CBS News omitted a second McCain falsehood: his characterization of Iraq war as "the first major conflict since 9/11"
SUMMARY: In a second omission of a falsehood by Sen. John McCain during his interview with Katie Couric, the CBS Evening News did not air a statement in which McCain characterized the war in Iraq as "the first major conflict since 9/11," apparently disregarding the war in Afghanistan, which began in October 2001.
On the July 22 broadcast of the CBS Evening News, while airing portions of an interview anchor Katie Couric conducted that day with Sen. John McCain, CBS News did not air McCain's response to a question in which he characterized the Iraq war as "the first major conflict since 9/11," apparently disregarding the war in Afghanistan, which Couric addressed in her question and which began in October 2001. As Media Matters for America and others documented, CBS News also did not air McCain's false assertion that the 2007 U.S. troop surge "began the Anbar Awakening" and instead aired spliced video of McCain's interview with Couric, expunging the false statement and tacking on a response he gave to a different question.
Couric asked: "Sen. [Barack] Obama also told me, Sen. McCain, that the money spent on those additional troops, on the surge, might have been more effective had it gone to Afghanistan or even to a better energy policy in the United States. What's your response?" McCain replied: "The fact is we had four years of failed policy. We were losing. We were losing the war in Iraq. The consequences of failure and defeat of the United States of America in the first major conflict since 9/11 would have had devastating impacts throughout the region and the world." In fact, nearly a year and a half before the Iraq war, the United States initiated Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) in order to "counter terrorism and bring security to Afghanistan." According to the Department of Defense, 554 Americans had lost their lives as a result of OEF and 2,257 had been wounded as of July 19.
In an entry on the Huffington Post website headlined "Another John McCain Gaffe -- Iraq Was the First Major Conflict After 9/11," Cenk Uygur wrote:
There is one more John McCain gaffe that the media missed from the now famous CBS interview with Katie Couric.
This is the same interview in which McCain claimed the surge led to the Anbar Awakening, which is demonstrably false.
[...]
Was Afghanistan not major enough for him?
From the transcript of Couric's interview with McCain posted on CBSNews.com:
Couric: Sen. Obama also told me, Sen. McCain, that the money spent on those additional troops, on the surge, might have been more effective had it gone to Afghanistan or even to a better energy policy in the United States. What's your response?
McCain: The fact is we had four years of failed policy. We were losing. We were losing the war in Iraq. The consequences of failure and defeat of the United States of America in the first major conflict since 9/11 would have had devastating impacts throughout the region and the world.
Thanks to a great general, thanks to a lot of courage and bravery on the part of American men and women in the military, we succeeded. And we are on the path to an honorable withdrawal and ... victory. Not having to return, as Sen. Obama said we might have to, if his strategy of straight dates for withdrawal didn't succeed.
So, of course it's been enormous sacrifice. And Americans are all saddened by it. But the consequences of failure would have been devastating. And that would have been the result if we had done what Sen. Obama wanted to do. Which would have meant our troops were out by last March, much less anytime soon, according to an arbitrary date.
And, again, the future is bright for the people of Iraq. The future is bright for stability in the region, for strengthening our alliances and succeeding in Afghanistan. And it's gonna be long and hard and tough struggle. If we had done what Sen. Obama had wanted, we would have been defeated. Now, we have the chance and opportunity for a very bright future.
From the July 22 broadcast of the CBS Evening News with Katie Couric, showing the full extent of Couric's interview with McCain that was actually aired:
[video clip]
COURIC: Senator McCain, Senator Obama says while the increased number of U.S. troops contributed to increased security in Iraq, he also credits the Sunni Awakening and the Shiite government going after militias and says that there might have been improved security even without the surge. What's your response to that?
