About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

McCain's reversals don't stop Harwood from continuing to use "maverick" moniker

August 07, 2008 12:31 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: In his latest New York Times article, CNBC's John Harwood continued a pattern of repeatedly and uncritically referring to Sen. John McCain as a maverick, without noting his own role in promoting that reputation or noting McCain's rightward shift on high-profile issues or acknowledging his numerous falsehoods. Harwood has also frequently referred to McCain as a maverick while reporting on the primary and general election campaigns for NBC, MSNBC, and CNBC.

55 Comments

In an August 4 article, New York Times political writer and CNBC chief Washington correspondent John Harwood claimed that "[t]he fervor inspired by Mr. [Barack] Obama's history-making candidacy poses challenges. Just as it partially obscured Mrs. [Hillary] Clinton's own assault on the glass ceiling limiting women in politics, it has overshadowed Mr. [John] McCain's war-hero biography and reputation as a maverick." In referring to McCain's "reputation as a maverick," Harwood continued a pattern of repeatedly and uncritically referring to McCain as a maverick, having the reputation of a maverick, or having a maverick brand, without noting his own role in promoting that reputation or noting McCain's rightward shift on high-profile issues such as immigration and taxes, or acknowledging his numerous falsehoods.

Harwood has previously written: "Mr. McCain's maverick stances could strengthen his brand of Republicanism by distinguishing it from that of a president with an approval rating around 30 percent. Moreover, race-based resistance to Mr. Obama's bid to become the first black president will prove greater with the general electorate than inside the left-leaning universe of Democratic primary voters."

In addition to his reference to McCain as a maverick in print, Harwood has also frequently referred to him as such while reporting on the primary and general election campaigns for NBC, MSNBC, and CNBC:

  • During the July 11 edition of MSNBC's Race for the White House, Harwood claimed: "[A]ny campaign has to have message discipline to try to succeed. The problem is that John McCain's message is not inherently coherent because of who he is. Yes, he is a maverick. Yes, he's also a conservative Republican."
  • During the June 10 edition of MSNBC's Hardball, Harwood claimed: "Well, I think with John McCain -- he doesn't fit the -- our political types quite as neatly as some other potential nominees might have. I think they see somebody who sort of shines through as a maverick, a hero, the whole Vietnam War hero thing."
  • During the June 9 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe, Harwood claimed that McCain's criticism of the media is in part "a way for John McCain, who has been such a maverick, to try to unify the Republican Party."
  • During the June 2 edition of Race for the White House, Harwood said to host David Gregory: "[Y]ou're going to see a lot more of that maverick status beginning tomorrow night, David, when he gives that speech on Tuesday night in Louisiana, even more forcefully distancing himself from President Bush. And we're going to see some of that John McCain we saw in 2000."
  • During the May 13 edition of Morning Joe, Harwood stated: "And in this election, who rose to the top? But -- not the establishment candidates, not the off-the-rack Republican, Mitt Romney ... or the establishment candidate, Hillary Clinton. It's John McCain, maverick, at odds with Bush on some things."
  • During the May 11 edition of CNBC's Wall Street Journal Report, Harwood claimed: "Energy is where the divide gets fuzzier. Clinton favors a cap and trade system to regulate carbon emissions. Obama favors the same thing, but so does John McCain, so often a maverick Republican."
  • During the April 30 edition of Hardball, Harwood said to host Chris Matthews: "You know, John McCain's brand, Chris, has been pretty well-established since 2000. He's likable. He's a maverick. He's a war hero. All of that redounds to his benefit."
  • During the April 16 edition of Morning Joe, Harwood stated that "[t]he maverick brand is intact for John McCain."

Additionally, during an interview with the Atlanta Journal-Constitution in June, Harwood referred to McCain as a maverick:

Q: What do you think has to be done to fix gridlock?

A: I don't think it's an accident that we have different kinds of Democratic and Republican nominees. The establishment Democrat, Clinton, lost. And all of the guys trying to be the establishment Republican lost to the maverick Republican, McCain. Each party has nominated someone who has explicitly embraced the idea of crossing divides.

Now, an objection to that which the Republicans offer is, "Yeah, but he [Obama] is really a liberal Democrat and that's his program." That's mostly true. However, you cannot ignore the meaning of what the guy has embraced as his overall theme. So I think he wouldn't necessarily govern as a one-party leader.

