About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Jonah Goldberg the latest to falsely claim McCain called for Rumsfeld's resignation

July 23, 2008 1:49 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: In his Los Angeles Times column, Jonah Goldberg falsely claimed that "[w]ithin months of the [Iraq] invasion, [Sen. John] McCain was calling for more troops and the head of then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld." In fact, McCain did not call for Rumsfeld to be fired, or for his resignation.

49 Comments

In his July 22 Los Angeles Times column, National Review Online editor-at-large Jonah Goldberg falsely claimed that "[w]ithin months of the [Iraq] invasion, [Sen. John] McCain was calling for more troops and the head of then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld." In fact, as Media Matters for America has repeatedly documented, McCain did not call for Rumsfeld to be fired, or for his resignation. The McCain campaign itself admitted to The Washington Post in February that McCain "did not call for his resignation. ... He always said that's the president's prerogative."

While McCain expressed "no confidence" in Rumsfeld in 2004, the Associated Press reported at the time that McCain "said his comments were not a call for Rumsfeld's resignation." Further, when Fox News host Shepard Smith specifically asked McCain, "Does Donald Rumsfeld need to step down?" on November 8, 2006 -- hours before President Bush announced Rumsfeld's resignation -- McCain responded that it was "a decision to be made by the president."

As Media Matters noted, The Washington Post reported in a February 9 article that McCain "regularly reminds audiences that he also criticized Bush's management of the war and called for Donald H. Rumsfeld's resignation as defense secretary." After Media Matters noted the article's failure to report that McCain's assertion that he had called for Rumsfeld's resignation was false, the Post published an article reporting that McCain "overstate[d] his public position on Rumsfeld" and never called for him to resign. According to the February 16 article: "[D]uring a debate at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif., aired on CNN, McCain said, 'I'm the only one that said that Rumsfeld had to go.' A McCain spokesman acknowledged this week that that was not correct. 'He did not call for his resignation,' said the campaign's Brian Rogers. 'He always said that's the president's prerogative.' " The February 16 Post article also noted that "McCain's false account has been unwittingly incorporated into the narrative he is selling by some news organizations, including The Washington Post."

Indeed, in addition to the Post, MSNBC chief Washington correspondent Norah O'Donnell, MSNBC's Joe Scarborough, PBS' Charlie Rose, and CNN senior political analyst Gloria Borger have all falsely claimed or suggested that McCain called for Rumsfeld to resign or be fired.

From Goldberg's July 22 column:

Yes, McCain heroically pushed for the surge when the war was at its most unpopular point. Even more impressive, he favored a change in strategy back when the war was popular.

Within months of the invasion, McCain was calling for more troops and the head of then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. Later, when the Iraqi civil war erupted, Al Qaeda in Iraq metastasized and the Iranians mounted a clandestine surge all their own, McCain doubled-down; he argued that we couldn't afford to lose and proposed a revised counterinsurgency strategy for victory. That was the same very month that Obama introduced the "Iraq War De-Escalation Act of 2007."

That's all great stuff for McCain's biographers. But the tragic Catch-22 for the Arizona senator is that the more the surge succeeds, the more politically advantageous it is for Obama.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by JLyons (July 23, 2008 1:56 pm ET)
         
      Can Jonah Goldberg and others just provide a video or transcript that shows McCain claiming he wanted Rumsfeld to resign? Please ?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (July 23, 2008 2:26 pm ET)
           

        Can Jonah Goldberg and others just provide a video or transcript that shows McCain claiming he wanted Rumsfeld to resign? Please ?

        They'll do that right after they produce the tape showing michelle Obama calling someone "Whitey".  On the Twelfth of Never.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by JLyons (July 23, 2008 3:02 pm ET)
             

          Yeah, im waiting for slimeball Hannity to produce that one.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (July 23, 2008 3:08 pm ET)
               
            He doesn't have to...the lie that the tape exists has already been spread. It's sort of like a new twist on push polling. It's like the way FOX will show a banner for an entire segment saying something like "Does Barack Obama want the terrorists to win?" They leave it up during an entire discussion that may not have anything directly to do with it. It's like push polling...it plants the seed.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by JLyons (July 23, 2008 3:26 pm ET)
                 
              Very true, which is why i hope Obama stays far clear from FAUX . They distort and report.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by shoes89 (July 23, 2008 4:08 pm ET)
                   

                Correction needed by MM: Nowhere in the article does Goldberg say McCain called for the "resignation" of Rumsfeld.

                You can "call for the head" of someone without calling them to resign. McCain clearly said he had "no confidence" in Rumsfeld.

                The fact that MM has to twist what Goldberg wrote to create a post shows that so-called "conservative misionformation" can't really be much of a problem in the media. 

                Report Abuse
                • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (July 23, 2008 4:13 pm ET)
                     
                  Shoes, do you think he was calling for a literal decapitation? I wouldn't ask this question of many posters, except to be snarky, but I'm not sure about you.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by wzwriter (July 24, 2008 12:02 pm ET)
                       

                    Shoes, do you think he was calling for a literal decapitation? I wouldn't ask this question of many posters, except to be snarky, but I'm not sure about you.

                    I'm sure about Shoes.  If there is something stupid to be said, you can be sure that Shoes will say it.  Unless the second-string mental midgets like Philib, POV, or Columbus1492 (aka Science101) say it first....

                    :-)

                    Report Abuse
                • Author by JLyons (July 23, 2008 4:14 pm ET)
                     

                  The fact that MM has to twist what Goldberg wrote to create a post shows that so-called "conservative misionformation" can't really be much of a problem in the media

                  Shoes there is no twist in what Golberg said. MMFA is right, and there have been media types that have spewed this lie for the past year and never challenge even McCain on it.

                  Report Abuse
                • Author by wzwriter (July 23, 2008 4:30 pm ET)
                     

                  The fact that MM has to twist what Goldberg wrote to create a post shows that so-called "conservative misionformation" can't really be much of a problem in the media. 

                  The fact is that once again, Shoes has snuck in here, posted something that has NO BEARING WHATSOEVER on the discussion at hand, and slinked back under her rock.  The REAL problem here is Shoes' chronic lack of reading comprehension.......

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by JLyons (July 23, 2008 4:58 pm ET)
                       
                    It seems Shoes has a problem just like Goldberg, he can not speak the truth.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by Taz (July 23, 2008 9:59 pm ET)
                       

                    "The fact is that once again, Shoes has snuck in here, posted something that has NO BEARING WHATSOEVER on the discussion at hand" - wzwriter

                    You mean the way Snoopy did by bringing Novak hitting a pedestrian into the discussion? So you'll be commenting on that as well, right? I won't hold my breath. You guys are such a bunch of phony hypocrites.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by therick (July 23, 2008 10:10 pm ET)
                         

                      Were we talking about Shoes or Snoopy.  Can you please respond to the topic you were answering?  I'm getting dizzy.

                       

                       

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by sportsguydave (July 25, 2008 6:13 am ET)
                           

                        Awww .. looks like someone's feeling left out ..

                        Don't worry, Taz .. you've  been voted first-team troll as well... :)

                        Report Abuse
                    • Author by wzwriter (July 24, 2008 9:52 am ET)
                         

                      You mean the way Snoopy did by bringing Novak hitting a pedestrian into the discussion? So you'll be commenting on that as well, right? I won't hold my breath. You guys are such a bunch of phony hypocrites.

                      At least Snoopy was discussing a current event.  You chose to dredge up a 39-year-old story in an attempt to hijack the thread, because you're intellectually bankrupt. 

                      Now, do all of us here at MMFA a favor.  Log off your parents' computer and go back to your Playstation.  Or turn on the TV - I think the Teletubbies are on; the subject matter may be a bit advanced for someone as mentally deficient as you, but I thing you'll enjoy looking at all the colors.....

                      Report Abuse
      • Author by captfoster2 (July 23, 2008 3:39 pm ET)
           

        Even if McCain had done this...... what does it prove?

        Grampy McSame would still be Grampy McSame...... I don't think many minds would be changed if it were true as there were several conservatives that were calling for Rummy to just go away! 

        Are those conservatives any less or more credible?  Hell no!  They did so because they knew that Rummy was a bigger disaster than the Bush regime could handle!

        Report Abuse
    • Author by ryanisforever9107 (July 23, 2008 2:09 pm ET)
         
      Why do reporters never ask McCain about these inconsistencies? Is it really so hard to say, "Senator McCain, you have repeated claims that you called for Donald Rumsfeld's resignation, but you actually said it was the president's call. In fact, here are several items that prove it. Why do you lie to the American people?"
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (July 23, 2008 2:19 pm ET)
         
      Absolutely amazing, even when there is a record of what McCain actually said, that these people can get away with this crap. As a result, a considerable segment of the voting population is just flat-out misinformed. Win at all costs is the credo... 
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (July 23, 2008 2:25 pm ET)
         

      Calling for Rumsfeld's head isn't exactly the same thing as calling for his resignation.  I have a bigger problem with him referring to McCain's actions as heroic and impressive.  And with the reference to the Iranian "clandestine surge".

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (July 23, 2008 3:02 pm ET)
           
        Yes, but THE SURGE worked!  Iraq is happy place with butterflies and puppies, thanks to THE SURGE!  In fact, THE SURGE worked so well, that we should definitely have another SURGE.  We shall call it THE SURGE 2, and it will work even better than THE SURGE, which I'm not sure is even possible, since THE SURGE worked so perfectly.  After the 2nd SURGE, we will continue with a series of subsequent SURGES that will also work.  Then SURGE we will SURGE and after the SURGE more SURGE and then Iraq was worth it!  SURGE!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (July 23, 2008 3:20 pm ET)
             
          By god, you're right! The SURGE worked so well it was the catalyst for an event called "the anbar awakening" which occurred MONTHS BEFORE THE SURGE TROOPS ARRIVED! Wow, how do they do that?!?!?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by neondesert (July 23, 2008 4:32 pm ET)
               

            Time is no barrier to the power of The Surge®!!!

            *The Surge® should only be used under strict adult supervision.  Keep away from children and pets.  For external use only.  Not available in Canada, Afghanistan, or Darfur.  Lather, rinse, repeat.  When used to revise history, keep in a lighted, well-ventilated area.  Use of The Surge® does not guarantee compliance with international law.  May cause bloating in pachyderms.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (July 23, 2008 4:37 pm ET)
                 
              If I call within the next 10 minutes, will you throw in a Mission Accomplished™ ?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by neondesert (July 23, 2008 4:43 pm ET)
                   

                No, but I'll include a Bedazzler® FOR ONLY $1.00 MORE!!!*

                *(add $10.95 s/h)

                Report Abuse
                • Author by mary59 (July 23, 2008 4:58 pm ET)
                     
                  Will you throw in a case of Surge with extra caffeine?

                  I want lemon lime.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by snoopy (July 23, 2008 5:06 pm ET)
                       
                    If you get him a sandwich he'll throw in two cases free (shipping and handling not included)!
                    Report Abuse
    • Author by foghornleghorn (July 23, 2008 3:01 pm ET)
         

      Jonah Golberg lies.  Grass is green.  Water is wet.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (July 23, 2008 3:50 pm ET)
         
      This is the same yay-hoo who thought Hitler and others like him were liberals. Yeah, OK...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (July 23, 2008 4:21 pm ET)
         
      Didn't this guy write a book called " Liberal Fascism " trying to equate us who exercise our constitutional duty to question our government to socialism, of which communism is the most common form ?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (July 23, 2008 4:43 pm ET)
           
        Yeah, Wolf. There were some related threads here that were just astounding, as a few posters made some very crazy arguments towards Hitler & Mussolini being liberals. It was mind-boggling.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by therick (July 23, 2008 10:05 pm ET)
             

          Those zany cons just crack me up.

          My fellow posters, I am now an official politician!  Running for twp. trustee after beckoning from neighbors and friends.  The cons we're opposing have likened us to Hitler, Saddam, socialists, and have said we would fire everyone if elected.  My God they play dirty, which tells me they're a bit desperate.  You may hear my voice on Thom Hartman next week.

          [sorry about the off topic, just had to tell all my bloggerbuddies]

           

          Report Abuse
          • Author by eweston8542983 (July 23, 2008 10:22 pm ET)
               
            Kewl, keep us up todate plize. ;-)
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (July 24, 2008 12:17 am ET)
               

            "...and have said we would fire everyone if elected"

            Wait, aren't they for smaller government, Rick??Good luck, let me know if  I can fly in on my private jet and tamper with some ballots (heh heh heh)

            Report Abuse
    • Author by DAWUSS (July 23, 2008 4:47 pm ET)
         

      "That's all great stuff for McCain's biographers. But the tragic Catch-22 for the Arizona senator is that the more the surge succeeds, the more politically advantageous it is for Obama."

       

       

      I thought troop surge success would play into McCain's favor more than Obama's, considering that numerous sources (guess, you'll get them right) have Obama penned in as hoping for defeat in Iraq along with the rest of the Democrat(ic?) Party

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (July 23, 2008 5:45 pm ET)
           
        I think if the surge succeeds, the war won't last 100 years, like McCain wants.  If we win the war soon, McCain's 100-year-plan doesn't work so well.
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.