About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

CNBC's Harwood still referring to McCain as a "maverick"

June 09, 2008 7:51 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: On Morning Joe, John Harwood once again described Sen. John McCain as a "maverick," claiming that McCain's criticism of the media is in part "a way for John McCain, who has been such a maverick, to try to unify the Republican Party." Harwood has repeatedly referred to McCain as a "maverick" or having a "maverick brand."

31 Comments

After repeatedly referring to Sen. John McCain as a "maverick" or having a "maverick brand" during the Republican presidential primary, CNBC chief Washington correspondent John Harwood once again used the moniker while discussing McCain, asserting the McCain campaign's criticism of the media is, in part, "a way for John McCain, who has been such a maverick, to try to unify the Republican Party, 'cause one thing that unifies Republicans is that the mainstream media is something they don't like very much." As Media Matters for America has documented, broadcast and print media routinely use the term "maverick" when discussing McCain, often without noting his rightward shift on high-profile issues such as immigration and taxes or acknowledging his numerous falsehoods.

Harwood's comments came during an appearance on the June 9 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe, after MSNBC political analyst Mike Barnicle asked: "John, what happens to John McCain if, as seems to be happening as we speak, is this continued thin-skinned atmosphere around the McCain campaign towards the media? You know, 'that's an unfair story,' 'you're pro-Obama.' " Barnicle added, "I mean, John McCain, we -- he's widely admired by members of the media, myself included. I've covered him for a long time. What happens if he changes during the course of this campaign and becomes appearing as thin-skinned, and his people appear as thin-skinned, toward a force in this country that has been so beneficial to him?" After suggesting that McCain's complaints about the media may be an attempt to "unif[y] Republicans," Harwood continued, asserting: "You know, I -- we'll see how that plays out over the long run. I think it's a tactic right now, and it's a little bit silly, because, you know, you talk to all the Republicans who ran against John McCain, they think that he's gotten a very favorable press for quite a long time. So, maybe he's trying to cure the perception that, you know, he's in love with all the people around your table up there."

From the June 9 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe:

PAT BUCHANAN (political analyst): Right. John, you know, when you take a look at the issues -- basically the unpopularity of the war, Bush at 28 percent, the economy, you know, unemployment rising by 750,000, gas prices going through the roof -- Democrats should walk away with the race, and yet, in the polls today, you've got a dead heat between Obama and McCain. What do you attribute that to?

MIKA BRZEZINSKI (co-host): Yeah.

BUCHANAN: I mean, especially the Obama segment has this sort of leftist taint and the attacks on him as being exotic and out of touch, do you think they've taken root in light of the fact that, I guess, Hillary Clinton was still running stronger in the national election only slightly against McCain when she dropped out?

HARWOOD: I think it's that green-puke background from that speech the other night --

[laughter]

BUCHANAN: That helped McCain?

HARWOOD: -- and the theme was pudding. Americans like a theme with pudding. No, seriously, I think it has to do with the fact that, first of all, John McCain's persona is very strong. People like McCain. They admire the brand of patriotism that he represents, so that's a powerful, independent asset, even if you set aside the problems for the Republican brand.

Barack Obama is different. He's the first African-American candidate. He's got a different background that -- than a lot of mainstream voters can relate to. The whole Jeremiah Wright thing, Bill Ayers, the entire aura of Hyde Park is something that Republicans and Mrs. Clinton were able to use in the primary -- will be able to use some more -- the question is, how does all that net out at the end?

I think Barack Obama, as you indicated earlier, Pat, begins in a pretty strong position. All of the atmospheric conditions are right for Democrats. The question is, can he hold up over the course of the campaign? Clinton people made the argument she would hold up better than he could. And there's some reasons to think that that might be true. However, it's a change election, and he's the guy more than anybody in the country who personifies change --

BRZEZINSKI: Change, absolutely.

HARWOOD: -- and so that puts him in a good position.

BRZEZINSKI: Yeah.

