About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Wash. Post reported McCain touting work on immigration bill, but not that he no longer supports it

July 15, 2008 12:39 pm ET

SUMMARY: The Washington Post quoted Sen. John McCain asserting, "I helped author with Senator [Edward M.] Kennedy comprehensive immigration reform, and fought for its passage," but did not note that McCain has since said he would not support that immigration reform bill if it came to a vote on the Senate floor.

13 Comments

In a July 15 Washington Post article on Sen. John McCain's July 14 speech at the National Council of La Raza convention, staff writer Juliet Eilperin asserted that McCain "said he would 'prefer' not to attack [Sen.] Barack Obama but felt obligated to respond to allegations that he backed away from comprehensive immigration reform for political reasons." She then quoted McCain's assertion: "I helped author with Senator [Edward M.] Kennedy [D-MA] comprehensive immigration reform, and fought for its passage." But Eilperin did not note, as Media Matters for America has repeatedly documented, that McCain said during a January 30 Republican presidential debate that he would not support the immigration reform bill he co-sponsored with Kennedy if it came to a vote on the Senate floor. Eilperin also reported that McCain "continued to say he would focus first on securing U.S. borders," but did not note that McCain's position that "we've got to secure the borders first" is at odds with his prior assertion that border security could not be disaggregated from other aspects of comprehensive immigration reform without being rendered ineffective.

Media Matters has previously documented other instances in which Washington Post reporters have ignored McCain's immigration reversal.

Eilperin's Washington Post July 15 article, headlined, "To Latinos, McCain Revisits Immigration":

Speaking at the National Council of La Raza conference Monday, John McCain said he would "prefer" not to attack Barack Obama but felt obligated to respond to allegations that he backed away from comprehensive immigration reform for political reasons.

"At a moment of great difficulty in my campaign, when my critics said it would be political suicide for me to do so, I helped author with Senator Kennedy comprehensive immigration reform, and fought for its passage," McCain said. Obama, he continued, "declined to cast some of those tough votes."

Obama, he continued, "declined to cast some of those tough votes."

Obama spokesman Tommy Vietor responded: "The facts are that Barack Obama stood up for comprehensive immigration reform in the Senate, and even the measure the McCain campaign is attacking us on today was supported by 40 immigrant groups supporting reform, including La Raza."

McCain reiterated his commitment to immigration reform in terms that appealed to the Latino audience. While he continued to say he would focus first on securing U.S. borders, he framed the pledge in language that sounded more favorable to immigrants than his usual town hall remarks.

"We must prove we have the resources to secure our borders and use them, while respecting the dignity and rights of citizens and legal residents of the United States," he said.

Describing some who died as they tried to cross the border, McCain concluded a vivid portrait of the dead by saying, "These simply were God's children who wanted to be Americans." The audience applauded with vigor.

McCain also devoted a significant portion of his speech to economic issues -- he noted that there are 2 million Latino-owned businesses in the United States -- saying he would keep taxes low and promote trade agreements with Latin America.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by H-Man (July 15, 2008 12:55 pm ET)
         
      Wow typical McCain. This is just like the Veterans bill that Senator Webb pushed through. McCain does not support it while it is being debated. Then he doesn't vote one way or the other when it comes up. Finally, he takes credit for it. But will we see this in the MSM? Sadly, we know the answer is no.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (July 15, 2008 12:56 pm ET)
         
      Heck, with McCain's track record, he won't even show up to vote on it. He's missed every single vote since April 8th and is now rated as the most absent senator in office.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by H-Man (July 15, 2008 12:59 pm ET)
           
        Hmm, weren't the right saying it was bad for Obama to miss votes? I haven't seen them say a word about McCain. 
        Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (July 15, 2008 1:05 pm ET)
             

          Not only that, McCain specifically criticized Obama for missing a vote he himself missed.

          Following Iran’s missile tests this week, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) slammed Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-IL) position on the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, declaring, “This is the same organization that I voted to condemn as a terrorist organization when an amendment was on the floor of the United States Senate. Senator Obama refused to vote.” CNN’s Political Ticker notes a flaw with McCain’s attack:

          The problem with the critique? McCain also missed that vote on the Kyl-Lieberman amendment on September 26, 2007. Records show that Obama was in New Hampshire and McCain was in New York instead of being in the Senate chamber for the vote in question.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by historygeek001 (July 16, 2008 1:49 pm ET)
             

          If I'm not mistaken, McCain has the worst record in the Senate as far as showing up for votes--I think he's missed something like 65% of all of them.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (July 15, 2008 1:00 pm ET)
           
        Yeah, if he cared so much, he would've flown one of his private jets to Washington D.C. in order to vote on the issue.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (July 15, 2008 1:03 pm ET)
             
          Grampy really seems to be making a habit of campaigning on a former version of himself.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by wzwriter (July 15, 2008 1:12 pm ET)
               

            Grampy really seems to be making a habit of campaigning on a former version of himself.

            Gramps needs to be reminded each morning what version of himself he's supposed to be that day...

            Report Abuse
        • Author by H-Man (July 15, 2008 1:04 pm ET)
             

          Come on they are not his private jets. They are Cindy'. Lets be fair. And she needs private planes because it's the only way to get around Arizona. 

           

          http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/14/cindy-mccain-in-arizona-t_n_112695.html

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (July 15, 2008 1:27 pm ET)
               
            Thanks for reminding me, H-Man, the McCain's assets are separate from each other.  Except when they're not.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (July 15, 2008 1:30 pm ET)
               
            H-Man, thanks for the link. I read some of the comments, and I hate to once again admit that my sense of humor hasn't developed much since I was 12, but I got a belly laugh out of Mc"needs a" Cane. Good, I was getting bored with Grampy.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (July 15, 2008 1:38 pm ET)
                 

              Well heck, if you want a laugh, let's look into Phil Graham's sordid past...

              and this is funny! Thanks to Andy Borowitz for that one.

              A Christian, a Jew and Barack Obama are in a rowboat in the middle of the ocean. Barack Obama says, "This joke isn't going to work because there's no Muslim in this boat."

              Report Abuse
        • Author by mari2jj (July 16, 2008 12:22 am ET)
             
          Yes especially since he has a freebie from his wife's business arrangement ON THAT JET..  But sad to say, McCain has jumped the rail on his straight talk express if he ever really adhered to it.  Amazing the double standard Republicans have these days/  Where of where are the Jacob Javits Republicans these days.  I know you will see how old I am now.  Anyway, even with all this crap the pubies are handing out, Obama is still up a bunch today.  Things are looking good if we just keep our eyes on which would be better, Obama or McCain and even a slight run through of those ideas would produce a resounding OBAMA!!!!!!!!!!!!
          Report Abuse
The Fox Effect
Media Matters Connect

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.