:46 pm ET)
           

        "I do believe Obama needs to be more careful when discussing his family and historical mentions such as this, it just gives fodder to Fox and others to make a mountain out of a molehill, which they will do with any little opening."

        Speaking of which, has anyone seen yet if Fox News has covered the Reggie Love "teabagging" incident?  Though I'm an Obama supporter, I still want to see the pics on Fox News, it'd be hilarious.

        (for the record, I hate Reggie Love.  Nothing against him personally, but he went to Duke, and I bleed Carolina Blue.) 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by dbeden4153 (May 28, 2008 6:50 pm ET)
             

          btw, for those yet to see it, here's the link:

          http://www.truthaboutduke.com/encyc.php?encycid=7

          warning: links may be explicit. 

          Report Abuse
      • Author by mikerhyner8202 (May 29, 2008 12:36 am ET)
           

        I wonder why MMFA never reports on a media outlet reporting on McCain miss-speaks saying why didn't they also bring up a democrat miss-speak?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by fawltylogic (May 29, 2008 1:54 am ET)
             
          Wow, do you really wonder that? Read MMFAs mission statement again if you do.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by mari2jj2970 (May 29, 2008 12:49 am ET)
           
        Actually my first husband helped liberate one of the concentrations camps.  He told me which one, but I cannot remember the name.  I suppose I could make the same mistake.  What I do remember is that he had horrible dreams about that time in his service in Germany.  He would wake up crying and sob for hours.  He never got over it in his entire life.  That Republicans are making such a big deal of this shows how far off the mark they are,  Obama's mistake is not a war started on a big bunch of lies like Bush did and that McBush is supporting.  He misremembered which camp it was.  What a totally non issue.  But then, it shows that Republicans are very much behind the eight ball in this election cycle.  Poor things!!!!!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by tex (May 29, 2008 9:32 am ET)
             

          THIS JUST IN: Fox News has documented proof that Barack Obama wrote a check for a purchase at Wal-Mart, and he FAILED TO PLACE A COMMA BETWEEN THE DATE AND THE YEAR.

          Clearly, this demonstrates that Obama is UNFIT TO BE PRESIDENT, as this is a PATTERN of errors indicating insufficient attention to details.

          VOTE McCAIN ... It's your only choice, since Obama is now disqualified!

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (May 29, 2008 10:10 am ET)
               
            In a related story, George W Bush's mouth has written yet another check his ass can't cash.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (May 29, 2008 10:20 am ET)
               
            Fortunately for John McCain, Cindy McCain writes the checks...  ;>)
            Report Abuse
      • Author by Governor (May 29, 2008 10:59 am ET)
           

        Funny, so far no mention about how the media is overlooking McCain's gaffes in light of Hillary's RFK comments - shhhh, on that.

         

        Well, this item is about Fox News, but since you brought it up, here's what Liz Trotta of Fox News had to say about it:

         

        "now we have what some are reading as a suggestion that somebody knock off Osama. Um, uh, Obama. Well both, if we could." (laughs at self)"

         

        Fox News: treason as humor.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (May 28, 2008 6:39 pm ET)
         
      FOX has propped up an administration that has used their own version of wingnut history to justify everything from torture to pre-emptive war and they never made a peep about it. Fox's biggest on air puppet has consistently made errors when describing historic events.

      Who cares if a candidate puts a relative at a different, yet similar time and place in history?

      I'm more concerned that the Republican candidate and the current administration failed to heed our own recent history and waged another unnecessary war. Another war that will continue to tear us apart decades after it ends.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by foghornleghorn (May 28, 2008 6:49 pm ET)
         

       Senator Obama's lack of historical knowledge is troubling, I think for somebody that wants to be commander in chief.

      I'll take a little lack of historical knowledge over a lack of current events knowledge, such as that pesky little fact that Bush didn't know the difference between Shia and Sunni before his illegal war and occupation.  I don't think McCain knows the difference either.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (May 28, 2008 7:26 pm ET)
           

        Fox is really ratcheting it up lately. It looks like they've figured out that nobody who can read without moving their lips still thinks Fox is a real news channel. They seem to be counting on the pinhead vote, on getting the dopiest Americans scared enough to get to the voting booths.

        Anybody who hasn't caught Bill O'Reilly lately, the Factor has been amazing. BilldO is doing long commentaries on the "blatant partisanship" of NBC, and wagging his finger at them for dirtying the name of journalism. Quite amazing, even by Fox standards.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (May 28, 2008 9:17 pm ET)
             

          They'd be winning on the dopey front. Considering that no matter how excessive they played Obama's christian preacher ties into the dirt 11% of the country still thinks he's a muslim. And 30% still thinks Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. Fox and Bill helped create the idiot nation, now let's see how they win an election with only 30% or less of the electorate.

