About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Limbaugh: "Democrats will bend over, grab the ankles, and say, 'Have your way with me' " to African-Americans and gays

June 24, 2008 7:37 pm ET
image

Please upgrade your flash player. The audio for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a MP3 version of the audio.

SUMMARY: After being asked by a caller: "I want to know how the Republicans don't need Christians and conservatives, and they think we're 30 percent. Twelve percent black people in the population. Ten percent -- they claim -- homosexuals in the population. Rush, honey, when did 30 percent get to be a small number?" Rush Limbaugh responded, "Let me see if I can get your question right. You want to know why the Republicans are willing to say, 'Screw you,' to 30 percent or more of their voters and yet Democrats will bend over, grab the ankles, and say, 'Have your way with me,' for 10 percent and 2 percent of the population?"

213 Comments

On the June 23 edition of his nationally syndicated radio program, Rush Limbaugh was asked by a caller: "I want to know how the Republicans don't need Christians and conservatives, and they think we're 30 percent. Twelve percent black people in the population. Ten percent -- they claim -- homosexuals in the population. Rush, honey, when did 30 percent get to be a small number?" Limbaugh responded, "Let me see if I can get your question right. You want to know why the Republicans are willing to say, 'Screw you,' to 30 percent or more of their voters and yet Democrats will bend over, grab the ankles, and say, 'Have your way with me,' for 10 percent and 2 percent of the population?" He later stated: "There is an answer to your -- basic question is, 'Why don't the Democrats say, "To hell with you, you wacko nuts in the base," like Republicans do?' "

Purporting to answer the caller's question, Limbaugh said, "[T]here's a complicated answer to this and I'm going to have answer some of it in the monologue in the next hour, but one of the simple answers that will require some elaboration is that a lot of money is coming from these kooks -- and I'm not talking about just the blacks -- I'm talking about a whole kook-fringe base because George Soros is running it and they need the money."

Limbaugh later returned to the caller's question, saying, "So her question was, how can it be that the Republicans are willing to just throw away 30 percent of their base and the Democrats will do everything they can -- they will grovel, do whatever they can to make sure their base hangs in with them. One of the multiple answers to this -- but one of the first answers is money. ... [T]he politically active gay community on the left is worth a lot of money. These people send the Democrats more money than you can possibly imagine. A lot of it from Hollywood, and the arts and entertainment." Limbaugh later asserted: "But in addition to the money aspect of this ... is the anti-war kook fringe. And it is huge."

Limbaugh has invoked the "bend over, grab the ankles" image on his radio program before, as Media Matters for America has noted. On his July 14, 2005, broadcast, Limbaugh blasted former Republican National Committee chairman Ken Mehlman's plan to apologize for the party's race-based Southern Strategy at the annual convention of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. Limbaugh asserted, "Republicans are going to go bend over and grab the ankles."

From the June 23 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:

LIMBAUGH: Kathy in Fort Worth, Texas, you are next.

CALLER: Hello. I want to know how the Republicans don't need Christians and conservatives, and they think we're 30 percent. Twelve percent black people in the population. Ten percent -- they claim -- homosexuals in the population. Rush, honey, when did 30 percent get to be a small number?

LIMBAUGH: I don't -- I think it's actually larger than 30 percent. But let me see if I can get your question right. You want to know why the Republicans are willing to say, "Screw you," to 30 percent or more of their voters and yet Democrats will bend over, grab the ankles, and say, "Have your way with me," for 10 percent and 2 percent of the population?

CALLER: Delicately, yes.

LIMBAUGH: Well, I -- nothing delicate about me on these matters. These are just innocent figures of speech --

CALLER: I understand.

LIMBAUGH: -- that I was using. There is an answer to your -- basic question is, "Why don't the Democrats say, 'To hell with you, you wacko nuts in the base,' like Republicans do?"

CALLER: Mm-hmm.

LIMBAUGH: The -- there's a complicated answer to this and I'm going to have answer some of it in the monologue in the next hour, but one of the simple answers that will require some elaboration is that a lot of money is coming from these kooks -- and I'm not talking about just the blacks -- I'm talking about a whole kook-fringe base because George Soros is running it --

CALLER: It's true.

LIMBAUGH: -- and they need the money. We'll be back after this. Stay with us.

[...]

LIMBAUGH: We had a caller with an interesting question just before the conclusion of the previous hour, and this -- in fact, grab sound bite number one because sound bite number one today is what spawned her question.

As you know, ladies and gentlemen, I have been warning you that the Republican Party, especially as currently constituted, is doing its best to deemphasize the importance or the influence of the traditional conservative base, which is not just the so-called evangelical Christian Right or the pro-lifers or whatever. But you have all kinds of people in the Republican base that are conservatives, from values conservatives, social conservatives, even fiscal economic conservatives. Conservatism has been the base of the Republican Party and because the conservative base does include pro-lifers and because many of them are from the South, there are many in the Northeastern corridors of power in the Republican Party who are embarrassed to be in the party with those people.

[...]

And the caller said, look, the black population totals 10 percent, don't know what the voting population is. The gay population -- what is it? One percent, 2 percent -- that's -- 12 percent, and we're not even factoring out the adult population, the voting population there. So her question was, how can it be that the Republicans are willing to just throw away 30 percent of their base and the Democrats will do everything they can -- they will grovel, do whatever they can to make sure their base hangs in with them.

One of the multiple answers to this -- but one of the first answers is money. The far-left -- and don't -- I'll tell you something, the politically active gay community on the left is worth a lot of money. These people send the Democrats more money than you can possibly imagine. A lot of it from Hollywood, and the arts and entertainment. They're not -- money -- you know, key number one, you might be saying, well, don't the pro-lifers donate a lot of money to the Republicans? Yeah. Yeah, they do. But it still embarrasses them. It still embarrasses a lot of the country club Rockefeller types.

The Democrats -- what are they embarrassed about? They're not embarrassed about anything. The Democrats have never set any standards for themselves. As far as they're concerned, everybody's a victim, even on their side. So, I mean, yeah, these victims are just fighting to be heard. Fighting for their rights, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. The conservative rights -- conservative right is viewed as trying to deny people rights, blah, blah, blah, you see.

But in addition to the money aspect of this -- and don't forget, the left-wing base is not even talked about by Mickey Edwards there -- is the anti-war kook fringe. And it is huge. From MoveOn.org to Think Progress to My Base Book -- whatever these things, these things -- well, maybe not MySpace or Face, whatever it is. But, there are so many of these 527 groups out there that are just raising money left and right and the Democrats are scared to death if these people take their money and go away or go to a third party or what have you. And so they will cater to them left and right.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by watershed (June 24, 2008 7:44 pm ET)
         

      'Why don't the Democrats say, "To hell with you, you wacko nuts in the base," like Republicans do?' "

      I am going to use cap, because I simply cannot belive what Limbaugh is saying.

      BLACKS AND GAYS ARE THE "WACKO FRINGE" OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by plhamel4926 (June 24, 2008 7:57 pm ET)
           
        Well he is a racist. Just  now that the Repoblican warhawk of choice is in serious trouble, he, and the others like him, are panicking. That's when the truth comes out.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by wookie (June 25, 2008 9:30 am ET)
             

          >>Well he is a racist.

          Come on now! He didn't say blacks want to screw you, he said African Americans want to screw you. See, he's a compassionate big tent conservative!

