About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

NY Times, WSJ reported McCain "has been a champion of public financing," but not that he may be breaking the law

June 19, 2008 1:47 pm ET

SUMMARY: In online articles discussing Sen. Barack Obama's decision to opt out of public financing for the general election, both The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times reported that Sen. John McCain "has been a champion of public financing." But neither article noted that McCain claims to have opted out of public financing -- and has exceeded spending limits under the public financing system -- during the primary season or that the FEC chairman has taken the position that McCain cannot legally opt out without FEC approval.

31 Comments

In a June 19 Wall Street Journal online article discussing Sen. Barack Obama's decision to opt out of public financing for the general election, staff reporter Jacob M. Schlesinger reported that "Sen. [John] McCain has been a champion of public financing, and his campaign predictably lambasted Sen. Obama for his decision to opt out." Similarly, in a June 19 New York Times online article, staff writers Adam Nagourney and Jeff Zeleny reported that "Mr. McCain has been a champion of public financing of campaign throughout his career" and quoted two McCain staffers attacking Obama for his decision. But neither Schlesinger nor Nagourney and Zeleny noted, in referring to McCain as a "champion of public financing," that McCain claims to have opted out of public financing -- and has exceeded spending limits under the public financing system -- during the primary season, or that Federal Election Commission chairman David Mason has taken the position that McCain cannot legally do so without FEC approval, meaning that every day that McCain spends beyond those limits, he could be breaking federal law.

In a February 21 article, the Associated Press reported: "The government's top campaign finance regulator says John McCain can't drop out of the primary election's public financing system until he answers questions about a loan he obtained to kickstart his once faltering presidential campaign. Federal Election Commission Chairman David Mason, in a letter to McCain this week, said the all-but-certain Republican nominee needs to assure the commission that he did not use the promise of public money to help secure a $4 million line of credit he obtained in November." Further, in a March 23 post on The Washington Post's The Trail blog, staff writer Matthew Mosk reported that "McCain has officially broken the limits imposed by the presidential public financing system," and in a February 22 article, the Post noted that "[k]nowingly violating the spending limit is a criminal offense that could put McCain at risk of stiff fines and up to five years in prison." Under the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, violators could face fines up to $25,000 and up to five years of jail time.

In an April 10 article, The New York Times reported that Obama chief strategist David Axelrod drew attention to McCain's actions: "Alluding to a $4 million line of credit that Mr. McCain obtained late last year, secured in part by the promise of federal matching money for the primaries, Mr. Axelrod said the rest of the primary season 'should give Senator McCain time to figure out whether he was in or out of the campaign finance system in the primary, which is still an open question.' " The loan could have required McCain to remain in the race, regardless of whether his candidacy was viable, in order to receive matching funds to pay back the loan.

From The Wall Street Journal's June 19 article:

Sen. McCain has been a champion of public financing, and his campaign predictably lambasted Sen. Obama for his decision to opt out.

"Today, Barack Obama has revealed himself to be just another typical politician who will do and say whatever is most expedient for Barack Obama," said Jill Hazelbaker, the McCain campaign's communications director.

"The true test of a candidate for President is whether he will stand on principle and keep his word to the American people," she said in a prepared statment [sic]. "Barack Obama has failed that test today, and his reversal of his promise to participate in the public finance system undermines his call for a new type of politics.

"Barack Obama is now the first presidential candidate since Watergate to run a campaign entirely on private funds. This decision will have far-reaching and extraordinary consequences that will weaken and undermine the public financing system."

From The New York Times' June 19 article:

With his decision, Mr. Obama became the first candidate of a major party to decline public financing -- and the spending limits that go with it -- since the system was created in 1976, after the Watergate scandals.

Mr. Obama made his announcement in a video message sent to supporters and posted on the Internet. While it was not a surprise -- his aides have been hinting that he would take this step for two months -- it represented a turnabout from his strong earlier suggestion that he would join the system. Mr. McCain has been a champion of public financing of campaign throughout his career.

[...]

Told on Thursday morning of Mr. Obama's decision to opt out of public financing, Charlie Black, a senior adviser to Mr. McCain, charged that Mr. Obama had "broken his word." Mr. Black reacted to the news after a reporter showed him the Obama campaign's statement on a Blackberry in the lobby of the Chicago hotel where the McCain campaign was staying.

