About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

CNN aired McCain's false suggestion that Obama opposed designating the Iranian Revolutionary Guard a terrorist group

July 10, 2008 4:09 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: CNN anchors Kyra Phillips and Campbell Brown each uncritically aired Sen. John McCain's false suggestion that Sen. Barack Obama opposed designating the Iranian Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization. In fact, Obama co-sponsored a bill in 2007 that would have designated the group a terrorist organization.

14 Comments

On separate July 9 CNN programs, anchors Kyra Phillips and Campbell Brown uncritically aired Sen. John McCain's false suggestion that Sen. Barack Obama opposed designating the Iranian Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization and that McCain, by contrast, "voted to condemn" them as such. During a press availability earlier that day, McCain said: "It's my understanding that this missile test was conducted by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. This is the same organization that I voted to condemn as a terrorist organization when a amendment was on the floor of the United States Senate. Senator Obama refused to vote, called it provocative. Called it a provocative step. And the fact is, this is a terrorist organization and should have been branded as such." Neither CNN anchor noted that Obama said he would have voted against the bill McCain referenced -- the Kyl-Lieberman amendment -- because it "states that our military presence in Iraq should be used to counter Iran," not because the resolution expressed the sense of the Senate that "the United States should designate Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps as a foreign terrorist organization." Indeed, Obama co-sponsored a different bill in 2007 that also would have designated the group a terrorist organization.

Moreover, neither Phillips nor Brown noted in response to McCain's assertion that McCain also did not vote on the Kyl-Lieberman amendment. The McCain campaign put out a press release touting McCain's assertion that he "voted to condemn" the Iranian Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization that cites the Kyl-Lieberman amendment, but no other amendment or bill.

During the 2 p.m. ET hour of CNN Newsroom on July 9, Phillips said: "John McCain and Barack Obama are calling the Iranian missile test a dangerous situation, but they differ on how they would handle the threat from Iran. Obama favors direct diplomacy with Tehran. McCain wants to work with European and regional allies. Well, the Arizona senator had this to say at a campaign stop just this morning in Pennsylvania." She then aired McCain's July 9 remarks and read a statement from Obama about the missile tests, but did not challenge the accuracy of McCain's remarks.

Similarly, on the July 9 edition of CNN Election Center, Brown said: "Today's test brought out some strong reaction from both presidential candidates. Senator Barack Obama spoke on NBC's Today show. Senator John McCain talked to reporters." Brown then aired McCain's remarks and Obama's statement on Today about how to achieve "a coherent policy with respect to Iran." However, Brown did not challenge the accuracy of McCain's statements.

From the 2 p.m. ET hour of CNN Newsroom on July 9:

PHILLIPS: On the political front, John McCain and Barack Obama are calling the Iranian missile test a dangerous situation, but they differ on how they would handle the threat from Iran. Obama favors direct diplomacy with Tehran. McCain wants to work with European and regional allies. Well, the Arizona senator had this to say at a campaign stop just this morning in Pennsylvania.

McCAIN [video clip]: It's my understanding that this missile test was conducted by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. This is the same organization that I voted to condemn as a terrorist organization when a amendment was on the floor of the United States Senate. Senator Obama refused to vote, called it provocative. Called it a provocative step. And the fact is, this is a terrorist organization and should have been branded as such.

PHILLIPS: In a statement, Obama says, quote, "Iran now possesses the greatest strategic challenge -- or poses the greatest strategic challenge to the United States in the region in a generation. And as president, I will do everything in my power to eliminate that threat. And that must begin with direct, aggressive, and sustained diplomacy."

Now, here's a closer look at the long-range missile reportedly fired this morning by Iran.

From July 9 edition of CNN Election Center:

BROWN: Today's test brought out some strong reaction from both presidential candidates. Senator Barack Obama spoke on NBC's Today show. Senator John McCain talked to reporters. Take a listen.

McCAIN [video clip]: This missile test was conducted by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. This is the same organization that I voted to condemn as a terrorist organization when a amendment was on the floor of the United States Senate. Senator Obama refused to vote, called it provocative.

OBAMA [video clip]: It's so important for us to have a coherent policy with respect to Iran. It has to combine much tougher threats of economic sanctions with direct diplomacy, opening up channels of communication, so that we avoid provocation, but we give strong incentives for the Iranians to change their behavior.

BROWN: And we want to talk this over with our panel of experts tonight in Washington. Nile Gardiner is a senior fellow at The Heritage Foundation, a right-leaning think tank. Brian Katulis -- I hope I'm saying that right, Brian -- is a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, who is a left-leaning think tank. He's also an informal unpaid adviser to the Obama campaign. His latest book is The Prosperity Agenda: What the World Wants From America and What We Need in Return. And in Los Angeles, Reza Aslan, a professor at the University of California, Riverside, and the author of the book No god but God: The Origins, Evolution, and Future of Islam.

Welcome to everybody. Nile, I want to start with you. You know, we just heard Barack Obama say that direct diplomacy is what needs to happen here, that the Bush administration policy hasn't worked so far. Why not give that a try?

GARDINER: Well, I think Senator Obama sends completely the wrong signal here. After all, the European Union has been negotiating directly with Tehran for several years now. Those negotiations have achieved absolutely nothing at all. They bought the Iranian regime valuable time to develop its nuclear program. Today's missile tests were there -- were an extremely provocative, hostile act by a brutal dictatorship. We should send a very clear signal to the Iranians that these actions have consequences.