BARNICLE: John, what happens to John McCain if, as seems to be happening as we speak, is this continued thin-skinned atmosphere around the McCain campaign towards the media? You know, "that's an unfair story," "you're pro-Obama" --

BRZEZINSKI: Yeah, there is a lot of that.

BARNICLE: I mean, John McCain, we -- he's widely admired by members of the media, myself included. I've covered him for a long time. What happens if he changes during the course of this campaign and becomes appearing as thin-skinned, and his people appear as thin-skinned, toward a force in this country that has been so beneficial to him?

HARWOOD: They're beating that drum pretty hard, aren't they?

BARNICLE: Yeah.

HARWOOD: I think part of it is that that is a way for John McCain -- who has been such a maverick -- to try to unify the Republican Party, 'cause one thing that unifies Republicans is that the mainstream media is something they don't like very much. You know, I -- we'll see how that plays out over the long run. I think it's a tactic right now, and it's a little bit silly, because, you know, you talk to all the Republicans who ran against John McCain, they think that he's gotten a very favorable press for quite a long time. So, maybe he's trying to cure the perception that, you know, he's in love with all the people around your table up there.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by jeter2 (June 09, 2008 8:28 pm ET)
         

      OMG. Does anyone really even care??? So what if the media calls him a maverick...

      Face it MMFA & all others so very concerned with this maverick BS. It ain't gonna stop. It ain't gonna matter. It's not gonna decide the race. It will be included in McCain's obit.

      File this away with the other 7,250 McCain is a Maverick threads.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by ConstanceRifleII (June 09, 2008 8:54 pm ET)
           

        "File this away with the other 7,250 McCain is a Maverick threads."

        done *papers shuffling* 

        Report Abuse
      • Author by my4cents (June 09, 2008 9:43 pm ET)
           

        I agree with you in principle.

        However, googling 'maverick mccain' results in mmfa links right away so it is helping a gullible person to not believe senator McCain is indeed a maverick.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by BottleBlonde (June 09, 2008 10:46 pm ET)
           

        Launched in May 2004, Media Matters for America put in place, for the first time, the means to systematically monitor a cross section of print, broadcast, cable, radio, and Internet media outlets for conservative misinformation — news or commentary that is not accurate, reliable, or credible and that forwards the conservative agenda — every day, in real time.

        It forwards the conservative agenda to say that John McCain is a maverick when he's not. Media Matters reports those instances every day, in real time. It doesn't matter how often it happens, or how it might not be the most important thing they cover, or that it might not stop as a result of their commentary. It's what they do. It's what they do well.

        You don't have a leg to stand on when you say that they should not cover it when McCain is called a maverick. They're doing exactly what they're supposed to be doing. All your comment does is try to distract us from that reality.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by jeter2 (June 10, 2008 10:03 am ET)
             

          You don't have a leg to stand on when you say that they should not cover it when McCain is called a maverick.

          Kindly point out where I suggested such a thing? Ah so typical of you Sue/Ellie17/NotThat George & the umpteen other monikers & sock puppets you've posted as here, to falsely accuse someone of saying something they didn't say.

          MMFA can highlight McCain is a Maverick till the cows come home, & I fully expect they will. My point, lost in your scrambled brain, is that it won't stop the media from repeating it. And it will, whether you or MMFA likes it or not be included in McCain's obituary.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Governor (June 10, 2008 10:17 am ET)
               
            MMFA can highlight McCain is a Maverick till the cows come home, & I fully expect they will. My point, lost in your scrambled brain, is that it won't stop the media from repeating it.

             
            That's not true, Jeter.  Your point was to simply opine 'so what?' and 'who cares?'  I care.  As do others.  It is total bunk for members of the media to market a politician.  It's really that simply.  You don't care.  Good for you.  So don't post about it.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by Governor (June 10, 2008 7:19 am ET)
           

        OMG. Does anyone really even care??? So what if the media calls him a maverick...

