About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Kurtz and Mason falsely suggested it was "new information" that McCain "acknowledged" his responsibility for failed first marriage

August 18, 2008 4:47 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: On Reliable Sources, the Houston Chronicle's Julie Mason said of Sen. John McCain's statement that his "greatest moral failing" was "the failure of my first marriage": "I think McCain really did something extraordinary when -- the way he answered that question. ... So he put it out there, he acknowledged it. And he sort of inoculated himself against it." Howard Kurtz similarly said: "McCain has acknowledged that he was not faithful in his first marriage, but not necessarily before a national television audience." In fact, McCain has repeatedly "acknowledged" his responsibility for the breakup of his first marriage in his memoir, in interviews, and "before a national television audience."

53 Comments

On the August 17 edition of CNN's Reliable Sources, Houston Chronicle White House correspondent Julie Mason characterized as "extraordinary" the response Sen. John McCain gave during the August 16 Saddleback Civil Forum on the Presidency to a question about his "greatest moral failure." Commenting on McCain's response that his "greatest moral failing" was "the failure of my first marriage," Mason said: "I think McCain really did something extraordinary when -- the way he answered that question. ... He addressed an issue that the campaign has been having a hard time figuring out how to deal with. They've wanted to confront it, it's out there on the Internet, it's something that Democrats are trying to use against McCain. So he put it out there, he acknowledged it. And he sort of inoculated himself against it. I think that's really going to help him." Host Howard Kurtz similarly said: "McCain has acknowledged that he was not faithful in his first marriage, but not necessarily before a national television audience." But contrary to Mason's and Kurtz's suggestion, there was little new in McCain's assertion regarding his first marriage: McCain has repeatedly "acknowledged" his responsibility for the breakup of his first marriage in his memoir, in interviews, and "before a national television audience."

Mason contrasted McCain's response with Sen. Barack Obama's, in which Obama named his past drug use and said, "What I trace this to is a certain selfishness on my part. I was so obsessed with me and, you know, the reasons that I might be dissatisfied that I couldn't focus on other people." Mason said: "Obama's answer, you know, that was not new information. For a 47-year-old man to claim that his worst moral failing happened when he was a teenager -- I don't know, it's a little disingenuous."

Indeed, during his first presidential run and in his 2002 memoir, McCain mentioned the breakup of his first marriage numerous times. For example:

  • On the February 2, 1999, edition of a CNN special event titled First in the Nation: The New Hampshire Primary, co-host Bernard Shaw asked McCain: "You had an affair your first marriage. The sitting president is been impeached for his conduct with Monica Lewinsky. Should a politician's private acts be part of public discourse?" McCain replied: "Let me say that I am responsible for the break-up of my first marriage. I will not discuss or talk about that any more than that. If someone wants to criticize me for that, that's fine. I believe that the standards of morality of conduct will be determined, not by the politician themselves, but by the media and the American people. I will leave that judgment to them."
  • On the March 2, 1999, edition of CNN's Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer, host Wolf Blitzer interviewed McCain and asked of McCain's "background": "Is there anything out there that you want to talk about rather than wait until this campaign goes on and on and on that's going to cause surprises in the press, once again will focus on scandals as opposed to policy issues?" McCain replied: "I certainly hope not. I have made it clear that I am responsible for the break-up of my first marriage. But I've also made it clear that I'm not going to discuss that."
  • During the April 18, 1999, broadcast of CBS News Sunday Morning, correspondent Rita Braver aired an interview she conducted with McCain, in which she said to McCain: "You admitted to infidelity in your first marriage. Are you worried about the scrutiny that you and your family will have to undergo in this campaign?" McCain responded: "I have said that I'm responsible for the breakup of my first marriage. I have then and now refused to discuss that further."
  • An August 20, 1999, San Francisco Chronicle article reported that McCain told San Francisco talk-radio host Ronn Owens: "I'm responsible for the breakup of my first marriage ... but I don't want to go into the details."
  • On the September 8, 1999, broadcast of ABC's 20/20, then co-host Sam Donaldson reported that "[w]hen he [McCain] came back from the war to a wife who had waited for him -- not only that, but had been badly injured in an auto accident while waiting -- he divorced her for the daughter of a wealthy Arizona beer distributor." Donaldson asked McCain, "What do you say about that?" To which, McCain replied: "I say I'm responsible for the breakup of my first marriage, and I will always bear that responsibility. And I am not proud of it."
  • In his memoir Worth the Fighting For (Random House, 2002), McCain wrote that in the years following his return from Vietnam he did "not show[] the same determination to rebuild my personal life" as he did his professional life. McCain wrote: "My marriage to Carol McCain was falling apart. Sound marriages can be hard to recover after great time and distance have separated a husband and wife. We are different people when we reunite. But my marriage's collapse was attributable to my own selfishness and immaturity more than it was to Vietnam, and I cannot escape blame by pointing a finger at the war. The blame was entirely mine."

From the August 17 edition of CNN's Reliable Sources:

KURTZ: Let me turn now to last night's presidential forum. This was the pastor Rick Warren at California's Saddleback Church. He had Obama and McCain on separately, asked them a lot of questions that you don't usually get asked at these things, including -- well, I'll let you hear the question, but in a response, Obama talked about his teenage drug use, and John McCain talked about his past infidelity years ago. Let's watch.

[begin video clip]

WARREN: What would be, looking over your life -- everybody's got weaknesses, nobody's perfect -- would be the greatest moral failure in your life?

OBAMA: What I trace this to is a certain selfishness on my part. I was so obsessed with me and, you know, the reasons that I might be dissatisfied that I couldn't focus on other people.

McCAIN: My greatest moral failing -- and I have been a very imperfect person -- is the failure of my first marriage.

WARREN: And everybody has some kind --

[end video clip]

KURTZ: Julie Mason, this was on Saturday night, up against the Olympics, Michael Phelps winning his record-shattering eighth gold medal. Is this going to be a blip in terms of the campaign coverage?

MASON: I don't know. I mean, I think McCain really did something extraordinary when -- the way he answered that question, Howie. He addressed an issue that the campaign has been having a hard time figuring out how to deal with. They've wanted to confront it, it's out there on the Internet, it's something that Democrats are trying to use against McCain.

So he put it out there, he acknowledged it. And he sort of inoculated himself against it. I think that's really going to help him.

Obama's answer, you know, that was not new information. For a 47-year-old man to claim that his worst moral failing happened when he was a teenager -- I don't know, it's a little disingenuous.

So I think it does get some traction going forward. There was a lot of news coverage, even if people weren't necessarily watching the forum.

KURTZ: Right. McCain has acknowledged that he was not faithful in his first marriage, but not necessarily before a national television audience.

Rick Warren, he asked questions about the nature of evil, Christ, abortion. Did he elicit more interesting answers than a network anchor might have?

JOSHUA GREEN (senior editor of The Atlantic): I think he intended to. I mean, it seemed to be more of a conversational setting. You know, we were told ahead of the time there weren't going to be any "gotcha" questions. He certainly managed to slip in a couple on the Supreme Court and other things.

From the September 8, 1999, edition of ABC's 20/20:

SAM DONALDSON: (voice-over) But no story ends so perfectly, nor does this one for John McCain. When he came back from the war to a wife who had waited for him -- not only that, but had been badly injured in an auto accident while waiting -- he divorced her for the daughter of a wealthy Arizona beer distributor.

(on camera) What do you say about that?

JOHN MCCAIN: I say I'm responsible for the breakup of my first marriage, and I will always bear that responsibility. And I am not proud of it.

From the August 20, 1999, San Francisco Chronicle:

For his part, McCain admitted to being "very uncomfortable" with the continual questions of Bush. "The media and the American people have the right to make a judgment about him ... (but) the governor is entitled to privacy."

"I've done things in my life I'm not proud of. ... I'm a believer in redemption, and my life has been less than exemplary in many respects," he said.

"I'm responsible for the breakup of my first marriage ... but I don't want to go into the details," he told KGO's Ronn Owens.

But asked at The Chronicle editorial board meeting if the cocaine question was a fair one for a presidential candidate, McCain, 63, said he had never used cocaine.

From the April 18, 1999, edition of CBS News Sunday Morning:

BRAVER: (Voiceover) McCain has, indeed, re-established his reputation for integrity. He considers himself a family man, but in the wake of President Clinton's indiscretions, everything about every candidate's past will be scrutinized.

You admitted to infidelity in your first marriage. Are you worried about the scrutiny that you and your family will have to undergo in this campaign?

Sen. McCAIN: I have said that I'm responsible for the breakup of my first marriage. I have then and now refused to discuss that further. I have done a number of things in my life that are pretty colorful, that--that we referred to earlier. But I don't intend to discuss my private life in this campaign, and that is my response.

BRAVER: Do you think there are episodes that will be revealed that will be embarrassing to you?

Sen. McCAIN: There's nothing in my life that I know of that will disqualify me from being president of the United States.

From the March 2, 1999, edition of CNN's Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer:

BLITZER: Your background. Is there anything out there that you want to talk about rather than wait until this campaign goes on and on and on that's going to cause surprises in the press, once again will focus on scandals as opposed to policy issues?

MCCAIN: I certainly hope not. I have made it clear that I am responsible for the break-up of my first marriage. But I've also made it clear that I'm not going to discuss that. It's -- the American people, the media and anybody else who wants to, can discuss it, I just don't choose to.

BLITZER: Is it fair game to go after candidates' personal backgrounds like that, or should we, the media, just stay out of it?

MCCAIN: Well, obviously all candidates would like to see the media stay completely out of it, but the fact is the media will be in it, and to what degree will be decided by the media and the American people; the candidates will not decide. So I have to say I have no position on that because I have no control over it.

From the February 2, 1999, edition of CNN's First in the Nation: The New Hampshire Primary:

BERNARD SHAW: You had an affair your first marriage. The sitting president is been impeached for his conduct with Monica Lewinsky. Should a politician's private acts be part of public discourse?

MCCAIN: Let me say that I am responsible for the break-up of my first marriage. I will not discuss or talk about that any more than that. If someone wants to criticize me for that, that's fine. I believe that the standards of morality of conduct will be determined, not by the politician themselves, but by the media and the American people. I will leave that judgment to them.

SHAW: How will you handle people trying to pry into your personal life? People who are just outright nosy?

MCCAIN: It happens, it goes with the territory, it's part of a political campaign, I'm not equipped to change it; only the American people and the media are. I realize that this is a very, very tough business. It's not a contact sport, it's a collision sport.

From Pages 13-14 of Worth the Fighting For:

I had used my professional advantages well since I had come home from war and was building a decent reputation for myself in the navy. But I had not shown the same determination to rebuild my personal life. My marriage to Carol McCain was falling apart. Sound marriages can be hard to recover after great time and distance have separated a husband and wife. We are different people when we reunite. But my marriage's collapse was attributable to my own selfishness and immaturity more than it was to Vietnam, and I cannot escape blame by pointing a finger at the war. The blame was entirely mine.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by shaggles (August 18, 2008 4:54 pm ET)
         
      Another opportunity for the media to kiss McCain's ass.  Who gives a crap about his first marriage or why it broke up?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DeminTX (August 18, 2008 5:17 pm ET)
           
        Well, I am very interested to hear about the "party that was going to bring morality" back to the White House is running a nominee that committed a variety of adulterous affairs.  Or, is there a statute of limitations on adultery?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by DAWUSS (August 18, 2008 5:18 pm ET)
             
          And you really think McCain's Republicans are going to bring morality to the White House?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by friedbergboy1422 (August 18, 2008 5:38 pm ET)
               
            Bush promised to restore "honor and dignity" back to the White House, remember?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by wzwriter (August 18, 2008 5:44 pm ET)
                 

              Bush promised to restore "honor and dignity" back to the White House, remember?

              Of coourse, "Honor" and "Dignity" were the pet names Bush gave to two rats who lived in the closet off the Oval Office.......

              But they sure brought back dignity - didn't they???

              Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (August 18, 2008 5:34 pm ET)
           

        I am because it's an indication of character, and because there is strong evidence that he was engaged in an affair when he was running for president in 2000. Her name was Vicki Iseman...

