About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

NY Times ignored McCain flip-flop on whether he believed Falwell was an "agent[] of intolerance"

June 09, 2008 11:24 am ET
image

SUMMARY: In an article about Sen. John McCain's outreach to "evangelicals and other Christian conservatives," The New York Times noted that "[i]n 2000, when he was running against Mr. Bush for the Republican nomination, Mr. McCain castigated Pat Robertson and the Rev. Jerry Falwell as 'agents of intolerance.' " But the Times did not point out that McCain subsequently said he no longer believed Falwell was an "agent[] of intolerance."

23 Comments

In a June 9 New York Times article about Sen. John McCain's outreach to "evangelicals and other Christian conservatives," staff writer Michael Luo wrote that "Mr. McCain's relationship with evangelicals has long been troubled. In 2000, when he was running against Mr. Bush for the Republican nomination, Mr. McCain castigated Pat Robertson and the Rev. Jerry Falwell as 'agents of intolerance.' " The article did not note, however, that, in April 2006, McCain said he no longer believed Falwell was an "agent[] of intolerance." A month later, McCain delivered the commencement address at Falwell's Liberty University.

Similarly, in a February 8 Times article, reporters Elisabeth Bumiller and David D. Kirkpatrick wrote that "[c]onservatives fault Mr. McCain for what they consider a long list of transgressions," noting that he "once call[ed] certain evangelical leaders 'agents of intolerance.' " Bumiller and Kirkpatrick also did not note McCain's subsequent statement about Falwell.

From the June 9 New York Times article:

Mr. McCain's outreach to Christian conservatives has been a quiet courting, reflecting a balancing act: his election hopes rely on drawing in the political middle and Democrats who might be turned off should he woo the religious right too heavily by, for instance, highlighting his anti-abortion position more on the campaign trail.

''If McCain tried Bush's strategy of just mobilizing the base, he would almost certainly fall short,'' said John C. Green, a senior fellow at the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. ''Because the Republican brand name is less popular and the conservative base is restive, McCain has special needs to reach out to independent and moderate voters, but, of course, he can't completely neglect the evangelical and conservative base.''

The instrumental role of evangelicals in Mr. Bush's victory in 2004 over Senator John Kerry is an oft-repeated tale at this point. Mr. Bush's openness about his personal faith and stances on social issues earned him a following among evangelicals, who represented about a quarter of the electorate in 2004. Exit polls in the 2004 election found that 78 percent of white ''born again'' or evangelical Protestants had voted for Mr. Bush.

In contrast, Mr. McCain's relationship with evangelicals has long been troubled. In 2000, when he was running against Mr. Bush for the Republican nomination, Mr. McCain castigated Pat Robertson and the Rev. Jerry Falwell as ''agents of intolerance.''

In a sign of the lingering distrust, Mr. McCain finished last out of nine Republican candidates in a straw poll last year at the Values Voter Summit in Washington, a gathering for socially conservative activists.

James C. Dobson, the influential founder of the evangelical group Focus on the Family, released a statement in February, when Mr. McCain was on the verge of securing the Republican nomination, affirming that he would not vote for Mr. McCain and would instead stay home if he became the nominee. Dr. Dobson later softened his stance and said he would vote but has remained critical of Mr. McCain.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Sueelldd (June 09, 2008 11:33 am ET)
         

      In contrast, Mr. McCain's relationship with evangelicals has long been troubled. In 2000, when he was running against Mr. Bush for the Republican nomination, Mr. McCain castigated Pat Robertson and the Rev. Jerry Falwell as ''agents of intolerance.''

      I think that was before McCain sold his soul to the vicious right wing.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by JLyons (June 09, 2008 2:00 pm ET)
           
        I never bought that act in 2000. He is still the msm choice, that is loud and clear. If you read the NYT they would have you believe that the religious right hates him, yet they have endorsed him.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by DorisRussell (June 09, 2008 11:40 am ET)
         

      The McCain of 2000 on CNN, wow have times changed.

      http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0002/28/se.01.html

      Just to refresh your memory, Pat Robertson made phone calls about McCain. And in those, he said that McCain had chosen a man as his national campaign chairman, a vicious bigot who wrote that conservative Christian politics are antiabortion zealots, homophobes and would-be censors, and they have argued back and forth about that time and time again since that happened.