        Media should not be branding politicians.  It's really that simple.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by RABBITLUVR (June 10, 2008 9:54 am ET)
             
          Except for the moron in the WH now... worst President ever. Can't find a more appropriate brand than that.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by wzwriter (June 10, 2008 10:30 am ET)
               

            Personally, I have never used the name of the office when referring to George W. Bush - that would be a term of respect for a person who deserves no respect whatsoever.  As far as I'm concerned, Bush is an illegal squatter in the White House, a military deserter, an alcoholic/drug abuser, and a war criminal.  I will not use the term "president" in conjunction with a person's name until January 20, 2009, when Barack Obama is sworn in as our truly legitimate president and begins the process of restoring the honor to our country that has been tarnished by the Bush Misadministration.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by tex (June 10, 2008 8:25 am ET)
           

        JETER:

        Just to be clear, it's your position that the dishonest Media, the lying rightwing, and the disingenuous Republican candidates should be able to give out false information without comment, without documenting the REPEATED efforts to fool the American People?

        It's OK if maybe it is noted by MMFA a time or two, but if the Rightwing Republican Media decides to repeat an untruth 750,000 times, that it should just be ignored after the first couple of times?

        The building of narratives is what the Media has been about for the past couple of decades -- it's a mainstay of propaganda. Repeat a LIE often enough, it becomes a TRUTH, a "CONVENTIONAL WISDOM".

        McCain cannot win as a Republican. Republicans have destroyed everything they've touched in the past decade, and America is in a hell of a fix because of their wrongheaded policies. So, McCain must be packaged as SOMETHING ELSE. A "maverick" is the approved way to distinguish McCain as sufficiently DIFFERENT from Republicans to get elected.

        Ah, but WHY would the corporate Media WANT McCain elected? Easy answer. McCain "the maverick" is in lock-step with Bush on all issues that matter, the economy and the war. He's reliably Republican on all issues foreign and domestic. He's on board to "BOMB BOMB BOMB IRAN". He's a reliable corporate guy, ready to continue the policies which have fabulously enriched the very few elites while trashing the rest of America.

        As the election approaches, the Rightwing Media should be challenged EVERY SINGLE TIME they try to promote their false narrative and try to FOOL the American People. MMFA's mission is to DOCUMENT rightwing misinformation, EVERY TIME it appears in a Media forum designed to misinform the audience. If the Rightwing lies ONCE, there is one mention in MMFA. If the Rightwing lies 750,000 times (which is how they do it, according to Joseph Goebbles' formula), then it MUST be noted 750,000 times.

        Here's how today's Corporate Rightwing Media is operating, following Goebbles' quote: "

        “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

        Report Abuse
        • Author by jeter2 (June 10, 2008 10:18 am ET)
             

          Just to be clear, it's your position that the dishonest Media, the lying rightwing, and the disingenuous Republican candidates should be able to give out false information without comment, without documenting the REPEATED efforts to fool the American People?

          No that's not my position. Why don't you go back & read my post instead of skimming it & posting with your typical knee-jerk reaction. The dishonest left or right media, the lying left or right, the disingenuous left or right candidates should not be able to give out false information without comment or without an effort to point out any & all false information.

          MMFA can point out the McCain is a Maverick myth every time it's uttered. That wasn't my point cowboy. I just don't find the mention of McCain as a Maverick earth shattering. Obviously you do...

          Tex, McCain being referred to as a maverick will not destroy humankind or even the USA.

          Your long-winded pontificating would be better utilized on more important mis-information--not on some inconsequential label hung on McCain by the media.

          McCain will forever be known by many as a maverick. It will not turn the election in McCain's favor. And I can guarantee it will likely lead off his obit. So why throw a tantrum over it?

          Choose your battles wisely Tex.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Governor (June 10, 2008 10:45 am ET)
               
            OMG. Does anyone really even care???
            Report Abuse
          • Author by DEMS_SOL (June 10, 2008 11:13 am ET)
               

            Hey J - consider this.  If MMFA stopped posting headlines referencing "Mavarick" McCain half their staff would have to be laid off.

            What they may not realize is that true conservatives don't like McCain because of his "Maverick" moniker.  By trying to convince them he is not may work in McCains favor. 

