About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Wash. Times uncritically repeated McCain campaign's statement that Obama "voted in lockstep with President George W. Bush nearly half the time"

August 15, 2008 5:35 pm ET

SUMMARY: A Washington Times article uncritically repeated an assertion by Sen. John McCain campaign spokesman Tucker Bounds that "[i]n the Senate, Barack Obama has voted in lockstep with President George W. Bush nearly half the time" and did not mention that, according to Congressional Quarterly, McCain voted with the Bush administration 95 percent of the time in 2007 and has voted with Bush 90 percent of the time over the course of Bush's presidency.

25 Comments

In an August 14 Washington Times article, reporter Christina Bellantoni uncritically repeated an assertion by Sen. John McCain campaign spokesman Tucker Bounds that "[i]n the Senate, Barack Obama has voted in lockstep with President George W. Bush nearly half the time, including the Bush-Cheney Energy bill which gave close to $3 billion in new giveaways to Big Oil." But Bellantoni did not report that according to the nonpartisan publication Congressional Quarterly, which tracks legislators' votes, McCain voted with the Bush administration 95 percent of the time in 2007 and has voted with Bush 90 percent of the time over the seven-and-a-half years of Bush's presidency.

Further, while Bellantoni uncritically quoted Bounds' claim that Obama voted for an energy bill that "gave close to $3 billion in new giveaways to Big Oil" and uncritically repeated a McCain campaign statement that asserted Obama "voted for the Bush energy bill in 2005, which gave tax breaks to Big Oil," a February 27, 2007, Congressional Research Service report found that although the bill "included several oil and gas tax incentives, providing about $2.6 billion of tax cuts for the oil and gas industry," it also "provided for $2.9 billion of tax increases on the oil and gas industry, for a net tax increase on the industry of nearly $300 million over 11 years":

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT05, P.L. 109-58) included several oil and gas tax incentives, providing about $2.6 billion of tax cuts for the oil and gas industry. In addition, EPACT05 provided for $2.9 billion of tax increases on the oil and gas industry, for a net tax increase on the industry of nearly $300 million over 11 years. Energy tax increases comprise the oil spill liability tax and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank financing rate, both of which are imposed on oil refineries. If these taxes are subtracted from the tax subsidies, the oil and gas refinery and distribution sector received a net tax increase of $1,356 million ($2,857 million minus $1,501 million).

From Bellantoni's August 14 Washington Times article:

But Team McCain pointed out in a statement that Mr. Obama voted for the Bush energy bill in 2005, which gave tax breaks to Big Oil.

"In the Senate, Barack Obama has voted in lockstep with President George W. Bush nearly half the time, including the Bush-Cheney Energy bill which gave close to $3 billion in new giveaways to Big Oil - a terrible policy that John McCain opposed," said McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds. "The truth is Barack Obama's plan is a job-killing machine that ignores the struggling economy and raises taxes on family savings, Social Security and small businesses."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by snoopy (August 15, 2008 5:38 pm ET)
         
      Obama voted in lockstep? Heck, I worry that Exxon John's neck will snap whenever Bush sits down!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by captfoster2 (August 15, 2008 5:46 pm ET)
           

        Grampy McSame attempting to claim that Obama is more in lock step with Bush in voting is a lot like Bush and Rice having the balls to go in front a camera and say with a straight face that soveriegn nations dont invade other soveriegn nations in the 21st century without cause.

        How these corporate rightwing thinking thugs survive on a daily basis is amazing!

        Report Abuse
      • Author by SFnomad (August 15, 2008 5:51 pm ET)
           
        There is something seriously wrong with Voted in lockstep nearly half the time.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by MoonbatYouBet (August 15, 2008 5:39 pm ET)
         

      Voted in lockstep half the time? 

      Um, is that even possible?  Apparently Team MCCain is no longer satisfied with mangling facts, they have now also decided to take aim at the meaning of words.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (August 15, 2008 5:40 pm ET)
         
      So Obama votes with Bush less than half the time and he's in "lock-step" with him.  McCain votes with Bush 95% of the time and he's a maverick.  Seems to me all McCain has succeeded in showing is that Obama has a mind of his own and doesn't vote a straight party line.  Interesting line of attack.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tommy (August 15, 2008 5:50 pm ET)
         
      How sad is it when you have to resort to smearing your opponent by saying they voted with the president from your very own party.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by steeve (August 15, 2008 6:40 pm ET)
           
        Pretty sad, but not nearly sad enough to get the Bush-lovers and supply-siders to change votes.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (August 15, 2008 5:51 pm ET)
         

      I just don't know who's more pathetic anymore - McCain or the Obama hating press...

      This Modern World By Tom Tomorrow

      Report Abuse
    • Author by loonz (August 15, 2008 5:51 pm ET)
         
      I thought Obama was the "most liberal" senator.  It seems the McCain campaign can't make up its mind.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mefirst (August 15, 2008 6:02 pm ET)
         
      you have to wonder what the half is.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (August 15, 2008 6:38 pm ET)
           
        Considering Bush and McCain attempted to take credit for a lot of democratic initiatives like the new vet bill, I'm sure those non republican bills were "factored" into the equation.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by puttforever4682 (August 15, 2008 6:52 pm ET)
         

      It makes the democrat's job harder when a certain percentage of voters(those who read the Washington Times and watch Fox news) are automatically on the republican side, No amount of facts or moral suasion will overcome this. Now that the So Called Liberal Media has joined in the misinformation campaign(Cokie Roberts, Bob Schieffer, Dana Milbank to name a few, The task For Obama is much harder despite President Bush (the worst president ever imho.

       

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by the Grey Path (August 15, 2008 8:39 pm ET)
         
      Obama may want to take his half lockstep and try out for the Ministry of Silly Walks.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by SgtCedar (August 16, 2008 1:07 am ET)
         
      I would guess at least half the bills which go through Congress are non-controversial bills which pass more or less unanimously. Are these the bills which make Obama in lockstep with Bush? If over half the Congress did not vote for measures the President signs the government would grind to a halt very quickly.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by steeve (August 16, 2008 8:33 am ET)
         
      Why didn't McCain just say Obama votes with Bush 100% of the time? It's not like he'll have to back it up.

      The media will spend 1000 hours discussing how such an attack plays politically, and 0 hours discussing whether it's true or not.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (August 16, 2008 9:16 am ET)
         
      As I think a couple of other people have said. How can Obama be the MOST liberal Senator, and yet still be voting with Bush half of the time? Is this sort of like how he's a dirty Muslim, and a black Christian separatist all at the same time? At least if they could, you know, make up just one lie, and stick with that, that would be helpful. Apparently, they can't even decide if he's the most liberal, or if he voted with Bush, just more flip flops from the right hand side of the country.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (August 16, 2008 1:31 pm ET)
           
        Let's see...he's a non-gun toting terrorist sympathiser Muslim Christian going to a radical church and is anti-coffee and an exotic too-skinny elitist. 
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.