Media uncritically reported McCain's claim that he opposed Bush tax cuts because they weren't accompanied by "spending reductions"
SUMMARY: The Denver Post, ABC News, and The Washington Post all uncritically reported that Sen. John McCain, during an August 14 appearance in Aspen, Colorado, responded to criticism that he had changed his position on President Bush's tax cuts by stating he originally opposed them because they were not accompanied by spending reductions. None of these outlets noted that when McCain voted against the tax cuts in 2001, the reason he gave in his Senate floor statement was not that they were not accompanied by spending cuts but, rather, that "so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us, at the expense of middle class Americans who most need tax relief."
In an August 15 article, The Denver Post uncritically quoted Sen. John McCain during an August 14 appearance in Aspen, Colorado, responding to criticism that he had changed his position on President Bush's tax cuts by stating, "I said they (the tax cuts) had to be accompanied by spending reductions" [parentheses in original]. Similarly, the ABC News blog Political Radar reported that McCain said "he did not support them because they were not balanced by spending cuts," and the washingtonpost.com blog The Trail reported that McCain "said he has always favored lower taxes but wanted them coupled with a reduction in spending." However, none of the outlets noted that when McCain voted against the tax cuts in 2001, the reason he gave in his floor statement was not that they were not accompanied by spending cuts but, rather, that "I cannot in good conscience support a tax cut in which so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us, at the expense of middle class Americans who most need tax relief." And on the April 11, 2004, edition of NBC's Meet the Press, McCain said, "I voted against the tax cuts because of the disproportionate amount that went to the wealthy Americans. I would clearly support not extending those tax cuts in order to help address the deficit. But the middle-income tax credits, the families, the child tax credits, the marriage tax credits, all of those I would keep."
Media Matters for America has documented other media outlets uncritically reporting McCain's assertion that he voted against the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts because they weren't accompanied by spending cuts without noting McCain's 2001 floor statement.
From the August 15 Denver Post article:
For more than an hour, the Arizona senator fielded questions on topics ranging from the nuclear threat posed by Iran to McCain's much-maligned fondness for the music of Abba. It included a vigorous exchange with an audience member on a topic that has dogged McCain throughout his second run at the White House: the perception by many that he has changed positions on key issues.
It's a perception McCain took exception to.
The audience member, who said he is a longtime supporter and resident of McCain's home state, lambasted the senator for changing his position on President Bush's tax cuts and for making nice with the Rev. Jerry Falwell, the late Christian-right leader.
McCain took issue with both statements.
"I respectfully disagree. I said (the tax cuts) had to be accompanied by spending reductions," he said.
From an August 14 post on The Washington Post's The Trail blog:
McCain denied he had abandoned his maverick ways when a questioner who said he had previously voted for McCain challenged the Arizona senator as having abandoned his principles on tax cuts and the Christian right.
McCain, who opposed President Bush's tax cuts but now wants to extend them, said he has always favored lower taxes but wanted them coupled with a reduction in spending. He said his newfound affinity for the Christian right was spurred by his desire to leave past differences behind.
From an August 14 post on ABC News' Political Radar blog:
McCain appeared at the Aspen Institute where he took a wide range of questions from Walter Isaacson, president of the institute and former CNN chairman for about an hour and then from members of the audience. A man who said he was from Tucson and had voted for McCain when he last ran for re-election said he was bothered by what he said were McCain's "flip-flops" on some positions.
"I'm somewhat concerned that you flipped on some ... maverick positions," he said. He went on to ask McCain to also clarify what he meant when he said last month that Obama "would rather lose a war in order to win a political campaign." "I heard that as you calling him a traitor," the man said. "Do you think Barack Obama is a traitor and do you still believe that he would rather lose a war to win an election? And, if you do, what makes you say that?"
McCain seemed asked him to specify on which issues he believed he had changed positions. The questioner mentioned taxes and McCain's reconciliation with leaders of the Christian Right.
McCain defended his position on tax cuts -- he voted twice against Bush tax cuts -- saying he did not support them because they were not balanced by spending cuts. He said he met a few years ago with the late Rev. Jerry Falwell, who along with evangelist Pat Robertson he once called "agents of intolerance," in the spirit of reconciliation.














Just another in yet a long line of flip flops from Senator McCain. He's changed his mind so often, and so many times, I seem to forget what his original positions were on, well, anything. And what was his reasoning behind changing his mind on things anyway?
Cue Snoop and his list of McCain's flip flops...
Senator McCain only embraced Bush's tax cuts after he got the nomination, or when he was seeking it. This makes him appear to want to "cut taxes" which is just code to his base that the rich will continue to grow richer still.
What did I hear the other day on the news? Something about 70% of corporations in the US didn't pay income tax in 2007, or some other number. It was more than 50%, but I just don't remember the percentage. Imagine now if all of those companies actually DID pay their fair share. Lower taxes probably for everyone.
I DO NOT SUPPORT MCCAIN OR OBAMA! SO PLEASE DO NOT GET THAT FROM MY FOLLOWING STATEMENT.
I am confused, the original reason he gave on the floor fo the Senate seems in line with the Democrat talking points when it comes to tax cuts. So whats with the complaining? Someone can't have multiple reasons to have afrrived at a particular decision?
Should we not be more concerned with the reason he changed his mind and decided to support them?
I am confused- insaneloki20024664
Edited for brevity and clarity.No charge.
I am confused, the original reason he gave on the floor fo the Senate seems in line with the Democrat talking points when it comes to tax cuts. So whats with the complaining?
McCain has contradicted himself since his statements originally are diametrically opposed to what he says now. He is trying to rewrite his own history. Not to mention that he and his wife will benefit from the tax cuts tremendously.
First he said the tax cuts were unfair, but later said he said that corresponding cuts in spending were needed to offset the tax cuts. This is not merely stretching the truth it is a whole new rewrite. Maybe he really can't keep track of what he said, so MMFA has to remind him.
How is it a rewrite? The two reasons are not mutually exclusive. he could have believed them to be unfair because they did not come with spending cuts, thus later placing a larger burden on the taxpayer.
No one has yet to answer my question about why he cannot have multiple reasons for arriving at a decision. I will also add this question, why would he have had to reveal all the reasons in the first place if he thought the one he gave was the best at the time?
While it's not inconceivable for someone to have mutiple reason to support or oppose legislation, there are many reason to suspect McCain is now giving the most politically beneficial reason /excuse for opposing the Bush Tax cuts:
1. I can find no contemporaneous statement by McCain in 2001expressing a desire for spending cuts to balance the tax cuts. He does however express concern about the impact of the tax cuts on the MILITARY budget. Conversely, there are multiple statements ( including his senate floor statement) that he believed the cuts too heavily directed towards the wealthy.2. McCain supported a early Senate version of the tax cut bill which provided the same total dollar amount of tax cuts ( and no requirements for spending cuts) but was weighted more towards middle class taxpayer releief.