Jill Hazelbaker, the McCain campaign's communications director, said later on a conference call with reporters: "The true test of a candidate for President is whether he will stand on principle and keep his word to the American people. Barack Obama has failed that test today, and his reversal of his promise to participate in the public finance system undermines his call for a new type of politics." She added, "This decision will have far-reaching and extraordinary consequences that will weaken and undermine the public financing system."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by newzhound (June 19, 2008 2:27 pm ET)
         

      Sen. McCain got on the ballot in Ohio and Delaware without collecting signatures because he had signed up for public primary campaign financing.  Now he wants to opt out of the sytem - after using it to obtain inexpensive (actually, free) ballot access?

      Additionally, the loan documents are on line.  McCain's campaign agreed to reenter the public financing system if he didn't do well in the primaries (within 10 points of the winner).  So he did pledge public funds as loan collateral - so he can't opt out.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jeter2 (June 19, 2008 2:44 pm ET)
         

      NY Times, WSJ reported McCain "has been a champion of public financing," but not that he may be breaking the law

      may be breaking the law

      may be

      may

      Get back to us when it's it's not just a may be. Then we'll talk ;-)

      Report Abuse
      • Author by loonz (June 19, 2008 4:16 pm ET)
           
        Since the FCC has not given him permission to opt out, he's breaking the law right now.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by newzhound (June 19, 2008 4:28 pm ET)
           
        Jeter2:  Please see the above.  He is breaking the law.  Right now.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (June 20, 2008 10:17 am ET)
           

        So has McCain broken the law?

        McCain has now spent $58.4 million on his primary effort. Those who have committed to public financing can spend no more than $54 million on their primary bid.

        McCain was certified to enter the matching program last year when he was starved for cash. But once he started to win primaries, he decided to step back from it. On Feb. 6, after his Super Tuesday victories, he wrote to the FEC to announce he would withdraw from the program.

        As the FEC Chairman made quite clear in a letter to McCain's campaign (PDF), he cannot simply withdraw from his agreed to limitations on spending by wishing them away -- and he decidedly does NOT have the permission of the FEC to violate campaign finance laws with wanton abandon.

        Since the FEC has NOT approved McCain's withdrawal common sense says he's currently breaking the law. 

        Of course the public will never have a legal opinion on the matter due to fellow Republican Mitch McConnell. It seems that McConnell couldn't get his way, and in a tantrum forced the process of nominating members to the FEC to come to a complete halt. Surprise, surprise, surprise, McCain gets a 'get out of jail free' pass. 

        December 19, 2007 Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) blocked up-or-down majority votes in the Senate on the confirmation of each of four pending FEC nominees.

        This action by Senator McConnell ensured that beginning on January 1, 2008 there would be no FEC capable of enforcing the campaign finance laws, opening investigations, issuing advisory opinions, writing regulations, bringing lawsuits, certifying public matching funds for presidential candidates or undertaking other activities that require the approval of a majority of the Commissioners.

        It's not rocket science, just another Republican cover-up in a long string of Republican cover ups of law breaking Republicans.  

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Clevenative (June 19, 2008 2:59 pm ET)
         

      If victory in this campaign is measured and determined by public financing, it could turn out to be the biggest landslide in history. Obama supporters  are speaking not only from their lips and fingertips - but from their wallets and pocketbooks as well.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Clevenative (June 19, 2008 3:29 pm ET)
           
        Oops - Did I type "public financing"? I meant private.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by pointofview (June 19, 2008 3:15 pm ET)
         

      For all of his talk and all his "yes we can" crap, all Obama is showing is that he can lie, cheat, and steal with the best of them.  He got out of public financing as fast as he could when it benefited him.  He showed that his promise and his word mean nothing. 

      Combine that with his campaign refusal to let muslim women sit behind him, and it has been a bad week for the savior of the dems. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by friedbergboy1422 (June 19, 2008 3:28 pm ET)
           

        POV,

        If he had a Muslim woman sit behind him, all of you (not you, those on your side) who think he was a Muslim would have pounced on it.  We don't know the whole story there.

        Plus, POV, why do you care about what Obama does?  Its not like you would have voted for him anyway.  I am sure there is not a thing he could do to persuade you.  Am I wrong?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by jeter2 (June 19, 2008 3:36 pm ET)
             
          Fried that was a damned if you do, damned if you don't moment by some Obama volunteers. Obama's campaign has apologized. The media will probably talk about it a few more days, then it will go away. Or it should.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by friedbergboy1422 (June 19, 2008 4:49 pm ET)
               
            Well said, Jeter.  I would think that critical thinking people might want to know about Phil Gramm and the Enron loophole or McCain's other campaign manager's involvment with the same issue, but I guess photo ops and decisions by campaign workers mean more....
            Report Abuse
          • Author by jawill11 (June 19, 2008 7:26 pm ET)
               
            I agree.  That said, I don't agree with that decision, but I understand it.  I am also saddened that he was forced to make that decision because of the rampant bigotry and ignorance  permeating our country.  
            Report Abuse
      • Author by sportsguydave (June 19, 2008 3:29 pm ET)
           

        News flash, POV: Your bogus talking points only resonate with folks who were never going to vote for Obama anyway.

        And show me a political campaign that hasn't had to weather a few storms along the way?? I've been involved with covering a lot of campaigns over the years. Volunteers often do dumb things that end up putting their candidate in a bad light.

        What about your guy, McSame??? Not a good week for him either, with yet another flip-flop.. Hell, this guy ought to apply to be a backup dancer for Jimmy Buffett ...  

        What's he gonna do when Joe Loserman isn't there to whisper in his ear???

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (June 19, 2008 3:37 pm ET)
             

          Take it easy on POV. If he can't transcribe the Rush Limbaugh show here, what's he gonna do with his time, watch Grampy decompose?

          BTW, the "MUslim women in the photo" story is pretty funny. I heard some of it on wingnut radio, and it's being made out to be this situation where somebody was yelling "get more white people in the picture" and shoving Asians aside to get a better "spectrum". I don't know what the facts are in it, I just heard a lot of anonymous sources and paraphrasing.

          Of course, the false analogies came flying, with the radio monkeys declaring "Imagine if John McCain had thrown Muslims out of his photo. There would be an uproar".

          Which probably  worked on certain people; those who don't understand that Grampy has not been trying to fight diversion from issues to his imaginary "radical/ non-Christian" background, and those who couldn't figure that a better analogy would be McCain moving old white guys out of his picture.

           

          Report Abuse
          • Author by pointofview (June 19, 2008 7:30 pm ET)
               

            Col

            I had come to expect more from you.  No where in your attempt at an answer did you even begin to address my points.

            1.  He said he would take public financing, and now that it does not benefit him, he says he will not.

            2.  It is not a national Enquirer story, the musulim women, one of them an attorney, were told they could not sit behind him, in camera view, because of their scarves.  If you care to address either point, let me know.

             

            PS.  Sorry, but simply calling McCain grampy is not an intelligent response. 

             

            Report Abuse
            • Author by loonz (June 19, 2008 9:05 pm ET)
                 

              1.  He said he would take public financing, and now that it does not benefit him, he says he will not.

              This decision was a product of McCain admitting that he is weak and feeble and can't control outside groups.

              Report Abuse
            • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (June 20, 2008 2:12 am ET)
                 

               No where in your attempt at an answer did you even begin to address my points.

              Don't take it too personally, POV. At a certain point, most posters here realize that "addressing" dittohead talking points is like trying to hammer spaghetti into a bowling ball. You provide some laughs , but don't be offended if others don't have the time to play with you as if you're an adult. 

              Report Abuse
              • Author by pointofview (June 20, 2008 10:29 am ET)
                   

                Col

                I am not offended at all.  And I know you cant really respond because the DNC has not told you what to say yet.  Like most posters here, not all, but most, you look at any conserative point as a Rush inspired talking point.  It is clear that with out guidance from the DNC or Howard Dean, you simply do not know what to say.

                It is cute really.  Obama says he will not do something, and then he does.  I point it out, and you simply do not know what to do.  You can not handle it.  It has to be the fault of the GOP.   But dont worry, you will have time.  This story will not go away.  Soon, Dean and or Saint Keith will defend Obama and they will tell you what to say.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (June 20, 2008 10:37 am ET)
                     
                  Your view of reality is very interesting POV.  I hope posting that calmed your soul.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by pointofview (June 20, 2008 11:03 am ET)
                       

                    Col 

                    You duck and dodge with the best of them.

