Will falsely suggested Obama comment was made in abortion context
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
SUMMARY: On Hardball, George Will described female pro-choice voters as "women who believe, in the words of Barack Obama, that they shouldn't be punished with a baby." As video of Obama's remarks shows, Obama was discussing sex education, not abortion, when he made the comment Will highlighted.
On the June 9 edition of MSNBC's Hardball, Washington Post columnist George Will described female pro-choice voters as "women who believe, in the words of Barack Obama, that they shouldn't be punished with a baby." But contrary to Will's suggestion, Obama was not talking about abortion when he made the comment.
Host Chris Matthews, discussing Sen. John McCain's efforts to woo anti-abortion evangelical Christian voters as well as Sen. Hillary Clinton's supporters, said: "The women voters, as a group, who vote Democrat, tend to be pro-choice. It's a poor choice of words, but it means they believe, ultimately, the woman gets to decide whether to have an abortion or not, not the state." Will replied: "You mean those are women who believe, in the words of Barack Obama, that they shouldn't be punished with a baby?"
As Media Matters for America has repeatedly documented, Obama made the "punished with a baby" comment in response to what CNN reported was "a question about how his administration, if he's elected, would deal with the issue of HIV and AIDS and also sexually transmitted diseases with young girls." As video of the March 29 campaign event, broadcast by CNN, shows, Obama was discussing sex education, not abortion, when he made the comment Will highlighted.
From the March 29 edition of CNN's Ballot Bowl 2008:
MARY SNOW (CNN correspondent): Welcome back to CNN's edition of Ballot Bowl. This is a chance for you to hear directly from the candidates. I'm Mary Snow in Johnstown, Pennsylvania, where Senator Barack Obama is holding a town hall meeting right now, taking questions from the audience. Let's go straight to Senator Barack Obama; he just was asked a question about how his administration, if he's elected, would deal with the issue of HIV and AIDS and also sexually transmitted diseases with young girls. Here's Senator Barack Obama.
OBAMA: -- or we give them really expensive surgery and we don't spend money on the front end keeping people healthy in the first place. So, when it comes to -- when it comes specifically to HIV/AIDS, the most important prevention is education, which should include -- which should include abstinence only -- should include abstinence education and teaching that children -- teaching children, you know, that sex is not something casual. But it should also include -- it should also include other, you know, information about contraception because, look, I've got two daughters -- 9 years old and 6 years old. I'm going to teach them first of all about values and morals, but if they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby. I don't want them punished with an STD at the age of 16.
You know, so, it doesn't make sense to not give them information. You still want to teach them the morals and the values to make good decisions. That will be important, number one. Then we're still going to have to provide better treatment for those who do have -- who do contract HIV/AIDS, because it's no longer a death sentence, if, in fact, you get the proper cocktails. It's expensive. That's why we want to prevent as much as possible.
But we should also provide better treatment. And we should focus on those sectors where it's prevalent and we've got to get over the stigma because understand that the fastest growth in HIV/AIDS is in heterosexuals, not gays. And so, we've got to get out of that stigma that we still have around it. It's connected also to drug use. So, one of the things we have to do is to start thinking about better substance abuse treatment programs around drugs and not just treat it as a criminal justice issue. Treat it as a public health issue as well.
So -- but this all is connected to the idea of prevention and so my health care plan says, you know what? I don't want kids in the emergency room for treatable illnesses like asthma. I want them to get a primary care doctor and have regular check-ups and, you know, if we decreased obesity rates back to the rates that existed back in 1980, we would save the Medicare system a trillion dollars -- one trillion dollars because that's what's accounting for huge spikes in heart disease and diabetes and all kinds of preventable illnesses.
So we've got to put emphasis on that. Let me say one last thing, though. I'm going to use the presidential bully pulpit to start talking about people taking responsibility. We were talking about education earlier. It doesn't matter how good the job the schools are doing, if parents, you don't turn off your TV sets and put away your video games and make your kids do your homework and meet with the teachers, it won't make any difference. And the same is true on health care. I mean, some of us just have bad luck, and -- or genetically, are predisposed to certain diseases.
