First reported allegation in Corsi's Obama attack book is false
SUMMARY: A WorldNetDaily.com article about author Jerome Corsi's forthcoming book, The Obama Nation, asserts that the book "points out" that "Barack Obama admitted using drugs in his autobiography but never revealed if or when he stopped." In fact, Obama wrote in his autobiography, Dreams from My Father, that he "stopped getting high" shortly after moving to New York City to attend Columbia University.
A July 30 WorldNetDaily.com article about author Jerome Corsi's forthcoming book, The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality (Threshold Editions), asserts that the book "points out" that "Barack Obama admitted using drugs in his autobiography but never revealed if or when he stopped." WND quotes Corsi, who is also a WND staff reporter, asking in the book: "Did Obama ever use drugs in his days as a community organizer in Chicago, or when he was a state senator from Illinois? ... How about in the U.S. Senate? If Obama quit using drugs, the public inquiry certain to occur in a general election campaign for the presidency will most certainly aim at the when, how and why questions George W. Bush successfully avoided." But Corsi's reported allegation that Obama "never revealed if or when he stopped" using drugs is false: Obama wrote in his autobiography, Dreams from My Father (Crown, 1995), that he "stopped getting high" shortly after moving to New York City to attend Columbia University as an undergraduate.
From Dreams From My Father (Page 120):
When Sadik lost his own lease, we moved in together. And after a few months of closer scrutiny, he began to realize that the city had indeed had an effect on me, although not the one he'd expected. I stopped getting high. I ran three miles a day and fasted on Sundays. For the first time in years, I applied myself to my studies and started keeping a journal of daily reflections and very bad poetry. Whenever Sadik tried to talk me into hitting a bar, I'd beg off with some tepid excuse, too much work or not enough cash.
As the WorldNetDaily article mentioned, Corsi is the co-author of Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry, a book that contains false and baseless attacks on Sen. John Kerry's military service. During and after the 2004 election, critics rebuked the media for having taken so long to challenge the smears against Kerry by the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth in Unfit for Command and in the news media, raising the question for the media: Will they have absorbed the lessons of their highly flawed Swift Boat coverage and give more immediate and more thorough scrutiny to Corsi's new book?
From Dreams From My Father (Pages 119-120):
Sadik tipped his coffee cup toward me in mock salute, his eyes searching for any immediate signs of change. And in the coming months he would continue to observe me as I traveled, like a large lab rat, through the byways of Manhattan. He would suppress a grin when the seat I had offered to a middle-aged woman on the subway was snatched up by a burly young man. At Bloomingdale's, he would lead me past human mannequins who spritzed perfume into the air and watch my reaction as I checked over the eye-popping price tags on winter coats. He would offer me lodging again when I gave up the apartment on 109th for lack of heat, and accompany me to Housing Court when it turned out that the sublessors of my second apartment had failed to pay the rent and run off with my deposit.
"Tooth and claw, Barack. Stop worrying about the rest of these bums out here and figure out how you're going to make some money out of this fancy degree you'll be getting."
When Sadik lost his own lease, we moved in together. And after a few months of closer scrutiny, he began to realize that the city had indeed had an effect on me, although not the one he'd expected. I stopped getting high. I ran three miles a day and fasted on Sundays. For the first time in years, I applied myself to my studies and started keeping a journal of daily reflections and very bad poetry. Whenever Sadik tried to talk me into hitting a bar, I'd beg off with some tepid excuse, too much work or not enough cash. One day, before leaving the apartment in search of better company, he turned to me and offered his most scathing indictment.
"You're becoming a bore."
I knew he was right, although I wasn't sure myself what exactly had happened. In a way, I was confirming Sadik's estimation of the city's allure, I suppose; its consequent power to corrupt. With the Wall Street boom, Manhattan was humming, new developments cropping up everywhere; men and women barely out of their twenties already enjoying ridiculous wealth, the fashion merchants fast on their heels. The beauty, the filth, the noise, and the excess, all of it dazzled my senses; there seemed no constraints on originality of lifestyles or the manufacture of desire -- a more expensive restaurant, a finer suit of clothes, a more exclusive nightspot, a more beautiful woman, a more potent high. Uncertain of my ability to steer a course of moderation, fearful of falling into old habits, I took on the temperament if not the convictions of a street corner preacher, prepared to see temptation everywhere, ready to overrun a fragile will.