                    Try this out...."Obama made a mistake....he was wrong to promise what he could not deliver".  Are you a big enough boy to say that? 

                    Looks like you need a demotion to private

                     

                    Report Abuse
            • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (June 20, 2008 11:19 am ET)
                 

              He said he would take public financing, and now that it does not benefit him, he says he will not.

              Early in 2007, Obama asked the FEC for permission to leave open the possibility of public financing in the general election, even though he made no promises. In his USA Today op-ed in February 2008 (matching the wording of his earlier promises), Obama wrote that he would "aggressively pursue such an agreement" for public funding.

              But Obama explained that such an agreement would have to be carefully negotiated: "The candidates will have to commit to discouraging cheating by their supporters; to refusing fundraising help to outside groups; and to limiting their own parties to legal forms of involvement. And the agreement may have to address the amounts that Senator McCain, the presumptive nominee of his party, will spend for the general election while the Democratic primary contest continues." According to the Obama campaign, McCain’s side simply refused to take the difficult steps necessary to fulfill this condition outlined by Obama.

               

              Report Abuse
      • Author by achrispage6992 (June 19, 2008 3:31 pm ET)
           
        First of all it was two volunteers who moved those women. When you have some proof that such a decision came from campaign officials you'll have something, until then all you got is another bs distraction story straight of National Enquirer. Also, please tell me specifically how Obama has lied, cheated and stole anything. You have got to be one of those idiots who call Hannity's show and you two spend ten minutes calling each other a "great american" before you repeat one of his talking points to him and he elaborates on it. Please offer something of substance other than the same drivel we can hear on call in right wing radio shows.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by wzwriter (June 19, 2008 3:34 pm ET)
             

          Please offer something of substance other than the same drivel we can hear on call in right wing radio shows.

          Drive is all POV can offer, because drivel is all POV's got.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by pointofview (June 19, 2008 10:01 pm ET)
               

            WZ

             

            Wow, you must have worked hard on that.  You fail to address my points, and make fun of me instead. It sounds like you got a smart second grader to help you.  I love to see you like this, when you know you are wrong.  You have no facts or even your lame Wikipedia to help ya here.  But go with another insult.  Maybe it will cover up the lie and racism Obama showed.  And of course if you can get someone to laugh at what you say, they may over look how stupid and ill informed you really are. 

            Report Abuse
        • Author by achrispage6992 (June 19, 2008 3:47 pm ET)
             
          Oh yeah, so what if Obama said he would take the public financing money in the beginning. He did so under the impression that there would be a level playing field. He would be an idiot to take 85 million and give up over 300 million, especially when the GOP and the 527's were going to spend unlimited amounts anyway. Now there is a level playing field and you guys can't stand it. You're scared although I don't know why. Anyone who is satisfied with the status quo is seriously disturbed.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (June 20, 2008 11:29 am ET)
           

        At the rally for Senator Obama in Detroit on Monday, June 16, two volunteers denied us seating behind the stage the Senator would soon take. The volunteers informed us that we were not allowed to sit in that area due to the hijab, the headscarf that each of us was wearing.

        This incident was unfortunate and extremely disappointing. Senator Obama has called us each to personally convey his deepest apologies and acknowledge that this was inexcusable. We both immensely appreciate the Senator's phone call and his commitment to remedy this issue. We commend him for displaying qualities befitting an effective President. We acknowledge that this injustice has been taken seriously and that Senator Obama does not tolerate discrimination against Arabs, Muslims or any community. We are assured that he and his staff are committed to upholding the principles of justice for all peoples and bringing about change we can believe in. The infringement on our rights occurred and has been addressed; now we are ready to move forward. We will continue to support Senator Obama in his campaign and wish him the best as the race continues.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Clevenative (June 19, 2008 3:44 pm ET)
         

      I know I'll catch a lot of flak for saying this, but McCain has been riding on his "war hero" trip since the day he stepped into politics - and will still be riding it into the sunset. Take that away from him - and his unrelenting sophomoric attitude - and you have just another Republican puppet.

