About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

GMA's Roberts did not challenge McCain's denial that he has said he lacks expertise on the economy

July 03, 2008 2:05 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: ABC's Robin Roberts said to Sen. John McCain, "You have admitted that you're not exactly an expert when it comes to the economy and many have said that they," at which point, McCain said repeatedly, "I have not." Roberts did not challenge McCain's denial, even though McCain has made repeated remarks acknowledging his weakness on economic issues.

46 Comments

On the July 2 edition of ABC's Good Morning America, anchor Robin Roberts said to Sen. John McCain, "You have admitted that you're not exactly an expert when it comes to the economy and many have said that they," at which point, McCain said repeatedly, "I have not," then added, "I said that I am stronger on national security issues because of all the time I spent in the military and others." Roberts did not challenge McCain's denial, even though, as Media Matters for America has documented, McCain has made repeated remarks acknowledging his weakness on economic issues, including at times doing so without mentioning what he says is his superior knowledge of national security issues. As the Boston Globe reported on January 26:

In fact, on numerous occasions over the course of the campaign, McCain has volunteered that he is unsatisfied with his lack of knowledge about aspects of economics.

"I'm going to be honest: I know a lot less about economics than I do about military and foreign policy issues. I still need to be educated," McCain told the Wall Street Journal in late November.

In December he said, "The issue of economics is not something I've understood as well as I should," as the Globe reported on its "Political Intelligence" blog at the time.

On at least one occasion, McCain has raised the matter himself. On Nov. 10, while traveling through New Hampshire on his Straight Talk Express bus, McCain was asked what he would seek in a vice presidential candidate if nominated.

After mentioning the ability of a potential running mate to replace the president, McCain said, "You also look for people who maybe have talents you don't, or experience or knowledge you don't, as well."

"What are those qualities that you don't - that you wouldn't mind complementing?" asked David Brooks, a columnist for The New York Times.

McCain paused. "Uh, maybe I shouldn't say this, but, somebody who's really well grounded in economics," he said.

"I think I understand the fundamentals, I talk to people all the time on economics -- it's obviously a vital part of America's future," McCain continued. "But I know there are some people who have literally immersed themselves on issues of economics, how Congress works on it, the tax code, that sort of thing. I would look for that kind of talent not in a vice president but in close advisers."

"They are complicated," McCain said of economic issues, "and I freely admit I am not an economist."

In addition to quoting McCain saying, "The issue of economics is not something I've understood as well as I should," the December 18, 2007, Political Intelligence blog entry to which the Globe referred reported that McCain additionally said, 'I've got [former Federal Reserve chairman Alan] Greenspan's book.' "

Moreover, Roberts did not mention an exchange during the January 24 Republican presidential debate, in which moderator Tim Russert quoted McCain's statement that he knew "a lot less about economics" than "military and foreign policy issues," and asked McCain: "Is it a problem for your campaign that the economy is now the most important issue, one that, by your own acknowledgement, you are not well versed on?" McCain responded, "I don't know where you got that quote from. I'm very well-versed in economics." Following the debate, MSNBC's David Shuster noted McCain's response in a fact check, asserting, "John McCain was asked a question that included a quote about McCain talking about economics. And McCain denied the quote." After airing a video clip of the exchange, Shuster asserted: "Well, actually, NBC News got that quote from last month. John McCain was heard saying on December 17th in The Boston Globe and Time magazine, quote, 'The issue of economics is not something I've understood as well as I should. I've got Greenspan's book.' " Following Shuster's fact check, Hardball host Chris Matthews asked Newsweek's Howard Fineman, "Howard, the 'Straight Talk Express': Did it stall tonight? Was it derailed by his denial of a quote that's on the record?" In his response, Fineman asserted, "You can't pretend that you didn't say something you said. You just can't wish it away."

In a July 2 article, The Hill reported McCain's comments about the economy from the Good Morning America interview:

Republican presidential candidate John McCain said Wednesday that the U.S. economy is in "terrible shape" and that Americans "are hurting badly right now."

The Arizona senator, in an interview with ABC's "Good Morning America," said he is "very strong on the economy."

"I understand it," he said, adding that he has "a lot more experience than my opponent."

