About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Hannity touted Wash. Examiner blog post based on Wash. Post article baselessly suggesting Obama received preferential treatment on mortgage

July 08, 2008 6:44 pm ET
image

Please upgrade your flash player. The audio for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a MP3 version of the audio.

SUMMARY: On his radio show, Fox News' Sean Hannity touted a Washington Examiner blog post claiming that Sen. Barack Obama got a "discount" and a "Countrywide-like sweetheart mortgage deal" from Northern Trust for the purchase of his house. But the Examiner's only source for that claim in the blog post was a Washington Post article that did not cite any evidence that the interest rate Obama received was in any way out of the ordinary or in any way the result of preferential treatment.

29 Comments

On the July 7 broadcast of his ABC Radio Networks program, Fox News' Sean Hannity claimed that, "shortly after being sworn in as a U.S. Senator in January 2005," Barack Obama "got what The Washington Examiner is calling a 'Countrywide-like sweetheart mortgage deal' on the Georgian mansion that he bought in an upscale Chicago neighborhood." Hannity then read from a July 2 post on the Examiner's Right Side Politics blog titled, "Obama's Countrywide-like sweetheart mortgage deal" by conservative blogger Dan Spencer. Spencer claimed that Obama received a "discount" and a "sweetheart mortgage deal" from Northern Trust in Illinois. However, the only source Spencer cited for the claim that Obama received a "sweetheart mortgage deal" was a July 2 Washington Post article which, as Media Matters for America noted, did not cite any evidence that the interest rate Obama received was in any way out of the ordinary or in any way the result of preferential treatment.

Spencer wrote:

To finance his new mansion, Obama secured a $1.32 million loan from Northern Trust in Illinois. Obama received a discount on the loan:

He locked in an interest rate of 5.625 percent on the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage, below the average for such loans at the time in Chicago. The loan was unusually large, known in banker lingo as a "super super jumbo." Obama paid no origination fee or discount points, as some consumers do to reduce their interest rates.

Compared with the average terms offered at the time in Chicago, Obama's rate could have saved him more than $300 per month.

So who cares? Perhaps you should. Joe Stephens explains why in the Washington Post:

But amid a national housing crisis, news of discounts offered to Sens. Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.), chairman of the banking committee, and Kent Conrad (D-N.D) by another lender, Countrywide Financial, has brought new scrutiny to the practice and has resulted in a preliminary Senate ethics committee inquiry into the Dodd and Conrad loans.

Within Obama's presidential campaign organization, former Fannie Mae chief executive James A. Johnson resigned abruptly as head of the vice presidential search committee after his favorable Countrywide loan became public.

Driving the recent debate is concern that public officials, knowingly or unknowingly, may receive special treatment from lenders and that the discounts could constitute gifts that are prohibited by law.

"The real question is: Were congressmen getting unique treatment that others weren't getting?"

[...]

Obama is spinning his sweetheart mortgage deal as the lender competing for Obama's business:

Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt said the rate was adjusted to account for a competing offer from another lender and other factors.

[...]

The Obama campaign called the rate "consistent with Northern Trust policies, and it reflected the base rate set for that period discounted to address the competition for the account and other opportunities, such as personal financial services, that the relationship would bring to Northern Trust."

As Media Matters noted at the time, while the Post reported that the Obamas received a "discount" and that their interest rate was "below the average for such loans at the time in Chicago," the article also quoted a vice president of Northern Trust saying "the rates offered to Obama were 'consistent with internal Northern Trust rates at that time.' " Indeed, the very concept of an "average" rate means that a substantial number of loans would have been at interest rates below the average level, as well as a substantial number above that level, and does not suggest that rates below average -- if in fact the Obamas received a below-average rate -- resulted from preferential treatment.

From the July 7 edition of ABC Radio Networks' The Sean Hannity Show:

HANNITY: All right. Now -- oh, by the way, how many of you know that Barack Obama, shortly after being sworn in as a U.S. Senator in January 2005, he got what The Washington Examiner is calling a "Countrywide-like sweetheart mortgage deal" on the Georgian mansion that he bought in an upscale Chicago neighborhood.

To finance his new mansion, Obama secured a 1.32 million dollar loan from Northern Trust in Illinois. Obama received a discount on the loan. He locked in an interest rate of 5.625 percent on a 30-year fixed, below the average for loans at the time in Chicago. Now the loan is what they call a "super, super jumbo loan." They paid no origination fee, no discount points as some consumers do to reduce their interest rates, and compared with the average terms offered at the time in Chicago, that rate saved him more than $300 per month.

I mean, you know, Chris Dodd, he gets a sweetheart deal. Kent Conrad, another. You know all these Countrywide financial guys, you know, resulted in a preliminary Senate ethics inquiry into the Dodd and Conrad loans. But you know what, folks? What am I? I'm forgetting he's the agent of change. He's different. He's above all of this. After all, he used to be a community organizer.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by worrierking (July 08, 2008 6:57 pm ET)
         
      Obama used to be a community organizer and Sean used to be an idiot.

      Obama will be our next president and poor Sean will still be an idiot.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mari2jj (July 09, 2008 12:21 am ET)
           
        Well, I would not have put it quite that way, but Hannity must truly be out of touch,  I am a retired RN, 75 Yrs old, and do tell, I got a loan this year .2 point lower than Obama.  Perhaps I should fear some political pull since I am a registered Republican but now one of the Republicans for Obama.  Poor Hannity needs some info about how home financing is arranged.  I checked with several companies and went with the best interest rate.  He must be very out of touch about how folks with a savings account and a good credit rating get good loan interest rates.  Dull witted or just the usual snide Republican of this era?  You guess!!!!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by achrispage6992 (July 09, 2008 7:50 am ET)
           
        That's too good Worrier. Well done.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by sportsguydave (July 08, 2008 7:01 pm ET)
         

      Insanity is the eiptome of the old saying..

      Any jackass can kick down a barn. Only a carpenter can build one ...

      Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (July 08, 2008 7:02 pm ET)
         
      Hannity makes millions of dollars to be a professional moron.  What about all the other less fortunate morons?  Sounds like Hannity got a sweetheart deal due to some preferential treatment.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (July 08, 2008 7:04 pm ET)
         
      Facts aren't even an inconvenience to Sean Hannity anymore, he's able to disregard them with such ease. Hannity really is in a class of his own... A CHRISTIAN pathological liar at that...!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (July 08, 2008 7:23 pm ET)
         

      You know who really received preferential treatment in regards to home ownership?

      Thats right, McCain.

      He didn't pay property taxes for four years on one of his homes, and then just cut a check to make all nice. Anyone you know get away with not paying taxes for four years? No? You mean everyone you all know got their homes confiscated or worse within 6 months?

      Yeah, that's what I thought...

      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (July 08, 2008 7:25 pm ET)
           
        Why do you hate POWs, Snoop...?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (July 08, 2008 7:34 pm ET)
             
          Probably because they disagree with him. That's why I hate people. At least I've been told that, by some very insightful posters here.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (July 08, 2008 7:52 pm ET)
             
          Uh, because they think the world owes them something for their sacrafice? ;)
          Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (July 08, 2008 7:55 pm ET)
               
            They just act so damn superior...  ;>)
            Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (July 08, 2008 8:16 pm ET)
                 
              especially that sissy who got preferential treatment because he had connections... =0
              Report Abuse
    • Author by deeznuts (July 08, 2008 9:17 pm ET)
         

      Barack Obama is a US Senator with TWO book deals and we're supposed to be shocked that he got a good interest rate on his mortgage?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (July 09, 2008 5:22 pm ET)
           

        Barack Obama is a US Senator with TWO book deals and we're supposed to be shocked that he got a good interest rate on his mortgage?

        PLUS he saved on his car insurance by switching to GEICO.  :-)

        inside-geico.jpg

        Report Abuse
    • Author by oscar the grouch (July 08, 2008 9:48 pm ET)
         
      Maybe he got a good deal and maybe he didn't. But as one of the higher income earners in the US, he should be paying 9+% interest, so that people in the lower earning levels would only have to pay 3-4%.  That would only be fair. 
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Cheney2012 (July 09, 2008 3:03 am ET)
           
        Very well said Oscar
        Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (July 09, 2008 10:41 am ET)
           

        Well yeah... if you favor a government takeover of the banking and crecit system.  You guys don't make any sense, even in sarcasm. 

        There are reasons and pricipals behind the way liberals think and reason. I'm not surprised that these are lost on your lot, because nothing lies behnd conservative thinking beyond greed and hypocrasy.

        A flat tax is utterly unworkable.  Sounds good in theory (if you don'tactually think about it too much) but it would be a disaster in practice.  Pretty much anyone with access to a pocket calculator can figure this out.  (But then... I guess BASIC ARITHEMETIC has a liberal bias as well.)

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (July 09, 2008 11:22 am ET)
             

          Eddie, I think the point Oscar was making (and faithful right-wing puppy dog Noleft turns was ditto-ing) was the inconsistency. The subject of the item is one of the many benefits of being well-off, lower interest rates.

          It's part of the lifestyle, along with comped hotel suites and free samples at the posh markets. It would only make sense to fix that last stubborn spot where the rich don't get what they feel they're entitled to, keeping every penny of the money they earn.

          It's almost as if the government isn't trying to compete for their business. That must be so confusing to them.

           

          Report Abuse
          • Author by oscar the grouch (July 09, 2008 8:41 pm ET)
               
            My gawd, I've acquired a ditto-head! How should I accessorize, oh great debonaire one?
            Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (July 09, 2008 10:41 am ET)
           

        Well yeah... if you favor a government takeover of the banking and crecit system.  You guys don't make any sense, even in sarcasm. 

        There are reasons and pricipals behind the way liberals think and reason. I'm not surprised that these are lost on your lot, because nothing lies behnd conservative thinking beyond greed and hypocrasy.

        A flat tax is utterly unworkable.  Sounds good in theory (if you don'tactually think about it too much) but it would be a disaster in practice.  Pretty much anyone with access to a pocket calculator can figure this out.  (But then... I guess BASIC ARITHEMETIC has a liberal bias as well.)

        Report Abuse
        • Author by oscar the grouch (July 09, 2008 8:38 pm ET)
             
          Who even mentioned flat tax here? But now that you have condemned it, tell us how you think it is completely unworkable.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Buck_Fush (July 09, 2008 1:23 am ET)
         
      did he just completely drop the "Rezco hooked him up" meme?  this sounds like a different angle for hannity...still completely nonsensical, but different nonetheless.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by newzhound (July 09, 2008 10:46 am ET)
         

      If Sheer Insannity is so concerned about politicians getting "sweetheart" home mortgage deals, why didn't he ever ask Rick Santorum how he got a mortgage from a relationship bank he hadn't previously done business with?  A bank Mr. Santorum would not have qualified to be a regular customer of?

      Sheer Insannity have Mr. Santorum plenty of free advertising for his failed campaign.  He had plenty of opportunities to ask him - but he never did. 

      There were some very serious questions about whether or not Mr. Santorum even lived in that house - if he didn't, and if he got an owner-occupied loan when the residence wasn't owner-occupied - that would not only be a sweetheart deal, that would also be fraud.

      There were some very serious questions about Mr. Santorum paying personal living expenses with campaign funds.  Sheer Insannity failed to ask about that issue, as well...

      Report Abuse
    • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (July 09, 2008 12:18 pm ET)
         
      This is just one more bit of proof that SHEER INSANITY is nothing more than a BRAIN DEAD RIGHT WING MORON AND APPOLIGIST.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by newzhound (July 09, 2008 5:03 pm ET)
           
        Hurricane:  I stole the spelling "Insannity" - it works so much better!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by historygeek001 (July 09, 2008 12:57 pm ET)
         
      He's lying again.  Anybody surprised?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (July 09, 2008 5:25 pm ET)
           

        He's lying again.  Anybody surprised?

        He claims to be a Catholic.  I wonder how much time he spends in confession for all the lies he tells on a daily basis.....

        (Oh, and Sean?  Since I know you or someone who works for you monitors MMFA, here's a personal message just for you.  Bite me.)

        Report Abuse
        • Author by oscar the grouch (July 09, 2008 8:43 pm ET)
             
          He is only on Radio/TV six days a week, he has all day Saturday to spend in Confession (and some weeks, he probably needs every minute of the available time).
          Report Abuse
        • Author by newzhound (July 10, 2008 1:47 pm ET)
             

          How would you like to work for Sheer Insannity?  Or for Bull O'Really?

          A few years ago "Doonesbury" had a series of comics about George Will's "Quote Boy."  That would be a far better job than working for those other two - not that that is saying much! 

           

          Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.