About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

MSNBC's Witt did not note McCain falsehoods in Anbar statement or in later campaign statement purporting to defend it

July 23, 2008 7:35 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: On MSNBC Live, Alex Witt uncritically repeated a statement by McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds defending a false statement by Sen. John McCain made the previous day during an interview with CBS, the video clip of which CBS edited to expunge the falsehood. But Witt did not note that Bounds inaccurately represented McCain's original statement or that McCain's statement was itself false.

6 Comments

MSNBC Live anchor Alex Witt uncritically repeated a July 23 statement made by McCain campaign spokesman Tucker Bounds in response to criticism Sen. John McCain has received for a false statement he made during a July 22 interview on CBS, the video clip of which CBS edited to expunge the falsehood. In his statement defending McCain's comments from the previous day, Bounds misrepresented the controversy, falsely suggesting that McCain said something different from what he actually said, which itself was false. Witt neither noted that Bounds did not accurately represent McCain's original statement, nor that McCain's statement was false.

As Witt noted, Bounds wrote, "Senator McCain is correct. As General [David] Petraeus has made clear, the surge is the reason why the Anbar awakening was so successful in tearing up Al Qaeda." Bounds' statement falsely suggested that what McCain had said was that the surge was responsible for the "success[]" of what McCain had referred to as the "Anbar awakening" -- an agreement by some tribal leaders in western Iraq to accept U.S. aid and cooperate with anti-Al Qaeda operations. In fact, McCain falsely claimed that the surge "began the Anbar awakening," implying that the surge happened before the "Anbar awakening." But the "awakening" reportedly began in September 2006, months before the surge was even announced.

Rather than note that McCain's original statement was false and that Bounds was purporting to defend a statement McCain did not make, Witt falsely suggested that the inaccuracy of McCain's original statement was in doubt, asserting, "[T]here's been some discrepancies as to what the timing was, what Senator McCain said regarding that."

From the noon ET hour of the July 23 edition of MSNBC Live:

WITT: An MSNBC "Campaign Alert": And this is regarding John McCain's camp, which has issued a statement as a result of the flap, if you will, that's been made over the timing that he alluded to with regard to when the surge in Iraq began to take effect and take hold and help turn things around somewhat. There was a previous effort called the Anbar awakening that was noted to be chronologically prior to the official beginning of the U.S. Army surge there with the forces in Iraq, and there's been some discrepancies as to what the timing was, what Senator McCain said regarding that -- but let me give you right now what the McCain camp is saying and the quote is this:

"Senator McCain is correct. As General [David] Petraeus has made clear, the surge is the reason why the Anbar awakening was so successful in tearing up Al Qaeda." Quote, "The surge strategy that was supported by John McCain and opposed by Barack Obama was responsible for the reduction in violence we have seen over the last year and a half. Democrats can debate whether the awakening would have survived without the surge, or whether the Shiite militias would have unilaterally disarmed without U.S. troops and our Iraqi allies disarming them by force, but that is nothing more than a transparent effort to minimize the role of our commanders and our troops in defeating the enemy, because to credit them would be to disparage the judgment of Barack Obama and praise the leadership of John McCain. If John -- Barack Obama had his way, the awakening would have been crushed at the hands of Al Qaeda and U.S. forces would have already left Iraq in defeat."

We're giving that to Tucker Bounds, a spokesperson for the John McCain camp.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mari2jj (July 24, 2008 3:11 am ET)
         
      The terribly dishonest clropping of the McCain statement by CBS is a new low for CBS.  Where oh where is the sort of great reporting and honesty of someone like Cronkite and all those heroes of newscasting.  The change ot the statement was so egregious, so calculating, so dishonest that I doubt CBS can ever recover.  I am unsure who cropped that statement that showed up on the screen but it was a truly stupid and dishonorable thing for them to have done.  Hereafter, we will all KNOW that CBS is really just a shill for McCain and Republicans.  The grand old lady has lowered her reputation to an irretrievable level.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (July 24, 2008 8:27 am ET)
         
      This all so disingenuous... The theory that THE SURGE! has been a success is flawed so McCain redefines surge to include events that occurred well before THE SURGE! I particularly like his remark that we provided protection for the leading sheikh who spearheaded the Anbar Awakening while failing to mention that the sheikh was assassinated during THE SURGE!  Absolutely incredible how McCain and his minions can get away with their lies, distortions and history re-writes. This is why I don't vote Republican...it's the the dishonesty that seems inherent in the party.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by eniobob2631 (July 24, 2008 9:45 am ET)
         

      http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/325.html

      Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (July 24, 2008 10:32 am ET)
         

      I think this deserves a repost:

      Again, from C&L. More evidence of a CBS coverup:

      CBS manuel—CBS NEWS STANDARDS….SEC111-5….EDITING:

      Editing is essential to the practice of journalism. We must make every effort to ensure that our editing reflects fairly, honestly and without distortion what was seen and heard by our reporters and recorded by our cameras and microphones. The editing process requires careful news judgments geared to the individual facts of each situation.

      Interviews are to be edited in a straightforward manner, preserving the sense of the interview. Even a short sound bite should accurately reflect the spirit of the entire interview. An answer may not be taken out of context if the result is to distort the original meaning. If a question to an interview subject is used, the answer must be to that specific question. The question and the answer may be edited, but not in a way that would distort the meaning of either. Answers to different questions may not be combined to give the impression of one continuous response. In short, we cannot create an answer merely because we wish the subject had said it better.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by congero6189599 (July 24, 2008 10:41 am ET)
         
      Thanks Snoop for that post.  Big hambone for you!!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by unitarianpatriot (July 24, 2008 2:05 pm ET)
         
      Fascinating. What's next from the McCain campaign? "Bomb USZ793, which hit a military target on Feb. 3, 2004, was actually an early part of the surge, even though the surge wouldn't be announced for a few years, and shows Sen. McCain's military wisdom. Sen. Obama's stubborn failure to recognize the success of Bomb USZ793 -- and the bravery and valor of the pilot who dropped it from 10,000 feet up in his air-conditioned fighter jet -- shows that Sen. Obama would rather lose a war than an election and will not honor the military service of our brave fighting troops. But Bomb USZ794, which accidentally killed dozens of women and children the next day and led to enhanced terrorist recruiting in that region, was part of the failed Bush strategy that Sen. McCain was critical of for years." Please, give us a break!
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.