Despite evidence to the contrary, NPR's Horsley called McCain "ordinarily straight-talking"

SUMMARY: During a report on NPR's Morning Edition, correspondent Scott Horsley referred to Sen. John McCain as "ordinarily straight-talking," despite evidence of McCain's numerous falsehoods, flip-flops, inconsistencies, and instances of apparent political pandering.
During the May 28 edition of National Public Radio's Morning Edition, correspondent Scott Horsley reported: "Late last week, during a news conference in central California, John McCain was asked an uncomfortable question: Which will be harder in the months to come --" Horsley then played an audio clip of an unidentified man finishing the question: " ... beating Barack Obama or pretending you like George Bush on a daily basis?" After airing McCain's response -- "Are you with Comedy Central?" -- Horsley asserted: "The ordinarily straight-talking McCain didn't take the bait, except to say that he expects to be judged on his own vision for America." But contrary to Horsley's assertion -- a repetition of the pervasive myth of McCain as "straight-talking" -- Media Matters for America has documented numerous McCain falsehoods, flip-flops, inconsistencies, and instances of apparent political pandering, including his repeated claim that he voted against President Bush's tax cuts because they weren't paired with spending cuts -- a different reason from the one he gave in 2001 when he voted against the tax cuts; his reversals on immigration and the religious right; his false claims that he called for Donald Rumsfeld's resignation as Defense secretary, that Iran is training Al Qaeda, that Obama has only recently proposed that a "strike force" remain in Iraq after the United States withdraws most U.S. troops, that Obama "approve[d]" of a meeting between former President Jimmy Carter and Hamas leader Khaled Meshal, that Obama "once suggested bombing our ally, Pakistan," that Obama and Sen. Hillary Clinton support a "big-government takeover of health care," and that Clinton and Obama "want to raise your taxes"; his false suggestion that Obama said Al Qaeda does not currently have a presence in Iraq; and his misrepresentation of statements by Mitt Romney.
Media Matters has repeatedly documented (here, here, here, here, and here) how the media routinely refer to McCain as a straight-talker, despite evidence to the contrary.
From the May 28 edition of NPR's Morning Edition:
HORSLEY: Late last week, during a news conference in central California, John McCain was asked an uncomfortable question: Which will be harder in the months to come --
[begin audio clip]
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: -- beating Barack Obama or pretending you like George Bush on a daily basis?
McCAIN: Are you with Comedy Central?
[end audio clip]
HORSLEY: The ordinarily straight-talking McCain didn't take the bait, except to say he expects to be judged on his own vision for America. Even as he leans on President Bush for fundraising help this week, McCain's trying hard not to be saddled with the president's troubles, including an approval rating that tumbled to just 27 percent last month in an NBC/Wall Street Journal poll. So far, McCain has fared better than many of his fellow Republicans. Charlie Black is one of McCain's senior advisers.
BLACK: If you look at all the national polls against either Democrat, he's basically even at a time when the Republican brand is lower than even with the Democratic brand, so we're happy with where we are.
HORSLEY: McCain has been stressing his independence from President Bush. The two were bitter rivals in the GOP primary eight years ago, and McCain has criticized the president for inaction on global warming and his early conduct of the Iraq war. Pollster Andy Kohut of the Pew Research Center says that's the image of John McCain that seems to resonate with voters.
KOHUT: He's seen as a different kind of Republican. He's seen as a maverick Republican. He's seen as a centrist when we ask people to judge his ideology. They put him very far away from President Bush.
HORSLEY: On the other hand, McCain campaigned hard for the president's re-election four years ago. While he initially opposed the Bush tax cuts, he now says they should be made permanent. His health-care proposal is built on the same consumer-driven chassis as the president's. And McCain is still one of the strongest backers of the Iraq war, which may be President Bush's most lasting legacy. Kohut says that's the John McCain Democrats want voters to focus on when they argue that McCain is running for George Bush's third term.
KOHUT: Their campaign is going to be, he's a lot more like Bush than you think, and he's a lot more like a typical conservative Republican when it comes to this issue, that issue, and the following other issues.
HORSLEY: One of McCain's senior advisers, Steve Schmidt, was a spokesman for President Bush's re-election campaign four years ago. And McCain recently hired Nicolle Wallace, the Bush campaign's communications director, to help fashion message and strategy. Part of that message is a break from the past. Just yesterday, aides characterized McCain's speech on nuclear security as a significant departure from Bush administration policy. With that in mind, McCain wasn't about to pose for pictures with the unpopular president at his side. For his part, Mr. Bush appears willing to keep a low profile as he said when the two men did appear together on camera in the White House Rose Garden in early March.















KOHUT: He's seen as a different kind of Republican. He's seen as a maverick Republican...
By whom? Grampy McMaverick has flip-flopped his way off the straight-talk expressway long ago.
Is is Horsley or,
Horse's Ass.
These days, your as likely to find NPR reading straight from RNC memos, as doing any real journalism.