Absolutely, we should place the use of force firmly on the table as a threat against the Iranian regime, and we should support, of course, even stronger economic sanctions against Iran. But the Bush administration's doing that already. So, Obama is saying nothing new on the sanctions front.

BROWN: Brian, if Obama's diplomacy plans don't work, then what? I mean, won't Iran just keep running out the clock here?

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by JLyons (July 10, 2008 4:11 pm ET)
         
      See the problem is once the media allows the McCain lies to surface and go unchallenged, the lies become harder and harder to combat. This is what the Republicans do best. They did it in 88, 2000 and of course 2004.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (July 10, 2008 4:17 pm ET)
         

      Things is, this guy asks, "What of Obama's diplomacy doesn't work?"

      If that's the case, then we can use force if all else fails. They keep seeming to forget that Obama is saying, yes, let's speak to our enemies, but also, we carry a big stick don't we? Speak softly and carry a big stick I believe were the words of TR. Why can't we speak with them, and then as I said, when all else fails, we do have a back up plan. it's called the most lethal military in the history of the world. We DO have a big stick, but we don't need to yield it unless we really have to.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (July 10, 2008 4:20 pm ET)
           
        But what they are saying, or implying, is that Barack Obama would not use the military under hardly any circumstances. I heard Tom Delay tell Chris Matthews in the past couple of days that one of the reasons his side is hoping we attack Iran (or that Israel does and we back them up) is because Obama would never invade Iran.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (July 10, 2008 4:30 pm ET)
             
          If Iran seriously threatened, or did something to Israel, or caused a major league ruckus in Iraq, he'd attack them. Why is it the GOP is all for war and attacking people anyway, and I've never understood why THAT is seen as being pro military? Then again, when Clinton used our forces in Bosnia, we heard a lot from the republicans as to how we shouldn't use our military like that, and so on and so forth.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (July 10, 2008 4:46 pm ET)
               
            I agree with you. But what I'm trying to get across is that part of the Republican message, whether overtly stated or not, is that the country will be less safe because Barack Obama is too much of a liberal to ever use military force. What the ones in the know mean, IMO, is that Obama will not use military force preemptively such as the neocons pushed.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by sambo (July 10, 2008 4:46 pm ET)
             

             tHERES NO REASON TO ATTACK IRAN

           These are thr same drumbeats Bush used to attack Iraq, and McSame intends to follow the same policies.Sic-um  AIPAC. McSame has already proved his word is as bad as Bushs, and if he keeps repeating      these campaign lies, even the 27% wont believe him     

          Report Abuse
          • Author by foghornleghorn (July 10, 2008 7:17 pm ET)
               
            And yet, our trade with Iran increased 10-fold during the Bush regime.  I guess Iran isn't really in the AOE (Axis of Evil) anymore.  Then again, neither is North Korea, after our dear leader went soft on them after they had a ceremonial implosion of a nuke site.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (July 10, 2008 5:22 pm ET)
         

      It's funny that McCain's smear is closer to what Obama should have done then what he actually did do.  The Revolutionary Guard is no more a terrorist organization than the US Army.  And they have as much right to conduct those missile tests as Israel has to conduct the flyover exercise they were apparently a response to. Our own intelligence agencies confirmed months ago that Iran stopped trying to develop nuclear weapons in 2004.  Stop trying to scare people in to voting for you with these lies.  That goes for Obama as well as for McCain.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (July 11, 2008 10:06 am ET)
           
        Ed Zachary!  TERRORISTS, by definition, are not under the authority of any state.  No matter what the Revolutionary Guard blew up or attacked, and where, it could never be an act of terrorism because the act under the Authority of the Government of Iran.  IT WOULD BE AN ACT OF WAR, NOT TERRORISM! In their efforts to scare us about terrorists, they've stripped the word of any real meaning.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mari2jj2970 (July 10, 2008 11:26 pm ET)
         
      You have to realize, McCain is "a gettin old" and he cannot keep these niceties straight.  He simply cannot keep all these details in his mind and so he mouths off like this all the time.  Remember his stutter about why insurance companies can refuse to pay for birth control medications all the while paying for Viagra for men.  Poor, old, slow witted McCain.   Imagine him at some international meeting.  Ughhhh!!!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mary59 (July 11, 2008 11:00 am ET)
         
      While we're at it, can we label the bush/cheney cabal a terrorist group?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (July 11, 2008 11:36 am ET)
         
      They do qualify in some important ways Mary. Perveyors of an illegitimate, invisible coup against their own form of government and society is closer IMO, but it has small chance as a sound bite.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by BJWL (July 11, 2008 11:51 am ET)
         
      This site is ridiculous. Obama absolutely opposed designating the Iranian Revolutionary Guards as a terrorist group, he attacked Hillary Clinton in one of the debates for voting for the designation.  He called it the equivalent of a war authorization.  It was only in a subsequent debate that Wolf Blitzer called him on the fact the that he hadn't bothered to vote on a bill that Obama had deemed so important.  That he co-sponsored a pro-designation bill in 2007 is interesting, yet another flip-flop from Obama.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

  • CNN
    CNN
    One CNN Center, Box 105366, Atlanta, GA 30303-5366
    Phone: 404-827-1500
    Fax: 404-827-1906