John McCain is somebody who has quite openly defied his party time and time again. He voted against Bush's tax cuts. He pushed through campaign reform; conservatives hated it. He's for a cap on carbon emissions. That makes him different. I think both of these guys ... are going to draw on different sources of support, both financially and in votes, than Kerry and Bush did. And the more you scramble the bases underneath the politicians, the more chance there is for new arrangements in Washington.

From the July 11 edition of MSNBC's Race for the White House with David Gregory:

NOAH OPPENHEIM [co-author, The Intellectual Devotional]: You know, instead of trying to pander and try to get the base going, they should -- you know, John McCain is the maverick reformer. That is who he is. John McCain is not somebody who's going to light an arena on fire, and John McCain is not a guy who's going to excite, you know, James Dobson. It's just not going to happen. But John McCain does have a message that could resonate with the things that, you know, Reihan [Salam, panelist and The Atlantic associate editor] pointed out people are caring about right now, which is that the institutions in this country are failing the average American and they need to be fixed.

GREGORY: Does John -- does the McCain campaign have to emulate Bush of '04? Does it have to be run like a Fortune 500 company when that's not who he is?

HARWOOD: Well, any campaign has to have message discipline to try to succeed. The problem is that John McCain's message is not inherently coherent because of who he is. Yes, he is a maverick. Yes, he's also a conservative Republican. He makes it difficult for his campaign as well. And let's face it, the John McCain that Noah's talking about -- the maverick reformer -- is not particularly popular within the Republican Party, and he needs an enthusiastic Republican Party if he's going to win this election. It's a very, very tough spot that he's in.

From the June 10 edition of MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews:

MATTHEWS: John, when people look at John McCain, do they look at security or do they look at familiarity? What do they really see there?

HARWOOD: Well, I think with John McCain -- he doesn't fit the -- our political types quite as neatly as some other potential nominees might have. I think they see somebody who sort of shines through as a maverick, a hero, the whole Vietnam War hero thing. I think people haven't quite gotten a fix, Chris, on exactly what he would mean economically. On Iraq, he certainly has the national security bona fides in a broad sense, but the Iraq war is also unpopular. So there are a lot of crosscurrents there.

From the June 2 edition of MSNBC's Race for the White House:

GREGORY: You know, John, the question, though, for McCain is how much of his maverick status, how much of his political outsider status can he preserve as the standard-bearer of the party? You always look at him and at times, do you think it's just an uncomfortable fit?

HARWOOD: Well, you're going to see a lot more of that maverick status beginning tomorrow night, David, when he gives that speech on Tuesday night in Louisiana, even more forcefully distancing himself from President Bush. And we're going to see some of that John McCain we saw in 2000, 'cause the only way he can stay alive in this race -- the one other thing about serving only one term, think about the Democratic majorities that he's likely to face in Congress if he is elected. They're going to be bigger than they are right now, if you look at the current situation and what the polls are telling us. It'll be an awfully tough situation for a lame duck president to go in with stronger Democratic majorities.

From the May 11 edition of CNBC's Wall Street Journal Report (according to the Nexis transcript):

HARWOOD: Energy is where the divide gets fuzzier. Clinton favors a cap and trade system to regulate carbon emissions. Obama favors the same thing, but so does John McCain, so often a maverick Republican. And we may see more maverick stances this fall as both sides fight for the votes of independents.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by tommy (August 07, 2008 12:40 pm ET)
         

      The more people get to know McCain the more people will realize that he is what he is.  If you want to call him a "maverick",  call him a maverick.  If you want to call him a flip-flopping opportunistic seasoned politician, then call him that as well.

      The sting some feel, or the endearment others feel, over the "maverick"label  has lost it's luster......who cares. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (August 07, 2008 12:54 pm ET)
           

        The brain dead media still cares less enough about the truth to still define him as a maverick, not just merely call him "The Maverick." 