        Report Abuse
        • Author by carlileb5935 (August 18, 2008 7:32 pm ET)
             

          hey guys:

          Is anyone else bothered by the fact that neither the MSM or even MMFA are taking seriously the fact that McCain LIED about the 'cone of silence' at Saddleback?

          Even MMFA is ignoring how the media is spinning this story as a 'joke' or a crank issue, and allowing the Republican Party to strong-arm CNN and NBC about not covering it.

          This, folks, is an example of the reason why Dems LOSE-- because they are IDIOTS who don't know how to fight-- or care enough to.

          One can only imagine what would have happened if it had been Obama who hadn't arrived yet until after the questions were asked.

           

          Report Abuse
          • Author by BottleBlonde (August 18, 2008 7:54 pm ET)
               
            I posted about this very issue on another posting here. I'm concerned about it.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by my4cents (August 18, 2008 9:17 pm ET)
               
            McCain's lie will be posted I am sure, once the facts are known. 
            Report Abuse
            • Author by carlileb5935 (August 18, 2008 9:34 pm ET)
                 

              Nope-

              Olbermann even complained that it was "overwrought" while at the same time condemning the Republicans for the tactics-- and then doing EXACTLY WHAT THEY WANTED with this issue-- ignore it.

              NBC caved, and Olbermann's a hypocrite.

              Larry King? What a disgrace. First of all, Warren shows up late so he doesn't have to answer phone questions, then calls the issue "bogus" but never apologizes for misleading people about the 'cone of silence.'

              The Dem. operatives on King's show? An embarrassment. Fools.

              This is why DEMS LOSE, folks. Which is what is clearly going to happen. A landslide for McCain. Obama won't even take California.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by mary59 (August 18, 2008 10:50 pm ET)
                   
                You seem entirely too obsessed with your opinion on this. It's just possible that the world is more layered than that, and your take on everything isn't the ultimate word.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by carlileb5935 (August 18, 2008 11:14 pm ET)
                     

                  Again, this is why Dems lose. When the evidence looks like-- at the very least- that Republicans don't play by the rules, "liberals" look away, and attack their own!

                  A watershed moment. Obama is doomed. 

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by mary59 (August 19, 2008 7:59 am ET)
                       
                    Honey, you have a point but only before your dire predictions.  You have a very hard headed approach to elections:  only your gal can win so diss everyone else.  Have you ever considered that YOUR antics are part of the problem?
                    Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (August 18, 2008 4:59 pm ET)
         
      I am more interested how Cindy McCain did in the Buffalo Chip Beauty contest at Sturgis, S Dakota.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DAWUSS (August 18, 2008 5:17 pm ET)
           
        I thought for sure there'd've been clips on H&C...
        Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (August 18, 2008 6:25 pm ET)
           
        Well, Cindy won the title of Ms. Cowchip, and John won the title of Mr. Bullshit.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by rtwmd1230 (August 18, 2008 9:09 pm ET)
             
          NPR did a story this evening about Cindy LYING every time she says that she is her father's only child: she has a half-sister whom she wishes didn't exist.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by rtwmd1230 (August 18, 2008 9:24 pm ET)
               
            Addendum:

            Apparently, Ms. McCain is really into magical thinking: if she wishes something didn't exist, she believes that it doesn't. For example, her half-sister, federal drug laws, IRS regulations regarding non-profits, copyright law as it applies to recipes, etc.

            Can anyone on the right side of the aisle honestly say that they would look forward to having this nutjob as First Lady?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by wolf kotenberg (August 18, 2008 9:36 pm ET)
                 
              I would be more confortable about her half-sister and other allegations being proven , and becoming facts. Do you have any links that name this person as being a half sister ? Any pictures of the two together ?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by rtwmd1230 (August 18, 2008 9:48 pm ET)
                   
                The NPR story presented it as fact. She's the daughter from the father's first marriage. Her parents divorced when she was three and her father had only minimal contact with her after that. She got something like 10k in the will. Apparently, this is all well documented. Her son says she's a Democrat, but her main gripe is Cindy stating over and over that she (Cindy) is her father's only child.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by freelance (August 18, 2008 11:49 pm ET)
                   

                Take a summer vacation to La Jolla Shores in San Diego CA and you will find plenty of people willing to talk about Cindy McCain and how she treated her sister. 