      This guy has shown the immaturity, stubbornness, rebelliousness, and intellect of a spoiled teenager with his decisions in life and politics ever since before his days as a pilot. If you want to fall for his "whatever I need to say" campaign, I suppose that is up to you. But this guy is not the guy who will bring the change America wants and needs so badly.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by deeznuts (June 19, 2008 5:14 pm ET)
           

        Gen. Wesley Clark made pretty much this same observation in an interview a few days ago. He essentially asked "where does McCain get this reputation as a foreign policy expert? From his time as a POW? How does that equal foreign policy expertise?"

        The other people on the show seemed genuinely surprised, as though Gen. Clark had just claimed the Earth was flat, even though they could offer no examples of where McCain's alleged "foreign policy" experience comes from.

        Sen. Obama, on the other hand, has been on Senate committees for Foreign Relations and Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs and is Chairman of the Senate's subcommittee on European Affairs.

        Sen. McCain? The most relevant experience has been on Senate Armed Services and Commerce, neither of which have anything to do with foreign policy.

        I am consistently amazed at the truthiness that gets around in the media today (and thank MMFA for pointing it out.) Sen. McCain is older and was a POW so it sounds true that he has more foreign policy experience than Sen. Obama. The reality is quite different.

        Another example is that Sen. Clinton was "more experienced" than Sen. Obama. Um...HUH? Let's see...Obama has 10 years in elected office (including the Illinois state senate)...Clinton has less than 7. Where, exactly, does this extra "experience" come from?

        Report Abuse
    • Author by ufleirx (June 19, 2008 3:44 pm ET)
         
      Add Bloomberg, NYT, and Reuter's to the group of forgetfuls that do not remember McCain's attempts to break off from the "public" system after signing for an agreement for a line of credit on the basis he accept public financing. Hold on I looked through several articles and the only one to get in RIGHT -- Fox News. Interesting times.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by truthseeker77 (June 19, 2008 10:16 pm ET)
         

      Speaking of campaign financing, Obama flip flopped on his vow to 'agressively pursue" campaign financing. He didn't even try to talk to the McCain camp about this, according to Ben Smith today.

       

      his campaign never even asked the Republican's aides for a meeting on the subject.  And Obama, both campaigns said, never asked for a face-to-face meeting with McCain.

       

      link 

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by right-winger (June 20, 2008 5:54 am ET)
         

      I LOVE IT JUST MADE $50.00 ON A BET!!!! CAN'T WAITE TO SEE CNN, MSNBC, FOX, NBCTODAY AND CBS THE SAME STATIONS WHO WHEN MCCAIN LIED ABOUT DRILLING AND OTHER THINGS THEY  SAID NOTHING.BUT LOOK AT THEM NOW ON OBAMA TAKING THE MONEY. GIBSON AND BOY GEORGE FROM WORLDNEWS LAST NIGHT SAID WORDS LIKE HE LIED TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, HE FLIPFLOPPED,MSNBC USED THE SAME WORDS, CNN, MSNBC, ABC WEBS SITE ARE SAYING THE SAME THING IN PRINT ON THERE WEB SITE SHOWING MCCAIN SPEECH OVER AND OVER HOW OBAMA DIDN'T KEEP HIS WORD. THE MEDIA BIG SHOTS WHO GO OUT THERE WAY EVERYDAY TO TRY TO BRING OBAMA DOWN SENT A LETTER TO OBAMA SAYING THEY DON'T LIKE THE WAY THEY ARE BEING TREATED BY THE OBAMA CAMP.PLEASE I DON'T BLAME OBAMA FOR NOT LETTING THEM GET TO CLOSE TO HIM ALL THEY WANT TO DO IS GET SOME DIRT ON HIM SO THERE MAN MCCAIN CAN WIN. THEY DON'T LIKE THOSE POLL NUMBERS FOR MCCAIN. NEED GAS IN MY TANK MADE A $60.00 BET TODAY BECAUSE I WILL WIN. OH YEA THE BET WAS THAT ALL THE CABLE AND NEWSPAPERS WILL SAY HE LIED AND HE IS A FLIPFLOPPER.

      Report Abuse
The Fox Effect
Media Matters Connect

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.