About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

USA Today described McCain's immigration reversal simply as McCain "placing more of an emphasis on border security"

July 10, 2008 1:49 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: In an article about appearances by Sens. John McCain and Barack Obama at the LULAC conference, USA Today reported that McCain "began placing more of an emphasis on border security during the primaries." But McCain's current position "to secure the borders first" is not just a change of "emphasis"; it is at odds with his prior position that border security could not be disaggregated from other aspects of immigration reform without being rendered ineffective.

7 Comments

In a July 8 article about appearances by Sens. John McCain and Barack Obama at the national convention of the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), USA Today reported that McCain "had been a leading advocate last year of a plan to expand programs for 'guest workers,' but he began placing more of an emphasis on border security during the primaries." In fact, McCain's current position -- that "we've got to secure the borders first" -- is not just a change of "emphasis"; it is at odds with his prior position that border security could not be disaggregated from other aspects of comprehensive immigration reform without being rendered ineffective. Moreover, the article did not mention that, during a January 30 Republican presidential debate, McCain stated that he would not vote for the immigration bill he co-sponsored with Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-MA) if it came to a vote on the Senate floor.

The article, by staff writer David Jackson, later quoted Obama saying of McCain: "We need a president who isn't going to walk away from something as important as comprehensive reform when it becomes politically unpopular." But Jackson did not include the portion of Obama's statement in which Obama noted that McCain "said that he wouldn't even support his own legislation if it came up for a vote." From Obama's speech at the LULAC convention:

OBAMA: Now, I know Senator McCain had a chance to speak to you earlier, and I want to give Senator McCain credit because he used to buck his party on immigration. He fought for comprehensive immigration reform. On one of the bills that I co-sponsored, he was the lead. I admired him for it. But when he started running for his party's nomination, he abandoned his courageous stance and said that he wouldn't even support his own legislation if it came up for a vote.

Well, for eight long years, we've had a president who's made all kinds of promises to Latinos on the campaign trail, but failed to live up to them in the White House, and we can't afford that anymore. We need a president who isn't going to walk away from something as important as comprehensive reform when it becomes politically unpopular.

Media Matters for America has documented previous instances in which USA Today ignored McCain's immigration reversal.

From Jackson's July 8 USA Today article:

"Hispanics have been projecting their demographics into political strength," said Janet Murguia, La Raza president and CEO, about the nation's fastest-growing group.

She said they also want "further clarification" from McCain on his stand on immigration. The presumptive Republican nominee had been a leading advocate last year of a plan to expand programs for "guest workers," but he began placing more of an emphasis on border security during the primaries.

On economics, McCain said the nation's 2 million Hispanic-owned businesses will benefit from lower taxes and less government regulation. His proposals include doubling the child deduction and a $5,000 tax credit for the costs of health insurance.

"If you believe you should pay more taxes, I am the wrong candidate for you," McCain said Tuesday.

Obama said he wants tax cuts for "workers and small-business owners." He criticized McCain's plan as providing "tax breaks to big corporations and the wealthiest Americans."

The candidates also renewed their immigration debate. McCain and Obama both support tougher border security, more guest-worker programs and a path to citizenship for the illegal immigrants already in the USA.

Obama, however, repeated his criticism that McCain has backed away from that comprehensive approach. "We need a president who isn't going to walk away from something as important as comprehensive reform when it becomes politically unpopular," the presumptive Democratic nominee said.

Two hours earlier, McCain launched a pre-emptive defense to Obama's criticism, saying he was unable to get approval for a broad immigration overhaul because too many Americans "did not believe us when we said we would secure our borders."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Leftwingcenter (July 10, 2008 1:55 pm ET)
         
      Didn't you guys get the memo here at MMfA? Only Democrats flip-flop--Republicans "evolve their positions"...sheesh...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (July 10, 2008 2:05 pm ET)
         
      Wouldn't it be great if John McCain "placed more of an emphasis" on remaining consistent on important issues? After all, voters would like SOME idea of what he might do if elected president.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Leftwingcenter (July 10, 2008 2:08 pm ET)
           
        You mean after he bomb bomb bomb, bomb bombs Iran or before?...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by IRONY 101 (July 10, 2008 2:15 pm ET)
             
          He would retire after bombing Iran having completed the number one item on his Bucket List. The he work on doing Madonna before he dies...  ;>)
          Report Abuse
        • Author by princeofwheels (July 10, 2008 2:17 pm ET)
             

          McCain is hoping that Bush does it before November. Maybe McCain can ask his buddy Lieberman for a non-biased opinion concerning Israel blowing-up Iran.

          Still have a question...We will back Israel attacking Iran but how has Israel, our ally, backed us in Iraq?  I know, it would upset the entire Middle East if Israel soldiers were in Iraq. Like bombing Iran won't piss anybody off. NONSENSE

          Report Abuse
    • Author by wesley (July 10, 2008 10:25 pm ET)
         

       -- he would not vote for the immigration bill he co-sponsored with Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-MA) if it came to a vote on the Senate floor. -- mmfa

      mmfa has become a liberal clone of Sean Hannity...distorting comments and dishonest reporting. mmfa knows full well that McCain has not reversed his position on immigration reform. He has engaged in political double speak...but he has not changed his position on comprehensive immigration reform.

       -- John McCain declared today that comprehensive immigration reform that includes a pathway to citizenship for the nation's estimated 12 million illegal aliens would be his "top priority" as president.

      "It will be my top priority yesterday, today and tomorrow," McCain declared at a forum this morning before the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials. -- Tribune 06/28/08

      If mmfa wants to torpedo McCain for pandering and attempting to hide his true position...go for it.

      But to continually drag out this worn out statement that McCain "would not vote for his own bill" is nothing short of Sean Hannity tactics. Hannity and mmfa...strange bedfellows...but never the less true. 

      Playing this type of pandering, word-smithing...disregarding McCain's many stattements supporting comprehensive reform and amnesty makes Hannity and mmfa equal partners in shabby partisan politicking.

      At least to this point Obama has been consistent in his support for comprehensive reform...including amnesty...making his position the same as McCain's. 

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by open_mind (July 11, 2008 12:28 pm ET)
           
        Good post, Wes.  I think you make a great point.  McCain's position is unchanged, but he is masking it to pander to his base.  His only reversal was on his specific bill and just mentioning the bill in that context is misleading.  That's a fair argument.
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.