From the July 30 WorldNetDaily.com article:
Barack Obama admitted using drugs in his autobiography but never revealed if or when he stopped, points out an explosive new book on the Democratic presidential candidate written by the co-author of 2004's "Unfit for Command," the Swift Boat exposé that impacted John Kerry's campaign for the White House.
"I blew a few smoke rings, remembering those years," Obama wrote in "Dreams From My Father," in a section of the book about his college days. "Pot had helped, and booze; maybe a little blow when you could afford it."
In "The Obama Nation," a new book by Jerome Corsi, a WND staff writer, the author speculates about why Obama disclosed his drug use.
"Why Obama chose to disclose he smoked marijuana and used cocaine at all remains a mystery," Corsi writes. "Perhaps Obama felt the information would eventually come forward from his school buddies. So, to minimize the damage from this concealed fact, Obama possibly judged self-disclosure was the best route."
Obama wrote that he stopped short of shooting heroin when it was offered to him by a friend.
"I'd looked at him standing there, surrounded by big slabs of salami and roast beef, and right then an image popped into my head of an air bubble, shine and round like a pearl, rolling quietly through a vein and stopping my heart. ..."
Corsi points out Obama has yet to explain whether he ever sold drugs or when he stopped using them.
"Did Obama ever use drugs in his days as a community organizer in Chicago, or when he was a state senator from Illinois?" Corsi asks. "How about in the U.S. Senate? If Obama quit using drugs, the public inquiry certain to occur in a general election campaign for the presidency will most certainly aim at the when, how and why questions George W. Bush successfully avoided."
Obama linked drug use in his college years with his struggle for identity and specifically with issues of race.
















FIRST REPORTED ALLEGATION IN CORSI'S OBAMA ATTACK BOOK IS FALSE
As will be the second, third, fourth...
the when, how and why questions George W. Bush successfully avoided."
Wonder how he did that? By having his entire pre-Texas governor biography "scrubbed" by Poppy, Babs, and Karl?
Sean Hannity to-do-list;
1) Grab morning coffee.
2) Grab White House talking points off bedroom fax.
3) Grab phone to H&C producers > "Have you booked this Corsi guy on my show yet??!! DO IT!"
Irony specified "anyone in his RIGHT MIND"...
So, Tommy, WITH?
Nowhere on Sean Hannity's To-Do list:
1 - Acknowledge that his hate-filled book may have contributed to the church shooting in Knoxville last Sunday. (A copy of "Let Freedom Ring" was found in the shooter's house.)
2 - Apologize for spreading hate in order to make a buck.
3 - Convince Bill O'Reilly and Michael Weiner to do likewise.
"Have you booked this Corsi guy on my show yet??!! DO IT!"
Corsi is on HANNITY & colmes tonight...
"Why Obama chose to disclose he smoked marijuana and used cocaine at all remains a mystery," Corsi writes. "Perhaps Obama felt the information would eventually come forward from his school buddies. So, to minimize the damage from this concealed fact, Obama possibly judged self-disclosure was the best route."
So, is Corsi saying that keeping stuff hidden is the way to go? It sure sounds like he suggests that it is with his first comment because he says that it's a mystery why Obama would reveal it.
Except in the second and third sentences, Corsi explains quite well why Obama would reveal it.
Obama was being honest in the book. I know that's a foreign concept to many of the right, especially those like Corsi whose currency is the smear.
If the Obama campaign doesn't counter-attack these these liars full bore, and expose them for who they are, they'll be publicly marred just like Kerry - whose greatest blunder in '04 was assuming people wouldn't buy the Swift Boaters' line of crap - a challenge, to be sure, when Fox "News" and Hannity were too happy to book John O'Neill nightly, and give him free air to shovel his fiction about Kerry's war record.
Yes, this new book Obama's past is bogus - but never assume the American public is too smart to buy it.
No one ever went broke betting on a horse called "Stupidity."
But from the pathetic history of the Republican slime machine in untruthful character assassination how can anyone in his right mind take any of this stuff with any credence?
There are some out there that will.
Let me tell you something-- Obama went to Occidental College in L.A. his first two years. It was hardly a hotbed of drug use and partying-- it was absolutely nerd central, as it still is. So there's nothing there pre-Columbia.
If anything, the highlight of those years was driving over to Trader Joe's, or hanging out at Tommy's in Eagle Rock. Big whoop. He'd probably agree, too. That's why there's nothing for him to 'reveal.'