        But since we sensitive liberals just aren't apathetic enough toward the media, I guess we're the ones with the problem, right?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by tommy (August 07, 2008 12:59 pm ET)
             
          If it's a big deal to make sure McCain is stripped of that insidious label, then by all means correct the entire brain dead media for each and every usage.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by pete592 (August 07, 2008 1:05 pm ET)
               
            As I pointed out, they're not merely labeling him a maverick, they are literally defining him as one.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (August 07, 2008 2:29 pm ET)
                 
              Apparently Jack Cafferty disagrees. He just said all this maverick stuff is just a bunch of hooey.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by BottleBlonde (August 07, 2008 4:43 pm ET)
                 

              How dare you interrupt Tommy's WITH post with facts and information?

              He knows why Media Matters posts things like this. It's because portraying McCain as a maverick furthers the conservative agenda because it's inaccurate information about John McCain's actual behavior.

              The motivation of the MSM, or the impact on that statement by people who know better are not the issues. It's that it makes McCain appear different than he really is - different in a better way than he deserves to look based upon his behavior.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by tommy (August 07, 2008 4:54 pm ET)
                   
                Gee, really Sue?  You are right there with your finger on the pulse of  misinformation.  I had no idea why MMFA put this here, and I thought it was only to illicit a response from you, well, that must be the second reason.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Governor (August 07, 2008 5:00 pm ET)
                     
                  Virtually spotless dishes, Tommy, when will you learn!  MMFA put this here because journalists shouldn't act like they're selling us some stain remover.  Simple really.  I almost surpized that you still don't get.  
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by BottleBlonde (August 07, 2008 9:17 pm ET)
                     

                  Thanks for the admission that despite apparently posting here for years, and having the reasons why Media Matters post things here explained to you repeatedly, you still don't get it.

                  I'm not sure why you think it's such a wonderful admission to make, or so funny, but you are your own man, so do what makes you happy.

                  You demonstrated that you didn't understand or wouldn't understand why this was posted here. If you're now trying to say that you do understand why this is being posted here, then you're admitting that your objections are only a weak attempt to distract us and nothing more.

                  Report Abuse
    • Author by Governor (August 07, 2008 12:47 pm ET)
         

      "......who cares[?]"

      I do.  Members of the media should not market candidates and politicians. McCain's so-called "reputation of a maverick" is the product of Harwood's (and others') repetitive and off-base branding.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by DeminTX (August 07, 2008 12:51 pm ET)
           
        especially considering that he's voted with Bush 90-95% of the time.  A Maverick on what?  I do agree with Tommy on the "who cares" part.  However, the problem is the 30% that still support Bush eat this up as if anything would change with McBush in office.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by tommy (August 07, 2008 12:56 pm ET)
             
          The 30% that still support Bush probably detest the "maverick" label as much as many do here.  Those dieharders for Bush most likely never cared for McCain when he may have earned that label, back when he opposed Bush's tax cuts for example.  So I would doubt they care for that label either.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by tommy (August 07, 2008 12:51 pm ET)
           
        What about when the media "brands" or "markets" Obama as a rock star?  Are you as equally vociferous in your objections to that?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Governor (August 07, 2008 12:55 pm ET)
             
          That depends on how vociferous you say I am.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by pete592 (August 07, 2008 1:04 pm ET)
             

          If the media tries to literally define Obama as a rock star when he possesses no musical talent and does not put on rock concerts, that means the media has its collective head up its rear end.

          When the media tries to literally define McCain as a maverick when his words and actions reflect the opposite, that means the media has its collective head up its rear end.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by MoonbatYouBet (August 07, 2008 1:05 pm ET)
             

          I'm not certain that "rock star" and "maverick" are really comparable terms of endearment as the first points more to a general level of popularity/celebrity while the other is a reference to political standing.  But I do think that the credible news media, if there were such an animal, should not really be using either of those terms.

          But why does it get your knickers in such a twist whenever MM complains about the maverick thing?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by tommy (August 07, 2008 1:08 pm ET)
               
            I would say MMFA gets its knickers in a twist every time some media member utters such a ridiculously irrelevant label.  I just comment on it.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by MoonbatYouBet (August 07, 2008 1:12 pm ET)
                 

              Yes, MM jumps to point out the "maverick" label very often, no argument.  And you always comment something along the lines of "Get over it, this doesn't matter." 