But, you know, if we're not all making some effort to get exercise and, you know, eat properly and not smoke and, you know, and I know -- I've had my own little battles. You know, I used to sneak a few cigarettes once in a while. My wife cut me off at the pass. She announced on 60 Minutes, she said, you know, "Yeah, he used to smoke once in a while, and he promised me. So if you catch him, anybody out there" -- but that was good. I think we all have to take some responsibility for these issues as well. That's going to be important. All right, I've got time for one more question.
From the June 9 edition of MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews:
MATTHEWS: How does he [McCain] choose between the evangelical vote and the Hillary vote? He seems to be going for both in the same day.
WILL: Well, I think he feels that his persona, his whole "I'm a warrior, I've been here, I've suffered" will appeal to these people who think they are suffering.
MATTHEWS: The women voters, as a group, who vote Democrat, tend to be pro-choice. It's a poor choice of words, but it means they believe, ultimately, the woman gets to decide whether to have an abortion or not, not the state. How can John McCain appeal to that point of view?
WILL: You mean those are women who believe, in the words of Barack Obama, that they shouldn't be punished with a baby?
MATTHEWS: Right.
WILL: Got it.
MATTHEWS: Another infelicitous comment --
WILL: That's right.
MATTHEWS: -- yes.
WILL: I suspect, Chris, that three-quarters of the country at this point does not know that John McCain is pro-life. They think because he's a maverick, and maverick means disagreeing with your party, he probably disagrees with the party on that. They're wrong. And I think once the Democrats make that known, as surely they will, these people will come scampering back to the Democratic Party in droves.

















Absolutely and a pregnancy is one of the most challenging situations a teen-age girl could face. There are serious consequences for both her and her baby. So yeah Obama thinks we should provide a compressive sex education so that both teen-age Mom and her child will have to spend their lives trying to play catch up with everyone else. Why go there if it can be and it can be avoided.
George Will often gets his facts wrong. I watched him at that townhall. It was hard to figure out what in the world he was talking about. He listed just about every form of birth control known to man. This isn't a big issue.
I see Media Matters is all over the big and little media comments that are character, and personal attacks (big and small) against Obama. That's fair and necessary.
But, please, for all the times I emailed your organization, as did other Clinton supporters, it was so unbelievably rare you even mentioned the non-stop personal and gender-biased comments that were being thrown at her day after day. Chris Matthews was nothing compared to Keith Olbermann's disgusting coverage. Suggesting someone take Hillary into a room, but only he emerge. The ridiculous twist and faux outrage at her reference to June primaries and citing the RFK campaign. Media Matters stayed silent through almost everything.
When Media Matters shows bias, how can we expect the media to respond? Obviously, the complaints are selective and Media Matters plays favorites.
Strange, this site used to be in the tank for Hillary, according to some of our dimmer bulbs.
I thought the same thing Steve.......
I seem to recall hearing from many in here that this site was created, owned and operated by George Soros and then it was Hillary Clinton, now it's Barack Obama...... I can't keep up with all this new ownership.
I can't keep up with all this new ownership.
When it comes to ownership, all you need to remember is that Rupert Murdoch still owns Faux News, and the Rev. Sun Myung Moon still owns the Washington Times and UPI. And while Pat Robertson no longer owns the cable network that is now called "ABC Family", they are still contractually obligated to show his crappy "700 Club" multiple times each day.....
Time to let it go, or prepare for President McBush.
George Will often gets his facts wrong.
Like 98% of the time. He gets his name right, and that's about it... :-)
Save your anger for the Troglodytes, Rojo.
it is so fresh to see George Will and Dick Morris are in bed together reading the same bedtime story.
George Will actually lies through his teeth quite often. His attempt to claim that Obama made the "baby" remark in that context is only one example. Earlier this year he "mistakenly" claimed Obama would raise Social Security taxes. There are many others.
Every election year Will turns into what he is at his core: a really articulate right wing propaganda hack.
Why doe MM continue to be so dishonest about this?
What's the "mistake," according to Obama? Getting pregnant.
What's the "punishment"? A baby.
Got it? Of course abortion is part of the entire issue.
Geesh ...
If Shoes takes his meds, he won't be nearly as funny or entertaining.