      The Virginia Republican primary is tomorrow and Mr. McCain saying that he is inclusive and conservative, several times going through issues where he stood, saying he was a proud conservative, a Reagan conservative, and saying that what was good for America was good for the Republican Party, that he is bringing new people into the Republican Party everyday. Then he talked about his values against Pat Robertson particularly, and putting his images almost on the power with union bosses saying they were using political tactics and slander and corrupting influences, including money, would "shame our faith and our party and our country," and that his faith unites not divides.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jawill11 (June 09, 2008 11:49 am ET)
         
      Proof that the MSM covers for McCain.  During the primary, they ignored his earlier rational stances and talked up his more recent hardcore stances.  Now that it is the general election, the reversed course and are ignoring his more recent stances to talk up those reasonable stances he has since abandoned. 
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (June 09, 2008 11:57 am ET)
           
        Jawill, don't take this too hard, but I believe you would get a very low rating from the Values Voters Coalition.You know, due to your lack of values.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jawill11 (June 09, 2008 12:21 pm ET)
             
          If I got anything above a 0%, I would have to take a long, hard look at what I was doing wrong in my life to not be 100% opposed to those crazy fools. 
          Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (June 09, 2008 12:44 pm ET)
             
          Yes but can't appeasement and surrendering also be called values?

          Can't the fact that we're godless, commie bastards, who kill babies and advocate the elimination of the elderly and infirm, and who wish to shove our science down the throats of those who follow the Risen Savior show that we have values?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (June 09, 2008 1:01 pm ET)
               
            Good points, WK. You know what I value? Reaching my terrorist-jabbing fist into the pockets of hard working Americans to take their money for outlandish social programs and the salaries of activist judges.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by princeofwheels (June 09, 2008 1:02 pm ET)
               
            WKING, You forgot VERMIN. My favorite.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by worrierking (June 09, 2008 1:14 pm ET)
                 
              Sorry Prince, that's become one of my favorites too. And I've even heard us refereed to recently as lice. I guess as individuals I would be a louse and we would be lice. I think lice pass the test for VERMIN too.

              And Colonel, I'd ixnay the talk about putting your grubby hands in the pockets of hard working Americans unless you're willing to answer to Tommy.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (June 09, 2008 1:19 pm ET)
                   
                He'll be powerless once I've taken his gun away.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by juliajayne (June 09, 2008 1:29 pm ET)
                   
                Vermin and lice. Those are the very words used by Hitler to describe Jews and other "undesirables". Yeesh. Is that what we've come to?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by snoopy (June 09, 2008 1:58 pm ET)
                     

                  Nah, we're still good. When we start measuring cranium size and taking note of features like the unibrow to describe someone who is genetically inferior then you should be worried.

                  Oops, my bad. Turns out the right wing does that now. Worry, JJ...

                  Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (June 09, 2008 2:10 pm ET)
         
      Now that Barack v. Hillary is over, I expect the systematic evisceration of Obama in the MSM to begin.

      That is, unless they finally start doing their jobs and provide in-depth analysis of how the Bush Administration manipulated the WMD intelligence and lied us into Iraq. Remember that story? As far as I can tell, it's already dead. They're getting pretty efficient at killing any and all stories about the criminal activities of the Bush administration. How can we expect them to cover the election fairly?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Sueelldd (June 09, 2008 2:14 pm ET)
           

        How can we expect them to cover the election fairly?

        We can not expect them to cover it fairly. Look what happened in 2004.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (June 09, 2008 2:16 pm ET)
           
        I'd just like to see them cover this. Maybe expose the name and address of the anonymous racist like O'Reilly and his ilk expose names and addresses of people they don't like.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dbeden4153 (June 09, 2008 2:45 pm ET)
             

          Speaking of O'Reilly, did anyone else catch this little gem from the National Conference from Media Reform?

          HE. GOT. OWNED. 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by RABBITLUVR (June 09, 2008 3:08 pm ET)
               
            I hope O'Reilly's head explodes if he features this tonight.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by worrierking (June 09, 2008 3:12 pm ET)
               
            Thanks for the link, DN.

            I'd like to say O'Reilly's guy was a weasel, but then I'd have to apologize to all of the weasels I offended.

            I loved this guy's logic. When they asked him if he thought he was a journalist after he ambushed Bill Moyers the guy responded "Well, Bill Moyers just called me one."
            Report Abuse
          • Author by juliajayne (June 09, 2008 3:25 pm ET)
               

            I love it when Bill Moyers says that O'Reilly isn't a jouralist, he's a pugilist. I guess that didn't go the way O'Reilly and his thugs had it planned.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by Preston (June 09, 2008 7:03 pm ET)
               

            I saw that video yesterday at mediabistro. Bill Moyers is DA MAN! I love that ending, too! It'll be interesting to see how O'Reilly will edit this video on his show tonight, I'm sure he'll drag in his goofy body language expert to analyze Moyers. Then, he'll bring in suck ups Bernie Goldberg and Jane Hall to smear Moyers and pontificate how Moyers has declined as a journalist. 

            Report Abuse
            • Author by JimmyCraghorn (June 10, 2008 10:52 am ET)
                 
              Excellent call, I caught a couple minutes, and the body language expert was on.  Very prescient_p
              Report Abuse
    • Author by wzwriter (June 09, 2008 2:59 pm ET)
         

      Jerry Falwell was not an "agent" of intolerance.  He, Pat Robertson, and D.James Kennedy were Exclusive East Coast Distributirs for intolerance.

      And now he and D. James are nice and toasty down in Hell.....

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.