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Governor (June 10, 2008 11:48 am ET)
                 
              Wow, you really don't get it.  Media should simply refrain from marketing a politician as anything, good or bad.  That's all.  Report, don't brand.  It's simple really.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by jeter2 (June 10, 2008 12:00 pm ET)
                 

              Excellent point Dem.

              One of the [many] reasons I'm not voting for McCain is because of his eagerness to jump in with Liberals on issues I would have rather he didn't...like Illegal Immigration for example. If that's a maverick, I want nothing to do with it or him...

              But if MMFA can convince hard core Conservatives that McCain does not deserve the maverick label-- they might actually help him get them back on board with his candidacy...and win in the Fall.

              Report Abuse
            • Author by RABBITLUVR (June 10, 2008 12:46 pm ET)
                 

              Oh sure, just like that 'true conservative' Bush, right? You so-called 'true conservatives' voted that moron in TWICE, remember? Well, things didn't turn out so hot, didn't they, with Bush's 'true conservative' stances on immigration and federal spending, right?

               

              Report Abuse
    • Author by truthseeker77 (June 09, 2008 9:00 pm ET)
         
      Candidates are given undeserved names sometimes. Take Obama, for example, who was said to be post-partisan even though he voted with his party 97% of the time in 2007.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by my4cents (June 09, 2008 9:55 pm ET)
           

        or, the 'compassionate  conservative' label attached to a certain presidential candidate and how well that turned out.

        happy defending the undefensible.

         

        Report Abuse
    • Author by gg (June 09, 2008 9:01 pm ET)
         
      John McCain is no more a maverick, then Bush was a uniter, not a divider (or a compassionate conservative).

      This is the party that gave us Dennis the Menace and now want to saddle us with Mr. Wilson.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (June 09, 2008 9:09 pm ET)
         
      McCain is still considered a maverick? Yea...and Madonna is a fresh young singer.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mikeinmd (June 09, 2008 9:44 pm ET)
         

      James Garner will always be Maverick to me.

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (June 09, 2008 9:53 pm ET)
           
        Well...John McCain is old enough to have played one of the Mavericks on TV.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mikeinmd (June 09, 2008 11:42 pm ET)
             

          Smooth as a handle on a gun

          Maverick is the name

          Wild as the wind in Oregon

          Blowing up a canyon

          Easier to tame

          Report Abuse
        • Author by wzwriter (June 10, 2008 12:22 pm ET)
             

          Well...John McCain is old enough to have played one of the Mavericks on TV.

          Gramps McCain is old enough to have LIVED in the Old West.... :-)

          Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (June 09, 2008 11:57 pm ET)
         
      How a NAVY fighter pilot turned into a Bush Kiss-A$$ i will never know.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by miriamsong (June 10, 2008 7:50 am ET)
         

      more like an escort than a maverick...

      maverickorescort.blogspot.com 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (June 10, 2008 10:03 am ET)
           

        more like an escort than a maverick...

        I was thinking more like a Pinto with the exploding gas tank....

        Report Abuse
        • Author by RABBITLUVR (June 10, 2008 2:01 pm ET)
             
          I'm waiting for that Pinto to explode during the debates...
          Report Abuse
    • Author by wzwriter (June 10, 2008 8:38 am ET)
         
      People just need to remember that just as the Ford Maverick was a lousy car, Gramps McCain would make a lousy president.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by thomp.steve9098 (June 10, 2008 10:39 am ET)
         
      As Harwood suggests, the Maverick moniker is not necessarily good, politically, for the Straight-Talker. Conservatives loathe the Maverick's independent judgment even more than Liberals. Repeatedly calling Maverick Maverick hurts him with the repub base, those whose votes the Straight-Talker could actually get.  Thus the liberal media injures Maverick's campaign by using that moniker because it reminds many conservatives of his independent positions. 
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (June 10, 2008 12:03 pm ET)
         
      McCain isn't a maverick, but he's full of something else one finds in horse barns.
      Report Abuse
The Fox Effect
Media Matters Connect

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.