About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

NPR's Liasson cited McCain's work with Kennedy on immigration reform as a "source of his maverick reputation," didn't note flip-flop

July 02, 2008 5:44 pm ET
image

Please upgrade your flash player. The audio for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a MP3 version of the audio.

SUMMARY: NPR's Mara Liasson said that Sen. John McCain "has made a career of taking heat from his own party for working with liberal Democrats like ... Ted Kennedy on immigration." However, Liasson did not note that during his run for president, McCain reversed his position on a key component of comprehensive immigration reform, and stated that he would not vote for the bill he co-sponsored with Kennedy.

19 Comments

In a July 2 report on National Public Radio's (NPR) Morning Edition, national political correspondent Mara Liasson said that Sen. John McCain "has made a career of taking heat from his own party for working with liberal Democrats like [Sen.] Russ Feingold [WI] on campaign finance reform or [Sen.] Ted Kennedy [MA] on immigration. These bipartisan efforts are both the source of his maverick reputation and the cause of his ongoing problems with the Republican Party's conservative base." However, Liasson did not note that in the course of seeking the Republican nomination for president, McCain reversed his position on a key component of comprehensive immigration reform. McCain now says that "we've got to secure the borders first" -- a position at odds with his prior assertion that border security could not be disaggregated from other aspects of comprehensive immigration reform. McCain further stated during the January 30 Republican presidential debate that he would not vote for the bill he co-sponsored with Kennedy if it came to a vote on the Senate floor.

A November 4, 2007, Associated Press article about McCain's change in position noted that his "high-profile support" for the McCain-Kennedy bill "hurt him politically" and quoted McCain stating: "I understand why you would call it a, quote, shift. ... I say it is a lesson learned about what the American people's priorities are. And their priority is to secure the borders."

Media Matters for America has documented a pattern of media outlets describing McCain as a "maverick" for his work on immigration reform without noting his later reversal.

In contrast to Liasson, in a June 23 Politico piece headlined "McCain's immigration zigzag," contributing columnist and Washington journalist Gebe Martinez wrote that "McCain, the Arizona senator, dismayed Latinos last year when he stepped back from his immigration bill that would have tightened the borders and legalized undocumented immigrants. As boos and hisses from angry Republican conservatives grew louder at campaign events, he switched course and vowed to 'first' secure the borders. Were his failed bill to come up again, he would not vote for it, he said." From Martinez's article:

McCain, the Arizona senator, dismayed Latinos last year when he stepped back from his immigration bill that would have tightened the borders and legalized undocumented immigrants. As boos and hisses from angry Republican conservatives grew louder at campaign events, he switched course and vowed to "first" secure the borders. Were his failed bill to come up again, he would not vote for it, he said.

[...]

Trying to regain Latino support, McCain has chastised Republicans who stoke the fires of the immigration at election time. And at a private meeting with Chicago-area Latinos last week, he promised to push for a comprehensive immigration bill.

"It sounds like he's trying to have it both ways, and it's not convincing anyone," said Frank Sharry, who also was involved in immigration bill negotiations when he headed the National Immigration Forum.

This is not the McCain Hispanics thought they knew. Even after the 2001 terrorist attacks placed an emphasis on national security, McCain's speeches to Latino audiences and on the Senate floor prioritized the compassionate side of the immigration argument.

He understood that border security "first" means "deportation only" in the eyes of immigrant activists, and he championed a broader approach.

As the Senate mulled immigration in 2006, McCain often stood in the Capitol's corridors, pounding his fist in the air, arguing that border enforcement would not work without simultaneously penalizing employers who hire workers illegally, creating a temporary worker program and finding a way to bring 12 million illegal immigrants "out of the shadows" of society.

"It won't work! It won't work!" he protested of suggestions to do enforcement first. The stool cannot stand on one leg.

From the July 2 edition of NPR's Morning Edition:

LIASSON: McCain has made a career of taking heat from his own party for working with liberal Democrats like [Sen.] Russ Feingold [WI] on campaign finance reform or [Sen.] Ted Kennedy [MA] on immigration. And these bipartisan efforts are both the source of his maverick reputation and the cause of his ongoing problems with the Republican Party's conservative base.

