On Fox News, Bolling repeats offshore drilling falsehoods
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
SUMMARY: Fox Business Network's Eric Bolling asserted that, according to offshore oil "drillers" with whom he had spoken, "China was probably drilling offshore, very close to our shore through Cuba, and taking some of that oil that -- that honestly could -- could and should be helping our situation." His assertion that China was drilling "very close to our shore" echoed a claim made by Vice President Dick Cheney -- citing columnist George Will -- that both Cheney and Will have since corrected.
During the July 1 edition of Fox News' Your World, Fox Business Network contributor Eric Bolling asserted that, according to offshore oil "drillers" with whom he had spoken, "China was probably drilling offshore, very close to our shore through Cuba, and taking some of that oil that -- that honestly could -- could and should be helping our situation." The assertion that China was drilling "very close to our shore" echoed a claim made by Vice President Dick Cheney -- citing nationally syndicated columnist George Will -- in a June 11 speech to the United States Chamber of Commerce that both Cheney and Will have since corrected.
On June 12, the Associated Press reported that "Vice President Dick Cheney's office acknowledged on Thursday that he was mistaken when he asserted that China, at Cuba's behest, is drilling for oil in waters 60 miles from the Florida coast." The AP further reported: " 'There is no actual drilling yet. ... There is exploration,' said Johanna Mendelson-Forman, a senior fellow on energy and Latin America at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. She said China's oil company, Sinopac, has conducted exploratory drilling on a lease on land in western Cuba, but is not involved in the offshore development." Additionally, in his June 17 syndicated column, Will noted, "In a previous column, I stated that China, in partnership with Cuba, is drilling for oil 60 miles from the Florida coast. While Cuba has partnered with Chinese companies to drill in the Florida Straits, no Chinese company has been involved in Cuba's oil exploration that close to the United States."
Bolling also falsely suggested that only unnamed "[w]ebsites" are claiming that it would take more than 10 years to retrieve oil from offshore sites currently covered by executive and congressional moratoriums on offshore drilling. Bolling stated: "I'm getting emails, bombarded. Websites are saying, you know, we are perpetuating a lot -- we're not. I talked to oil companies. I talked to drilling companies because I did not want to be accused of saying, 'Hey, you're talking to the oil industry, and what else are they going to say.' I went to the drillers themselves. I went to Trans Ocean. I went to Diamond Offshore. I went to two or three other drillers. And they said, clearly, number 1, we can get that oil in a much shorter time frame than the 10 years -- some said up as close as one year." In fact, in addition to "[w]ebsites," in its Annual Energy Outlook for 2007, the Energy Department's Energy Information Administration considered the likely effects of allowing the existing congressional and executive moratoriums on certain off-shore drilling to expire in 2012 and stated: "The projections in the OCS [Outer Continental Shelf] access case indicate that access to the Pacific, Atlantic, and eastern Gulf regions would not have a significant impact on domestic crude oil and natural gas production or prices before 2030. Leasing would begin no sooner than 2012, and production would not be expected to start before 2017."
From the July 1 edition of Fox News' Your World with Neil Cavuto:
ALEXIS GLICK (guest host): You know something. You and I keep talking about is -- we keep talking about offshore drilling -- looking for more here, and with some controversy. There is a new -- recent Pew poll, Eric, that says 47 percent of Americans say it's more important to look for our own oil then to deal with climate change right now. Now, two different topics here, but Americans are getting frustrated.
BOLLING: You know, I came on here a couple of times with you, Alexis, and since then I'm getting emails, bombarded. Websites are saying, you know, we are perpetuating a lot -- we're not. I talked to oil companies. I talked to drilling companies because I did not want to be accused of saying, "Hey, you're talking to the oil industry, and what else are they going to say."
I went to the drillers themselves. I went to Trans Ocean. I went to Diamond Offshore. I went to two or three other drillers. And they said, clearly, number 1, we can get that oil in a much shorter time frame than the 10 years -- some said up as close as one year. Almost all of them said no later than six years, but unequivocally across the board they all said that China was probably drilling offshore, very close to our shore through Cuba, and taking some of that oil that -- that honestly could -- could and should be helping our situation.
GLICK: All right, Eric Bolling, thank you very much. Let's hope it doesn't get a lot worse. The rhetoric alone is scary.

















I talked to oil companies. I talked to drilling companies because I did not want to be accused of saying, "Hey, you're talking to the oil industry, and what else are they going to say."
What the heck was that supposed to prove? That he approached this objectively?
If Americans are getting frustrated, it's because they aren't well informed by the media.
If they think that if we only drilled for more oil off our coasts the price of oil would be dramatically different, they aren't being well informed by the media.
If they think that we could see any decrease in prices at the pump today or in the near future, they're being misled by the media's failure to keep them well informed.
If it's supply that drives prices, and in many ways it is, then it doesn't matter if it's China, Cuba, or the USA that's drilling in the Florida straits. A greater supply will lower the price no matter who's doing the drilling.
China is a boogeyman to some on the right.
But is it supply that is driving prices, or is it demand? Oil supporters claim fear of decreased supply has driven up prices. The Saudis have agreed to increase their production (just this year) an amount equal to what we could get from offshore or ANWAR..... and the price did not come down!
Drilling may help a little, eventually, but I am persuaded that production cannot be increased faster than demand. Reduced consumption through efficiency and alternate renewable energy is the solution. How much fuel would we save by dropping the interstate speed limit by 5mph (As we did in the 70's?)
I don't know. Probably an ANWAR, every year, forever.
I would like to see some real data on the issues you bring up (not a challenge, just a true curiosity). I know that the reduction in the '70's did help out, so I would guess that the overall savings overshadowed any losses to the shipping industry in the macro picture.
As for road expansions, that might cut both ways as well, since much more gas is used up in stop and go than highway cruising. However, I agree that mass transit needs to be utilized more, but the big problem is a lack of practical mass transit in many cities. Maybe if those road expansion projects were diverted to mass transit projects.
i heard some obama surrogate over the weekend refer to drilling for more oil as a gimmick. some gimmick, it's what we've been doing since oil was discovered. what an idiot.
also, last friday i listed to a conference call with don coxe of bank of montreal. he said the democrats are trying to keep canada from exploiting their oil sands in west canada. there is a bill to forbid the military from purchasing any oil that come from those sands. they say it's because exploiting the sands will create greenhouse gasses, but i think the demsand obama just want to keep supplies tight, and prices high so they can blame the republicans.
how stupd and hypocritical. they will not let a vote come forward on theinterior bill because the republicans will include a measure for offshore drilling. sothat is held up.
anyway, the canadians say screw you, we will just sell to china.
The Energy Depts Energy Information Administration input, if the drilling moritoriums are allowed to expire, drilling starts when rigs become availible, the prices of crude oil and natural gas will not be significantly impacted before 2030, but what do they know.
So Sandss AKA _______ has found a new rumor to beat on democrats with. How lovely for him.Think the brewup was over the tech's source for oil extraction, ie not an american owned or controlled process. Sounds more like republican efforts to help the people who bought them fair and square.