              So I guess what I'm trying to say to you here is that MM is going to keep talking about this so maybe you should just get over it, it doesn't matter.  :)

              Report Abuse
              • Author by tommy (August 07, 2008 1:16 pm ET)
                   

                So in other words you only want to hear from those like you who are burnin', hoppin' mad over this "maverick" label?  Not from those who disagree? 

                I would say you need to get over it, not me.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by MoonbatYouBet (August 07, 2008 1:51 pm ET)
                     

                  But you misunderstand, I'm not all that engaged in the maverick thang.  Most of the time I skip over these entries on MMfA but today I'm just really bored.

                  I chalk it up to sheer laziness on the part of our useless media, once they find a label they stick with it regardless of whether the label has remained appropriate or not.  (It never really was appropriate, until positioning himself as a Presidential candidate McCain was always a centrist Republican, it was the shift of the party around him to the far right that made him seem like a rogue.  I've wondered how it was that Delay never managed to purge him with the rest of those who didn't toe the new line.)

                  What I find humorous here is that this is a cycle with no end:  MMfA is never going to stop complaining about the use of the Mav label and you will never stop complaining about MMfA's compaining about it.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by tommy (August 07, 2008 1:56 pm ET)
                       

                    I agree with you about the laziness of the media, or their insistence on labeling everyone and everything to highlight in their graphics, or just for convenience.....you are absolutely right.  

                    But this maverick silliness has outlived any bite anymore, at least for me.  Of course I don't think McCain is a maverick, but I also think it's essentially harmless. It has been around for so long that its nearly meaningless.  And now that McCain is the nominee people will see him for what he is, regardless of some decades old label once affixed to him and still used occasionally. 

                    Report Abuse
              • Author by Governor (August 07, 2008 1:29 pm ET)
                   

                And you always comment something along the lines of "Get over it, this doesn't matter."

                 

                I think his 8 posts about the Media's Maverick in this thread alone underscore just how little he cares.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by tommy (August 07, 2008 1:34 pm ET)
                     
                  Pointing out your overreactions here is part of the fun, Governor.  And knowing you count my posts is just gravy.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by BottleBlonde (August 07, 2008 9:23 pm ET)
                       
                    Yeah, your constant protestations that you don't understand why Media Matters is covering something, your repeated WITH posts when the reasons are clear, and your consistent personal attacks on those people who do the best job of putting your arguments where they deserve, in the dustbin, show your overreaction, because you're so frightened of the power of Media Matters. Your pathology is showing.
                    Report Abuse
            • Author by pete592 (August 07, 2008 1:13 pm ET)
                 
              They're not labeling him with it, they're defining him with it.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by tommy (August 07, 2008 1:19 pm ET)
                   

                Then your beef is with MMFA, because they say "maverick" is a moniker, which is a nickname, or a label. 

                Perhaps you should contact them for a headline rewrite > "McCain's reversals don't stop Harwood from continuing to use "maverick" [ as a definition]"

                Report Abuse
            • Author by neondesert (August 07, 2008 1:20 pm ET)
                 

              I disagree that it is irrelevant.  It's the only thing McCain has going for him.

              And viewing it from the perspective of your typical "last week in October" voter, "Maverick" has a good connotation.  James Garner made it cool.  We can't let McCain drag the term through the hog trough.

              Report Abuse
            • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (August 07, 2008 2:31 pm ET)
                 

              I would say MMFA gets its knickers in a twist every time some media member utters such a ridiculously irrelevant label.

              Tommy, the maverick label is was made John McCain a household name back in 2000. His popularity with the public came from reporters constant use of the word maverick when reporting on McCain. They painted a picture of a principled man who stood up to his party when he thought they were wrong. He was his own man not owned by any party affiliation. NONE of that was ever true. McCain voted with the Republican party 90% of the time. During this campaign he’s totally capitulated to the conservative wing of the Republican party. There isn't one issues that he hasn't flipped on and his current tacky campaign tactics are right out of Rove/Republican play book.

              Just a simple request for accurate reporting.  

              Report Abuse
              • Author by tommy (August 07, 2008 2:49 pm ET)
                   

                Pearl,

                I am not denying it's misuse.  I am merely commenting on it's impact, anymore. 

