About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

On Meet the Press, Brokaw attributed proposal for gas-tax holiday to Clinton, but not McCain

July 21, 2008 4:29 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: On Meet the Press, Tom Brokaw asked Al Gore if, on the subject of renewable energy, "Hillary Clinton reset this debate when she said there should be a summer holiday on the federal gas tax." But Brokaw did not mention that Sen. John McCain also proposed a gas-tax holiday or that one of his top advisers still touts the plan as "the best stimulus package we can have right now."

37 Comments

On the July 20 edition of NBC's Meet the Press, host Tom Brokaw interviewed former Vice President Al Gore and asked him if, on the subject of renewable energy, "Hillary Clinton reset this debate when she said there should be a summer holiday on the federal gas tax." But Brokaw did not mention that Sen. John McCain also proposed a gas-tax holiday or that one of his top advisers still touts the plan as "the best stimulus package we can have right now." Brokaw did not mention McCain's proposal despite having said of McCain on the July 13 edition of Meet the Press, "Here's a man who has worried about global warming, now he wants to give American motorists a gas tax holiday so they can drive even more during the summer months."

The environmental news website Gristmill wrote that Brokaw "pestered Gore to condemn Hillary Clinton -- who's no longer in the race -- for proposing a gas tax holiday, without so much as mentioning that John McCain -- who's still in the race -- is still supporting one" [italics and bold in original].

From the July 20 edition of NBC's Meet the Press:

BROKAW: Did Hillary Clinton reset this debate when she said there should be a summer holiday on the federal gas tax?

GORE: Well, I don't want to get into a primary battle that I successfully avoided getting into while it was going on.

BROKAW: Well, it's not a primary battle. She's speaking --

GORE: I didn't --

BROKAW: -- to an issue you feel very strongly about.

GORE: I disagreed with those who wanted a so-called gas-tax holiday. And I think -- taking it from that to sort of the whole --

BROKAW: Was that irresponsible on her part, do you think at this time?

GORE: I'm not going to label friends of mine irresponsible. I think that particular proposal -- wasn't one I agreed with -- was in response to what people are feeling with gasoline prices, and we've got to respond to the gasoline price increase. But here's the point, Tom. The people of this country are ready for bolder, more dramatic answers. The real way to bring gasoline prices down is not by going back to try more of the same things that have not worked in the past, but to say, Wait a minute, now's time -- now is the time for a really dramatic shift over to renewable energy.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by christopherpking (July 21, 2008 4:36 pm ET)
         
      Tit for Tat..... All the same mumbo jumbo from a one party system. He said she said..... Bunch of spinless prostetutes.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (July 21, 2008 4:57 pm ET)
           
        I watched MTP - Gore was fabulous as usual, but when he started making some in-depth analysis of the energy situation that we now are faced with, Brokaw stopped the presses and went right back to the good ol' campaign trail tripe - you know, THE CLINTONS.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by oscar the grouch (July 21, 2008 5:35 pm ET)
             
          Yep, sitting in a nice air conditioned studio while his ride was probably waiting out back with the engine idling so that the limo would be cool when he finished.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (July 21, 2008 5:44 pm ET)
               
            You forgot the part where he strangled three baby seal pups with his bare hands...
            Report Abuse
            • Author by oscar the grouch (July 21, 2008 6:41 pm ET)
                 
              Strangling the seals would be an out and out lie, however there is video of his limos idling while waiting for him to finish a presentation (it wasn't MTP, so I did take some literary license, but the limo idling part is a fact.) I may stretch facts at times, but an out and out lie?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by foghornleghorn (July 21, 2008 7:54 pm ET)
                   
                Stretch?  Limo?  You made a funny.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (July 22, 2008 1:10 pm ET)
                   

                Oscar-

                Thanks for explaining yourself.  Since you didn't get my joke - I was using hyperbole to satirize your 'stretching' of the truth, a skill at which you are adept.

                Report Abuse
          • Author by jawill11 (July 22, 2008 12:38 pm ET)
               
            Good point.  For that reason alone, I am now changing my opinion on energy policy.  We should never invest in alternatives and we should open up evern National Park and Reserve for extensive drilling.  Thanks for pointing out such an important aspect to the debate that I was lacking. 
            Report Abuse
        • Author by Science101 (July 21, 2008 8:56 pm ET)
             

          Gore was fabulous as usual, but when he started making some in-depth analysis of the energy situation that we now are faced with

          Gore wouldnt know energy conservation if it shot him in the foot.  The only reason normal people are conserving is because of money, not to be "green" or to care for the environment.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by eweston8542983 (July 21, 2008 9:51 pm ET)
               

            Your thesis has all the integrity of a condemed limburger.

            Evidence that you have some connection to reality would be rilly appreciated.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by magnolialover (July 22, 2008 12:31 pm ET)
               

            Well, maybe, just maybe if people are conserving because of money, it might lead them down the path to conserving to, you know, help out this big blue ball we all live on.

             

            Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (July 21, 2008 4:56 pm ET)
         
      But it's only right they don't mention McSame. After all, the press is in the bag for Obama, we've got shoes, POS and some newbie here today telling us so! That bad ol' librul press is just trying to make up for all that McSame bashing by laying off for a few days, that's all...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pointofview (July 21, 2008 5:22 pm ET)
           
        With all the major news anchors on the trip with Obama, and the NYT refusing to run an editorial by McCain after running one for Obama with no rules, and the media still runinng this "America does not yet know Obama" crap everytime he makes a mis step, you still question that the media is in the bag for Obama.  Amazing. 
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (July 21, 2008 5:30 pm ET)
             
          How do you know there were no rules for Obama? Nobody has said that there were "no rules" as you say. And what is a bigger story? Obama traveling to the mid east, or McCain running around bad mouthing his opponent in podunk USA? I'd say the Obama story, which is WHY the big news anchors are with him now. Does it really not make sense to you?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (July 21, 2008 5:40 pm ET)
             

          Are you going to bring this subject up in every discussion? You're doing a pretty good job thus far.

           

           

          Report Abuse
        • Author by carlileb5935 (July 21, 2008 9:36 pm ET)
             

          "and the NYT refusing to run an editorial by McCain after running one for Obama with no rules"

          The rules were simple. If you're gonna write about your plan for Iraq, then you gotta have a plan. Obama had one, McCain doesn't. That's all that happened-- at no time was the NYT dictating specific content. 

          Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (July 21, 2008 9:36 pm ET)
             

          I absolutely believe it. You've seen several examples here of McCain getting a free pass. I watched Fox this weekend, kinda funny how they were saying if Obama made any gaffes by referencing a wrong country his presidential hopes would be sunk by the media.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by carlileb5935 (July 21, 2008 9:42 pm ET)
               

            TheMSM bias in favor of Mccain is extraordinary. Tonight he talked about the dangers at the border between Pakistan and Iraq.

            What if Obama had said that?

            It's a nightmare. 

             

            Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (July 21, 2008 4:57 pm ET)
         

      Come on now we gotta sell off some landscape that ain't making some corp big money so we can fer shur see our gas prices go down by 3 cents next year on the outside, uhuh.

      Maybe I disremember, but didn't John bring it up first. Then Hillary bought into it?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by fishergirlusmc (July 21, 2008 5:03 pm ET)
         

      How come Tom Brokaw did not ask Al Gore what did the Clinton Administration do for the eight years it was in power to curtail global warming? Why does your own home even after you made it green use more energy than 20 average or more americans? How come at the speech you gave ,were there 2 lincoln town cars and a number of SUV'S that were allowed to idle with the AC on for at least 20 minutes? How come this fat slob does not sell off all his property and set a good example for the rest of us and show us how easy it is to use the energy that he proposes the rest of us use? How much money is he making off of this charade? Why does'nt he donate all his wealth to the cause? How come he sold off all our oil reserves to oxidental petroleum when he took office without any bids from any other companies? How come he lied when making his documentary and used footage from the movie the day after tomorrow? Finally does mother nature channel these idea's directly to the Goracle himself?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by commonsenseliberal (July 22, 2008 12:03 pm ET)
           

        Do some research, my dear.  It will do you some good.

        You posted so much disinformation, I'm not even sure where to start.

        But, you may start with doing some research on Gore's house.  It's not what you'd like others to think.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (July 22, 2008 12:05 pm ET)
           

        I've got a question for you:

        If "global climate change" is a threat to national security (as noted by a Pentagon study), why to you hate the security of the U.S. so much?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (July 22, 2008 12:47 pm ET)
           

        WOW! Nice unhinged attack there.

        Let's break it down a little bit shall we?

        "How come Tom Brokaw did not ask Al Gore what did the Clinton Administration do for the eight years it was in power to curtail global warming? Why does your own home even after you made it green use more energy than 20 average or more americans? How come at the speech you gave ,were there 2 lincoln town cars and a number of SUV'S that were allowed to idle with the AC on for at least 20 minutes? How come this fat slob does not sell off all his property and set a good example for the rest of us and show us how easy it is to use the energy that he proposes the rest of us use? How much money is he making off of this charade? Why does'nt he donate all his wealth to the cause? How come he sold off all our oil reserves to oxidental petroleum when he took office without any bids from any other companies? How come he lied when making his documentary and used footage from the movie the day after tomorrow? Finally does mother nature channel these idea's directly to the Goracle himself?"

        Clinton administration and environmental policies. How about first, the fact that most of the policies put into place during Clinton's terms in office were removed by Bush almost as soon as he took office:
        http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=9307833

        Here's an entire report (99 pages) about what the Clinton administration did during their time in office on the environment:
        http://www.aei-brookings.org/admin/authorpdfs/page.php?id=469

        Did you even bother to look around? Nah, probably not.

        Why does Gore's home use more energy? Because it's a lot bigger than a lot of other homes. Compare houses of the same size, and I would bet that his uses about the same amount of energy. Compared to my modest 1100 sg ft house, I'm sure he uses tons more than I do. Plus he has stated and shown, time and again that he buys carbon credits to offset what he uses. Don't ignore the facts.

        How do you know at the speech he gave there were limos idling and SUVs idling? Were you there? Chances are good, that they were. Do you know why? It's called national security. Terrorists would love to off a former president, or in the case of Gore, a former VP.

        What does him being fat have to do with anything? He's not a slob, now you're just projecting. Why doesn't he sell of his property? Where is he going to live? He's not advocating for poverty, he's advocating for climate change.

        First, it's Occidental, not Oxidental oil, or however you spelled it. Gore, yes, he had stock in the oil company, from his father's estate after he died. Truth is, he never exercised the options that he legally owned after his father died, and the stock was sold when his father's estate was closed. Again, don't let facts get in the way of a good tirade about Al Gore. And the reserve land was sold to Occidental in 1998 to reduce the size of the federal government, and was approved by, yes, republicans.

        He used footage from The Day After Tomorrow to show a worst case FICTIONAL scenario. He noted it in the movie, which I'm sure you've never seen.

        Maybe Gore does get inspiration from Mother Nature, but I doubt it. I think he sees something going wrong with our environment, and is in a unique position to try and effect change, and to do something about it. It's not as if he was told by God that he deserved to be President, like someone else I know "cough" George Bush "cough".

        Your talking points are tired, and weak, and have been debunked about 16 million times, and yet you hold them so near and dear. Sad really, really sad.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by JLyons (July 21, 2008 5:12 pm ET)
         
      I am just Gore handled it in the typical classy way he handles these partisan questions. Brokaw was trying to get him to say terrible things about Lieberman as well, the former VP made it clear he disagrees with Lieberman on many issues but that Joe Lieberman supports a womens right to choose and has been a leader in the Senate on the fight to protect our enviornment. Wow Brokaw looked so silly as does NBC.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (July 21, 2008 5:15 pm ET)
         

      I don't know why they would be running away from that idea.  As dumb as it was I think it had broad public appeal.  What politicians should be saying about high gas prices is "drive less, car pool, use public transportation, ride a bike, walk".  Forget waiting for cheaper gas or more efficient cars.  I bet almost every single person in this country could cut the amount they drive in half with little or no disruption to their life style.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by oscar the grouch (July 21, 2008 5:38 pm ET)
           
        Well, if you could talk my bosses into only making me come into the office 2 1/2 days/week (average), I certainly could cut my driving in half (less that 3000 miles in the last 12 months on my go to work vehicle as is.)
        Report Abuse
        • Author by oscar the grouch (July 21, 2008 5:41 pm ET)
             
          And, oh yeah, now that gas prices are inching down and useage is down, there is talk in WA DC of raising the gas tax by about 55% (federal).
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (July 21, 2008 5:47 pm ET)
               

            I agree with Oscar, gas is too expensive.  Heck, I can barely even fill up my private jet to get around the state!  It's hard enough getting out to one of my 7 vacation homes without gas being so expensive!  Sheesh!

            Report Abuse
            • Author by oscar the grouch (July 21, 2008 6:52 pm ET)
                 
              John K, why are you using an alias?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (July 22, 2008 1:12 pm ET)
                   

                A flip-flopper with a questionable military record who married into inherited money to start a political career? 

                This is John M, I think you have me confused with someone else...

                Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (July 21, 2008 9:21 pm ET)
                 
              I thought it was 8 vacation homes? Did the government take over your property in Malibu that you didn't pay taxes on for 4 years?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (July 22, 2008 1:13 pm ET)
                   
                Well, I figured one of them had to be a primary residence.  But I guess you never know...
                Report Abuse
          • Author by snoopy (July 21, 2008 11:03 pm ET)
               
            Oscar, in the same note I noticed what they stopped talking about was offshore drilling and taking alternative sources seriously. I think they heard us say uncle and are backing it off just enough to get us to stop talking about putting resources in making us energy independant.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by shaggles (July 21, 2008 6:37 pm ET)
             
          If you only drive 3000 miles a year that's great.  You probably don't need to cut down but you still could.  Those numbers make me think you live within 5 or 6 miles of where you work.  Is there public transportation you could take?  If not that's a pretty easy bike ride or maybe you could car pool with someone.  I'm not saying that you should do any of those things.  Your footprint is already pretty small.  I'm just saying that you could.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by oscar the grouch (July 21, 2008 6:51 pm ET)
               
            Mass transit is about a mile away and would take another 30-45 minutes, plus at least one transfer. Unfortunately my knees are pretty much shot from about 20 years of officiating basketball, so walking/biking is not the best option. Living in a semi rural area, there is no one close that works in the same area I do plus my schedule is not a uniform 8-5 so coordinating schedules would be hard. My house is passive solar with a geothermal heat pump, my thermostat is probably set higher (cooling) and lower (heating) than the vast majority of the country.  I made those choices before Gore was even VP, so I don't need someone pointing fingers at me or mandating that I change my lifestyle when they don't. Education would go a lot further than government mandates/laws in changing people's outlooks.  I don't want a national 55 mph speed limit primarily because where I choose to live is already 10-12 hours from a lot of my family (at present 65-75 mph limits.  Sure, its only a trip or two (maybe three) a year, but why should it have to be turned into a two day trip, when most of the time we're very conservation minded?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by shaggles (July 22, 2008 1:14 pm ET)
                 
              As I said above "almost" everyone could cut their driving in half.  I realize some can't either because they have already minimized it like you have or because of other factors.  My main point is that we don't have to be slaves to the oil companies and we don't have to wait for someone else to do something about gas prices or the environment.
              Report Abuse
    • Author by ryanisforever9107 (July 21, 2008 9:00 pm ET)
         
      The media is NOT in the bag for Obama and they aren't in the bag for McCain either. The media serves to sensationalize everything and who it is about doesn't really matter. The media's job used to be reporting facts now it is to make money.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.