          D-i-e-b-o-l-d,

          made to steal democracy!

          Priceless!

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (May 29, 2008 12:35 am ET)
               

            One part I'm really enjoying, Snoop, is the "Obama as Messiah/Obama Kool-Aid drinkers" theme that has been built. The win/win for the GOP and their media is that they can throw out all the meaningless BS they want (Wright, Ayers, trivial gaffes). If only the Republo-Zombies buy it, Obama's poll numbers don't suffer, and...

            Proof! that the Obamabots are brainwashed, as they can't be swayed by all of these "important" issues.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by open_mind (May 29, 2008 4:55 pm ET)
               

            "...11% of the country still thinks [Obama]'s a muslim. And 30% still thinks Saddam had weapons of mass destruction." --snoopy

            I'm just guessing but I'd bet good money there's some overlap there.

            Report Abuse
        • Author by pointofview (May 29, 2008 8:10 am ET)
             

          Col

          You love Fox news, just like the rest of America.  They have been #1 for 77 straight months now.

          http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/may_ratings_fnc_stays_on_top_85816.asp

          Fair and balanced wins again

          Report Abuse
          • Author by friedbergboy1422 (May 29, 2008 9:40 am ET)
               

            POV,

            If popularity equaled quality of product, McDonald's would be the top restaurant in America.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (May 29, 2008 10:11 am ET)
               

            Fair and balanced wins again?

            LOL... Yea, right... All FOX's numbers mean is that they have been successful in keeping the hard-core right wing base from wandering off the reservation by feeding the idiots a constant stream of misinformation designed to keep them pissed off. Dumb is still dumb regardless how you crunch the numbers.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (May 29, 2008 10:14 am ET)
               

            You love Fox news, just like the rest of America.  They have been #1 for 77 straight months now.

            Their #1 ratings are still dismally far behind the lowest rated broadcast network shows. But, you are correct using the numbers 1 and 77. That's been their ratio of truth to lies ever since they started. 1 for 77.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by JLyons (May 28, 2008 7:08 pm ET)
         
      Gotta love that FOX News.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by steelydan (May 28, 2008 7:59 pm ET)
         
      It's a meaningless slip, give the guy a break. Where are the real journalists today? The media has fallen so far, it's a tragedy. I blame Reagan and his 1987 deregulation bill that pushed out the independent voices all across the spectrum.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by HotWings (May 28, 2008 8:20 pm ET)
         

      Obama has been making gaffe after gaffe after gaffe.  And you bash Fox News for even reporting it?  Well then, if you want to watch a news network that is in the tank for Obama, you can watch MSNBC.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (May 28, 2008 8:26 pm ET)
         
      Would FOX News agree that Sean Hannity's and Bill O'Reilly's frequent misstatements mean they are unfit for their jobs?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by juliajayne (May 28, 2008 9:22 pm ET)
         

      A misstatement about which camp his great uncle went into isn't that big of a deal especially since his campaign corrected the information. It isn't substansive enough a misstep to give me any pause. What Obama said doesn't really change the basic point.

      Now McCain not understanding the players in the current conflict IS a big deal. In the BIG picture of things it is a far more serious mistake. His statements were repeated at least 3 times and he has exhibited other problems with understanding this conflict.

      But of course this is par for the course. McCain gets a pass, Obama is held up to much greater scrutiny. I guess these media people are scared that John McCain can't pass muster under scrutiny. That's of course a kind assessment.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (May 28, 2008 9:35 pm ET)
           
        Julia, I still think the main reason the media, generally speaking, refuse to say anything bad about McCain is the fear of blowback because McCain was a POW. It's just like all this bullshet of being accused of being unpatriotic or, worse, not supportive of the troops if you criticize the war. You can't talk bad about anyone in the military...and McCain is so closely identified with the military, and as a former POW, that for all practical purposes he's untouchable.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (May 28, 2008 9:41 pm ET)
             
          I don't know about that. This weekend he pissed a lot of veterans off with his "volunteers don't deserve a GI bill" round of talks. I heard a lot of veterans at the cemetary helping pick up the flag markers saying he just lost their endorsement. The press are more concerned about losing a seat off of the bullsh!t express and a weekend bbq then they are about blowback from the public. We don't feed them stories for print sensationalism, we just buy the print.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (May 28, 2008 9:47 pm ET)
               
            Snoop, I hope you are right but what you are describing may simply be a shift in public attitudes away from McCain...which is encouraging that people may be seeing through McCain's bullshet. I still think, however, that one of the reasons the media have given McCain a pass for so long is because of his ex-POW status.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by fawltylogic (May 29, 2008 2:03 am ET)
             

          You mean you can't talk bad about about a REPUBLICAN ex-military. There was certainly no issue about talking bad about John Kerry, John Murtha or Max Cleland - not even a problem to directly criticize their service, or in the case of Kerry claim that the Purple Hearts, the Bronze Star and the Silver Star he received as recognition for his service should not have been awarded to him.