What's all this talk now about "Brands?" Is this a new type of corporate news doublespeak?
Are we trying to pick a president, or trying to decide what we'll eat for dinner?
The image the rightwing media is trying to project with its "STRAIGHT TALK" labelling of McCain is that when he speaks, it is (1) LOGICAL, (2) HONEST, and (3) CONSISTENT.
A straight talker is all three, or he is NOT a straight talker.
Is McCain's talk LOGICAL? On the war in Iraq, for instance, he keeps predicting VICTORY when there is NO CHANGE in the conditions which have existed for the past FIVE YEARS. To continue doing the same thing, over an over, and expecting a different result is the definition of INSANITY, not a characteristic of one who is LOGICAL. McCain is seldom LOGICAL in the things he says.
Is McCain's talk HONEST? On Iraq, he says the markets are free and open for business, and he was able to wander around a market unguarded and unprotected without fear. The footage shows him wearing a flak jacket, surrounded by troops, and the reports confirm attack choppers and armored vehicles surrounding his position. He was not HONEST.
On the economy, McCain says all indicators are UP. "Americans are better off, overall we've had a prosperous time, low unemployment, low inflation, a lot of good things have happened, a lot of jobs created" is McCain's assessment of today's American economy. This is either DISHONEST or downright DELUSIONAL.
Finally, is McCain's talk CONSISTENT? Quite the contrary. On issues from Iraq to border security to tax policy, McCain's position has changed almost daily. There is not a single issue on which McCain's position has been completely consistent. Even his support for BUSH is fickle and confusing, as he tries to court Bush, his base supporters (27% or so) and his campaign contributors, simultaneously trying to distance himself from Bush to try to dupe support from the 70% or so who disapprove of Bush's reign (which McCain, by all indications, will simply continue).
McCain is NOT logical, is NOT honest, and is NOT consistent, as regularly as breathing. There is not a single thing he utters which is not in violation of at least ONE of the requirements of a "straight talker".
Yet, the Rightwing Media perpetuates the MYTH ... even as, in this example, as they expose yet another example (among hundreds) where McCain is talking crooked.
It would seem that when the talk has become 50% or more in VIOLATION of the requirements of "straight talk", that the label would be dropped by the press as anything but an object of nostalgic ridicule. McCain is approaching 100% perfect violation of any sane definition of "straight talk", yet the media persists in bestowing the label on the man daily.
There is only one explanation: It is calculated propaganda, repeated with the intent to FOOL the audience.
OMG, Are we going to have to through this every time anyone in the media uses the words "straight talker"? Maybe we can keep a count between that and every time Obama says "stand for change"? At least that would relieve the tedium.
*sigh* It's going to be a long five months.
Another American:
It is YOU, and like thinkers (who, even at the TIME, were in the minority), who gave us the reign of George W. Bush.
It's been an EXTREMELY long (and destructive) eight years. And it's YOUR fault, YOU should have known how disasterous Bush was going to be (we Libs told you often enough), but you thought you knew better. And you were WRONG. Your support for Bush has netted us all these problems in the nation and the world.
Now you're worried that you'll hear for five months what a friggin' LIE it is to refer to McCain as a "straight talker". Poor widdle babykins. All the crap you've brought down on us by your tragically wrongheaded "judgment", and now you're worried McCain might actually be vetted?
We Americans have LIVED your "judgment" for eight years. Your "judgment" is TOXIC. Republican rule has been DISASTEROUS for America (with the lone exception of those favored CEO's out there, turning their millions into billions thanks to government favors).
What makes you think your "opinion" has any value at all? Is it that FOX NEWS hires shills like Rove and Morris, so you think there still might be PROFIT in trying to fool the American People?
Anyone who takes you, Rove, or any of the other die-hard rightwing apologists for Bush SERIOUSLY, would be certifyably NUTS and self destructive. Your cred is ZERO.
I was listening to Cspan when I heard Horsley's comment
The press is so lazy it boggles the mind. McCain votes conservatively and does not resemble the maverick label .
The only issue that matters is that McCain wants to continue in Iraq which is
destroying our country in so many ways(soldiers's lives, financiallym and world prestige).
In 2008, McCain the Senator has sided with G W Bush 100% of the time.
That's not a "maverick", that's a lackey, a toady. Next, we'll see McCain slobbering up to his hero Bush, asking him to PLEASE help raise money for McCain's bid as a "change" candidate! It would be comical if not so tragic.
One thing I did appreciate was earlier this week, when Bush and McCain were at a fundraiser together yet didn't appear in public together until after the nightly newscasts, the news media I heard pointed out that bit of strategy.
I heard about 5 different broadcast networks say that Bush and McCain purposely didn't show their faces so that it would not be possible to have a picture of them together on those newscasts. I think that having your picture on a newscast is less toxic than having it pointed out that you purposely manipulated your behavior to deny that photo op!
The hypocrisy that it's okay for Bush to attend a fundraiser but not okay to have their picture on the news was pointed out in this case. I think that's progress.