This is one of those items where I generally don't even allow for the possibility that the trolls really don't understand it-- I think even a mildly mentally disabled person could figure it out, and anyone still taking the right-wing stance on it is being dishonest.
I'm not so sure about Shoes. He might really be confused, and that's almost cute.
By SHOE'S logic Obama would have been talking of infanticide...not abortion.
By SHOE'S logic Obama would have been talking of infanticide...not abortion.
You can't use "Shoes" and "logic" in the same sentence - they're mutually exclusive.
An unpleasant side effect to following the things said by these political media hacks, is an awful suspicion at how phony and manipulative are those things... it borders on an unpleasant cynicism, to think their discussions on-air are contrived, and that these phony "colloquies" sometimes contain insidious and clever strategies.
chris matthews broaches the subject, and refers to "a poor choice of words": but he broaches the subject just the same.
And that's george will's cue, to quote Sen. Obama, but change completely the original meaning and context of that quote: an original meaning and context I understand to be, what people generally refer to as "sex education".
And the two of these political media hacks, in tandem, thereby share equally in completely (and intentionally I say) misrepresenting Sen. Obama's words: matthews broaching the subject and setting up a contrived context, and then george will immediately fastening Sen. Obama's quote, from a different context, to that subject that chris matthews had just introduced (by way of "a poor choice of words").
And then they confirm what they had just done, with this strange little dance of incomplete thoughts (non-thoughts really)...
MATTHEWS: Right.
WILL: Got it.
MATTHEWS: Another infelicitous comment --
WILL: That's right.
MATTHEWS: -- yes.
And so they get cited here at MMFA.
I know you can read, and I know you didn't need me to remind you, of what you had just read, in the item... but I had said there was an insidious and clever strategy, implanted in that phony and contrived "colloquy" between the political media hacks chris matthews and george will.
This is it: chris matthews and george will, in tandem, implied that some part of the great Democratic constituency that looms before them presently, are (in matthews's words) "women voters ...who ...tend to be pro-choice"
...but (in will's words) "three-quarters of the country at this point does not know that John McCain is pro-life"
...setting up george will to pronounce this advice of his, with regard to how Democrats should proceed...
WILL: "And I think once the Democrats make that known ["that John McCain is pro-life"], as surely they will, these people ["women voters ...who ...tend to be pro-choice"] will come scampering back to the Democratic Party in droves."
What you just read there, pronounced as supposed political advice from a political media hack named george will (containing a vague and false assumption that someone has left "the Democratic Party in droves"), and as part of a phony "colloquy" with another political media hack named chris matthews, is essentially this: a baiting exhortation to Democrats, to initiate as a campaign issue an intensely private and personal surgical procedure, one that only people in the most distressing of personal circumstances ever elects to have performed, and one that no sane person would ever desire to witness... and not only does george will want Democrats to initiate this as a political issue in the upcoming campaign...
WILL: "And I think once the Democrats make that known ["that John McCain is pro-life"], as surely they will, these people ["women voters ...who ...tend to be pro-choice"] will come scampering back to the Democratic Party in droves."
...but he of course wants Democrats to Publicly affirm this surgical procedure. Again, he wants Democrats to Publicly affirm as a campaign issue, as a matter of Public and National Policy, an intensely private and personal surgical procedure, one that only people in the most distressing of personal circumstances ever elects to have performed, and one that no sane person would ever desire to witness.
He (george will) is advising Democrats to alienate millions upon millions of Americans in what we often call "red States", by Publicly affirming a surgical procedure so private and so personal, and so horrific in the imagination of it... so private and so personal, that I would not deign to even type out the word here, let alone to utter it in any discussion of Public and National Policy... which chris matthews happily did (notwithstanding his oblique disclaimer of "a poor choice of words"), in his and george will's contrived "colloquy", which contained clever and insidious bad advice, meant to sabotage Democrats, and alienate them from "red State" Americans.
This wasn't a Limbaugh, Hannity, Coulter, Weiner, O'Reilly, or Beck moment where you have to respond with "I was just kidding" or "Get a life". Obama had great points, and this one goes well above the head of the average Con.
Obama had great points, and this one goes well above the head of the average Con.
Many things go well above the head of the average Con. Like childrens' books:
Not that it really matters, but the photo is a fake according to snopes.
http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/bushbook.asp