When is Jerome Corsi going to admit that he's never stopped lying?
When Hell freezes over?
consciences
egads that SB consciousness. Husband.. talking.. too...much
I don't care about the DVR, dude! :-0) Sorry!!
Cool
Like a lion in the shade
This beatnik snaps for you
Um...Julia darlin are you stoned? Hehehe ;-)
While there are a few folks left on the planet [mostly 75yrs & over plus a handful of straight arrows] that never indulged, I doubt Obama's past drug use would have made any significant difference. So of course the suggestion that he never "quit" is the desperate smear tactic these guys are gonna use.
Good luck guys. The only one who'll be hyperventilating over this is probably Hannity & a few other chumps.
Um...Julia darlin are you stoned? Hehehe ;-)
No Honey, I'm just high on Obama (the next POTUS), life and of course you!
Hey, "W" was drinking up until 40 years of age.
Which would explain all those dead brain cells ;-)
Hey whom among us here didn't at least smoke some weed in high school/college & even beyond. Big frigin deal....well maybe Pearlene didn't, I think she said she's 74, she might have been on the cusp & missed out on the fun.
You know what darlin? I'm probably gonna vote for Barack. His inexperience did make me hesitate, but he's an intelligent guy, & I've got confidence that he processes leadership qualities. And he'll be smart enough to surround himself with a top notch cabinet. Go Obama!
Mmmmm, I must be high on juliajuana :-O
You know what darlin? I'm probably gonna vote for Barack. His inexperience did make me hesitate, but he's an intelligent guy, & I've got confidence that he processes leadership qualities. And he'll be smart enough to surround himself with a top notch cabinet. Go Obama!
Mmmmm, I must be high on juliajuana :-O
Congrats, there Jeter. I was hoping and praying you'd come around. I knew eventually my luv for you would prevail in getting you to do the right thing! :-0)
Well Julia darlin, I've always told you I was fair & open-minded. Your good lovin sealed the deal :-)
BTW darlin, I left you a serenade on the Eric Boehlert thread, don't know if you saw it. It's underneath the only other remaining post [yours] that survived the purging of our love notes ;-)
Hey darlin :-)
Sorry I got involved earlier on another thread with 2 of my favorite moonbats [sarcasm intended] & just got back here now.
I'll go check out the other thread.
Oops, read that wrong. I thought you were dissing his song. But I still wanted to insult you anyway so it's all good. Besides I'm high on Obama and the fact that Jeter is possibly going to vote for him.
(yeah, that's my problem). Sure, um hmmm.
Anybody got some weed. Obama?
Hey Colonel,
I'm a Gene Pitney fan from way back. And I agree Town Without Pity is underrated.
Hey whom among us here didn't at least smoke some weed in high school/college & even beyond. Big frigin deal....well maybe Pearlene didn't, I think she said she's 74, she might have been on the cusp & missed out on the fun. - Jeter2
I certainly did. What's more, I've been informed by my soon-to-be 80 year old mother that she smoked a little in her young adulthood.
Jeter sez: "Hey whom among us here didn't at least smoke some weed in high school/college & even beyond. Big frigin deal....well maybe Pearlene didn't, I think she said she's 74, she might have been on the cusp & missed out on the fun."
Let's see, Pearlene in her 20's, Las Vegas in the late 50's. The Rat Pack, The Moulin Rouge after hours, Buddy Hackett, Joe Wilson...
Not to mention the fact that I saw her Harley parked out in front of the Sanddollar last weekend...
Ha! All good points Neon.
Pearlene is a pretty hip cool lady...hell she's probably still smoking weed ;-)
Jeter: Hey whom among us here didn't at least smoke some weed in high school/college & even beyond.
Oddly enough, I didn't. Never drank alcohol, either. But I have my own set of vices, so I don't set myself up as a judge (that ol' beam-in-the-eye thing); I'm glad that you don't judge others, either.
Cheers! (with a raised glass of milk)
Hey, "W" was drinking up until 40 years of age.
I'm still not convinced he stopped drinking. There's the Pretzel Incident, numerous falls and unexplained bruises on his face, and numerous pictures of him at summit meetings with various heads of state with drink glasses on the table in front of him. Not to mention his inability to speak coherently...
Tommy, May I answer?
Let me ask any of you a question? If you were advising the Obama campaign, would you recommend he address these books and their fabrications, or ignore it?
Not ignore it but have the campaign send out reps to knock down the lies point by point. On all cable news shows (Except FOX, they are hopeless)
If yes, in what way or what forum?
"I'd ignore it. I'd ignore the negative campaiging too."
Yeah. Right. and that just worked SO well for John Kerry, didn't it?
This is what cracks me up about these stupid smear attempts;
Let's say you were born in 1942, at the front end of WWII, before the baby boom really hit.In the summer of love, you were 25. If you didn't touch any drugs, not even weed, you were probably a cult member or just a complete nerdy douchebag. If it just wasn't your thing, you probably weren't that shocked by your peers who did do it.
You're 66 now. About 5 years younger than Grampy McCain.Grampy McCain is at the youthful end of the demographic who has any sort of negative reaction to a candidates having smoked pot in college. Even his group has to have some surviving beatniks or somebody who doesn't give a flying funk either.
I know, it's just more reinforcement for the geezers who have no intention of voting for Obama anyway, but I wish they'd just admit the black guy with the funny name scares them and quit subjecting everybody else to their nonsense.
Racism no longer exists? But, but....
FoxNews was telling me this evening that Obama pulled the race card with his comments today! Obama talked about how off-base McCain's latest attacks are, and FoxNews says that his comments are evidence that he's exploiting his race!
Who do I believe?
Hey Colonel, on of my fond memories of the late 60's was a trip to Colorado with a fellow hippie friend. We decorated her VW bug with "OM" on the front and a rising sun on the back & took off from her home in Alliance, Nebraska...the first night, near Estes Park, we met a group camping nearby who invited us to join them. so we slept in a big tent &
next morning, a guy in his 40s (he'd be in his 80's now, older than grampy) cooked breakfast for all of us. He was a businessman most of the year, but for a month out of the year he took off time to travel around with Young People and talk with them and find out what they were thinking. We were blown away by his cheerfulness, tolerance and open-ness, since the adults we were used to were stuck in their mindset about life & moderately unhappy.
We'll make some room...we could get the place next door, too...Our next door neighbors might move away by then. You'd have to get rid of their surplus cars, though...they have about 2 dozen. Some of them even run.
Your not as think as you stoned I am.
Flashback of the Adam's Family, Natasha asked a guest if he minded if she smoked. With permission given, her whole body let off smoke.
O-)
Pretty fast moving fossils Mary.
;-)
So, I disagree with the angry response idea, it makes victims of us. As much as I display my fury and anger here, I realize that every time I do so the con jobs score a few points. Anger is the Republican way, anger is their tool.
We already have one unstable, hot-head in the race. His name is John McCain. This is Barrack's chance, yet again, to delineate the clear contrast in choice between himself and McCain and the kind of people that McCain has working on his behalf.
Round,
Since you are an honest guy and deserve clarification on what the Governor is repeating about something I once said on an unrelated topic, of course he is taking it out of context as it had nothing to do with these books that are being written about Obama.
Your point is a good one.
So these books are not part of the "rightwing onslaught that he will face, far into the fall campaign"?
So, as far at these attack books go, you don't "sincerely hope that Barack Obama puts himself right in the middle of it and fights back hard, hit them in the gut with this crap and expose it for what it is."?
Ok... that's for clearing that up.
See, but Tommy subscribes to the line of attack that doesn't use any evidence to back up their allegations.
So, when you actually use his own words to attack his position, he's baffled. It's a foreign concept to him!
He pissed and moaned about Brabantio (spelled it right again!) using Tommy's own words against him a couple of times in the past few days. Somehow he's missed that Media Matters is all about context and using someone's own words against them!
Irony and Tommy:
You're both right. The best thing to do would be to make the entire book into a joke; laughter deflates everything. Just proving the book to be lies isn't enough, getting angry is playing into their hands--laughter is anathema to this kind of deception.
I saw Corsi's first interview on Fox (no doubt the first of many over the next several weeks), and judging from his presentation, I doubt his little book will have much (if any) impact on Obama's campaign - chiefly, because Corsi and John O'Neill's Swift Boat liars were able to exploit the potent emotional residue of the Vietnam War by attacking Kerry's patriotism vis-a-vis his anti-war protests after he got home.
Corsi doesn't have that same emotional edge on Obama.
All he was able to produce in his Fox interview was a laundry list of people (all lefty radicals, don'tcha know) whom Corsi claims are Obama's ideological soul mates from Rev Wright to Malcolm X to Chavez.
Corsi also calls his Obama's father as an Islamic radical, and an alcoholic. I can only imagine how he drags Obama's mother thru the mud.
However, amidst all this noise, Corsi doesn't have much to back anything up (a lot of his material has been floating around the blogs for months anyhow) much less a group of old soldiers who never met John Kerry, much less served alongside the man in Vietnam.
So my prediction is that Corsi's book will make a splash among the Fox crowd, then quickly die off into the obscurity it so rightly deserves.
"I'd ignore it. I'd ignore the negative campaiging too."
Yeah. Right. and that just worked SO well for John Kerry, didn't it?
I never said he should respond agressively. I just don't think he should IGNORE them - because that does NOT WORK...hence the reference to Kerry, who tried that and it didn't work.
He should respond - preferabley with humor - which can be devastating when done right. Surely there are enough talented people around Obama, to say nothing of the man himself, to be able to turn these lies back on the liars.
1. Release point by point refutation, in print, to all media outlets. Top it with a statement saying the campaign would prefer that absolutely no mention or publicity be given to this trash, but that if any notice is given, then the publication or station must in fairness print or air the campaign's full response.
2. Also say that the publication or station, if it gives this trash any notice, also should ask the McCain campaign whether it denounces and disowns any connection with these allegations and these people. Demand that the medium also do its job and investigate whether there is ANY connection or ties between the folks putting out these lies and ANYONE associated or affiliated with the McCain campaign.
3. Encourage any medium that does give notice to this trash to, through whatever editorial (opinion) function it has, brand these books as the worst sort of lies and unpatriotic trash, which tear down our system of government and the American way of life.
4. Sue, with the ultimate purpose of bankrupting, any publication or station that does not play fair and present the truth regarding these books.
Ask conservatives if Corsi speaks for them. Ask McCain if that's what his campaign is about. Ask McCain if he believes any of the accusations. Ask McCain if anyone should ever read Corsi's book. Why debunk him if you can get McCain to do it for you?
Like with Savage and Coulter, Corsi should be made synonymous with republicanism until the republicans throw him overboard. If the republicans don't kick that crap out of their party, then that crap IS their party.
It didn't work to ignore slander and libel for Kerry, but Kerry had nowhere near the momentum Obama has. I would say play it close to the vest only if these books DON'T get any traction. If they do, due to the best efforts of our young patriot Sean Hannity and his ilk, then possibly a statement or two is in order.
What say you, Tommy? (said in my best papabear voice...)
Let me ask any of you a question? If you were advising the Obama campaign, would you recommend he address these books and their fabrications, or ignore it? If yes, in what way or what forum? - Tommy
I'd also like to jump in. We all saw Kerry get clobbered for his silence when he chose to take the high road and ignore the swift boat smears. He and his staff probably really believed that the issue would get little coverage and go away faster if ignored. Hindsight shows that they were wrong. Obama's team will have learned from that.
Obama himself should address it when he is asked about it. He should take a calm, dignified approach with just a touch of anger. He could use surrogates to provide a more vocal and enthusiastic approach.
In addition, he should be willing to use the words lie, lying and liar when talking about it. I hate the common use of less antagonistic euphemisms for those words in cases where they're referring to a definite falsehood. It leaves some with the impression that there may be some small bit of basis to the smears. If it's a lie, call it a lie.
I very much agree with you there. Some real declarative adjectives would certainly help. It's time to use them on these SOBs.
Corsi was a co-author with John O'Neill on Unfit for Command -- had equal billing on the cover and inside the book.
However, sometime after Unfit for Command hit the stands, Corsi's background surfaced. O'Neill then went around saying Corsi wasn't a co-author -- no kidding.
How to combat Corsi's lies? Publish the truth about his background.
Doug Reese
Nice to see you on here, Doug. I agree: here's a MM item about him:
http://mediamatters.org/items/200408060010
I liked Obama's commercial after McCain disgraced himself with his ad...
accusing Obama of not visiting the troops because he "couldn't bring camera's along."
Obama could really rub Grampy's nose in this if he wants to. I think he should.
I would say it depends on how inflammatory the Republicans get. I have not read Obama's books, but I will go out on a fairly safe limb,here, to say I assume the record is probably clear. So, if the questions come up with the press: just answers the questions and submit that the record is clear.
If the Republicans and the Smear Machine gets fired up I would say : make a formal but somewhat casual statement clarifying the matter and (and I assume that this request will be justified) _demand_ a formal public and personal apology from John McCain.