          Report Abuse
          • Author by plhamel4926 (June 25, 2008 4:51 pm ET)
               
            And he puts blacks, the entire GLBT population, probably women (secretly Jewish people) Latino/Hispanics, and Asians all in the same tent!!!
            Report Abuse
      • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 8:50 pm ET)
           

        Gay's as the whacko finge?  Nah.  Sick?  Yeah, but not whackos.

        Black's as the whacko fringe?  No higher a percentage than whites are of either party.

        Now, if we want to talk about the democratic members of Code Pink, Green Peace, the NAACP...need I go on.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by jawill11 (June 24, 2008 9:10 pm ET)
             
          People who think homosexuals are "sick" are the whacko fringe of humanity. 
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 9:20 pm ET)
               

            For not accepting that someone likes to stick something up their *** and enjoy it?  Hardly.

            You can try to coin your acceptance on someone else, but it won't work on me.

             

            Report Abuse
            • Author by jawill11 (June 24, 2008 9:27 pm ET)
                 
              Wow.  You seem a bit obsessed with anal sex.  Here's a clue: millions of heterosexual couples engage in anal sex.  Here's another clue: homosexuals are dynamic human beings, not anal sex machines.  
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 9:32 pm ET)
                   

                Yes, and there's plenty people out there who enjoy kiddie porn...doesn't make it right, or socially acceptable.

                When I think of gay's, I often think of the scientfic principals of a magnet.  The two positive ends reject each other, the two negative ends reject each other...and only the positive and negative ends connect.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by magnolialover (June 24, 2008 9:41 pm ET)
                     
                  Nice one. Didn't take you long to equate homosexuals with kiddy porn. They're not even remotely the same. Or even close for that matter, but I don't think you'd ever understand that.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 9:48 pm ET)
                       
                    No, i didnt equate them as the same.  I said they both fall under the category of "people do it, but doesnt make it right".  I never claimed one wasn't worse.  But nice attempt of a hijack word spin.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by RABBITLUVR (June 24, 2008 10:38 pm ET)
                         
                      So how is anal sex - straight or otherwise - not 'right'? Let's have some real insight into your thinking on this.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:45 pm ET)
                           

                        Its considered the riskiest method of intercourse for diseases and parasites.  Also, the anus is not a part of the sexual reproduction system...and for good reason. 

                        Didn't your mom ever teach you, dont play where you s***.

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by IRONY 101 (June 24, 2008 10:48 pm ET)
                             
                          So, in other words, you are saying that gay men should only pleasure each other's penis orally and should refrain from anal sex?
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:52 pm ET)
                               
                            Im saying they shouldnt do it at all lol.  God, such description...lol
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by RABBITLUVR (June 24, 2008 10:53 pm ET)
                                 
                              What's the matter... too crude for ya? Prudish much?
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:55 pm ET)
                                   
                                No, just dont want descriptions of two gay men pleasuring themselves.  Not exactly a nice vision.
                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by IRONY 101 (June 24, 2008 10:59 pm ET)
                                     
                                  But, just above, you were talking about people who "stick something up their *** and enjoy it?"  Kinda graphic, huh...? 
                                  Report Abuse
                                  • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 11:00 pm ET)
                                       
                                    Sure, you got me there.  Not that I exactly wanted either vision.
                                    Report Abuse
                                    • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (June 24, 2008 11:16 pm ET)
                                         
                                      I think it's kind of funny that Columbo elaborates on his feelings towards gay human beings.  I guess it's a little ironic, because many of us here feel exactly that way toward him.
                                      Report Abuse
                                      • Author by SDL (June 25, 2008 12:13 am ET)
                                           

                                        I just can't resist...

                                        I wonder what Columbus feels when he goes for a physical and he has to get his prostate checked...?

                                        Report Abuse
                                        • Author by IRONY 101 (June 25, 2008 12:19 am ET)
                                             
                                          I understand from a reliable radio source that the scent of gardenia candles actually makes the experience pleasurable... ;>)
                                          Report Abuse
                                        • Author by open_mind (June 25, 2008 12:24 am ET)
                                             
                                          Columbus is only physically 28, so he has a few years.  My proctologist told me not to worry unless he grabbed BOTH of my shoulders while he was doing the check.  I guess proctologists need to be comedians.
                                          Report Abuse
                                          • Author by wzwriter (June 25, 2008 8:42 am ET)
                                               

                                            Columbus is only physically 28, so he has a few years. 

                                            Maturity-wise, he's about 12....

                                            Report Abuse
                                        • Author by jawill11 (June 25, 2008 10:26 am ET)
                                             
                                          He feels shame because he enjoys it so much. 
                                          Report Abuse
                                • Author by deeznuts (June 25, 2008 11:06 am ET)
                                     

                                  Paraphrasing columbusxxx:

                                  "Ewww, yucky, icky, gays doin' gay stuff. Ewww. I'm totally not gay. Totally. I won't even touch my own penis when I'm peeing!" 

                                  Dude. You are so freakin' closeted it's not even funny.

                                  Report Abuse
                            • Author by historygeek001 (June 25, 2008 1:23 pm ET)
                                 

                              "I'm saying they shouldn't do it at all."  I'm saying I hope you haven't reproduced.  You're a waste of space and genetic material.

                              Report Abuse
                        • Author by RABBITLUVR (June 24, 2008 10:52 pm ET)
                             

                          Sorry, anal isn't my sort of thing so your lame attempt at a personal 'shot' failed miserably. Anyway...

                          Not to get too clinical here... but the anus is considered an erogenous zone so, even though it has no role in sexual reproduction... you are right on that point, ka-ching, it does have a role in sexual pleasure.

                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:54 pm ET)
                               
                            Actually, thats a bit false - its primarily becuase its location to certain glands...but im not getting into a full scientific discussion on this lol.
                            Report Abuse
                        • Author by open_mind (June 24, 2008 10:54 pm ET)
                             

                          "the anus is not a part of the sexual reproduction[sic] system...and for good reason." 

                          So you have never had oral sex either?  Maybe that explains why you guys are so uptight.

                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:56 pm ET)
                               
                            No, I havent.  And won't.  Tight is right... and I prefer to keep it that way.
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 11:02 pm ET)
                                 
                              Whoops, read that wrong lol.  Oral?  sure.  Who hasn't?  Like I said in my other posts, im not agaist sexual positions, different methods.  Im just against homosexuality due to my personal beliefs, and anal due to the health risks.
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by open_mind (June 24, 2008 11:09 pm ET)
                                   

                                I guess you cannot keep track of your contradictions.  One of your objections against anal sex was that it is "not a part of the sexual reproduction[sic] system..."  ...and oral sex is?

                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 11:14 pm ET)
                                     

                                  Anal sex, in terms of homosexual and heterosexual relations is not a part of the reproductive system.  And neither is oral.

                                  However, you will read in my other claims that I am not against anal because of this...its because of its associated health risks. 

                                  Im not against homosexuality because they like anal...im against it becuase of the lifestyle and principals.

                                  Report Abuse
                                  • Author by RABBITLUVR (June 24, 2008 11:19 pm ET)
                                       

                                    Come on, you're against the anal because you find it 'sick'. Especially the idea of two men doing it.

                                    You're just trying to switch with the 'principles' crap. So... now that you have decided to go there... tell us what 'principles' gays have and why they are 'wrong'?

                                    Report Abuse
                          • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:56 pm ET)
                               
                            No, I havent.  And won't.  Tight is right... and I prefer to keep it that way.
                            Report Abuse
                          • Author by IRONY 101 (June 24, 2008 10:56 pm ET)
                               

                            So you have never had oral sex either? 

                            Yea, once, but...left a bad taste.  ;>)

                            Report Abuse
                          • Author by wzwriter (June 25, 2008 8:49 am ET)
                               

                            So you have never had oral sex either?

                            I'm starting to get the feeling that the only sex Columbus has ever had involves his right hand......  :-)

                            Report Abuse
                    • Author by rendesign (June 24, 2008 11:48 pm ET)
                         
                      Whatever homosexuals engage or don't engage in they do so in the privacey of their own homes. That doesn't make it right or wrong. It makes it NONE OF YOUR FREAKIN BUSINESS
                      Report Abuse
                  • Author by Ro (June 25, 2008 5:15 pm ET)
                       

                    I knew it wouldn't take long for you to conflate a gay person with a child molester. Asshole.

                    You guys are as predictable as the sun.

                    Report Abuse
                • Author by jawill11 (June 24, 2008 9:49 pm ET)
                     
                  That's the difference.  When I think of homosexuals, I think of human beings, not their sexual activity.  Why are you so obsessed with it?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 9:52 pm ET)
                       

                    Not obessed, against.  Big difference.  I have the freedom to not accept their lifestyle, just as a secular progressive has the freedom to not agree with someone's religion.  Fairly simple concept.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by IRONY 101 (June 24, 2008 9:54 pm ET)
                         
                      You called them sick... That's more than just disagreement. 
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:04 pm ET)
                           
                        I called murderers, rapist, and nazi's sick too.  Again, you toy with words in the sense of what you want them to mean. 
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by IRONY 101 (June 24, 2008 10:08 pm ET)
                             
                          So sorry to hold you accountable for what you write...
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:12 pm ET)
                               
                            You're not holding me accountable for anything.  Your imaging my words mean something else.  I hold myself unaccountable for that.
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by Governor (June 24, 2008 10:25 pm ET)
                                 

                              Gay's as the whacko finge?  Nah.  Sick?  Yeah, but not whackos.

                              People who call gays sick have had gay thoughts.  Several.  It's a fact.

                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:29 pm ET)
                                   

                                I can shens on that one...

                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by open_mind (June 24, 2008 10:56 pm ET)
                                     

                                  My wingnut-to-English dictionary is broken.  Can you re-post in English?

                                  Thanks.

                                  Report Abuse
                                  • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 11:03 pm ET)
                                       
                                    It means, I call bs.  Saying "its a fact" would require some scientific or hard data to back that up.  Up until now, through 28 years of life, Im yet to see it.
                                    Report Abuse
                                    • Author by open_mind (June 24, 2008 11:11 pm ET)
                                         
                                      I would have guessed 18, but that seems merely to be the age at which you are arrested.
                                      Report Abuse
                        • Author by iceman (June 25, 2008 11:49 am ET)
                             

                          So now you equate Gays to "murderers, rapist, and nazi's"

                          So, that's all you have is hate.  

                          Report Abuse
                    • Author by princeofwheels (June 24, 2008 10:07 pm ET)
                         

                      Columbus, You have every right to disagree with anything you like which makes it okay for people to do whatever they desire...Agree? Of course you do. If you don't like anal sex or talking about it, call Rush and tell him to quit using it as a prop. Agree? Of course you do.

                      But I must ask, do you bedroom police type have badges? Can you suck it up and explain your stand on oral sex...giving or receiving? Then you can be on record for that also.

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:11 pm ET)
                           

                        I dont care what Rush says, or what Dan Savage says to be honest.

                        But I must ask, do you bedroom police type have badges? Can you suck it up and explain your stand on oral sex...giving or receiving? Then you can be on record for that also.

                        Bedroom police?  Hardly.  I disagree with the unnatural lifestyle, not what people do in the bedroom.  The anal part, I disagree with between a man and woman because of health issues, and many doctors will tell you the same.

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by princeofwheels (June 24, 2008 10:14 pm ET)
                             
                          Then you agree that people can do and think the way they like because you have the same right....Simple, you don't like it, others like it. And ne'er the twain shall meet...or something like that. We finally agree that it is okay to disagree..simple, now on to the next subject.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:17 pm ET)
                               
                            Sure, never claimed they dont ahve the right to do these things.  Just said I dont agree with it, and there is no law or legislation that can force me to.
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by IRONY 101 (June 24, 2008 10:21 pm ET)
                                 
                              No...but I'm sure you would favor the enactment of laws which would prohibit Americans from engagaing in things with which you disagree.
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by princeofwheels (June 24, 2008 10:26 pm ET)
                                   
                                Irony,You stole my line but your verbage is so delightful
                                Report Abuse
                              • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:28 pm ET)
                                   

                                If a vote was put out to the public as a yes or no to make an ammendment change to ban gay marriage, then yes, i would vote to enact it.

                                However, if a vote was put out, and gay marriage was legalized by popular vote, I would not protest against it.  I would maintain my mindset that I personally do not find it acceptable, and leave it at that.

                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by IRONY 101 (June 24, 2008 10:31 pm ET)
                                     
                                  That's mighty big of you...
                                  Report Abuse
                                  • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:33 pm ET)
                                       
                                    You asked ... oh the perfect world if everything went your way huh?
                                    Report Abuse
                                    • Author by IRONY 101 (June 24, 2008 10:36 pm ET)
                                         
                                      No, I just thought it was very magnanimous gesture on your part to live with gay marriage.
                                      Report Abuse
                            • Author by rugbyref (June 24, 2008 10:28 pm ET)
                                 
                              Just as a point of clarification Columbus ... (who, btw, was also as lost and sailing in circles in 1492 as you appear to be now) ... being gay is not a "lifestyle choice".  Choosing to live at the beach, drive a hybrid, or play polo instead of rugby are "lifestyle choices".  Sexual orientation is not.  You get a 10 minutes in the sin-bin ...
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:30 pm ET)
                                   
                                Never said it was a choice to be gay or not, did i?  But I did say its my choice on whether to accept it.
                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by RABBITLUVR (June 24, 2008 10:41 pm ET)
                                     
                                  Would you find it all right to 'accept' people who are born with Down Syndrome or cerebral palsy or autism since they do not 'have a choice' in the matter?
                                  Report Abuse
                                  • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:47 pm ET)
                                       
                                    As you pointed out, being Gay is not a disease, its a lifestyle.  Therefore, nice try at the comparison, but it doesnt fly.
                                    Report Abuse
                                    • Author by Brabantio (June 24, 2008 10:49 pm ET)
                                         
                                      He's not saying it's a disease, he's saying it's something you're born with, like the diseases mentioned.  How do you not accept something that someone is born with?
                                      Report Abuse
                                      • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:50 pm ET)
                                           
                                        You cannot scientifically prove to me that its something you're born with.  There is no DNA or gene manipulation or mutation.  Therefore, I find it hard to believe...
                                        Report Abuse
                                        • Author by Brabantio (June 24, 2008 10:53 pm ET)
                                             

                                          "Never said it was a choice to be gay or not, did i?"

                                          So now you are saying that it's a choice?  Below this you answer my question about things beyond people's control with two "yes" responses.  If you think it's a choice why do you accept the premise that it's beyond their control?

                                          You're not making a hell of a lot of sense. 

                                          Report Abuse
                                          • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:57 pm ET)
                                               
                                            Im saying that I dont know if its a choice or not, because im not god, but what i can tell you is there is nothing scientifically you can show me to prove that it is.  Its more less of an accepted theory, but has not been proven.
                                            Report Abuse
                                            • Author by open_mind (June 24, 2008 11:00 pm ET)
                                                 
                                              How old were you when you considered being a homosexual?
                                              Report Abuse
                                            • Author by Brabantio (June 24, 2008 11:01 pm ET)
                                                 
                                              Nothing here relies on definite proof of anything.  You don't have a belief one way or the other on whether it's a choice or not?
                                              Report Abuse
                                              • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 11:04 pm ET)
                                                   
                                                Not really - to be honest, I dont care either way.  I dont find it acceptable regardless of how it starts.
                                                Report Abuse
                                                • Author by Brabantio (June 24, 2008 11:11 pm ET)
                                                     
                                                  So if you were born gay, you wouldn't have a problem with refraining from sexual activity with someone of your own sex because other people don't accept you the way you were born?  It seems unlikely.
                                                  Report Abuse
                                                  • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 11:16 pm ET)
                                                       
                                                    I dont like to speak in nonsense hypotheticals.  Its a crutch.
                                                    Report Abuse
                                                    • Author by RABBITLUVR (June 24, 2008 11:21 pm ET)
                                                         
                                                      Columbus, you've been owned in this thread. You might as well just give up.
                                                      Report Abuse
                                                    • Author by Brabantio (June 24, 2008 11:25 pm ET)
                                                         
                                                      There's nothing nonsensical about looking at things through a different perspective.  Thanks for admitting your narrow-mindedness, though.
                                                      Report Abuse
                                        • Author by rendesign (June 25, 2008 12:04 am ET)
                                             

                                          The reverse is also true. You cannot scientifically prove that it is NOT something they are borned with. In the absence of scientific proof either way then you are forced to take the word of someone who is gay and right down to the last person asked they all say that it is not a choice. Or is logic on the list of things you don't agree with???

                                          Report Abuse
                                          • Author by Leftwingcenter (June 25, 2008 8:20 am ET)
                                               

                                            The reverse is also true. You cannot scientifically prove that it is NOT something they are borned with.

                                            Not so, Rendesign!  They know everything there is to know about them-thur ho-mo-seck-shuls from their dear pastor, the Right Reverend Rush Whosiewhazit of the First Bible-Beating Baptist Church... 

                                            Report Abuse
                                      • Author by IRONY 101 (June 24, 2008 10:51 pm ET)
                                           
                                        Well, Brab...left-handed people really p!ss me off. ;>)
                                        Report Abuse
                                    • Author by RABBITLUVR (June 24, 2008 10:55 pm ET)
                                         
                                      Uh, I didn't point that out. Time for bed, Columbus. Nighty-nite.
                                      Report Abuse
                                • Author by Brabantio (June 24, 2008 10:42 pm ET)
                                     
                                  If you don't think it's a choice, then it deepens the mystery of how you think it's not "right".  People's sexual orientation is beyond their control, but it's wrong and sick to act on that orientation?
                                  Report Abuse
                                  • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:48 pm ET)
                                       

                                    People's sexual orientation is beyond their control, but it's wrong and sick to act on that orientation?

                                    yes, and yes.

                                    Report Abuse
                                    • Author by RABBITLUVR (June 24, 2008 10:57 pm ET)
                                         
                                      Wrong and sick according to... what?
                                      Report Abuse
                                      • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:58 pm ET)
                                           
                                        to me.  I only speak for me.
                                        Report Abuse
                                        • Author by open_mind (June 24, 2008 11:22 pm ET)
                                             
                                          I think you speak for most dittoheads.
                                          Report Abuse
                                          • Author by RABBITLUVR (June 24, 2008 11:26 pm ET)
                                               
                                            What's so ironic about it is that the Master of the Dittoheads may be a closeted homosexual who has yet to come clean about his Pittsburgh arrest.
                                            Report Abuse
                                      • Author by plhamel4926 (June 24, 2008 11:13 pm ET)
                                           
                                        A 2000 year old story book...
                                        Report Abuse
                                    • Author by Brabantio (June 24, 2008 10:58 pm ET)
                                         
                                      On what basis?  If it's not a choice then it's natural behavior.  What could make it socially acceptable if not that?
                                      Report Abuse
                                      • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:59 pm ET)
                                           
                                        I'm fairly certain there isnt anything that can. 
                                        Report Abuse
                                        • Author by open_mind (June 24, 2008 11:03 pm ET)
                                             

                                          You are simply a bigot.  Embrace it.  Don't run away from it.

                                          Report Abuse
                                          • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 11:06 pm ET)
                                               
                                            Who's running?  Im advertising it.
                                            Report Abuse
                                            • Author by RABBITLUVR (June 24, 2008 11:12 pm ET)
                                                 
                                              So you are telling us that you are a bigot. Congratulations.
                                              Report Abuse
                                            • Author by NiceguyEddie (June 26, 2008 10:22 am ET)
                                                 
                                              Yes.  It's nice to see a man truly embracing his ingorance. 
                                              Report Abuse
                                          • Author by RABBITLUVR (June 24, 2008 11:09 pm ET)
                                               

                                            Just like that Detestable Mark Rotten Levin. A couple weeks back, when the court in CA made its ruling on the gay marriage issue, His Rottenness rambled on and on about how the court was soooo out of line with its ruling. Blah blah blah. But he DID let it slip out that he is opposed to gay marriage for 'personal' reasons, aka HOMOPHOBIC BIGOT. So his whining about the 'legality' of the ruling was just a smokescreen to cover up his true feelings about the issue.

                                            Why can't these lunatics just come out with it? Why can't they just say 'you know, I'm a racist bigoted homophobe and I'm proud of it'. Why can't they stand up for what they truly believe in? Why do they have to be such miserable little cowards?

                                            Report Abuse
                                            • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 11:12 pm ET)
                                                 
                                              Is that not what i'm doing?  Im against homosexual lifestyle and marriage, plain and simple.  I have no reason to hide that.
                                              Report Abuse
                                        • Author by Brabantio (June 24, 2008 11:05 pm ET)
                                             

                                          So even if homosexuality is innate, natural behavior, then you don't think it should ever be socially acceptable because you personally find the mechanics of the sexual relations to be distasteful.

                                          I see. 

                                          Report Abuse
                                          • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 11:08 pm ET)
                                               

                                            The mechanics of sexual relations to be distasteful?  Uh no.  Is that how you're trying to coin the acceptance for it now?

                                            When one guilt statement fails to yield universtal acceptance, try another

                                            Report Abuse
                                            • Author by IRONY 101 (June 24, 2008 11:14 pm ET)
                                                 
                                              What Brab is saying is that your comments strongly suggest a distaste for the mechanics of gay sex. Disgusting and sick, I think, are two words you used. What Brab is asking is would you be okay with people being gay so long as they didn't do those "disgusting" things to each other?
                                              Report Abuse
                                            • Author by Brabantio (June 24, 2008 11:15 pm ET)
                                                 

                                              "...because you personally find the mechanics of the sexual relations to be distasteful."

                                              Are you denying that you've made several posts talking about how you find the activity of anal sex "sick"?  That's the mechanics of the sexual relations.  How am I misrepresenting your sentiments, exactly? 

                                              Report Abuse
                                              • Author by commonsenseliberal (June 25, 2008 12:14 pm ET)
                                                   

                                                You know, it's about time a gay man stepped in here.  I appreciate all of the great things fellow posters have said - and for the most part, I agree.  However, I do want to point out that sexual relations between two men do not necessarily have to end up with anal sex.  I've been with my partner for quite some time now, and we've NEVER engaged in anal sex.  We just don't do it.  There are many reasons why we don't do it, but mostly because for both of us, part A is too big for part B - and it freakin' hurts.  Some couples engage in it - which is fine - because what you do in your bedroom is your business.  Not mine - and not Columbus'.

                                                In the Jewish tradition, anal sex is important with regards to birth control. 

                                                There are many gay couples who engage in what is called "frottage".  Look it up, if you're that interested.  It's based upon neither party being the "male" or the "female" of the relationship, but having total equality, in and out of the bedroom.  Couples who engage in frottage don't engage in anal sex, and most times don't even engage in oral sex.

                                                It's also very interesting that Columbus never brought up lesbian sex.  I'm sure he more than approves of lesbian sex.  Two hot girls, gettin' it on...turns you on, doesn't it?  It's OK for two women to do it, but not for two men.  That makes Columbus a hypocrite - just like most narrow-minded right-wingers.

                                                 

                                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by rugbyref (June 24, 2008 10:47 pm ET)
                                     

                                  WrongWay PeachFuzz wrote:

                                  "Not obessed, against.  Big difference.  I have the freedom to not accept their lifestyle, just as a secular progressive has the freedom to not agree with someone's religion.

                                   So what, exactly, did you mean by writing "their lifestyle"?

                                  Report Abuse
                                • Author by wzwriter (June 25, 2008 8:44 am ET)
                                     

                                  Never said it was a choice to be gay or not, did i?  But I did say its my choice on whether to accept it.

                                  People used to say the same thing about blacks, Columbus.  You're as bad as the racial bigots of the '50s.

                                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Ro (June 25, 2008 5:19 pm ET)
                       

                    This shit gets posted out of the right-wing authoritarian's general sense of repression, sexual and otherwise. And a raging need for validation.

                    Report Abuse
                • Author by onionhead (June 24, 2008 9:55 pm ET)
                     

                  Yeah, it does kinda disgust some heterosexuals like I'm sure it would disgust some gays to think about heterosexual sex. 

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:05 pm ET)
                       
                    Yes, I'm sure it disgusts them to think how they were brought into this world....and how their parents were, and their parents, and so on and so on.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by IRONY 101 (June 24, 2008 10:09 pm ET)
                         
                      I don't know of any human being, gay or straight, who doesn't find the image of his parents having sex rather repulsive.  ;>)
                      Report Abuse
            • Author by IRONY 101 (June 24, 2008 9:34 pm ET)
                 

              For not accepting that someone likes to stick something up their *** and enjoy it?  Hardly.

              What about women who engage in anal sex?

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 9:40 pm ET)
                   

                That just makes them disgusting and asking for a disease.  If you worked in healthcare, and knew the results of what could happen from this type of activity, you would know why its just not right.

                 

                Report Abuse
                • Author by magnolialover (June 24, 2008 9:43 pm ET)
                     
                  Nope. That makes them pretty normal, as in, there are LOTS of women who like anal sex, as in, many millions. And if done correctly, there is no "disease" that you're going to get from anal sex practiced safely.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 9:50 pm ET)
                       

                    Safely?  Seeing as how there is no 100% proven contraceptive, or STD prevention - outside of abstinence, that is an incorrect statement.

                    However, its not only STD's that are the problem  The tissue there is some of the thinnest of the body, and prone to tearing ... opening up additional areas to contract some sort of disease.  Not to mention, parasites.

                    But hey, if parasites are your thing...keep on keepin' on.

                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by IRONY 101 (June 24, 2008 9:53 pm ET)
                       
                    It would not surprise me if there are as many women in America who have engaged in anal sex as there are gay men.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:06 pm ET)
                         
                      That would not surprise me either...in fact, I would assume there would be more.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by IRONY 101 (June 24, 2008 10:12 pm ET)
                           
                        So are women who have engaged in anal sex also sick, in your opinion? What's your position on oral sex? I like mine in the supine position...  ;>)
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:17 pm ET)
                             

                          I dont really want to know what position you like to take it in.

                          However, I'm not against a woman taking anal sex because of sexual reasons, but more less because of the associated health risks.  But hey, its like smoking...people do what they want to do, regardless of the risks.  Just dont come crying to me if you come down with something like AIDS, since its commonly known that anal sex is the most risky form of intercourse in terms of disease passage.

                          Report Abuse
                • Author by snoopy (June 24, 2008 10:22 pm ET)
                     
                  and you work in healthcare...
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by IRONY 101 (June 24, 2008 10:26 pm ET)
                       
                    ...a real compassionate conservative. ;>)
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:32 pm ET)
                         
                      Who claimed I was supposed to be compassionate?
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by IRONY 101 (June 24, 2008 10:33 pm ET)
                           

                        Okay...you win. YOU DON'T HAVE A COMPASSIONATE BONE IN YOUR BODY!

                        There...satisfied?

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:51 pm ET)
                             
                          No, I resent that.  I'm compassionate towards my frieds and family.  Probably leaning closer to your first statement lol
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by IRONY 101 (June 24, 2008 10:54 pm ET)
                               
                            And if a friend or family memeber -such as your son- turned out to be gay, would you not be compassionate towards them?
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 11:10 pm ET)
                                 
                              Luckily I've never had to make that decision, and crossing my fingers that I never will.  I'm not going to speak in hypotheticals.
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by RABBITLUVR (June 24, 2008 11:16 pm ET)
                                   
                                Quit dodging... that doesn't work here.
                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by jeter2 (June 25, 2008 12:21 pm ET)
                                     

                                  Next time one of you Libs squawks about a thread being derailed I hope you'll remember this thread.

                                  It's not Columbus that took this discussion into the netherlands it was Lib posters.

                                  So the guy is uncomfortable with Homosexuality & the Gay lifestyle. That's his opinion.

                                  All I've seen here was sanctimonious posturing by so called tolerant folks...isn't tolerant what you Libs claim to be?

                                  You are not going to change minds, no matter how you try to browbeat folks. Call them bigots. Or suggest they must be Gay if they don't accept Homosexuality as a normal alternative lifestyle.

                                  Here's a newsflash: Just because someone doesn't agree with you or what you believe it doesn't mean you're the be all end all in deciding who is correct, fair, bigoted, or tolerant.

                                  Here's a clue: You can't force folks to think like you. They are entitled to their own opinions, especially on what makes them comfortable or what they will tolerate.

                                  Me? I say live & let live if it doesn't hurt anyone else. But that doesn't mean I don't still find a guy-guy, or gal-gal pairing a tad different. But I don't need or want you to tell me I can't feel like that. K?

                                  Report Abuse
                                  • Author by open_mind (June 25, 2008 12:34 pm ET)
                                       

                                    Jeter,

                                    He isn't just "uncomfortable" with it.  I think that is the difference here. Heck, even I am uncofortable with homosexuality (I just don't think it is really any of my business and I realize I may make gay people uncomfortable with my own rampant manly heterosexuality).  This guy called gays "sick".  That is more than just being "uncomfortable" - that was a judgment.  He is getting back what he put out IMO.

                                    Report Abuse
                                    • Author by jeter2 (June 25, 2008 1:35 pm ET)
                                         

                                      Open_Mind,

                                      I agree "sick" is a harsh judgment, but if that's his opinion no one is going to beat that opinion out of his head by suggesting he's a bigot or that he's a closet Gay.

                                      Homosexuality is one of those topics that often produces a variety of points of view.

                                      Twenty years ago I would have called it "sick"...but that was probably because it seemed strange & totally bizarre to me & I didn't actually know any Gay folks [or thought I didn't]. Over time I did meet Gay folks/couples, found out they were "just people" & I'd like to think it helped me evolve & be more open minded.

                                      That doesn't happen to everyone. So if Columbus or others still view Homosexuality as "sick", no amount of chiding them or calling them names is going to change their views.

                                      I guess I was just a tad amused how folks around here get pissed about thread derailment, unless of course they are the ones doing it ;-)

                                      Report Abuse
                                      • Author by Brabantio (June 25, 2008 1:57 pm ET)
                                           

                                        "I guess I was just a tad amused how folks around here get pissed about thread derailment, unless of course they are the ones doing it"

                                        I think there's a slight distinction to be made between criticizing homophobic bigots and things like making unsubstantiated charges against people or demanding some grand solution in order for other people to complain about irresponsible behavior on national television.

                                        Report Abuse
                                        • Author by jeter2 (June 25, 2008 2:27 pm ET)
                                             

                                          Oh please.

                                          Anal & oral sex took up a great part of the thread. Calling him a closeted Gay & discussing his sex life was hardly a serious debate.

                                          He thinks homosexuality is "sick". Did you really think you'd change his mind by trying to shame him or poke fun at him.

                                          The thread got derailed because folks here couldn't let a chance to poke at a fellow poster with an opinion they didn't approve of go by.

                                          Report Abuse
                                          • Author by Brabantio (June 25, 2008 3:41 pm ET)
                                               

                                            Did you miss my other post?  He admitted to being a bigot.  He thinks even if you're born gay you're unacceptable in society.  Why should we respect these sorts of opinions?

                                            If someone came on here throwing out racist remarks, would you object to the blowback because we're not going to "change his mind"?  Would that just be his opinion and that's the end of the matter?  Think carefully.

                                            Report Abuse
                                          • Author by foghornleghorn (June 25, 2008 4:11 pm ET)
                                               

                                            Did you really think you'd change his mind by trying to shame him or poke fun at him...

                                            Yes.  Enlightenment is always a good thing.  If you have to get there through shaming and or poking fun, so be it.

                                            Report Abuse
                                  • Author by Brabantio (June 25, 2008 1:26 pm ET)
                                       

                                    Did you read the thread?  He thinks that homosexuality shouldn't be socially accepted even if it's innate.  That is bigotry, plain and simple.  How on earth is that a respectable opinion?  He even admitted to being a bigot, so it's not really up for determination anymore.   I think it's fair to criticize this sort of person, perhaps you disagree.

                                    I have a post waiting for you on yesterday's Morris thread.  If you haven't seen it, I would greatly appreciate a response.  Thank you kindly.

                                     

                                    Report Abuse
                                    • Author by Brabantio (June 25, 2008 1:30 pm ET)
                                         
                                      That reads "I have a post waiting for you on yesterday's Morris thread.  If you haven't seen it, I would greatly appreciate a response.  Thank you kindly."
                                      Report Abuse
                                      • Author by jeter2 (June 25, 2008 2:38 pm ET)
                                           
                                        It's short & sweet & you won't like it...
                                        Report Abuse
                                        • Author by Brabantio (June 25, 2008 3:37 pm ET)
                                             
                                          You're right, I don't like irrelevant replies.  You won't own up to your own behavior, that's up to you.
                                          Report Abuse
                                          • Author by jeter2 (June 25, 2008 4:08 pm ET)
                                               

                                            No Brab, you just don't accept anything without over thinking it & delving into minutia. Sometimes things aren't worth parsing, slicing & dicing. Sometimes it's simple.

                                            You obviously find that difficult to understand. 

                                            Report Abuse
                                            • Author by Brabantio (June 25, 2008 4:43 pm ET)
                                                 

                                              Oh, you mean how like not allowing certain people on the air simply means networks upholding high standards as opposed to advocating political censorship?  That sort of parsing, dicing and splicing of the word "allowed" when there's a much more obvious explanation that you shouldn't have to "overthink" so much?

                                              Not your brightest moment there, not by a long shot.

                                              Report Abuse
                                  • Author by Governor (June 25, 2008 1:54 pm ET)
                                       

                                    Next time one of you Libs squawks about a thread being derailed I hope you'll remember this thread.

                                     

                                    Complaining about thread derailment has no political affiliation. 

                                    Report Abuse
                              • Author by open_mind (June 24, 2008 11:19 pm ET)
                                   

                                I hope you could be strong enough to put your personal gay-fearing obsession aside for the sake of a loved one.  Who knows.  I was once a bigot like you when I was in my twenties and I changed.

                                Report Abuse
                              • Author by worrierking (June 25, 2008 7:31 am ET)
                                   
                                If you're not going to speak in hypotheticals, I can assume that your revulsion for sex with another man is due to the fact that you've tried it and found it distasteful.

                                Good for you then. At least you're being honest.

                                And for every one who responds to Columbus1492, didn't your mother ever tell you not to scratch a mosquito bite, it only makes the itch return and return and return.

                                Sort of like Colombus 1492.

                                Yikes! Now I'm responding to him.
                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by commonsenseliberal (June 25, 2008 12:18 pm ET)
                                     

                                  Excellent post, WK!  Insightful - and inciteful. ;)

                                  Cheers!

                                  Report Abuse
            • Author by unitarianpatriot (June 25, 2008 2:03 am ET)
                 
              Uh, few things "work" on "minds" like yours. And I'll bet you, oh, a $100 contribution to the Obama campaign that you are gay and too scared to admit it. Most guys who talk hate like you do are.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by zamfir273114 (June 25, 2008 10:24 pm ET)
                 
              I like anal sex and I am a heterosexual. Maybe you should try it. Oh, and I know a LOT of gays that don't do that sort of thing.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by thedailyphosdex (June 25, 2008 12:03 pm ET)
               

            Has anybody considered the possibility of homosexual behaviours likely being mistaken for such associated with transvestism, transsexualism and/or hermaphroditism?

            (In case you need some evidence to that effect.)

            Report Abuse
        • Author by What Happened to Gannon (June 24, 2008 9:20 pm ET)
             
          Columbus, I think the log cabin just fell in, if it hasn't already...
          Report Abuse
        • Author by wzwriter (June 25, 2008 8:41 am ET)
             
          Columbus1492 has lived his life on the wacko fringe....
          Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (June 24, 2008 7:45 pm ET)
         

      I knew that eventually, Limbaugh would be able to discuss something that's in his area of expertise.

      Well done, Mr. Chrisite 

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by onionhead (June 24, 2008 9:46 pm ET)
           
        Shake a bottle of Oxys in front of him and watch how fast he grabs his ankles and bends over.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by onionhead (June 24, 2008 9:48 pm ET)
             

          I apologize for that remark. It was out of line and certainly not true. Especially since I don't think he can reach his ankles.

           

          Report Abuse
    • Author by watershed (June 24, 2008 7:45 pm ET)
         
      Democratic. I shouldn't use caps, apparently. They are bad for spelling.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Nebraska Blue (June 24, 2008 8:01 pm ET)
         
      These words are not strange to limbaugh. He probably says them in his sleep.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (June 24, 2008 8:02 pm ET)
         
      And there you have it, folks. Republicans ignore blacks and gays because there aren't enough of them to concern them. Come to think of it, same is true about Hispanics. And Asians. And women. And liberals. And Vets who don't vote republican. And wounded Vets. Aw, heck - everyone except white lunatic fringe christians who are ruining this country...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by sportsguydave (June 24, 2008 8:26 pm ET)
         

      Democrats will bend over, grab the ankles, and say, 'Have your way with me,' for 10 percent and 2 percent of the population?" ...Rush

      ===================================================

      Something the former Jeff Christie apparently has extensive experience with .... 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (June 24, 2008 8:34 pm ET)
           
        Jeez...and today he told a caller that he likes large gardenia scented candles, but then caught himself and said that it was a sign that he was secure in his masculinity to be able to publicly pronounce his affection for flower scented candles. What is wrong with this guy...?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by susangee (June 24, 2008 8:44 pm ET)
             
          Seriously. And just a couple of weeks ago he spent nearly twenty minutes talking about his cat "Punkin" --telling some long. pathetic story about taking her to the vet, feeding her, blah, blah. He's starting to sound like a seventy year old spinster. Next he'll treat his listeners to a monologue about tatting lace doilies. 
          Report Abuse
          • Author by eddy3957 reregistered (June 24, 2008 9:11 pm ET)
               

            Hmmm..... I noticed a while back Mark Levin starting to copy Michael Savages' personal life musings style a bit with the dog talk and writing a book about his deceased pet and what-not.  I presume he's doing this to both improve ratings and to humanize himself (after telling his listeners to vote against their self interests for most of his show).

            Limbaugh may be doing the same sort of thing here.  Maybe they have the same radio consultant or something........... Limbaugh went out of his way with the gardenia scented candles riff.  It was no slip.  He was very consciously getting out the massage ("let the word go forth...") that he is one very big scented candles fan, and the place where he gets his from--- jo malone.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by gg (June 24, 2008 8:54 pm ET)
         
      Oh, Rush, remembering some of your "youthful indiscretions"? First sign of Alzheimer's is remembering the past more vividly then the present; or is it just the drugs talking?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by annes10 (June 24, 2008 9:05 pm ET)
         

      Oh, danm, I missed it! Darn darn darn darn darn ...

       

      Was he slurring or speeding yesterday?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by eddy3957 reregistered (June 24, 2008 9:18 pm ET)
           
        Check the Jo Malone link above---a lot of it's there
        Report Abuse
        • Author by eddy3957 reregistered (June 24, 2008 9:33 pm ET)
             
          course I know 'grab ankles' is the story here...just that the candles thing surprised me more.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by annes10 (June 24, 2008 9:47 pm ET)
             

          Yes, I found the audio. Sounds more like slurring than speeding, maybe with a little cough medicine chaser?

          Report Abuse
      • Author by What Happened to Gannon (June 24, 2008 9:23 pm ET)
           
        I noticed him lisping a LOT when I heard him a few weeks ago.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (June 24, 2008 9:27 pm ET)
         
      There goes Rush. Projecting again what he wants done to him.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by What Happened to Gannon (June 24, 2008 9:28 pm ET)
         
      Is Rush going "Operation Sabatoge" on McCain, or on his own show? I don't see how anyone can listen to him now. If more organizations expose this self-defeating garbage to the public, Rush would be recognized for the albatros he's becoming.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:08 pm ET)
           

        You can't imagine why people listen to him?  I think you are bit confused.

        I would be almost willing to bet that there are more people who support Rush, than those who actually like McCain.  After all, I dont think its that they support McCain, but that they don't support Obama.  Lesser of two evils.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by princeofwheels (June 24, 2008 10:17 pm ET)
             
          Columbus, then Rush should run for office..RIGHT. He can lead the Cons. But those followers of Rush who have anal or oral sex must not be permitted to vote for him. Agreed.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:35 pm ET)
               
            No.  Political media analysts - Rush, BO, KO, CM, etc, etc are great at pointing out the problems.  But lack the other half - coming up with solutions.  Thats what seperates politicians from political analysts.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by IRONY 101 (June 24, 2008 10:19 pm ET)
             

          I would be almost willing to bet that there are more people who support Rush, than those who actually like McCain. 

          So, in other words, what you are saying is that the Republican Party is getting ready to bend over and grab it's ankles...?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Science101 (June 24, 2008 10:36 pm ET)
               
            Um, that made no sense. 
            Report Abuse
            • Author by IRONY 101 (June 25, 2008 12:11 am ET)
                 
              What I meant was that if, as you say, more people support Rush Limbaugh than they do John McCain then the Republican Party had better get ready for an arse whuppin' in November.
              Report Abuse
    • Author by John the Elder (June 24, 2008 10:37 pm ET)
         
      Bend over etc. exactly what Limberger has been doing to his 'to dumb to know better listeners' for years. They have been only to willing to 'take it' from this gasbag for far too long. That is what makes him an authority on this kind of thing. It is the only thing which he is an expert about.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (June 24, 2008 11:35 pm ET)
         
      This shows just how desperate EL FLUSH BO and his FAR RIGHT WING LOONY TUNES are getting. They wont admit it but they are sensing  that they will be wiped out in November and the dont know what to do  about it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (June 24, 2008 11:39 pm ET)
         
      The world would be a better place if someone  would pour superglue down RUSH'S MOUTH.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by open_mind (June 27, 2008 1:00 pm ET)
           

        I flagged your comment.  Hopefully MMFA will get around to removing it.  We don't need to advocate violent fantasies and stupidity like the rightwing sites so often do.  Let Rush talk all he wants.  Shutting him up only proves to him and his dittoheads he was right all along.

        I suspect you came here to pretend being a liberal.  Either way, grow up.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by jmmartin3402 (June 25, 2008 12:07 am ET)
         
      I am reminded of the late Joseph Nye Welch.  Standing up to Sen. Joseph McCarthy (the leading dittohead of the times), Welch said: "You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir? At long last, have you left no sense of decency?"
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Leftwingcenter (June 25, 2008 8:30 am ET)
           
        Ah, but you forget, sir; to those such as Colombian1492 and The Pinball Wizard, Tailgunner Joe is a national hero...
        Report Abuse
    • Author by clams casino (June 25, 2008 12:20 am ET)
         

      Interesting how this imagery has popped up in Limbaugh's speech more than once:

      http://mediamatters.org/items/200507140004 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (June 25, 2008 12:46 am ET)
           
        Hmmmm...seems to be a recurring theme for ElRushbo. I'll bet that if he reads this thread he's going to ditch the anal imagery. And I wouldn't be surprised if he never mentions gardenia scented candles again either.  ;>)
        Report Abuse
    • Author by FNC Liberal (June 25, 2008 4:11 am ET)
         
      Rush Limbaugh is the one who's sick and twisted. The years of abusing prescription drugs destroyed what's left in his brain cells. No logic left in him.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by moe (June 25, 2008 5:52 am ET)
         

      A few questions for ditto heads; inquiring minds want to know -

      Rusty appears to be obsessed with the gay lifestyle; what if it turns out that he is gay?  Will you turn him off or simply light a candle and ask him to grab his ankles?  Why or why not?