He touted his economic recovery plan, saying that his remedies would include low taxes, less regulation and beginning to drill off the U.S. coast. McCain also argued that the country needs to "get to work" on nuclear and alternative energy and invest in clean coal technology.

In addition, the GOP standard-bearer said that the country must "stop distorting the market by subsidizing ethanol and preventing sugar cane-based ethanol from coming into the United States."

McCain spoke to the network from Colombia where he is discussing drug trafficking and a free trade agreement with the U.S.

The Hill article did not include Roberts' mention of McCain's admission that he's "not exactly an expert when it comes to the economy" or McCain's denial.

From the July 2 edition of ABC's Good Morning America:

McCAIN: I have town hall meetings almost every single day, and I have a plan of action to bring our economy out of the situation it's in today, and I don't believe increasing their taxes is the answer. I believe leaving -- leaving their taxes low, getting off this dependence on foreign oil and doing it quickly and we can -- I call it the Lexington project. We can, as we sent people to the moon, we can also get off this dependence on foreign oil and keep people in their homes and stop this job loss. We can do it.

ROBERTS: We can do it. You have admitted that you're not exactly an expert when it comes to the economy and many have said that they --

McCAIN: I have not. I have not. Actually, I have not. I said that I am stronger on national security issues because of all the time I spent in the military and others. Very strong on the economy. I understand it. I have a lot more experience than my opponent.

ROBERTS: People feel that it -- it is not a strong suit. You have other strengths, as well, but that if you selected somebody from the business sector as a running mate, that it could go a long way for you. Mitt Romney's name has come up again, very successful, of course, with -- with business ventures. Is he somebody that's at the top of your VP list?

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by thomp.steve9098 (July 03, 2008 2:16 pm ET)
         
      Does Obama claim to be an "expert" on the economy? If asked point blank whether he was an expert on the economy, what would his answer be?  I'm unaware of his education and experience in economics. 
      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (July 03, 2008 2:27 pm ET)
           
        That's not even a question worth asking. The point is McCain said he wasn't and now says he is. The guy can't even be trusted to pay his own property taxes, he folded under pressure as a POW and gave away sensitive information, he folded under pressure in 2000 and stepped aside for Bush, and is now folding under pressure from the right to say whatever they want to hear. He lacks ethics and has no business being president.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by IRONY 101 (July 03, 2008 2:35 pm ET)
             
          Come on, Snoop, lay off McCain..he's one tough hombre maverick. When was the last time Barack Obama roughed up a Sandanista rebel? John McCain don't need no stinkin' economics... <spit>   ;>)
          Report Abuse
          • Author by thomp.steve9098 (July 03, 2008 2:52 pm ET)
               
            Well said.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by snoopy (July 03, 2008 3:13 pm ET)
               

            The Republican presidential contender, who is known for his hot temper, was questioned about the alleged incident at a news conference Wednesday here. He noted that at the time, he had been asked to co-chair a Central American working group in the Senate with Democrat Chris Dodd, D-Conn., and had made several trips to the region in that role.

            "I had many, many meetings with the Sandinistas," McCain said. "I must say, I did not admire the Sandinistas much. But there was never anything of that nature. It just didn't happen."

            He can't even rough up a sandanista right! ;)

            Report Abuse
            • Author by IRONY 101 (July 03, 2008 3:24 pm ET)
                 
              Yea, he would have killed the guy had Chris Dodd and Thad Cockerhan not pulled him off of him. McCain had already bitten off the guys nose and was going for his ears. Strangely, McCain kept screaming at the poor Sandinista, "You gook mutha******...!"
              Report Abuse
        • Author by achrispage6992 (July 03, 2008 4:19 pm ET)
             

          Saying he folded under pressure as a POW to prop up your argument further is over the line. You really shouldn't make light of that experience, it's not as if you would have done better. Come on man, you're better than that.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by snoopy (July 04, 2008 11:44 am ET)
               
            Why should his pow experience be off limits? The vietnamese used torture to break soldiers and get them to do things they otherwise wouldn't do. Bush and co. broke him in 2000. I think this is important to note that whenever under pressure he folds, and chances are it's because of his torture that he continues to this day to fold under pressure. Do we really want a president who will break so easily leading us?
            Report Abuse
        • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (July 03, 2008 4:35 pm ET)
             

          EXACTLY SNOOP,

          McCain feels he can say anything, and then a couple days or a week later, say something completely different.

          He did the same thing on immigration and taxes.  There is a tremendous underlying arrogance and elitism in this man.

          The lapdog corporate press, of course, gives him a free pass.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by see it real (July 04, 2008 2:31 pm ET)
               

            "McCain feels he can say anything, and then a couple days or a week later, say something completely different.

            He did the same thing on immigration and taxes. There is a tremendous underlying arrogance and elitism in this man.

            The lapdog corporate press, of course, gives him a free pass."

            This lapdog corporate conservative press not only gives him a free pass, this lapdog corporate conservative press will also at times attack and/or smear and/or lie on and lie about any person or group that points out Liar McCain's lies and flip-flops.

            This corporate conservative Republican news media wants Liar McCain to be elected president.  The corporate conservative Republican news media is showing even more favoritism to Liar McCain now than the favoritism they showed Liar Bush in BOTH the 2000 and the 2004 presidential elections put together. 

            Report Abuse
      • Author by see it real (July 03, 2008 3:34 pm ET)
           
        "Does Obama claim to be an "expert" on the economy? If asked point blank whether he was an expert on the economy, what would his answer be?"
        Report Abuse
        • Author by see it real (July 03, 2008 3:40 pm ET)
             

          "Does Obama claim to be an "expert" on the economy? If asked point blank whether he was an expert on the economy, what would his answer be?"

          Now, before that technical difficulty took place...

          Answering your false diversionary question, Thomp, I haven't heard Obama say he was an economic expert, and Obama's comments on economic expertise aren't the point here, anyway.

          The point is, Liar McCain said that the economy was not his strong suit, and how he's lying by denying he ever said that.  The other point is that Robin Roberts is refusing to challenge Liar McCain on his lie because Roberts being a right wing partisan Republican trying to help Liar McCain get elected in November.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (July 03, 2008 4:39 pm ET)
               

            Absolutely correct See It Real...

            Liar McCain gets a free pass.  And this is not the first lie that Liar McCain has told.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by see it real (July 04, 2008 2:41 pm ET)
                 
              You are absolutely right on that one, 8 Homes.  Today, Norman Goldman, Ed Schultz's fill-in host http://www.wegoted.com pointed out a list of 27 flip-flops and/or lies out of Liar McCain's lying mouth on SEVERAL issues, the economy included.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by see it real (July 03, 2008 3:45 pm ET)
           

        "Does Obama claim to be an "expert" on the economy?"

        Not the point, and you know it, Thomp.  The REAL points are that liar McCain LIED when he denied ever saying that the economy was not his strong suit even though he's on record saying it several times last year.

        The OTHER point is that Robin Roberts deliberately let Liar mcCain get away with telling that lie because Roberts is herself a right wing Republican trying to assist Liar McCain's election chances, AND that her bosses at GOP-Disney-ABC are part of Liar McCain's Corporate Conservative News Media.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by thomp.steve9098 (July 03, 2008 4:14 pm ET)
             
          I understand the point, in terms of the Maverick's innocent inconsistency.  Only I don't think it's a big deal in the first place that Maverick said he lacked expertise in economics. His competitor is not an expert either, but the liberal main stream media ran off with the Maverick's straight-talk as though everyone had previously thought he was an expert.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by commonsenseliberal (July 03, 2008 4:23 pm ET)
               

            So you admit that your post is a diversionary tactic, one you use because you don't have a real argument to make, one which rebuts this article and supports McCain?

            Weak, dude, weak - but expected from clowns like you.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by see it real (July 04, 2008 2:35 pm ET)
               

            "I understand the point, in terms of the Maverick's innocent inconsistency."

            Innocent shminnocent!  Liar McCain is DELIBERATELY LYING, and is a blad-faced LIAR!  McCain admits to not knowing economics, and now he denies ever saying it!  That's called LYING, and McCain is not a maverick, McCain is a two-faced, unpirincipled, integrity-void, bald-faced LIAR!

            Report Abuse
          • Author by see it real (July 04, 2008 2:39 pm ET)
               

            "Only I don't think it's a big deal in the first place that Maverick said he lacked expertise in economics."

            It is when the LIAR denies ever saying that he lacked expertise in or knowledge about economics in the first place.  McCain's not a maverick, far from it, McCain's a two-faced unprincipled LIAR!  If you's stop being a partisan Republican for 2 seconds, you'd know that McCain's a liar.

            Second, it's a BIGGER deal when the right wing conservative GOP-Disney-ABC and the lying right wing conservative Republican Robin Roberts protect and cover for Liar McCain's deliberate outright lie because BOTH Roberts and GOP-Disney-ABC want Liar McCain to get elected, and both are covering up this lie to give him a political assist. 

            Report Abuse
    • Author by RoberttheP (July 03, 2008 2:18 pm ET)
         
      So I am not sure what MMFA issue is here with Robin Roberts? This courageous women is fighting cancer, is MMFA saying she is a McCain supporter and spouting out Conservative misinformation? 
      Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (July 03, 2008 2:20 pm ET)
           

        She should have had Schieffer moment.  She should have gasped (incredulously) - "REALLY?!?"

         

        Report Abuse
      • Author by clams casino (July 03, 2008 2:54 pm ET)
           

        "This courageous women is fighting cancer..."

        Jeebus, why is it that conservatives can't argue without employing at least one logical fallacy per paragraph? Appeal to pity much? Her illness doesn't have anything at all to do with her failure to do her job properly.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by commonsenseliberal (July 03, 2008 4:24 pm ET)
             

          Agreed.  And if she cannot do her job properly, she should not be doing it.  If I didn't do my job properly, I'd be standing in the unemployment line.

          Not so for these troglodytes.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by RoberttheP (July 03, 2008 4:29 pm ET)
             
          I do not know, I am not a conservative. I was however wondering if MMFA is suggesting Robin Roberts is? Why is it that if you question something on here some brainless posters accuse others of being "Conservative"?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by clams casino (July 03, 2008 4:40 pm ET)
               
            I alway assume that the logically-challenged are conservatives. If MMFA was claiming that Roberts was a conservative, they would have explicitly done so. They simply reported the facts, which are that Roberts failed to challenge McCain's false assertion. Roberts knew that McCain was lying and she didn't call him on it. Roberts may or may not be a conservative, but those are the facts.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by BottleBlonde (July 03, 2008 5:49 pm ET)
                 

              The fact that she is fighting cancer has absolutely nothing to do with anything. It shouldn't have even been part of any discussion here. Just like McCain's history as a POW doesn't give him any extra credit towards being President, Robin Roberts having cancer doesn't make her immune from criticism.

              From Media Matters own website, this site.

              Media Matters for America put in place, for the first time, the means to systematically monitor a cross section of print, broadcast, cable, radio, and Internet media outlets for conservative misinformation — news or commentary that is not accurate, reliable, or credible and that forwards the conservative agenda — every day, in real time.

              Conservative misinformation doesn't have to come from a conservative. I don't know why anyone would be confused by that. It only has to further the conservative agenda by being unreliable, incredible or inaccurate and thereby creating a false picture of liberals or conservatives.

              Report Abuse
          • Author by see it real (July 04, 2008 2:43 pm ET)
               
            I am not suggesting, I am SAYING, that Robin Roberts is a right wing conservative Republican, whether Media Matters says so or not.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by watershed (July 03, 2008 2:55 pm ET)
           
        To paraphrase Clark- having cancer does not qualify you for exclusion from accurate media analysis.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (July 03, 2008 4:49 pm ET)
             

          Why is Watershed attacking someone for having cancer?

          I think if someone has cancer this line of attack is out-of-bounds. 

          Maybe the whole conservative party is just totally disabled?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by see it real (July 04, 2008 2:47 pm ET)
               
            I know for a fact that Watershed was not doing any such thing.  Watershed correctly pointed out that Roberts' cancer fight is a seperate entity from Roberts' deliberately allowing Liar McCain to get away with a lie because Roberts placed her right wing Republican politics ahead of her journalistic integrity.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by see it real (July 03, 2008 3:37 pm ET)
           

        "This courageous women is fighting cancer, is MMFA saying she is a McCain supporter and spouting out Conservative misinformation?"

        Your attempt to use her fighting cancer as justification for her spouting out conservative lies because she is a McCain supporter is offensive.  There are many others fighting cancer and/or won fights with cancer that would condemn Roberts' pro-Republican actions.