One of McCain's closest allies, South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham [R-SC], says McCain's willingness to work across the aisle on those hot-button issues is one of his strongest qualifications.

GRAHAM: All of these other issues that have been tough and controversial, John has been out front more than anybody else in the Senate and when it comes time to ask the question who will do the hard things as the next president. The best way to answer that question is to ask who has done the hard things before they got to be the next president.

LIASSON: Whenever there's a bipartisan scrum of moderate Democrats and Republicans working toward a compromise -- the Gang of 14 on judicial filibusters, or other groups dealing with torture, tobacco regulation, or global warming -- McCain can usually be found right in the middle.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by tommy (July 02, 2008 5:51 pm ET)
         

      The Politico article MMFA references is right on target.  McCain is such a flip-flopper on this issue he grows fins and scales like he's bouncing around on a boat deck. 

      He talks to his Republican base and he is border security first, then it's off to the panderers convention speaking to Latinos, and he is too much of a political wimp so he talks about the classic "comprehensive reform" gobbledygook nonsense that most politicians spout when dancing around this issue.

      At least Obama is consistent, even though he isn't committed to a secure border first either, and we know his position. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (July 02, 2008 6:00 pm ET)
           
        Fortunately the hispanics are seeing through his flip flopping. Any inroads Bush may have made are pretty much gone +. I'm starting to think that while the media desperately tries to tell us we've got another horse race on our hands the truth is it's gonna be a landslide that reshapes the political map for the next 30 years.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (July 02, 2008 6:25 pm ET)
         
      Let's redefine maverick as a politician who refuses to be bridled by his previous positions. 
      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (July 02, 2008 6:53 pm ET)
         
      Donno, I still like smelly, dirty, vicious, four legged feral horse. But thats just me.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wesley (July 02, 2008 8:02 pm ET)
         

      In thread after thread mmfa has tried to paint McCain as a flip flopper on illegal immigration but I think that it has or will likely backfire on mmfa.

      Yeah, I get it...they think that proving McCain has flip flopped on immigration reform will hurt his election chances...whoa...not so fast.

      mmfa pounding away on the charge that he has reversed his position and no longer supports Kennedy on immigration will gather him more conservative support than the charge of flip flopper will cause him to lose...I think that mmfa has treed a possum on this coonhunt.

      But make no mistake about it...McCain has NOT reversed on comprehensive immigration reform. While no longer shouting Wallace-like from the courthouse steps...he is quietly still in favor of the elements of his McCain/Kennedy bill...wait and see for yourself.

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (July 02, 2008 8:31 pm ET)
           
        Oh, I see, it's not like McCain was for it before he was against it...it's that first he was for it but now he just doesn't shout about it. Gotcha... BTW, take two Advil because I'm sure your back will hurt tomorrow considering the gymnastics required for your post.  ;>)
        Report Abuse
        • Author by wesley (July 02, 2008 8:57 pm ET)
             
          I guess that goes to show that "nuanced" thinking isn't the sole property of liberals...lmao.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mefirst (July 03, 2008 9:32 pm ET)
               
            i think mccain has said different things at different times, but i agree that he has not really changed his mind. "immigration reform" equals amnesty which equals eventual citizenship which equals all the immediate family members eligible to eventually come here.  i think an estimate of 12 million illegals and family members of 50 million is somewhat on the low side.  we are on autopilot as far as immigration and no one wants to discuss the fact that our problems are going to be even harder to solve with a soaring population.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by eddy3957 reregistered (July 02, 2008 9:04 pm ET)
           

        Wesley said:

        In thread after thread mmfa has tried to paint McCain as a flip flopper on illegal immigration but I think that it has or will likely backfire on mmfa………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….mmfa pounding away on the charge that he has reversed his position and no longer supports Kennedy on immigration will gather him more conservative support than the charge of flip flopper will cause him to lose...I think that mmfa has treed a possum on this coonhunt.”

        ----------------------

         

        But MMFA “… is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.  Launched in May 2004, Media Matters for America put in place, for the first time, the means to systematically monitor a cross section of print, broadcast, cable, radio, and Internet media outlets for conservative misinformation — news or commentary that is not accurate, reliable, or credible and that forwards the conservative agenda — every day, in real time.”--- from MMFA’s “Who We Are”.

        This site does not err when pointing out the MEDIA’s fault’s as far as their favoring (so-called) conservatives.  Your specific political point may or may not be right in this instance.  Either way, MMFA is doing its’ thing correctly.  It is not controlled by Obama.  They are obviously for him, but for them to focus on his needs or those of the Democratic Party exclusively would distract them from their mission and weaken their credibility.  In the long run, MMFA’s approach will work out best for Obama and the Dem Party, but most importantly the country generally.

        Further, the point of these articles is to show the MEDIA’s neglect of the flip-flopping by McCain.  This neglect helps McCain.  To report it fairly would reflect badly on his perceived character, which is what much of the electorate heavily bases their vote on.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by wesley (July 02, 2008 9:17 pm ET)
             

           -- for them to focus on his needs or those of the Democratic Party exclusively would distract them from their mission and weaken their credibility -- eddyregistered

          It's ok eddy...there's a learning curve here at mmfa...every newbie eventually finds the mission statement published by BrockCo.

          However, most don't swallow the entire hook, line, and sinker. mmfa is a democratic political machine...masquerading as a media watchdog. Their interest is not in cleaning up conservative misinformation in the media...it's to advance the democrat party's agenda. 

          It really is just that simple. 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by friedbergboy1422 (July 02, 2008 9:43 pm ET)
               
            Are you saying this is a dishonest site, Wesley?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by wesley (July 02, 2008 9:56 pm ET)
                 

              I meant exactly what I said...so don't try to pull the wordsmithing on me.

              If you disagree with my comments...say so.  

              Report Abuse
              • Author by friedbergboy1422 (July 02, 2008 10:52 pm ET)
                   
                I think this is a media watchdog site, Wesley.  Some of the things they watch are opinions that are pure namecalling.  I am not trying to put words in your mouth.
                Report Abuse
      • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (July 03, 2008 5:02 am ET)
           

        In thread after thread mmfa has tried to paint McCain as a flip flopper on illegal immigration but I think that it has or will likely backfire on mmfa.

        Sorry Wes, McCain's flip flopping will backfire ON McCain.

        Conservatives aren't buying McCain "changed his mind" on immigration, they haven't forgotten he co-sponsored the bill with Ted Kennedy. The same Ted Kennedy that Republicans have hated for years. Hispanics aren't buying the "double talk" express either. It's hard to miss the  complete turnaround McCain has made on the issues while kissing the conservative butt. McCain's flip flop on immigration is simply a loser. Another in a long line of McCain flip flops designed to garner more  conservative votes and guaranteed to backfire. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by wesley (July 03, 2008 7:55 am ET)
             

          I should have said that it "could" backfire on mmfa because it's hard to dispute what you said...so I won't.

          He hasn't really changed his mind on immigration...he's just changed what he says about immigration depending on who he thinks is listening...hardly a case for being known as the "straight talker". 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by friedbergboy1422 (July 03, 2008 9:50 am ET)
               
            Good point, Wes and that is my guess as to why its being brought up.  McCain's straight talker and maverick images dominate conversations about him when they are hardly true.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by see it real (July 03, 2008 4:47 pm ET)
         

      This is Liar McCain's latest flip-flop, one of MANY flip-flops on MANY issues, immigration being one of them.

      McCain's Corporate Conservative News Media will either say nothing, or thwey will attack the people and groups noting McCain's flip-flops and/or lies.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by piniella (July 04, 2008 12:31 am ET)
         
      Liasson did the same thing back on June 13 or so when she claimed that McCain was "very competitive" with Hispanics because of his immigration stand.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

Most Popular Tags

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace