About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

CNN's five new "top political reporters and commentators" include reported McCain adviser, former RNC official, CBN's Brody, and Wash. Post's Milbank

August 15, 2008 1:57 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: CNN announced in a press release: "Brody, Castellanos, Milbank, Rosen, Wall Span Spectrum of U.S. Politics for CNN Analysis, Commentary ... CNN has added five more top political reporters and commentators to its deep bench of political contributors and analysts." CNN's new "top political reporters and commentators" that "[s]pan" the "[s]pectrum" include reported McCain adviser Alex Castellanos, former RNC official Tara Walls, Christian Broadcasting Network's David Brody -- who once described a male blogger as Fred Thompson's "angry girlfriend" -- and Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank.

74 Comments

In an August 13 press release -- posted on Media Matters for America Senior Fellow Duncan Black's blog -- CNN announced: "Brody, Castellanos, Milbank, Rosen, Wall Span Spectrum of U.S. Politics for CNN Analysis, Commentary ... CNN has added five more top political reporters and commentators to its deep bench of political contributors and analysts. Each of these respected observers of politics will provide analysis and commentary as CNN continues its political coverage." CNN's new "top political reporters and commentators" that "[s]pan" the "[s]pectrum" include reported Sen. John McCain adviser Alex Castellanos, former Republican National Committee official Tara Walls, Christian Broadcasting Network senior correspondent David Brody -- who once described a male blogger as Fred Thompson's "angry girlfriend" -- and Washington Post reporter Dana Milbank, who was recently chastised by the Washington Post ombudsman over his use of an anonymously sourced and unconfirmed quote.

Republican strategist Alex Castellanos. As Media Matters documented, in a March 25 post on the washingtonpost.com blog The Fix, staff writer Chris Cillizza reported that Castellanos -- creator of the racially charged "Hands" advertisement -- is a member of the "McCain Ad Council," a "group of advisers ... [that] will serve as outside thinkers and strategists to the [McCain] media effort." The New York Times reported on August 10 that Castellanos is a "member of Mr. McCain's panel of outside advertising consultants."

Some of Castellanos' recent CNN remarks include his saying of a characterization of Sen. Hillary Clinton as a "white bitch," "[S]ome women, by the way, are named that and it's accurate" (for which he apologized); suggesting that Clinton would poison Sen. Barack Obama; and falsely suggesting a link between 9-11 and Iraq.

Christian Broadcasting Network senior national correspondent David Brody. As Media Matters documented, in an August 21, 2007, post on his CBNnews.com blog -- titled "Fred, You're Such a Tease!" -- Brody characterized male blogger Lane Hudson as former Sen. Fred Thompson's "angry girlfriend." Hudson had filed a complaint against Thompson (R-TN) with the Federal Election Commission for Thompson's conduct in forming an exploratory committee on his presidential bid. After asserting that Thompson was handling speculation about his presidential campaign "like the cool, handsome jock in high school who teased all the girls who wanted to go out with him," Brody wrote: "Well, now Fred Thompson has an angry girlfriend. His name (don't go there) is Lane Hudson."

Washington Post reporter Dana Milbank. As Media Matters documented, in a July 30 column discussing a meeting Sen. Barack Obama had with members of the House of Representatives, Milbank wrote: "Inside, according to a witness, he told the House members, 'This is the moment ... that the world is waiting for,' adding: 'I have become a symbol of the possibility of America returning to our best traditions.' As he marches toward Inauguration Day (Election Day is but a milestone on that path), Obama's biggest challenger may not be Republican John McCain but rather his own hubris."

While Milbank gave no indication that he contacted the Obama campaign or anyone at the event to confirm the accuracy of the quote, Post colleague Jonathan Weisman, who also reported the quote and also cited "a witness," reportedly did hear from people at the event: House leadership aides who disputed interpretations -- like Weisman and Milbank's -- of the comment as self-aggrandizing. Weisman wrote in an update:

[O]ne leadership aide said the full quote put it into a different context. According to that aide, Obama said, "It has become increasingly clear in my travel, the campaign -- that the crowds, the enthusiasm, 200,000 people in Berlin, is not about me at all. It's about America. I have just become a symbol."

In a July 31 online chat, Milbank referred to criticism he had received for his July 30 column as "whines." The Washington Post itself was not quite as dismissive, later publishing a correction to one falsehood in Milbank's column. Further, responding to reader complaints about Milbank's use of a disputed and "anonymous secondhand quotation from Sen. Barack Obama," Post ombudsman Deborah Howell chastised Milbank for citing the source anonymously and for imputing a particular interpretation to a quote he did not witness. Howell wrote in her August 10 column: "Anonymous quotes should be used sparingly; this one wasn't worth it. If you weren't there, be careful about judging the context." Howell also found that "[n]either Weisman nor Milbank called the source" to confirm their interpretation of the quote.

Media Matters also documented that on the January 24, 2007, broadcast of National Public Radio's Morning Edition, Milbank asserted of Sen. Hillary Clinton at President Bush's State of the Union address: "Hillary Clinton was situated immediately behind Barack Obama, making it easier for her to actually place the knife into his back, if that's what she was trying to do." Milbank also distorted a quote from Clinton -- "[P]eople who have known me, who can talk about what I do when the lights are off" -- to claim that her remark "was very nearly a case of Too Much Information." But Milbank left off the rest of Clinton's sentence, which makes clear that she was not insinuating what Milbank suggested. Milbank also wrote in December 2007 that Obama's "signature legislation as a state senator, the Health Care Justice Act, merely set up a panel to craft a plan," not, as Obama claimed, "expanded health care in Illinois by bringing Democrats and Republicans together, by taking on the insurance industry." In fact, Obama sponsored a bill that expanded health insurance programs for low-income families in Illinois.

Washington Times deputy editorial page editor and columnist Tara Wall. As CNN's release notes, Wall previously served as the "director of outreach communications for the Republican National Committee." A February 2005 RNC press release stated: "Tara Wall will serve as Director of Outreach Communications, ensuring that specialty and mainstream press are informed of the RNC's outreach efforts, President Bush's record of achievement and the Republican agenda as it relates to different constituencies across the ethnic, religious and ideological spectrums."

CNN also added Democratic strategist Hilary Rosen, also the political director and Washington editor at large for The Huffington Post.

From CNN's press release:

CNN Recruits Key Political Experts for Campaign Coverage

Brody, Castellanos, Milbank, Rosen, Wall Span Spectrum of U.S. Politics for CNN Analysis, Commentary

Building upon its winning coverage of the U.S. presidential campaign and other political contests, CNN has added five more top political reporters and commentators to its deep bench of political contributors and analysts. Each of these respected observers of politics will provide analysis and commentary as CNN continues its political coverage.

The contributors, who will appear across CNN's numerous platforms in the coming days, include:

  • David Brody, senior national correspondent for the Christian Broadcasting Network. A veteran journalist of more than 20 years, Brody writes the political blog, "The Brody File."
  • Alex Castellanos, a Republican strategist and former campaign consultant for Mitt Romney's presidential campaign. Castellanos is a partner in National Media Inc., a political and corporate consulting firm.
  • Dana Milbank, a Washington Post staff writer and author of the thrice-weekly "Washington Sketch" column. A veteran of political coverage, he has also worked for The New Republic and The Wall Street Journal, and his latest book is Homo Politicus: The Strange and Scary Tribes That Run Our Government.
  • Hilary Rosen, a Democratic strategist and currently the political director and Washington editor-at-large for HuffingtonPost.com. In a previous role, she was chairman and CEO of the Recording Industry Association of America.
  • Tara Wall, deputy editorial page editor and columnist for The Washington Times. Previously, she served as director of the office of public affairs at the Administration for Children and Families, a division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and as director of outreach communications for the Republican National Committee.
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by shaggles (August 15, 2008 2:02 pm ET)
         
      They span the spectrum alright.  From A to B.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (August 15, 2008 2:53 pm ET)
           
        great, i hopethey get along with the present B's..Bennet and Beck.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by pointofview (August 15, 2008 2:03 pm ET)
         
      Not sure what the point is here, except that MMFA wants control over who is hired at CNN.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by tommy (August 15, 2008 2:09 pm ET)
           

        More whining. Of all the three major cable news channels, CNN is by far the most fair and balanced. 

        They regularly have a nonpartisan type, a left and a right winger, all quite capable of verbalizing their opinions and refuting the other side when discussing issues and candidates. These are not Karl Rove or Dick Morris types, they may be staunch conservatives but they generally act and argue their points appropriately and respectfully.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by princeofwheels (August 15, 2008 2:10 pm ET)
             
          Tommy, like the "whining" thrown in. Classy.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by tommy (August 15, 2008 2:11 pm ET)
               
            It is.  To complain about a network hiring someone who disagrees with you politically is whining.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by princeofwheels (August 15, 2008 2:25 pm ET)
                 
              I agree.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by pete592 (August 15, 2008 2:33 pm ET)
                 

              What about hiring someone who publicly lies, denigrates, insults, misquotes, or relies on anonymous quotes?

              Report Abuse
              • Author by tommy (August 15, 2008 2:39 pm ET)
                   
                Well, that would disqualify most, if not all, conservative commentators in MMFA's eyes, and perhaps yours.  
                Report Abuse
                • Author by pete592 (August 15, 2008 2:46 pm ET)
                     

                  Only if every single conservative commentator has a proven track record of engaging in the activities I mentioned.

                  MMFA does seem to make an issue out of Tara Wall.  Based upon just the info that MMFA provides about her, I agree with your sentiment.  Yeah, she worked for the RNC, big deal.  

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by tommy (August 15, 2008 2:51 pm ET)
                       
                    So is there an honest way to "further the conservative agenda" where they would be somehow granted "immunity" here?
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by pete592 (August 15, 2008 3:03 pm ET)
                         
                      Let's just say that if this is the juiciest information they have on Tara Wall, I believe she should have been granted immunity in this item and gotten no more than a passing mention much like Hilary Rosen did.
                      Report Abuse
                • Author by pete592 (August 15, 2008 2:50 pm ET)
                     

                  BTW, Milbank is a former "Friend of Countdown."

                  I'd hardly consider him to be a conservative commentator.

                  Report Abuse
            • Author by NiceguyEddie (August 15, 2008 2:39 pm ET)
                 

              It is not whining to point out that a news organization, and one that conservatives LOVE to hold up as an example of the liberal media (Clinton News Network, anyone?) hires five new "analysts" during an election year - and a CLOSE election at that - and ALL FIVE are well know right-wingers. (That's balance?  That's objective? Give me a break!!)  It's not about who CNN hires.  It's about the myth of the liberal media.  In an effort to be "conservative enough" (for who I have no idea - the average fox viewer will still watch fox) the corporate media, in general, has moved significantly to the right of center.

              It's bad enough that there is a well documented conservative bias in the media, but it's intolerable that the myth of liberal bias (or even objectivity) still persists and is given merit.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by BottleBlonde (August 15, 2008 7:25 pm ET)
                   

                CNN's new "top political reporters and commentators" that "[s]pan" the "[s]pectrum" include reported McCain adviser Alex Castellanos, former RNC official Tara Walls, Christian Broadcasting Network's David Brody -- who once described a male blogger as Fred Thompson's "angry girlfriend" -- and Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank.

                It's the fact that they said that the commentators "span the spectrum" that's the conservative misinformation. It's not true that they span the spectrum. Dana Milbank was banned from KO's show because of his offensive comments and has smeared Hillary on several occasions. Two others are clearly righties. Another has dubious partisan leanings, but worked for the RNC and now works for the Looney Times (Wash Times).

                That's not a spectrum of advisors.

                Report Abuse
            • Author by carlileb5935 (August 15, 2008 6:17 pm ET)
                 

              Did you actually read this article? Or do you just start posting?

              MMFA's point-- and it's well taken-- is that these new pundits are all slanted to the right.

              CNN is the biggest culprit when it comes to the old MSM tactic of having a 'balanced' debate that involves two or three admitted Republican "consultants," versus a journalist who explains the Democratic position. They do this constantly.

              Their in-league-with cousin, AOL, is even worse. Ever seen their "news?" Just this minute, they are highlighting "9 things Obama has done wrong' as a lead story! 

              Report Abuse
      • Author by shoes89 (August 15, 2008 2:33 pm ET)
           

        P.O.V., you are right. Does MM want to rid the airwaves of all conservative voices? Do they want to disallow them?

        Also, Milbank is a reliable liberal. (Reminder - This is the same guy who showed up on the set of MSNBC wearing an orange hunting outfit after the Cheney hunting accident.) MM is now eating one of their own because of one poor remark.

        What's of the fact that Carville and Begala have been firmly planted at CNN for years? Cristiane Amanpour? We could go on ...

        How about some balanced airwaves, folks!

        Report Abuse
        • Author by mary59 (August 15, 2008 2:36 pm ET)
             
          Can you give any examples of Christian Amanpour being less than factual?  (perhaps that's your definition of liberal:  someone who reports facts.)
          Report Abuse
        • Author by pete592 (August 15, 2008 3:12 pm ET)
             

          "MM is now eating one of their own because of one poor remark."

          Actually, NO. They're "eating one of their own" because Milbank cited anonymous secondhand quotes to disparage Barack Obama, and then copped an attitude when he got called on it.  He was completely unapologetic for his lack of responsibility.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by Pyrrhonist (August 15, 2008 3:15 pm ET)
             
          What's Christiane Amanpour done to get dragged into this?  Was it the God's Warriors thing?  
          Report Abuse
        • Author by carlileb5935 (August 15, 2008 6:19 pm ET)
             

          MM is now eating one of their own because of one poor remark.

          Milbank has been a constant source of MMFA concern the last year or two. He's a company boy, not a "liberal." Mr status-quo.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by deeznuts (August 15, 2008 2:41 pm ET)
           

        *sigh*

        You WITHers just don't get it do ya?

        The point here is not that these people are conservatives. It's that they are purveyors of conservative misinformation.

        I'm sure CNN could have found some non-liar conservatives somewhere to put on the air. They do exist...don't they?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by tommy (August 15, 2008 2:46 pm ET)
             

          "The point here is not that these people are conservatives. It's that they are purveyors of conservative misinformation"

          Funniest post of the day! 

          Report Abuse
        • Author by Pyrrhonist (August 15, 2008 3:12 pm ET)
             
          Thank you.  That is exactly the point.   
          Report Abuse
      • Author by RABBITLUVR (August 15, 2008 2:41 pm ET)
           
        Care to show us where exactly MM wants 'control' over who gets hired at CNN?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Russycle (August 15, 2008 2:47 pm ET)
           
        I thought it was pretty obvious.  The point is that CNN claims that these guys "span the spectrum of US politics", but 3 of the 5 have strong Republican ties, and Milbank has demonstrated his willingness to throw ethics to the wind to smear Obama with a third-hand, out of context quote.  I guess in Washington, that is the spectrum of US politics.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (August 15, 2008 2:08 pm ET)
         
      How did they leave Corsi off the list? CNN can do what they want. Fox can do whatever pleases their flock. Therefore, maybe MMFA will be able to do their thing. I hope the Cons here would agree.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by princeofwheels (August 15, 2008 2:09 pm ET)
           
        Sorry POV didn't see your fine post. Guess I was too late.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by MissDee (August 15, 2008 2:57 pm ET)
           
        Actually I'm going to agree with you PoW... Fox, CNN, MSNBC, the NY Times, they can all hire whoever they want and position themselves as they want- left right or center. It seems that MMA, Move-on and other left leaning organizations, along with most of their  denizens only want to stifle opposing viewpoints, not promote their own. That's more a sign of insecurity than conviction in your own beliefs.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (August 15, 2008 3:53 pm ET)
             
          Again, you and your ilk miss the entire point. It being, they CAN of COURSE hire whoever they want, but we are also free to criticize their hirings, especially when there is so little balance in who they did hire. we don't try to stifle anyone's speech, but you guys seem insistent, that when we do call out something "bad" that somehow we're intolerant, and want someone tossed in jail or something like that. Of course, you'd be wrong, because then we'd be neglecting our own freedom of speech. It's so adorable how you don't seem to understand this whole comment, criticize, and call out business. Just because someone has an opinion doesn't mean we have to agree with it, and doesn't mean we should shut up and not say something.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by chris1795 (August 15, 2008 2:26 pm ET)
         
      Milbank may have messed up on the Obama "quote", but he's really pretty good most of the time.  I wouldn't lump him in with Brody et al.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mary59 (August 15, 2008 2:34 pm ET)
         
      To sum up, CNN hired 5 new analysts.  Of the 5, 3 are Republican partisans outright (Castellanos, Wall and Brody); one is a Democrat, and one a reporter who has been misquoting Obama and saying snarky things about Hillary lately.  He may be the most objective one of the bunch, but I'd put no money on that.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (August 15, 2008 2:43 pm ET)
           
        what goes up, must come down............someday....................maybe after Nov 4, 2008 ?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by thomp.steve9098 (August 15, 2008 3:09 pm ET)
         

      Unlike the rest of the liberal msn, at least CNN appears to be trying to provide a balanced coverage. . . . However, these new moderates, or tepid conservatives, hardly balance out the overwhelming liberal bias that has permeated CNN for years

      Report Abuse
      • Author by deeznuts (August 15, 2008 3:15 pm ET)
           
        Surely you jest.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (August 15, 2008 3:27 pm ET)
           
        nice trick. Define CNN as liberal and the new hired guns provide a " balance ".
        Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (August 15, 2008 3:56 pm ET)
           
        And you can show us, of course, the liberal misinformation on CNN correct? Please, you MUST have some examples that you can cite. I mean, they are the "liberal" CNN after all.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by thomp.steve9098 (August 15, 2008 3:45 pm ET)
         

      I guess this means Milbank no longer will be on Countdown to confirm for Keith Odouchebag that the latter is correct in everything that he says.  Did Odouchebag have Milbank on the show after his article about Obama's arrogance?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (August 15, 2008 3:54 pm ET)
           

        from this moment on, i regard you as a name calling poster who deserves little credibility on yourpostings.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by thomp.steve9098 (August 15, 2008 4:00 pm ET)
             
          KO dishes it out insults all the time to a broad audience. I'm sure he can take it.  I typically don't, and won't, throw out insults to others, including posters on here, who don't routinely do the same themselves.  And the few times that I have, I've apologized.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by tommy (August 15, 2008 3:56 pm ET)
           

        To use a relevant Olympics analogy, Olbermann's show is like a gold medal winner on the gymnastics balance beam - always on point, never strays, narrow and focused, no room for wobbling or wavering, straight down the line.

        Milbank slipped and fell on the mat, poof, he's off the team. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by clams casino (August 15, 2008 4:41 pm ET)
             
          And why did Milbank slip off? Because he was dishonest. So far, every post of yours in this thread is based on your premise that facts are subjective, and that anything anyone says should be regarded as just an opinion. Truth be damned.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by tommy (August 15, 2008 4:51 pm ET)
               
            Let me just say that the "truth", as you define it, I want no part of....considering your track record. So it gets damned quite often when you troll around and find me, and your panties wad up over something or another.  
            Report Abuse
            • Author by clams casino (August 15, 2008 5:52 pm ET)
                 
              There aren't multiple definitions of "truth." Milbank's dishonesty was very clearly shown here, but you choose to ignore any factual evidence so that you can claim that partisanship and bias are the real reasons that Milbank is being singled out.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by tommy (August 15, 2008 5:57 pm ET)
                   

                I was specifically referring to Olbermann's show in the post you responded too.  Anyone that can come here with a straight face and tell me that partisanship and bias have no place in who Olbermann chooses to have on as guest on his leftwing lovefest are either lying, or delusional.

                Anybody's guess on which of those categories you fall into. 

                Report Abuse
                • Author by clams casino (August 15, 2008 6:17 pm ET)
                     

                  Well, then here's another inconvenient truth for you: Milbank quit the show before Olbermann made any public comments about his Obama column. Which still doesn't discount the fact that Milbank's column was a dishonest smear piece. Olbermann's partisanship doesn't enter into the equation. You just saw an opportunity to take a cheap shot at him, in spite of the facts.

                   

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by tommy (August 15, 2008 6:31 pm ET)
                       

                    "Olbermann's partisanship doesn't enter into the equation"

                    You can't possibly be this dense.  My entire post was a response to Steve's post about Olbermann, specifically.  You choose to respond to it, and now you want to tell me that Olbermann is not part of the equation?

                    Lay off the Clams Sweetheart, they are starting to disrupt blood flow to the brain. 

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by clams casino (August 15, 2008 6:40 pm ET)
                         

                      Yes, Thomp.Steve asked, "Did Odouchebag have Milbank on the show after his article about Obama's arrogance?" And you responded by falsely claiming that Milbank was off the show for not toeing the party line. In fact, Milbank says that he quit his MSNBC gig the day before the appearance of his dishonest smear piece on Obama, and Olbermann says that he found out about Milbank's departure after the piece appeared. Either way, Milbank was not kicked off the balance beam for partisan reasons. He wrote a dishonest hack piece, refused to acknowledge his errors, and now he's being held up by CNN as a leading light in political commentary.

                      And now I guess it's time for you to post more childish and petty insults at me...

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by tommy (August 15, 2008 6:45 pm ET)
                           

                        "And now I guess it's time for you to post more childish and petty insults at me..."

                        Nah, I'm done. 

                        Report Abuse
      • Author by Pyrrhonist (August 15, 2008 4:02 pm ET)
           
        "Odouchebag"? What are you, 12? 
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (August 15, 2008 4:11 pm ET)
             
          Must have been listening to Mark Levin who has 12 year old schoolyard nicknames for every liberal he likes to talk about it. It's kind of annoying actually. No, it's really annoying, and then there is his voice. Sorry, getting off topic.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by tommy (August 15, 2008 4:14 pm ET)
               

            Or it could be the liberal talk radio hosts who say "Grampy McSame". 

            They are schoolyard, aren't they? 

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Pyrrhonist (August 15, 2008 4:20 pm ET)
                 
              I agree. Grampy McSame is pretty stupid also.  
              Report Abuse
              • Author by magnolialover (August 15, 2008 4:29 pm ET)
                   

                Me too. I don't like the name calling or nickname assigning that either side does. I don't like it when some of my esteemed posters on here call others names as well. And just speaking for me, I try to maintain respectful disagreements with public figures, even Limbaugh, who I just call Rush, or Limbaugh. It's dumb to call him Limpbaugh, or other stupid things. Why? Because I'm smarter than he is, and don't need to stoop to his level to get my point across.

                 

                Report Abuse
                • Author by tommy (August 15, 2008 4:35 pm ET)
                     
                  Well said.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (August 15, 2008 4:47 pm ET)
                       

                    How about Limboob?...

                    You gotta admit that's funny?  Or, Ole' Fathead?

                    How 'bout Old Feces Mouth?  Slimebaugh is not bad.

                    Come on!, work with me here?

                     

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by mary59 (August 15, 2008 4:54 pm ET)
                         
                      I reserve the right to say "grampy mcsame," as it's obviously endearing...as an aside, an admirer of my mother told her "you're as cute as a little 'ole pig."  This was in South Dakota during the Depression, so pigs were sought after.
                      Report Abuse
                • Author by Pyrrhonist (August 15, 2008 4:36 pm ET)
                     
                  Yes. What is that old saying about mud wrestling with a pig? I've noticed that here, especially in threads dealing with O'Reilly and Limbaugh.  Both are truly dangerous and loathsome media personalities, but I don't get what talking about their penises accomplishes.  It just seems to take credibility from a site that is otherwise a really useful weapon against media menipulation.  Just my opinion. 
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Pyrrhonist (August 15, 2008 4:39 pm ET)
                       
                    Manipulation, that is.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by magnolialover (August 15, 2008 4:44 pm ET)
                         
                      But, those are in the comments section, and not in the actual article. It's not the website that is impugned, it is the folks who write such things. Can't really blame that too much on the site, as MMFA, I have found, tends to let more things get posted and less administering of the website, which is both good and bad. Saying that the comments are the same as the rest of the site (not sure if that's what you were doing or not) would be like equating the comments section at Kos to the actual content of the site like Mr. O'Reilly does on an almost daily basis, never drawing a distinction between the 2.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Pyrrhonist (August 15, 2008 4:59 pm ET)
                           
                        No, of course the comments are different from the site's contents, and honestly some of the posts I've seen here are hilarious, but I just think the effort is better served when the comments are better. You know, when something particularly egregious shows up on Fox, I like to check MMfA, first to see if they caught it (they always do), and second to see what other people think of it. Sometimes, the discussion is brilliant - sometimes it isn't.  Again, just my opinion.  
                        Report Abuse
            • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (August 15, 2008 4:43 pm ET)
                 

              I don't care what they call Sen. George McCain on talk radio...

              Just as long as it's 50 - 50.  Instead on the 90% of talk radio the Cons currently control.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Pyrrhonist (August 15, 2008 4:51 pm ET)
                   
                You're right about that.  Talk radio is helping to tear society apart.  I used to be able to have calm, reasonable disagreements with conservatives I know.  Now many - not all, but many - just resort to reciting the Hannity/O'Reilly/Limbaugh insults they hear on the radio. The other terrible thing is that the right-wing talkers are really scaring the gullible elderly. You know, those people who grew up when the "news" was more like news? They're not just mad, they are genuinely terrified of other Americans because they listen to these guys and believe them.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by hogprint (August 17, 2008 9:33 pm ET)
                   

                8 homes posted:

                Instead on the 90% of talk radio the Cons currently control.

                Let me guess...this is some kind of conspiracy?  Maybe if the libs had a good message that people wanted to hear then they would control 90% of talk radio.  

                Report Abuse
            • Author by wolf kotenberg (August 16, 2008 12:00 am ET)
                 
              Grampy McSame is an earned title where ODouchebag is just a silly name calling frustration.
              Report Abuse
    • Author by puttforever4682 (August 15, 2008 4:29 pm ET)
         
      What has become clear to me is that liberal is defined to be any viewpoint that disagrees with the far right.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (August 15, 2008 4:41 pm ET)
           
        That's the game. 
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (August 15, 2008 4:56 pm ET)
             

          Anybody who doesn't want to fight endless wars,

          doesn't want to keep the wealth distribution as is (which is the same gap between rich and poor we had before the Depression), and persists in the silly and amoral notion that working people have a right to see a doctor if they get sick...

          Is a dang liberal! 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by HomerRamone (August 16, 2008 6:05 am ET)
               
            I read Media Matters' emails every day, and find them enlightening if often depressing and/or infuriating. But I usually don't have time to come to the web site for details and comments. I had no idea the place was so infested with right-wing trolls...
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mary59 (August 16, 2008 1:41 pm ET)
                 
              We suspect that there are a few people posting under more than one name.
              Report Abuse
    • Author by thebigkate3703 (August 15, 2008 11:52 pm ET)
         
      I have never liked or trusted CNN News, and now I see 5 more reasons not to!  Especially Dana Milbank!  Please, Washington Post--get rid of this destructive person!  He is a narcissist who likes to humiliate the Democrats (i.e., Clinton and Obama) and refuses to take responsibility for taking quotes out of context!  He is obviously self-important and reminds me of Phil Gramm--that disrespectful McCain adviser who said we are a nation of whiners!  Milbank meet Gramm!  You deserve each other!!!
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

  • CNN
    CNN
    One CNN Center, Box 105366, Atlanta, GA 30303-5366
    Phone: 404-827-1500
    Fax: 404-827-1906