                Report Abuse
                • Author by Governor (August 07, 2008 3:15 pm ET)
                     
                  There's always an impact when the media lies to us.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (August 07, 2008 3:43 pm ET)
                     

                  I am merely commenting on it's impact, anymore. 

                  It's impact is it's continued use.

                  I've notice since McCain's "celebrity" ad, Republican blowhards are saying the word "celebrity" and "Obama" together. It's designed is to get folks to think "Hollywood useless celebrity" when thinking of Obama just like they want folks to think "principled, honorable man" by continuing to call McCain a maverick.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by tommy (August 07, 2008 3:52 pm ET)
                       

                    Pearl,

                    There will always be people that vote on labels or intuition, for or against any candidate.  I guess it's better than not voting at all, but it will happen as often for your candidate as against.  Some will vote for Obama because he is young, or because he is a "rock star", or because it's cool to vote for him, as opposed to stale and stodgy to vote for the "old guy".   And there are probably McCain supporters who say the exact same thing about Obama and the media labels that are rightly or wrongly affixed to him.  

                    The maverick thing is not some new 2008 label that may have some resonance, it's as old and worn out as.........well, you know :) 

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (August 07, 2008 3:59 pm ET)
                         

                      it's as old and worn out as.........well, you know :) 

                      Tommy, I know absolutely nothing about ***. :p

                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by Governor (August 07, 2008 4:22 pm ET)
                         

                      It's just wrong for journalists to market the people they're suppose to be reporting on.  It's very clear (based in part on your 250+ posts about the Media's Maverick) that you don't really care either way, but that's really the only issue here.  ::winkieface::

                       

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by tommy (August 07, 2008 4:25 pm ET)
                           
                        And you've made your point over and over and over Governor, trying to incite another argument with me over it.  I am not biting because you have your opinion and I have mine. Go in peace........
                        Report Abuse
    • Author by DAWUSS (August 07, 2008 1:08 pm ET)
         
      Nicknames tend to stick though. It's just an image or title that becomes associated with that individual or organization.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (August 07, 2008 1:20 pm ET)
           

        "Yes, he is a maverick."

        "John McCain, who has been such a maverick"

        "John McCain, so often a maverick Republican."

        "He's a maverick. He's a war hero."

        This is not "nicknaming," this is literally defining him as a maverick.

        And what about that last one? 

        Would "war hero" also be reduced to a silly nickname using the same logic?

        Report Abuse
    • Author by MidnightWriter (August 07, 2008 1:19 pm ET)
         
      McCain is as much a "Maverick" as Mel Gibson--in that it's a role he played for a brief time years ago and now no longer applies.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (August 07, 2008 1:55 pm ET)
         
      I would argue aginst only, but definitly one of the few true Marvericks. In the best sense of the word.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by neondesert (August 07, 2008 2:36 pm ET)
           

        Well, then.  You would be wrong.


        1 And Maverick spake all these words, saying,

        2 I am Garner thy Maverick, which have brought thee out of the land of cowboys, out of the house of gambling.

        3 Thou shalt have no other Mavericks before me.

        4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is on CBS, or that is on NBC, or that is worn by Maverick without paying royalty fees.

        5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I Garner am Maverick, visiting the iniquity of the reruns upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that watched me;

        6 And showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my schwag.

        7 Thou shalt not take the name of Garner thy Maverick in vain; for Garner will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.

        8 Remember the sabbath day, 8:00 p.m. EST, 7:00 Central, to keep it open.

        9 Six days shalt thou labor, and do all thy work:

        10 But the seventh day at 8:00 p.m. EST is the premier of Maverick: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy living room:

        Report Abuse
        • Author by mary59 (August 07, 2008 11:46 pm ET)
             
          Thou didst hear all this thru thy television tubes in olden days, before faux McMaverick befouled the airwaves with his cheap imitation?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (August 07, 2008 5:38 pm ET)
         

      Irredentifrence recognificant! Thy maverick be longwinded. And you totally swept into the recycling bin of history his aspecktical as.....THE MAN BEHIND THE WHEEL!!

      He'd of wupped McQueen at Le Mans.

      He did a photo shoot a year or so back in a Formula Ford. Freaked out his handlers by putting some heat into the drive and then disappeared into the back to have a smoke with some of the mechanics.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.