Halperin declared Republicans the "winner of the week" -- did not note McCain campaign's week of controversies, admitted falsehoods
SUMMARY: In a July 11 entry on The Page, Mark Halperin declared "Republicans" the "winner of the week" over Democrats without noting any of the admitted falsehoods by or controversies involving the McCain campaign over the previous week.
In a July 11 entry on his website, The Page, Time magazine senior political analyst Mark Halperin declared "Republicans" the "winner of the week" over Democrats without noting any of the admitted falsehoods by or controversies involving the McCain campaign over the previous week, as Steve Benen pointed out on his blog The Carpetbagger Report. Halperin asserted: "Despite Obama's splashy news that he'll deliver his nomination acceptance speech in a 76,000-seat stadium, his campaign is still proceeding with caution -- leaving Obama open to aggressive GOP attacks." In addition to naming Republicans the overall winners, Halperin named the Republicans winners of three categories: "Public Image," "Iraq," and "Arrival of the Calvary." He pronounced there to be a "tie" on the remaining issue, "Economy."
From Halperin's July 11 entry:
The admitted falsehoods by and controversies involving the McCain campaign that Halperin did not mention in his weekly campaign assessment include the following:
- As Benen noted, during a July 7 town hall meeting in Denver, McCain said: "Americans have got to understand that we are paying present-day retirees with the taxes paid by young workers in America today. And that's a disgrace. It's an absolute disgrace, and it's got to be fixed." On the July 8 edition of CNN's American Morning, McCain said during a discussion of Social Security that young people "pay their taxes and right now their taxes are going to pay the retirement of present-day retirees. That's why it's broken, that's why we can fix it." As The Washington Post reported on July 9, "If that payment system is a disgrace, it has been one since Social Security was created during the Great Depression. For as long as the popular program has existed, today's workers have paid the benefits of today's retirees." The Post added: "Reaction to McCain's statement has been slow to burble, but it is beginning to burst."
- On July 7, Sen. John McCain's falsely asserted: "If you are one of the 23 million small business owners in America who files as an individual rate payer, Senator Obama is going to raise your tax rates." In fact, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center's table of 2007 tax returns that reported small-business income, 481,000, not 23 million, of those returns are in the top two income tax brackets -- which include all filers with taxable incomes of more than $250,000. The San Francisco Chronicle reported on July 10 that "McCain's camp acknowledges that only individual business owners making more than $250,000 would pay higher taxes under Obama's plan -- but it insists those businesses will be hurt by the Democrat's proposals."
- In the wake of Iran's test of long-range missiles, McCain asserted: "It's my understanding is that this missile test was conducted by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. This is the same organization that I voted to condemn as a terrorist organization when an amendment was on the floor of the United States Senate. Senator Obama refused to vote. He called it provocative, a provocative step. The fact is, this is a terrorist organization and it should have been branded as such." As CNN.com's Political Ticker blog reported on July 11, "McCain also missed that vote" on designating the Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization. Political Ticker reported that "[t]he McCain campaign admits the error." Additionally, as Political Ticker noted, Obama also sponsored legislation that "would have designated the Iranian Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization."
- The McCain campaign issued a press release on July 7 stating: "McCain's presidential campaign today released a statement signed by over 300 professional economists in support of John McCain's Jobs for America economic plan." However, a Politico article reported:
Upon closer inspection, it seems a good many of those economists don't actually support the whole of McCain's economic agenda. And at least one doesn't even support McCain for president.
In interviews with more than a dozen of the signatories, Politico found that, far from embracing McCain's economic plan, many were unfamiliar with -- or downright opposed to -- key details. While most of those contacted by Politico had warm feelings about McCain, many did not want to associate themselves too closely with his campaign and its policy prescriptions.
- As Benen noted, in an interview with The Washington Times, former Sen. Phil Gramm (R-TX) said, "You've heard of mental depression; this is a mental recession." He also stated: "We have sort of become a nation of whiners. You just hear this constant whining, complaining about a loss of competitiveness, America in decline. We've never been more dominant; we've never had more natural advantages than we have today." McCain subsequently said, "Phil Gramm does not speak for me. I speak for me." However, Gramm is McCain's National Campaign General co-chair and an economic policy adviser.















Me speak for me all the time. Sometimes me listen, sometimes me not.
I love Halperin's blurb about Irag- 'he's shifted from stressing the withdraw of troops to assessing the situation in Iraq first.' How DARE Obama rethink his stance a year and a half later?!?! If he were any man at all, he would follow through on EVERY SINGLE THING he ever said without stepping back to see if they are still good ideas after a period of time has passed.
And if Gramm doesn't speak for McSame, who the hell does?
The Liberal Media Strikes Again:
Once again the press praises the bunch of screwballs that have put us in the worst shape since the Great Depression. The Republicans controlled every branch of our government for six years. They gave us tax cuts for the rich, deregulated, banking, a four-fold increase in gas prices and a wonderful war in Iraq. Only a liberal media could find something positive about this current group of Republicans. So when McCain has his worst week ever, of course our media declares his group the winner. It makes perfect sense.
Reminds me of some semi humorous lists of advice for sailors. The failsafe of always being refered to Rule#1 "The Chief is right."
In this case advice for the populis from the media seems to always failsafe to "The Republicans are right."
Snoop, I heard this on Stephanie Miller's show this morning.Nothing surprising about the hypocritical gay-bashing gay Republicans, but the parallel to the Lincoln/Kennedy coincidences was the best part;
What are the odds of a dude named Troy King getting caught in bed with a Homecoming King from Troy University?
Imagine if there was a liberal media, this would be the 24/7 joke.
heaven forbid, he ever says the republicans had a better week.- pointofview
So you think the media should act like some sort of Special Olympics, giving McCain a medal just because it might make him feel good? I thought that was the sort of non-merit-based self-esteem building that conservatives got outraged over when it's applied to elementary school kids. You really think journalists should ignore reality and divide their praise up to make things even?
"I'll do everything in my power to get those offshore reserves exploited ... um, er, explored, discovered and um..." McCain said...
Yeah, real winners, them...
So, POV thinks these "wins" should be divided up by some extreme socialist model that ignores performance, and you think losses should be awarded to a candidate because somebody metaphorically threatened that candidate.
Maybe you two should put your heads together and try to conjure up an actual thought. Go!
Col
Not at all. It seems that what you are looking for is someone to declare the election over now and Obama named the winner. I cant btelieve it really bothers you that much that a journalist said McCain had a better week. If you look at his score card, and the one in the most recent Time that I got, he has Obama ahead on points.
Come on Col, at least you try to make good points here. You cant really beleive that any reporter who does not give every week to Obama has a biasis can you? Say it aint so.
Asking Col. why it "bothers him so much" is called marginalizing. When you use that tactic, it makes you look really childish. Most intelligent people see right through it.
Just a friendly word of advice.
Open
So dont take the easy childish way out. Address the question yourself. Do you really believe that it is impossible for McCain to have a better week, and any reporter who thinks so has to be biased?
It is logically possible for McCain to have a better week.
Now a question for you. Is it possible for a candidate to be so terrible that he never actually has a better week than his opponent?
It ain't so, POV. These ratings are mostly unimportant and subjective, and I don't care much about them at all.
As Openmind pointed out, your tactics are pretty clumsy and transparent. The fact that you had to create some point that I "seemed" to be making, and another that you "can't believe", I'm making (neither of which I said nor implied),only makes it really obvious that you have no reality-based defense of your cheerleading for the Grampy McFreepass media.
Col
And yet once again, you completely and totally avoid the very basic question i am asking. You simply cannot bring yourself to address the issue at hand!!
No. The Col and most of us do not hold ideology over reality. If McIlovemywifesmoney has a good week and is so reported. MMfa has no writ to report this. It would be conservative information versis misinformation.
The conservative voices would be shouting themselves horse about it. You and like minded could nyah nyah nyah about it here till your fingers were unable to stamp and post the glory any more.
Yeah we do politics down here in the threads, its sometimes pretty far off topic. All I can say is that if Mickey had a good week and it was so reported I'm not going to attack the message/messinger in the instance. Niether am I going to blindly accept a therefore argument from you.
You've show some better stuff recently, keep at it.
HALPERIN has done no more, no less, than the propaganda ministers of Iran did by "photoshopping" that picture of 4 missiles being launched.
In both cases, REALITY had no place. It's the propaganda minister's JOB to make his masters LOOK GOOD, LOOK LIKE WINNERS, and so they simply DO it, even if it means distorting all facts and truth.
McCain has to be made to look an even-steven CONTENDER, and this a "very close race". That McCain has difficulty filling a town hall with 200 fans, while Obama is filling stadiums with 75,000 fans ... this is meaningless to our media. It's anybody's contest, they will tell us, and this was a VERY GOOD WEEK for McCain (if you ignore all his gaffes, his advisor's outrageous comments, and his inability to generate ANY enthusiasm).
I see a cartoon here. In the "horserace", one horse is running strong, the other seems dead, but is being borne along furiously by a mob of guys with "PRESS" cards in their hats. As they wheeze, struggle, and run their hardest with their burden, one of the PRESS bearers states, "It's still a very close race!"
I think that no one threatened to cut McCain's nuts off, is winning enough on its own.
LOL
McCain has nuts? Really? Are you sure?
I think McCain won the beginning of the week, but Obama wins running away at the end.
Laura Ingraham was practically crying on the radio this morning after Obama just shredded McCain regarding Gramm's remarks with some hilarious remarks:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=1XlsZznzb5E&feature=related
cut and paste backup link:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=1XlsZznzb5E&feature=related
Grand slam, Barack.
HALPERIN would be a good choice for GW Bush's Press Secretary. Tony Snow showed that many a fierce partisan is to be found in the "Fair and Balanced" world of today's Media.
These guys who "call 'em like they see 'em" don't bother to tell readers what their severely limited "point of view" is ... that being the scenery available from being up Dick Cheney's butt.
And oh, how they scoff and snarl when it is suggested they are not "objective". Heavens!
I recall a certain right-wing genius declaring that the GOP would win easily in 2006. Let them declare their "winners of the week." Let the disconnect grow to unimaginable heights. The mainstream media's utter shock and consternation at the (to them) unforeseen yet laughably predictable results that will ensue (barring a monumental blunder on the part of Obama) are almost worth the price alone. Nobody outside the eternal 20% of the Republican base buys it.
this is a big falsehood i noticed this week. columinist jonah goldberg tried to defend bush with this nonsense:
"holding prisoners indefinitely at guantanamo without benefit of a trial? as terrorism expert andrew c. mccarthy notes in national review, we were doing that under the first president bush and under clinton to innocent haitian refugees, who got even less due process than we give captured enemy combatants."
baloney. that refers to haitians [and others] attempting to enter this country illegally by sea. many filed asylum claims, some of those claims were accepted, but most were returned to haiti. there were no "trials", just hearings, but no one was held indefinitely and all were free to return to haiti at any time. that does not even begin to compare to bush's claim of holding anyone that he deems a threat, without charges or counsel.
"MARK MY WORD MCCAIN WILL WIN THE WHITEHOUSE"
OK, I literally did just that now. I bookmarked this page and put a link to it in the live.com calendar on November 4th. I look forward to gloating. :D
Halperin's gimick is an astonishingly pathetic excuse for journalism, another example of male political reporters' obsession with inappropriate sports analogies. A presidential campaign as a series of rounds in a prize fight? Give me a break. This is a media concept worthy of fifteen-year-olds. It reminds me vividly of Baudrillard's comments on the infantilization of the United States.
Besides that, look how the Ref totals the score. Would a real prize fighter win points on things that have nothing to do with the substance of the contest? Do real facts and events have anything to do with Halperin's so-called analysis?
This is political reporting at its trivializing worst. Halperin should be ashamed to appear in public as a serious journalist.
I agree.
This looks like something The Onion would do, except then it would be satire. This idiot apparently does this crap for real.