About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Despite own reporting on flip-flop, Wash. Times asserts "Maverick" McCain's support of bill "to overhaul immigration" "could help more than harm"

June 16, 2008 1:44 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: The Washington Times' Joseph Curl wrote that Sen. John McCain "bucked his party" when he "joined forces with a liberal leader, Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat, via the McCain-Kennedy bill to overhaul immigration," but Curl failed to note that McCain now says he would no longer support that bill if it came to a vote on the Senate floor.

10 Comments

In a June 16 Washington Times article headlined "Maverick McCain bedevils Democrats," reporter Joseph Curl wrote that Sen. John McCain "bucked his party" when he "joined forces with a liberal leader, Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat, via the McCain-Kennedy bill to overhaul immigration" and asserted that "some say those against-the-grain transgressions could help more than harm Mr. McCain." However, the article did not mention that McCain now says he would no longer support the immigration bill he co-authored if it came to a vote on the Senate floor.

The Times itself has previously reported on what it described as McCain's "flip-flops" to more closely align himself with the base of the Republican Party by changing his positions on taxes and immigration. In an October 31, 2007, article headlined "McCain caters to GOP voters," the Times' Stephen Dinan reported: "Sen. John McCain has quietly been piling up flip-flops, including ditching his long-held support for the Law of the Sea convention and telling bloggers he now opposes the DREAM Act to legalize illegal alien students. ... Republican primary voters tilt to the right, and the sea treaty is another example of Mr. McCain veering to try to align himself with them, recanting positions along the way on immigration, tax cuts and campaign-finance reform." Dinan further reported: "Mr. McCain's list [of flip-flops] is growing fast -- possibly because he brings a longer record -- and is coming on signature issues that bear his name, such as the McCain-Kennedy immigration proposal."

Dinan also wrote: "The problem for Mr. McCain, says one Republican strategist unaffiliated with any campaign, is that his appeal to voters is based on his willingness to stick to his own convictions."

Nonetheless, Curl wrote in his June 16 article that McCain "has returned this cycle with much of his maverick image intact."

From Curl's June 16 Washington Times article:

But Mr. McCain also has bucked his party often, and on several high-profile issues. He attached his name to McCain-Feingold, a campaign-finance reform bill co-authored by Sen. Russ Feingold, Wisconsin Democrat, that Republicans opposed. He also joined forces with a liberal leader, Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat, via the McCain-Kennedy bill to overhaul immigration. Many Republicans opposed the bill.

Still, some say those against-the-grain transgressions could help more than harm Mr. McCain.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by snoopy (June 16, 2008 1:56 pm ET)
         

      My hard core righty office mate thinks McCain is a democrat 5 days of the week. Me? It's clear that he'll say anything to get elected.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (June 16, 2008 2:12 pm ET)
           

        If he's speaking to a Democratic audience 5 days a week, then he is a Democrat 5 days a week.

        That's the beauty of St. McCain, his policy positions adapt to the audience he is addressing.  He's a sort of chameleon, if you will, never revealing his true colors.

        It makes me wonder how he'll do in the debates, though.  He won't be able to pander to Americans as a whole, and the most intuitive of Americans will see through his charade.  I just hope that Americans will be smarter in this election than they have demonstrated in the past.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by wzwriter (June 16, 2008 2:15 pm ET)
         

      ...but Curl failed to note that McCain now says he would no longer support that bill if it came to a vote on the Senate floor.

      Curl also failed to not that Gramps McCain shows up to vote so infrequently that they don't even bother tracking his votes to see how conservative or liberal he is.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (June 16, 2008 2:21 pm ET)
           
        somewhere in the vast vaults of MMFA there is a list of votes that Mccain missed. And if my memory serves me right, it filled a page.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by wzwriter (June 16, 2008 2:38 pm ET)
             

          somewhere in the vast vaults of MMFA there is a list of votes that Mccain missed. And if my memory serves me right, it filled a page.

          I just found something through Google that was put together by the Washington Post.  It lists the absentee precentages for all US Senators.  I've posted all those with percentages of ten percent or greater - the complete list can be found at the link I provided.

          I think it's significant that the Senators that were running for president had high absentee percentages, but none anywhere NEAR as high as Gramps McCain.  His percentage was even higher than that for Tim Johnson, who was out for several months recovering from a brain hemorrhage!!!

          * * * * * * * * * *

          Senate Members Who Missed Votes

          60.9% - Sen. John McCain (R-AZ)
          Votes: 360 votes missed (60.9%), 231 votes cast

          52.6% -  Sen. Tim Johnson (D-SD)
          Votes: 311 votes missed (52.6%), 280 votes cast
          Note: Sen. Johnson suffered a brain hemorrhage on Dec. 13, 2006, and spent several months recovering. He has since returned to the Senate.

          42.6% - Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL)
          Votes: 252 votes missed (42.6%), 339 votes cast

          32.7% - Sen. Joseph Biden (D-DE)
          Votes: 193 votes missed (32.7%), 398 votes cast

          32.7% - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY)
          Votes: 193 votes missed (32.7%), 398 votes cast

          28.9% - Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-CT)
          Votes: 171 votes missed (28.9%), 420 votes cast

          23.2% - Sen. Sam Brownback (R-KS)
          Votes: 137 votes missed (23.2%), 454 votes cast

          10.8% - Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-HI)
          Votes: 64 votes missed (10.8%), 527 votes cast

          10.8% - Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-MA)
          Votes: 64 votes missed (10.8%), 527 votes cast

          10.2% - Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV)
          Votes: 60 votes missed (10.2%), 531 votes cast


          Complete List: http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/110/senate/vote-missers/ 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by wolf kotenberg (June 16, 2008 2:42 pm ET)
               
            thank for your post. I am hanging on to this one, like my family photo in the living room.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by ufleirx (June 16, 2008 2:51 pm ET)
               
            Wow while McCain certainly has the record, Democrats definitely top this sport. And I want to know why should someone be pushing the agenda where is the Democratic Whip?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by wzwriter (June 16, 2008 4:02 pm ET)
                 

              Wow while McCain certainly has the record, Democrats definitely top this sport.

              Of the ten Senators I listed above, six were running for president - four Democrats and two Republicans.  Tim Johnson was recovering from a brain hemorrhage, and the other three Democrats (Inouye, Kennedy, and Byrd) probably had medica issues as well.  It just looks like while other candidates would return to Washington for votes when they could, Gramps McCain just couldn't be bothered....


              And I want to know why should someone be pushing the agenda where is the Democratic Whip?

              He's much further down the list, with a near-perfect attendence record:

              0.8% - Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL)
              Votes: 5 votes missed (0.8%), 586 votes cast

              Report Abuse
          • Author by christopherpking (June 17, 2008 11:49 am ET)
               
            That says it all. The Maverik and the Messiah are both slackers.
            Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

Most Popular Tags

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace