About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Reuters uncritically reported McCain adviser's assertion that McCain no longer believes Russia should be excluded from G-8

June 26, 2008 4:38 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: Reuters falsely suggested that Sen. John McCain most recently called for Russia to be excluded from the Group of Eight major industrialized nations (G-8) in October 2007, and uncritically quoted an anonymous McCain adviser's assertion that McCain no longer holds that position. In fact, McCain again called for Russia to be excluded from the G-8 in a March 2008 speech.

26 Comments

A June 25 Reuters article falsely suggested that Sen. John McCain most recently called for Russia to be excluded from the Group of Eight major industrialized nations (G-8) in October 2007, and uncritically quoted an anonymous McCain adviser's assertion that McCain no longer holds that position. The article reported that analysts cite "McCain's call for Russia to be excluded from the Group of Eight major industrialized nations as a neoconservative position that could inhibit his more moderate call for arms reduction talks with Moscow" and later stated that the McCain adviser "dismissed McCain's comment last October on Russia and the G-8 as 'a holdover from an earlier period,' adding: 'It doesn't reflect where he is right now.' "

However, McCain proposed excluding Russia from the G-8 in a March 26 speech on foreign policy before the Los Angeles World Affairs Council, in which he stated: "We should start by ensuring that the G-8, the group of eight highly industrialized states, becomes again a club of leading market democracies: it should include Brazil and India but exclude Russia."

The blog Think Progress first flagged the Reuters article and pointed to McCain's more recent remarks on excluding Russia from the G-8 in a June 25 entry.

From McCain's March 26 speech:

The United States did not single-handedly win the Cold War; the transatlantic alliance did, in concert with partners around the world. The bonds we share with Europe in terms of history, values, and interests are unique. Americans should welcome the rise of a strong, confident European Union as we continue to support a strong NATO. The future of the transatlantic relationship lies in confronting the challenges of the twenty-first century worldwide: developing a common energy policy, creating a transatlantic common market tying our economies more closely together, addressing the dangers posed by a revanchist Russia, and institutionalizing our cooperation on issues such as climate change, foreign assistance, and democracy promotion.

We should start by ensuring that the G-8, the group of eight highly industrialized states, becomes again a club of leading market democracies: it should include Brazil and India but exclude Russia. Rather than tolerate Russia's nuclear blackmail or cyber attacks, Western nations should make clear that the solidarity of NATO, from the Baltic to the Black Sea, is indivisible and that the organization's doors remain open to all democracies committed to the defense of freedom.

From the June 25 Reuters article:

"If I were Obama's people I would just say: 'Neocon, neocon, neocon.' That would be a fun thing to do," said a McCain adviser who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak on behalf of the campaign.

"But McCain knows his own mind, and I wouldn't call him uniformly one thing or another."

A "neocon" is more inclined than other conservatives to support vigorous government advocacy of morality and interventionist foreign policy. Neoconservatives such as former Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz were key architects of the Iraq war and Bush's doctrine of military pre-emption.

Analysts say McCain could also be vulnerable to contradictory statements that suggest rivalry between neoconservatives who influenced Bush on Iraq and other foreign policy issues and another foreign policy camp of so-called realists such as Henry Kissinger.

They cite for instance McCain's call for Russia to be excluded from the Group of Eight major industrialized nations as a neoconservative position that could inhibit his more moderate call for arms reduction talks with Moscow.

[...]

Derek Chollet, of the Center for a New American Security, said inconsistency is a sign of turmoil among Republican foreign policy experts who have been widely discredited in the minds of voters after seven years of the Bush administration. Chollet was an adviser to former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards, a Democrat who ran for president.

Democrats say the Republican candidate who staunchly supports the Iraq war and once jokingly sang "bomb Iran" to the tune of the 1960s Beach Boys hit "Barbara Ann," already has to reassure voters that "I hate war" in a current campaign ad.

"McCain's going to run hard on foreign policy and Obama's not trying to change the subject. Democrats are better prepared and more confident on foreign policy issues than at any time since the end of the Cold War," he said.

The McCain adviser denied any serious policy differences inside the campaign and says some of the candidate's more moderate remarks, including his embrace of multilateralism, were advocated also by neocons.

"The speech-writing has been within a pretty tight circle and everybody talks to everybody else. There have not been big wars over these speeches," said the adviser.

He also dismissed McCain's comment last October on Russia and the G-8 as "a holdover from an earlier period," adding: "It doesn't reflect where he is right now."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by JLyons (June 26, 2008 4:47 pm ET)
         
      McCains position on Russia should scare us all, he is an advocate of returning us to the cold war days and nuclear conflict with Russia.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Science101 (June 26, 2008 4:59 pm ET)
           
        An honest question - why do you believe that Russia SHOULD be part of the G8?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by RABBITLUVR (June 26, 2008 5:02 pm ET)
             
          I take it that you think the Cold War is still running hot?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Science101 (June 26, 2008 5:09 pm ET)
               
            Nope.  But trusting Russia is anything but smart.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by RABBITLUVR (June 26, 2008 5:12 pm ET)
                 
              But they're no longer a threat to us, says the jubilant Rightwing who won the Cold War and saved the world from total annihilation! Why shouldn't we trust them? After all, didn't they learn their lesson from Bonzo? ;)
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Science101 (June 26, 2008 5:17 pm ET)
                   
                They aren't a threat to us directly via military.  However, their nuclear ties with Iran and China are a cause for great concern.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by skeptical (June 26, 2008 5:19 pm ET)
                     

                  Science,

                  I must be missing something, but what will throwing Russia out of the G-8 accomplish?

                  Report Abuse
                • Author by RABBITLUVR (June 26, 2008 5:19 pm ET)
                     
                  Yeah? So what do you propose we do about it?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Science101 (June 26, 2008 5:25 pm ET)
                       

                    Don't know, I'm not a policy maker.  However, I don't think we should sit at a round table with them as buddy buddy, while they are helping Iran build nuclear facilities.  What kind of message does what we are currently doing send to Russia? 

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by skeptical (June 26, 2008 5:32 pm ET)
                         

                      Science,

                      I guess you don't undestand what the G-8 does.  Nobody is sitting there "buddy-buddy".  What they are doing is trying to insure that international commerce and economics is allowed to occur unhindered.

                      The countries try to work out problems and differences that effect their industries.

                      Now, if you think we should ignore Russia and allow them to do what they want, then we should exclude them.

                      If you think we need to exert pressure on them so that they don't act in ways that we don't like, then we need to include them.

                      Do you get it now?

                      Report Abuse
            • Author by DeminTX (June 26, 2008 5:14 pm ET)
                 
              But, Bush looked into Putin's eyes and saw his soul....................
              Report Abuse
              • Author by RABBITLUVR (June 26, 2008 5:17 pm ET)
                   

                Yeah! But now it's Medvedev, whose name means 'of the bear', and our newest friend 'Science' is starting to get scared because he sees the stereotypical big bad Russian bear lumbering towards him.

                Time to ramp up the arms race again... 

                Report Abuse
                • Author by Science101 (June 26, 2008 5:26 pm ET)
                     
                  I dont "fear" Medvedev....but I dont trust anyone who rules a country like a dictator and has ties to old school KGB. 
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by RABBITLUVR (June 26, 2008 5:37 pm ET)
                       
                    Oh wow, what a surprise, more stupid fear and paranoia from the Right. Are you related to Joe McCarthy by any chance? Scared of dem evil lil commies?
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by brewer24 (June 27, 2008 1:47 pm ET)
                         
                      Oh what a surprise...more downplaying of threats from a liberal.  C'mon, are you saying that you are OK with the KGB ties, cooperation with Iran on nuclear issues, and trampling on civil rights?
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by RABBITLUVR (June 27, 2008 4:27 pm ET)
                           
                        Please explain, with supporting evidence, how those so-called 'threats' threaten the United States of America.
                        Report Abuse
            • Author by sambo (June 27, 2008 6:14 am ET)
                 
                            trusting the United states, is anything ,but smart
              Report Abuse
        • Author by skeptical (June 26, 2008 5:23 pm ET)
             

          Science,

          Because Russia is on eof the leading industrial nations, which is what the G-8 represents.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by skeptical (June 26, 2008 5:29 pm ET)
               
            The above is in response to Science's question way above!
            Report Abuse
        • Author by sambo (June 27, 2008 6:08 am ET)
             

           

                     why shouldn't they be ?
           

          Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (June 26, 2008 7:30 pm ET)
         
      Another McCain flip flop. Lack of cohesive thought must be an age thing...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (June 26, 2008 9:25 pm ET)
           

        "a holdover from an earlier period," adding: "It doesn't reflect where he is right now."

        <Grin> I don't even have to comment further... ;>)

        Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (June 26, 2008 8:14 pm ET)
         

      Its not our call to say if Russia is a part of G8 or not. More of McCluck's foreign policy experience showing though.

      "Bearings, who needs bearings! I just like  the sound of steelies in hand.", said Captn McStrawberry.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Leftwingcenter (June 26, 2008 10:39 pm ET)
           

        Yeah, that vaunted foerign policy experience.  But just what is it?

        Has he ever been an ambassador to another nation?  No.

        Has he ever served in the State Department?  No.

        Has he ever in any way engaged in policy negotiations with representatives of another nation?  No again.

        His experience is that he has served in the Senate longer than Obama, and considering his results so far, I wouldn't exactly be celebrating that so-called "foreign policy experience"...

        Oh, I forgot!  He's a war hero!  That just makes him an expert on everything, doesn't it?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by RABBITLUVR (June 27, 2008 9:57 am ET)
             
          Yeah, that's just terrific! Just what we need - a Rambo-wannabe in the White House.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by open_mind (June 27, 2008 12:43 pm ET)
         

      Conservatives are trying to bring back a re-hashed version of calling the Democrat a "flip-flopper".  The Democrats would be wise to start the time consuming task of gathering up all of McCain's obvious flip-flops like this one to counter them.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.