McCAIN: Senator Obama has indicated by his failure to acknowledge the success of the surge that he would rather lose a war than lose a campaign. Thanks to General [David] Petraeus, our leadership and the sacrifice of brave young Americans. I mean, to deny that their sacrifice didn't make possible the success of the surge in Iraq, I think does a great disservice to young men and women who are serving and have sacrificed. There will still be attacks. Al Qaeda's not defeated. But the progress has been immense, and to not recognize that and why it happened and how it happened, I think is really quite a commentary.
COURIC: A commentary on what?
McCAIN: That Senator Obama does not understand the challenges we face, and he did not understand the need for the surge. And the fact that he did not understand that and still denies that it has succeeded, I think the American people will make a judgment.
COURIC: Senator Obama describes Afghanistan as the central front in the war on terror. That is where, after all, Senator, 9-11 was plotted. Why do you believe Iraq is the central front in the war on terror?
McCAIN: Well, one reason is, is because that's what Osama bin Laden said that it was. He said, "Go to the country of the two rivers." That's what General Petraeus says, who I think is extremely knowledgeable, that it is the central battleground. And Afghanistan is very tough. And there's a number of great challenges there. And we have to employ the same strategy there that succeeded in Iraq. And we can succeed there. Now that we've succeeded in Iraq, obviously we will be freeing up troops to go to Afghanistan, and we will urge our NATO allies to send more troops and be more involved as well. We can succeed.
But, you see, Senator Obama doesn't understand -- it's not just troops; it's an overall strategy. It's not just two or three brigades. It's also increased engagement on the part of our NATO allies. But I guarantee you, if we had failed in Iraq and been defeated in Iraq, our challenges in Afghanistan would have been dramatically complicated and worsened.
COURIC: Senator McCain, you sound very frustrated with Senator Obama's perspective.
McCAIN: No, I'm not at all. I respect Senator Obama. I admire his success. He's just has been wrong and is wrong, and therefore, I strongly disagree, and I think the American people will make a judgment about who was right.
[end video clip]
COURIC: The numbers do indicate that Iraq became much safer during the surge. Civilian deaths are down from 2,000 last August to 490 this past June. Attacks against coalition forces, down from 1,500 a week in June of 2007 to about 200 a week now. That's an 80 percent drop. And fewer U.S. troops were killed in May and June in Iraq than in Afghanistan.
I'll be back in a little while with more from the Middle East, but first, here's Harry Smith back in New York. Harry.
SMITH: Thanks, Katie.















Did the US ever declare war on Iraq, you know, with all the pomp and circumstace typical of such event ????
The consequences of failure and defeat of the United States of America in the first major conflict since 9/11 would have had devastating impacts throughout the region and the world.
I can tell you right now how McCain and his people are going to spin this. They are going to conflate the war in Afghanistan and the war in Iraq as THE WAR ON ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALIST TERRORISM. It's all one war, they're going to say...just different fronts of the same war.
The pattern has been set. When McCain screws up or when they have a flawed argument, they redefine words. THE SURGE! now includes the Anbar Awakening as part of the same counter-insurgency, they now say. There is only one continuing war on terror...even if we invade Iran. Get it?
Ageist monster !!!
I'm thinking maybe Afghanistan wasn't a major conflict because most Americans supported it.There was less conflict here about it.
Or maybe by "major" he's talking about the gross profits. I may be wrong, but I don't think all the BushCo contractors robbed us as badly there as in the ensuing Iraq bonanza.
Mari, you reminded me of another funny one I heard today (I was out meeting some Clients and had to listen to righty radio after Obama's speeches in Germany. Sorry, couldn't resist)
A caller to Michael Medved got through and mentioned McCains Iraq/Pakistan border blooper. Medved, who paints himself as a well-informed intellectual, insisted that he hadn't heard that, and was "pretty sure" that McCain never said that.Then he went on, trying to pass off some BS about the countries being connected by policy, as if Grampy was speaking about a more figurative connection. Priceless!
You're just not used to seeing borders that are wider than they are long. The Iraq/Pakistan border is just a really, really thick border.
With border-dwellers.
Who call themselves Iranians...
Or maybe he was talking about the Iraq/Pakistan boarders.
I realize that they're only living in those areas because of the generosity of the U.S., but most folks don't really see them as just boarders. Perhaps referring to them as Iraqis and Pakistanis would have avoided the confusion.
By the way, the folks in the Fallujah suite are still complaining about the plumbing, and they need more towels.
Even more likely, Neon.A homonym problem for the McCain hating media. The line in question was transcribed as;
"...it’s a very hard struggle, particularly given the situation on the Iraq-Pakistan border.”
Border, or boarder, singular. It may only be one person, and the situation "on" them. It could just be lousy surf conditions in the Persian gulf, and the struggle of the Iraq-Pakistan boarder.Or an Iraqi/Pakistani person who cares for pets of vacationing customers.
"A homonym problem for the McCain hating media."
I don't know why you decided to change the subject and discuss alternative lifestyles, Col. But frankly, I think the media has been more than fair with the homonyms, slobbering and fawning all over them.
Aside from that, what you're saying about a "singular boarder" makes a lot of sense. Thank goodness we have the internets to exchange tubefulls of ideas like this.
It looks like McCain will continue the Bush tradition of rewriting history to fit his needs, and now he has CBS on the J-team along with ABC and Fox.
And look at this bit of sloppy reportage:
"And fewer U.S. troops were killed in May and June in Iraq than in Afghanistan," says Katie.... Oh yeah, I'll leave off the fact that the Taliban is picking up strength in Afghanistan and that may be why the numbers are up in Afghanistan --- the two figures have no connection, Katie, so what is the comparison supposed to prove? Idiot!
Wait, is McCain saying there is a major conflict in Iraq?
From Meet the Press last year (via Think Progress):
RUSSERT: Go back, Senator, to 2002. The administration saying we would be greeted as liberators. John McCain saying you thought success would be fairly easy.
MCCAIN: It was.
RUSSERT: In all honesty…
MCCAIN: It was easy, it was easy. I said the military operation would be easy. It was easy. We were greeting as liberators. Look at the films of when we rolled into Baghdad.
Much more important than McCain calling Iraq the first major conflict since 9/11 is this:
"We were losing the war in Iraq."
Where were you 2 years ago McCain? Didn't Harry Reid get pilloried for suggesting that we were losing the war? I don't recall McCain jumping to his defense then.
And here's one for all of you out there who like to keep bringing up your petty little "fact" about Bill Clinton letting Bin Laden go when he was in Ethiopia:
GUANTANAMO BAY NAVY BASE, Cuba — Soon after Osama bin Laden's driver got here in 2002, he told interrogators the identity of the al Qaeda chief's most senior bodyguard — then a fellow prison camp detainee.
But, inexplicably, the U.S. let the bodyguard go.
This startling information was revealed in the fourth day of the war crimes trial of Salim Hamdan, 37, facing conspiracy and material support for terror charges as an alleged member of bin Laden's inner circle.
Amazing, wasn't that? Bush actually had the guy in custody and let him go. How's that for incompetance?
That Obama sure is crafty!
Aw man, I am an idiot!!
I give it 5 stars!
Above the usual willful ignorance and general incompitance displayed by this golden star of neocon imperialism!
I laughed, I cried, It changed my life forever! I look forward to his end.
In a strictly nonhomophilic way.
This data is another telling indication of the glaring liberal bias in the main stream media. What's amazing is that the polls are still so close, in spite of the incessant hero worship that media figures direct towards saint Obama on the news everyday.
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=301702713742569
More evidence that those closest to the source and with the most information favor liberals.
Makes a person almost ashamed to claim to be conservative, doesn't it?
Interesting, Thomp, but a more revealing study would be about those producing the stories and those who set the agenda for the networks and their contributions to political parties.
I also would like to see the contributions of the anchorpeople and those who bring the news to us, not merely those who work in media.
"Only the anchors on the Fair and Balanced network seem to maintain any objectivity, upholding at least some journalistic integrity."
That has got to be the most hilarious thing I have read this week. Thanks for the laugh.
"This data is another telling indication of the glaring liberal bias in the main stream media."
More conservative think tanks putting up contrived and concocted studies and research to try to back up their big lie about the media being liberal, and it is a big lie. The media is right wing conservative.
Liar McCain's Media, as Crooks & Liars http://www.crooksandliars.com so accurately calls them, has TONS of stories debunking these lying conservatives! The Daily Howler http://www.dailyhowler.com has in their archives stoires about how reporters ADMITTED to favoring Liar Bush in 2000, and how these right wing conservative reporters AND their right wing conservative media bosses wanted Liar Bush to win in 2000, and how the conservative news media showed favoritism to Liar Bush in BOTH 2000 and 2004.
Add to that, the RIGHT WING CONSERVATIVE GOP-Viacom-CBS and their right wing Republican Hate Hag Katie Couric, whitewashed Liar McCain's lies from her "interview" because both Couric and GOP-Viacom-CBS want Liar McCain to be the president.
He said, "Go to the country of the two rivers."
I don't think that's the exact quote, but bin Laden did say something to that effect. What Sen. McCain conveniently forgets is that when bin Laden said that, US troops were already in Iraq and it was said as an expression of support for the insurgency against US occupation.
Which means it not only confirms that al-Qaeda was not in Iraq before the invasion, it also means that to whatever extent Iraq is "the central front in the War on Terror(reg.)(c)(pat.pand.)," it's because we made it such.
The same thing has been brought up by Wesley, I believe. This years data? Lotta people giving demcratic that are new to doing so this year.
Where's the meat? An example on the media carrying though a liberal stance in the face of criticis to sucess in the national dielectic?
LINO's?
It's obvious BOTH McCain and CFR Couric are liars and liars by omission and Couric is as despicable as they come w/ her PROPAGANDA , "Sen. McCain you seem frustrated w/ Sen . Obama " worst than a softball question , a leading statement to emphasize his disdain for Obama's positions .
CBS and CFR couric did a great job also juxtaposing images in the background of troops marching gallantly into " victory " , which really means a better OCCUPATION , what McCain is to cowardly to say . The GRAPH was ready to go after the interview , provided by CBS to confirm JM's allegations , yet civilian deaths HAVE TO be higher, because they don't include the high street crime , kidnapping and rapes that all shot up over 300 % . She also failed to acknowledge Electricity is out most of the time , Sewage is causing illness and deaths to children and old . Unemployment is over 50% .
Council on Foreign Relations CBS & Couric are in the tank for McCain and so is most of the other parrots in the media and w/o an honest media , Obama will LOOSE , he will LOOSE . Also bcs he's allowing McSame to label him with the scurrilous statement " he's rather lose the war and win the election " , so if OBAMA doesn't t take off the gloves and shoot down that baseless charge , it's over ba - by . But the real problem for Obama he's arguing the same side of the coin, both want a continuous occupation of Iraq . Hence why Obama never says he wants a complete withdrawal , just " combat troops ' which are only about 30 % of occupation forces , leaving over 100,000 including many many mercenaries .
Read or watch pres. Richard Haass of the CFR.org says about SOVEREIGNTY and watch his interview w/ Katie Couric on youtube . She never brings it up , but shows you how thew CFR CABAL is infecting the news .
Remember this the NEOCONS will get 110% from McCain and even though Obama says " we need troops in Iraq to protect out interests " and " pull combat troops out of Iraq " to move to Afghanistan, to spread more death and destruction , he's still not fully trusted by the neocons .
Yeah, This is the guy who knows how to win wars... at least when he remembers which ones we're fighting in.
AND YES, THAT IS A KNOCK ON HIS AGE, BECAUSE THE ONLY EXPLANATION FOR THIS OTHER THAN SENILITY IS STUPIDITY.