About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Atlanta Journal-Constitution uncritically reported RNC spokesperson's false assertion that Reid "took nearly $68,000 from Abramoff"

August 12, 2008 2:12 pm ET

SUMMARY: The Atlanta Journal-Constitution uncritically quoted a Republican National Committee spokeswoman's false assertion that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid "took nearly $68,000 from [former Washington lobbyist Jack] Abramoff." In fact, Abramoff made contributions only to Republicans, not Democrats.

22 Comments

An August 12 Atlanta Journal-Constitution article about an upcoming fundraiser for Sen. John McCain hosted in part by former Christian Coalition executive director Ralph Reed uncritically quoted Republican National Committee spokeswoman Katie Wright's false assertion that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), a national campaign co-chairman for Sen. Barack Obama, "took nearly $68,000 from [former Washington lobbyist Jack] Abramoff." In fact, as Media Matters for America previously noted, while Reid received contributions from Abramoff's firm's PAC (to which Abramoff did not contribute) and from some of Abramoff's partners and clients, a Center for Responsive Politics breakdown of Abramoff's donations shows that Abramoff himself made contributions only to Republicans, not Democrats.

From the August 12 Atlanta Journal-Constitution article:

"Senator McCain knows exactly how Ralph Reed helped Jack Abramoff defraud Indian tribes out of tens of millions of dollars," said David Donnelly, director of Campaign Money Watch. "Senator McCain should spare himself any further embarrassment by canceling this event immediately. Whose help will he accept next? Tom DeLay's?"

Republican National Committee spokeswoman Katie Wright said she found Campaign Money Watch's statement "laughable."

"I suggest they take a closer look at Barack Obama's friends like convicted felon Tony Rezko or his national co-chairman Harry Reid, who took nearly $68,000 from Abramoff," Wright said.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by shoes89 (August 12, 2008 2:15 pm ET)
         

      *yawn*

      This is just parsing by MM. Even MM admits that Reid took a bunch of cash from Abramoff's PAC and his clients; and that's how Abramoff funneled cash to politicians he dealt with!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (August 12, 2008 2:26 pm ET)
           
        You mean besides Bob Ney, Tom DeLay, Tom Feeney, and David Safavian, who took bribes directly from Abramoff?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (August 12, 2008 2:36 pm ET)
           

        **double yawn **

        Once again, Shoes slithers in here, post some nonsensical crap about one little insignificant part of the story that's supposed to make MMFA look bad and her side look good (which it doesn't), and slithered back out before anyone saw her.

        I wish you had the courage to stick around and discuss the crap you post here, Shoes.  You might actually learn something in the process...

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (August 12, 2008 2:48 pm ET)
             

          Shoes doesn't really want to come back, then she'd have to defend the criminal scumbag Ralph Reed, and his fundraising buddy John McCain (who actually knew what Abramoff was up to)

          Report Abuse
      • Author by JLyons (August 12, 2008 2:43 pm ET)
           
        Shoes the only "yawn" is reading you and your partisan bias crap.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Taz (August 12, 2008 2:48 pm ET)
             
          yes reading loony-left partisan bias crap is far more entertaining.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by wzwriter (August 12, 2008 3:12 pm ET)
               
            Your crap is the least entertaining of all, Taz.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by snoopy (August 12, 2008 3:53 pm ET)
               
            Nah, what's really entertaining is watching Bob Barr disect "the maverick" to make John be seen as "the horses' ass".
            Report Abuse
          • Author by snoopy (August 12, 2008 3:56 pm ET)
               

            This is entertaining too:

            [Pelosi] is committed to her global warming fanaticism to the point where she has said that she’s just trying to save the planet. … We all know that someone did that over 2,000 years ago, they saved the planet — we didn’t need Nancy Pelosi to do that.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by foghornleghorn (August 12, 2008 9:30 pm ET)
                 
              Bachman is a insane.  She's got those crazy eyes as well.  Anyone else see her on c-span talking about how much she loves drilling? (for oil, that is)
              Report Abuse
            • Author by NiceguyEddie (August 13, 2008 8:29 am ET)
                 
              This is why religion has no place in politics.  Psychotic, superstitious nutcase.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Brabantio (August 13, 2008 8:45 am ET)
                   

                "Psychotic" is the key word to describe that quote.  We don't need to worry about the planet because Jesus died on a cross almost 2,000 years ago.  What strikes me about that is that even if one believes in Christ, believes that he died for our sins, saved mankind, whatever, that has absolutely nothing to do with global climate change.  By that line of thinking a potential nuclear holocaust is nothing to fret over, since Jesus already saved the planet.

                The fact that this sort of person got elected into any position anywhere is highly disturbing. 

                Report Abuse
          • Author by snoopy (August 12, 2008 4:03 pm ET)
               

            And you know what's really, really hillarious? The new DNC ad on Exxon John!

            Be sure to check out the new Exxon John site too!

            Report Abuse
      • Author by wookie (August 12, 2008 2:48 pm ET)
           
        In fact, as Media Matters for America previously noted, while Reid received contributions from Abramoff's firm's PAC (to which Abramoff did not contribute)
        Report Abuse
    • Author by DAWUSS (August 12, 2008 3:16 pm ET)
         
      Even Neal Boortz claims the Atlanta Journal-Constitution doesn't have much credibility
      Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (August 12, 2008 3:50 pm ET)
         

      This proves everything about the Republicans..

                          "WRIGHT IS WRONG"

      Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (August 12, 2008 4:08 pm ET)
         
      I wasn't aware Reid was running for office ?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (August 12, 2008 4:27 pm ET)
           
        I wasn't aware Reid was running for office ?

        According to Wikipedia, Harry reid was re-elected in 2004, meaning he still has two years to go on his current term. GOP spokesperson Katie Wright was simply resorting to the old "change-the-subject-when-you-have-no-defense" ploy, which the Repugs do quite frequently nowadays.....
        Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (August 12, 2008 7:53 pm ET)
         

      Oops, explains the press coverup though...

      Next week, John McCain will attend the fundraiser for his campaign, which is being hosted by a close ally of Jack Abramoff, Ralph Reed:

      “John McCain believes in a strong national defense, a smaller, more accountable government, steady economic growth and opportunity, the dignity of life and traditional values,” wrote Reed, whose 2006 campaign for lieutenant governor sank under the weight of evidence detailing his relationship with Washington lobbyist Jack Abramoff — much of it uncovered by McCain’s Indian Affairs Committee. Read on…

      Report Abuse
    • Author by ImpeachBushNow (August 13, 2008 7:25 am ET)
         

      Postmodern John McCain: the presidential candidate some Arizonans know — and loathe

      By Amy Silverman, phoenixnewtimes.com

      http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/2008-08-07/news/postmodern-mccain-the-john-mccain-some-arizonans-know-and-loathe/%20/2

      Report Abuse