      Rusty appears to be obsessed with race. (If you have any doubts do a nexus search).  Why do you think he brings it up so often?

      Rusty is so far out there that he has no idea that he is actually the kook-fringe.  Will someone please be a friend and inform him of this?

      Finally, what was the last thing you learned from Rusty?

      (No, I'm not completely anti-Rusty. I do think he is entertaining in a train-wreck, circus clown kind of way)

      Report Abuse
    • Author by oneleft (June 25, 2008 8:00 am ET)
         
      a recent study

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7456588.stm
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wzwriter (June 25, 2008 8:48 am ET)
         
      Interesting how Jeff Christie was so descriptive of a homosexual sex act.  Describing it must have brought his back to that night in Pittsburgh when he was arrested in the company of that male prostitute.....
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Dose of Reality (June 25, 2008 9:11 am ET)
         
      I fail to see what you cannot comprehend about what he said. The kook fringe left (i.e. you people) are not being disenfranchised by your own party. Republicans are supposedly willing to disregard 30% of their base: Christians and Conservatives, but Democrats will openly accept ALL including 12% of the Democrat population: homosexuals and blacks. There was clearly a distinguish made between the so-called 12% and the far left fringe. But you're all too busy making fun of Rush with your vicious name calling than demonstrating your reading and comprehension skills.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (June 25, 2008 10:34 am ET)
           
        Thanks for clearing that up. That makes a lot more sense.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by christopher howard (June 25, 2008 10:57 am ET)
           

        But you're all too busy making fun of Rush with your vicious name calling than demonstrating your reading and comprehension skills. - webelibtards / Wednesday June 25, 2008 9:11:15 AM EDT

         

        I always thinks it's funny when someone with a nick like "webelibtards" shows up to decry name calling.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Dose of Reality (June 25, 2008 11:49 am ET)
             
          So you sidestep the issue by talking about my screenname?  Hilarious. 
          Report Abuse
          • Author by open_mind (June 25, 2008 12:37 pm ET)
               
            Pot, meet kettle.  Seemed pretty obvious.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by christopher howard (June 25, 2008 12:53 pm ET)
                 
              I'll debate issues seriously with conservatives who are willing to discuss them in good faith. They do show up here often enough. A poster who chooses a provocative eff-you nick while crying about namecalling doesn't deserve to be taken seriously.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Brabantio (June 25, 2008 3:09 pm ET)
                 
              And on another level, anyone who wants to blast liberals for being stupid ("libtards") and doesn't realize such obvious hypocrisy isn't coming off as very intelligent himself.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by RABBITLUVR (June 25, 2008 11:10 am ET)
           
        Tell ya what - we'll knock off the 'vicious name-calling' when Jeffy-poo comes clean about his past and who he really is. On the air and uncensored.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by robotchubby (June 25, 2008 11:03 am ET)
         

      " . . . there's a complicated answer to this and I'm going to have answer some of it in the monologue in the next hour,"

      Read:  I'll answer your question once I have a nice script written for me.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (June 25, 2008 11:21 am ET)
         

      Well your post is a real test of comprehension. Near as I can figure you define the normal part of the Democrat(ic) population to be the blacks and the homosexuals (the so called 12%?). So the caucasian and latino democrats are all orbiting moonbat central?

      A major part of posting here is to give your opinion. Backing it up, despensing current and historical conservative talking points, derailing the topic, and a little comedy (sometimes intenional), cover the marjority of what happens here.

      Most of us are not fans of the fetid miasma that oozes out of the MSM. Occasional gold stars are awarded, but hey the site is about critiquing the MSM, what kind of post would you prefer?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (June 25, 2008 11:45 am ET)
           

        ...what kind of post would you prefer?

        Uhhh...something about Barack Obama and Jeremiah Wright, perhaps.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Dose of Reality (June 25, 2008 11:55 am ET)
           

        Another sidestep.  The point was when are the majority of the dems going to tell the lunatic fringe of your party that they do not accept their viewpoint?  We supposedly turned our backs on our fringe element, when are you going to do the same?  I already know the answer: never.  Because the inmates run the asylum.

         

        Report Abuse
        • Author by IRONY 101 (June 25, 2008 12:09 pm ET)
             
          Why don't you worry about the Republican Party and its internecine fights and don't fret over how the Democratic Party is run? Limbaugh is saying that the Democratic Party is prostituting itself to blacks and guys...at least in part for money. This is typical unfounded Rush Limbaugh bullshet. My reading comprehension is just fine...I understood clearly what Limbaugh was lying about. And, therefore, Limbaugh clearly deserves the derision he has generated here.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (June 25, 2008 12:19 pm ET)
               

            ...that the Democratic Party is prostituting itself to blacks and gays...

            Sorry for the typo...

            Report Abuse
        • Author by debra.knight5209 (June 25, 2008 3:43 pm ET)
             
          "We supposedly turned our backs on our fringe element, when are you going to do the same? "

          When did the Republicans "supposedly" do that? Last I knew, you guys put your fringe element in charge of everything, from the President on down.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (June 25, 2008 11:32 am ET)
         
      Then I though, what about the oritental population? Moonbat or not?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (June 25, 2008 12:15 pm ET)
         
      Flush Limbugh has no functioning brain cells.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (June 25, 2008 4:52 pm ET)
         

      This Limbaugh bag of filth is a new type of scum...

      the likes of which America has never experienced before.

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by cArn (June 25, 2008 5:07 pm ET)
         

      We supposedly turned our backs on our fringe element, when are you going to do the same?

      Inquiring minds would like  to know when the Republicans did this?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by FormerConservative (June 25, 2008 7:29 pm ET)
         
      What a hoot.  Once again, our favorite poofter talks about one of favorite subjects -- bending over and grabbing ankles.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mghamma (June 26, 2008 3:33 am ET)
         
      Rednecks like to say quocksucker a lot to. They can almost taste the word.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Brabantio (June 26, 2008 11:18 am ET)
         
      Why the hell are all the "Columbus1492" posts now signed "Science101"?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by SemiDiscerning (June 26, 2008 1:15 pm ET)
         
      Typical El Rushbo bullpoop.  Each party seems to have its share of people who "may" be on the fringe depending upon persepective.  But, I can't seem to find where the Republican's, in recent years, have said that any of their "whacko nuts" (some of whom are out right neo-religious fascist, homophobic, and closet anti-semtic) need to leave that party.  In fact they seem to welcome, and cater, to them.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Huck500 (June 26, 2008 1:26 pm ET)
         

      @science101 - 

       I'm surprised, given your nick, that you aren't up on the latest in the science of gayness...

      ...the researchers genetically altered synapse strength, independent of GB. They also gave flies drugs to alter synapse strength. As predicted, they were able to turn fly homosexuality on and off, within hours. 

      Also:

      In an experiment, men and heterosexual women sniffed a chemical from the male hormone testosterone. The homosexual men's brains responded differently from those of heterosexual males, and in a similar way to the women's brains.

      And damn those sick, unnatural animals...
       Almost a quarter of black swan families are parented by homosexual couples. Male couples sometimes mate with a female just to have a baby. Once she lays the egg, they chase her away, hatch the egg, and raise a family on their own.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

Most Popular Tags

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace