About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Novak falsely asserted Clark attacked McCain's "credentials as a war hero" as part of "conscious effort" by Obama campaign

July 03, 2008 7:27 pm ET
image

Please upgrade your flash player. The audio for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a MP3 version of the audio.

SUMMARY: On The Radio Factor, Robert Novak falsely asserted that Wesley Clark joined a group of "Obama surrogates who have been questioning and attacking [Sen.] John McCain's credentials as a war hero" and suggested that Clark's comments were part of "a really conscious effort to downgrade [McCain] as a war hero." In fact, Clark praised McCain as a "hero" for "his service as a prisoner of war," while, as CJR's Zachary Roth wrote, "question[ing] the relevance of McCain's combat experience as a qualification to be president of the United States" -- an argument Clark has been making for months.

18 Comments

On the July 2 broadcast of Westwood One's The Radio Factor, syndicated columnist Robert Novak falsely asserted that, during an appearance on the June 29 edition of CBS' Face the Nation, retired Gen. Wesley Clark joined a group of "Obama surrogates who have been questioning and attacking [Sen.] John McCain's credentials as a war hero." In fact, during his Face the Nation appearance, Clark praised McCain as a "hero" for "his service as a prisoner of war," while, as Zachary Roth wrote at the Columbia Journalism Review's Campaign Desk blog, "question[ing] the relevance of McCain's combat experience as a qualification to be president of the United States." Novak further asserted that Clark's comments were part of "a really conscious effort to downgrade him [McCain] as a war hero," adding, "[S]o when you find five, six, seven surrogates, all questioning McCain's war record -- this isn't an accident. This is -- I am sure this is some talking points that were put out secretly in the Obama campaign. But Wesley Clark being such a clumsy, ham-handed person, he just went too far." However, contrary to Novak's assertion that Clark was using "talking points that were put out secretly" by the Obama campaign, Clark has been saying for months that McCain's military service alone does not make him qualified to be president, including while he was speaking on behalf of Sen. Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign.

As Media Matters for America has noted, during a March 2 conference call arranged by Clinton's presidential campaign, Clark praised McCain's "service as a fighter pilot" and "his courage as a prisoner of war," but added that "having served as a fighter pilot ... doesn't prepare you to be commander in chief in terms of dealing with the national strategic issues that are involved."

From the July 2 edition of Westwood One's The Radio Factor with Bill O'Reilly:

MICHAEL SMERCONISH [guest host]: Are you surprised by the legs that the General Wesley Clark story appears to have or is this just a July issue?

NOVAK: I -- no. I think this is a very interesting story. You know, there's a whole record of Obama surrogates who have been questioning and attacking John McCain's credentials as a war hero. I think they're very -- I think the Obama campaign is very much worried about this being something that will, when they get to know -- when people who don't follow politics, when they realize that he is a war hero, that this is gonna get the undecided vote to his favor. So, I think they're trying -- there's a really conscious effort to downgrade him as a war hero. And so when you find five, six, seven surrogates, all questioning McCain's war record -- this isn't an accident. This is -- I am sure this is some talking points that were put out secretly in the Obama campaign.

SMERCONISH: But where's the --

NOVAK: But Wesley Clark being such a clumsy, ham-handed person, he just went too far. He was too nasty. He didn't do it in some obscure place. He did it on a national television talk show on Sunday, and he just went too far. And he might have really inhibited the Obama campaign from carrying on this technique.

SMERCONISH: But where would the substance be to go after John McCain on his war record? It's not as if you have, as we saw four years ago, individuals who served with him now coming forward and saying history recorded this in an inaccurate fashion.

NOVAK: Well, it's a -- it's part of politics. If you're a -- if your main attribute as a politician for example, say, is that you're an expert at energy, what your -- what the opposition will try to do is to knock you down as an energy expert. So, the way to do this -- to knock you down as a war expert -- but it has to be done subtly. And Wes Clark was just so ham-handed, and clumsy, and really vulgar about it that he might have spoiled the whole thing for Obama.

SMERCONISH: Robert Novak, a privilege to have you on the Radio Factor. Thank you, sir.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mary59 (July 03, 2008 7:35 pm ET)
         
      Oh how surprising how much "legs" this faux story has.  It's not as if the people with the mikes have anything to do with it...Novak certainly has found his proper niche, on Bill O'Reilly's bluster fest.  If we could just cut their mikes, they'd carry on and not bother anybody.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (July 04, 2008 12:39 pm ET)
           
        Ironic, isn't it? These same people insist to this day that the swift boat vets acted outside the knowledge of the Bush campaign. A bunch of two faced liars. Thanks, faux news. You've really got a lot to be proud of now that you're australian in chief has turned american media into the outback.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (July 03, 2008 7:38 pm ET)
         

      It might help McCain's cause if he had more going for him than just being shot down over Viet Nam and taken prisoner. What's the first thing that comes to mind when McCain's name is mentioned? POW. What's next? Fraud.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (July 03, 2008 7:53 pm ET)
           
        That's why this story still has legs.  Even on a bogus "criticism", the MSM and right-wing noise machine has to defend Gramps to the last breath on his war record, because that's all he's got going for him.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by BottleBlonde (July 03, 2008 9:30 pm ET)
         

      Top that off with the fact that Clark didn't begin the conversation. He simply replied to Bob Schieffer's thought that somehow McCain was superior to Obama because McCain was shot down in a fighter jet! Schieffer said in effect - they're equivalently lacking in experience except that McCain is better because he was shot down. That's nonsense, and Clark said as much.

      "I have to say, Barack Obama has not had any of those experiences either, nor has he ridden in a fighter plane and gotten shot down."

      Go back and see what happened. It's 100% false what's being said about Clark's comments.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (July 03, 2008 10:01 pm ET)
         
      "traitor" Novak sure has the credentials to define american hero's. He should be reading the bible in jail. Speaking of surrogates, i lost count at how many are claiming the same rubbish ( cropped comments ) and that is definitaly no accident.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by open_mind (July 04, 2008 12:39 am ET)
         

      Clark's comments aren't even that remarkable.  They are just obvious.  The fake outrage on the right about this is pretty interesting to watch, though.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by HughG (July 04, 2008 9:25 am ET)
           

        Why do you hate the troops? Why don't you love America?

        Sincerely,

        Flaggy Flagg Huah 911 

        Report Abuse
    • Author by edella1793 (July 04, 2008 12:51 am ET)
         
      Here we go again, letting FACTS get in the way of the MM's narrative.

      Damn you MMfA sheeple! When will you learn to just accept the MM's assbackwards view of things?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by open_mind (July 04, 2008 1:34 am ET)
         

      "there's a whole record of Obama surrogates who have been questioning and attacking John McCain's credentials as a war hero."--Novak

      So Mr. Novak, who are these other supposed evangelicals?  Where is the record of other people bringing this up?  The first time I heard it was from Wes Clark in this context and it seems he brought up a reasonable point.

      In a slightly different context I remember Sean Hannity's stacked comparison of the Republican Primary field front-runners to the Democratic Primary field front-runners in January of this year or so and saying the Republicans were much better qualified because their candidate would likely have "executive experience" (mostly relating to the strength of the Romney, Giuliani and Huckabee campaigns at the time and their executive offices as compared to Hillary and Obama's mere legislative experience.  I would say if Hannity can bring up executive experience, why cannot Wes Clark?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (July 04, 2008 2:43 am ET)
           
        I don't think NoFacs has had a personal "conscious effort", aside from bowel movements and spouting talking points, in years.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by nativeofsf (July 04, 2008 3:52 am ET)
         
      Who has been questioning and attacking Robert Novak's credentials as a lying, rat-bastard traitor & coward?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (July 04, 2008 6:34 am ET)
         
      It's interesting how everyone in the media uses the same talking points on this story while accusing their opponents of a conscious effort by the campaign.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by eniobob2631 (July 04, 2008 7:12 am ET)
         
      Nobodys listening to Novak,but Novak.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Timmee (July 04, 2008 8:38 pm ET)
         
      Novak is one of those surrogates who has the "red phone" in his office where the orders come from. He is always in lock-step and right on message. After they free the idea (that Clark smeared McCain) from the context, then they can go further than even the talk shows did right after the event. Novak here builds on the false idea saying Clark was under Obama's orders to smear.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by captfoster2 (July 04, 2008 11:30 pm ET)
         

      I'm still trying to understand why this sleeze ball is not in prison??

      If his aiding in outing an undercover CIA Operative had happened under a Clinton presidency, rest assured, this assclown would have been in prison a long time ago!!

      Instead, in our warped world, this ignoramous is still out there talking on the Fox 'Right Wing Corporate Propaganda' Network.....or in this case the radio side!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by imanicongracia361 (July 05, 2008 2:51 am ET)
         

      General Clarke's comments are true....Being a P0W although heroic is not a pre-requiste for being commander in chief.  Regrettably, POWs are exposed to the lowest levels of humanity, in that their captors may be among the cruelest.  Their interactions with their captors is not the same as meeting civilians in that society.

      Being a soldier with interactions among the other soldiers and civilians affords an opportunity to assess their society.  General Clarke is certainly in a position to evaluate Senator McCain's military perceptions.  His comments have generated valid questions and in a democracy we must ask legitimate questions of all of our elected leaders.

      Valid questions should be encouraged and attacking someone for their questions is not democratic... and our great country can certainly sustain valid questions.

      Report Abuse