He is, ultimately, responsible for the character of his campaign and the behavior of the Republican Party as he is the Presumptive Republican Nominee for President of the United States.
He speaks for the Republican Party. Hannity notwithstanding.
"If Obama quit using drugs, the public inquiry certain to occur in a general election campaign for the presidency will most certainly aim at the when, how and why questions George W. Bush successfully avoided"
Wow! So the implication is that Bush probably took drugs, that he avoided any questions of his drug use, not that he refuted or disproved such allegations. Good to know they might be willing to throw Bush under the bus.
Speaking of "self-disclosure"...
Comparing the speeches and especially the actions of Obama and Duhhbya over just the last seven years, who would you judge as the one who's still a stoner?
why doesn't Media Matters ever link the actual article they are citing, even Worldnetdaily does that.
why doesn't Media Matters ever link the actual article they are citing, even Worldnetdaily does that.
Here is the first paragraph of MMFA's srite at the top of this page:
A July 30 WorldNetDaily.com article about author Jerome Corsi's forthcoming book, The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality (Threshold Editions), asserts that the book "points out" that "Barack Obama admitted using drugs in his autobiography but never revealed if or when he stopped." WND quotes Corsi, who is also a WND staff reporter, asking in the book: "Did Obama ever use drugs in his days as a community organizer in Chicago, or when he was a state senator from Illinois? ... How about in the U.S. Senate? If Obama quit using drugs, the public inquiry certain to occur in a general election campaign for the presidency will most certainly aim at the when, how and why questions George W. Bush successfully avoided." But Corsi's reported allegation that Obama "never revealed if or when he stopped" using drugs is false: Obama wrote in his autobiography, Dreams from My Father (Crown, 1995), that he "stopped getting high" shortly after moving to New York City to attend Columbia University as an undergraduate.
If you click on the word "article" in the first like, it takes you to the article at World Nut Daily. Here's the link:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=70991
This man Corsi gives a whole new meaning to the word
FILTH
Maybe someone should ask Jerome Corsi if he's stopped beating his wife - answer "yes" or "no".
:-)
My products now contain 33% more trans fats. We even have a new animated spokes-mascot, Fat Tranny.
Better watch it, Col. Schwarzenegger might come and steal your tranny now that the librrrrl state of Cali has banned the stuff.
Damn nanny govt. is stomping on the consumer's right to buy trans fat now. What else is next? Ban on the use of asbestos in school buildings? No more lead materials in drinking water systems?!? People consciously choose to use those harmful materials! Their minimizing you options now! XD
What they're doing is taking away people's choice...
I've talked to some parents in my neighborhood and they would rather give their kids toys from China.
Why?
Because they get feedback from their kids. Good old communication. The kids say the toxic toys (especially the ones with very high lead content) just plain taste better.
Gov't just needs to butt out, and not take away children's enjoyment of toys.
Oh, bravo! Bravo!
That was so beautifully done. <sniff>
Excuse me. I need a moment...
The thing that struck me most is not how there might be some legitimate
political debate to be had out there in this presidential campaign, but that it is clear: Hannity and Corsido not really believe in the American system of checks and balances.
They fear Obama as if Obama would be a dictator with unfettered Presidential powers!
I wonder why they would fear that?
Might it be it is because they have favored the dimantling the constitutional powers of our three branches of government to give unbalanced favor to the Executive branch?
I was wondering how long it was going to take for something like this. I keep hearing about an 'October surprise'. I guess some people are getting nervous with Obama in the lead, and they couldn't wait til October. It's a sad day when folks have to stoop to such tactics to not only sell a book, but try and stir up an election. God help us all if Mccain wins this thing. GOD HELP US ALL!!!
my2cents
I think it was in response to my comment about Corsi's past, and how it was so bad even John O'Neill distanced himself. I see MMFA has pulled some of that up on their home page.
Doug Reese
How about this one...Obama calls for a major press conference.
To begin, he pulls out a copy of this book and informs the press that he is will to answer any questions as long as the reporter read the book, not the Hannity notes, I mean Cliff notes version. Or, He opens the book and disputes the llying liars' lies one by one. I realize this would expose the book even more but it will be fodder for many news cycles.
As a special bonus, the Obama camp can have clips of the lying liars lies on tape and go after those people also. And then, at the conclusion, Obama can hand out his book.