         The answer to your question is YES, for the record.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by commonsenseliberal (July 03, 2008 4:26 pm ET)
             

          It's like saying that we shouldn't castigate W because he fights mental retardation on a daily basis.

          Sorry, no offense intended toward those who are mentally challenged.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (July 03, 2008 2:19 pm ET)
         
      Eeeeew, John McCain...liar, liar, liar. Somebody please tell me what is John McCain's strong suit as a candidate other than having been shot down and taken prisoner? Really...? He reminds me more and more of George Bush every day.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (July 03, 2008 2:25 pm ET)
         

      I'm unaware of the relevency of Obama's hypothetical answers to hypothetical questions here. I think his site is up to speed on his economic positions and reasoning. I don't see the media being to interested in making the effort to report on it.

      Roberts lets him get an outright lie in and its all good for Roberts.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by see it real (July 03, 2008 3:43 pm ET)
           

        "I'm unaware of the relevency of Obama's hypothetical answers to hypothetical questions here. I think his site is up to speed on his economic positions and reasoning. I don't see the media being to interested in making the effort to report on it.

        Roberts lets him get an outright lie in and its all good for Roberts."

        Roberts is likely a right wing Republican AND also a Liar McCain lover herself, and her corporate conservative masters at GOP-Disney-ABC are part of Liar McCain's Media.

        McCain's Media, GOP-Disney-ABC included, all want Liar McCain to get elected president. 

        Report Abuse
    • Author by foghornleghorn (July 03, 2008 2:38 pm ET)
         

      I call it the Lexington project - Gramps

      Huh?  What is that supposed to mean?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by see it real (July 03, 2008 3:31 pm ET)
         

      GOP-Disney-ABC, like the rest of Liar McCain's Corporate Conservative Media, wants Liar McCain to get elected.

      Being the good Republican that Robin Roberts is, or is trying to be, she rubber stamps Liar McCain's denial that he said the economy was not his strong suit.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by roundhouse (July 03, 2008 3:36 pm ET)
         
      "GMA's Roberts did not challenge McCain's denial that he has said he lacks expertise on the economy"

      Of course she didn't challenge him, she didn't want that dirty old bastard to call her a c***.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (July 03, 2008 3:40 pm ET)
           
        That's going to far, Round... The C-word is John's pet name for Cindy. It makes her feel young again...   ;>)
        Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (July 03, 2008 3:42 pm ET)
         
      Wow.  How stupid can McCain be?  It's easy enough to prove that he said it.  He'd be better off saying he was joking (which I think he has in the past.)  His whole response is a joke. He has by his own admission little understanding of economic matters and his support for the Iraq war shows that he has little understanding of national security.  What exactly does this guy have going for him?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (July 03, 2008 3:48 pm ET)
           

        What exactly does this guy have going for him?

        Shot down over Viet Nam in his fighter jet and taken prisoner. An American hero...

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (July 03, 2008 4:26 pm ET)
           

        Shag, he's strong on women's issues...

        Oh, except for that time he called his wife a C*nt.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (July 03, 2008 4:29 pm ET)
             

          I just sent Roberts an e-mail...

          She is an absolute disgrace to America.  Lapdog Press.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by BottleBlonde (July 03, 2008 5:55 pm ET)
         

      This is really offensive behavior on the part of Robin Roberts. Unlike some news reporters who might be ignorant of a certain fact, she clearly knew that McCain had said that he doesn't understand economics as well as he should have, and she still didn't call him on that denial! She did her homework before this interview and let him get away with it, almost like it was planned to give him that opening to deny it to a nationwide audience!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by see it real (July 04, 2008 2:51 pm ET)
           
        BottleBlonde, if your last point is right, then not only is Robin Roberts a lying right wing conservative Republican who is guilty of allowing Liar McCain to get away with another lie, both she and GOP-Disney-ABC may have been acting in collusion with Liar McCain and/or Liar McCain's campaign henchpeople to allow this lie to go unchallenged.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by artlavois9969 (July 04, 2008 4:42 am ET)
         

      People posting here seem to be under the mistaken impression that GMA is a news show.

      Tim Russert, who DID call McSame on a similar weasel, is rolling over.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

  • ABC
    ABC News
    ABCNews
    7 W. 66th St.
    New York, NY 10023