          But of course, they are Democrats, so that's allowed. 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (May 29, 2008 8:57 am ET)
               
            Kerry, Murtha and Cleland all had problems with Bush's Iraq war. The point I was trying to make is that media appears to have bought into all the right wing phony patriotism crap and they feel it's risky to criticize a so-called war hero like McCain in a time of war. McCain, the politician, could not have dreamed of a better career move than being taken POW as a young man.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by BottleBlonde (May 28, 2008 11:36 pm ET)
         

      Ah, the ever-delightful statement in the form of a question for semi-plausible deniability

      Fox News echoed a Republican National Committee talking point when it featured on-screen text that read: "Obama WWII slip: Evidence he's unfit for top job?"

      They didn't say that it was evidence that he's unfit for the job. They only asked if it was evidence that he's unfit. There's a world of difference between those two things.

      Isn't there?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by robrob (May 29, 2008 12:15 am ET)
         

      "Obama's frequent exaggerations and outright distortions raise questions about his judgment and his readiness to lead as commander in chief."

      Can anyone explain how  accidentally switching names of Nazi internment camps affects in any way Obama's story of how the war affected his (Grand) Uncle?

      Out of curiosity, what was FOX News' opinion on the "frequent exaggerations and outright distortions"  of the Bush administration leading up to the war in Iraq? 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (May 29, 2008 9:16 am ET)
           
        Rob, I see this as simply a preemptive strike by FOX in anticipation of criticism of John McCain for his continuing (and expected) gaffes. When McCain is criticized for his faulty remarks then FOX can say that Obama has made misstatements, too. Of course, FOX will not accurately report the lack of equivalency of the two candidates' faulty remarks.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by dave (May 29, 2008 12:50 am ET)
         

      My favorite Obama gaffe to date

      On this Memorial Day, as our nation honors its unbroken line of fallen heroes -- and I see many of them in the audience here today -- our sense of patriotism is particularly strong.

      That's as good as GW's "Is our children learning"

      Report Abuse
      • Author by friedbergboy1422 (May 29, 2008 9:41 am ET)
           
        So, he only has about 10,000 more to go, eh ;)?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (May 29, 2008 10:31 am ET)
           
        That edited "quote" has been debunked at least three times on this site already. Don't let the truth get in the way of your repeated lies, Dave.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by fawltylogic (May 29, 2008 1:56 am ET)
         
      That this mistake by Obama (that's exactly what it is - it wasn't an attempt to lie or cast his uncle in a different light) is even news is pathetic. It just shows that these cable news channels really have nothing substantial to fill their time with, they need to dig out these fabricated controversies while burying real and important news every day.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tex (May 29, 2008 9:54 am ET)
         

      FAWLTY:

      Don't forget, the "news" outlets not only REPORT the mistake, they extrapolate that it renders Obama UNFIT FOR OFFICE.

      It's a theme that's been obvious for over a decade now: In "our" Media, verbal errors, gaffes, and mistakes make Democrats UNELECTABLE and UNFIT FOR OFFICE, while the same errors, gaffes, and mistakes add to the "everyman down-to-earth charm" of Republicans.

      It's called BIAS, and it's both BLATANT and is reflected across the wide spectrum of ALL Media.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (May 29, 2008 10:47 am ET)
         

      Ran accross a bit in a Terry Prachett book that Fox might consider modifying slightly as a new motto.

      "Neither Deluge Nor Ice Storm Nor The Black Silence Of The Netherhells Shall Stay These Messengers About Their Sacred Business. Do Not Ask Us About Saber-Toothed Tigers, Tar pits, Big Green Things With Teeth, Or The Godess Czol."

      The Best informed news veiwers watch The Daily Show.  

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Missouri Democrat (May 29, 2008 1:11 pm ET)
         
      Well it's not like he's a certain ex president who claimed to have seen the death camps in Europe when he was actually making propaganda movies in Hollywood USA!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by open_mind (May 29, 2008 5:01 pm ET)
           
        Exactly.  I almost forgot that Reagan claimed to help liberate the death camps - apparently forgetting he was in Hollywood at the time.
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.