                  

                Report Abuse
    • Author by DAWUSS (August 18, 2008 5:17 pm ET)
         
      Maybe it was in fact news for them. You never know...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wesley (August 18, 2008 5:21 pm ET)
         

      Sweet fancy moses...this has got to be one of the biggest WITH's ever published by mmfa.

      I guess mmfa would have been happier if McCain...when asked about his greatest moral failing...would have just said, "You know what it is".

      Report Abuse
      • Author by jeter2 (August 18, 2008 5:39 pm ET)
           

        Good one Wes.

        So since McCain has acknowledged all of this before, doesn't that make him honest? Unlike those other politicians [past or present] than shall remain nameless dancing around the question until the truth is slowly, painfully, pulled out of their mouths once the press catches them red-handed??

        And yes folks the media should have known he [McCain] already came clean, but in the larger scheme of things, I have to give this topic a big... SO WHAT?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by watershed (August 18, 2008 5:52 pm ET)
             

          Doesnt it make him honest, the way he tells the truth about his lies?

          Huh?

          Report Abuse
      • Author by watershed (August 18, 2008 5:51 pm ET)
           

        No, I think this is more about the media response to Mccain, their wild pride over his bold admission of his infidelity, and not Mccain's answer itself. But you knew that.

        If he admits it for the "first time" again, and the media reacts like it's new THAT time, would that make any sense to you why MMFA would cover it?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by wesley (August 18, 2008 5:57 pm ET)
             

           -- If he admits it for the "first time" again -- watershed

          The only people clamoring about McCain's "first time" is mmfa...not the reporters...and not McCain.

          This is a fairy tale...made up by mmfa. The reason? Easy...they wanted an excuse to put in print his many admissions of marital failure. 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Brabantio (August 18, 2008 6:06 pm ET)
               

            And it's just so convenient that these two were acting like it was some bold, brilliant move to admit something he's admitted many times before.

            Maybe they were looking for an excuse to bring up Obama's drug use, so the comparison in this exchange gave them that opening.

            Or maybe they address all aspects of misinformation, whether the actual subject matter helps or hurts either candidate.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by tommy (August 18, 2008 6:10 pm ET)
                 

              "Or maybe they address all aspects of misinformation, whether the actual subject matter helps or hurts either candidate"

              You're not serious with that?  Most naive post of the day...... 

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Brabantio (August 18, 2008 6:12 pm ET)
                   
                Why go into Obama's drug use?  Is that supposed to be a positive for him?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by tommy (August 18, 2008 6:17 pm ET)
                     
                  So you stand by your statement, at least where this thread is concerned.....that the ultimate goal is correcting the misinformation and the positive or negative affect on either candidate is secondary to that?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Brabantio (August 18, 2008 6:21 pm ET)
                       
                    Why shouldn't I?  If it was really just about making McCain look bad, why on earth would they ever bring up Obama's past drug use under any circumstances?
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by tommy (August 18, 2008 6:25 pm ET)
                         
                      I didn't say you should or shouldn't.  I was just asking for clarification.  You did.
                      Report Abuse
                • Author by hogprint (August 20, 2008 8:50 pm ET)
                     
                  Because I don't want a crack head with his finger on the button...maybe, but that's just me....
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Brabantio (August 21, 2008 7:06 am ET)
                       
                    You're confused.  I'm talking about MMfA discussing Obama's past drug use.
                    Report Abuse
              • Author by wesley (August 18, 2008 9:43 pm ET)
                   

                 -- Most naive post of the day......  -- tommy

                Amen, brother Ben...

                Where are all the partisans who blindly post and follow the mmfa mission statement. You know the ones that can't wait to drag out the mmfa mission statement...citing that mmfa is not fair and balanced...they only post conservative misinformation.

                I'll tell you where they are...they're on the sidelines because they recognize you are correct about the most naive post of the day.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by Brabantio (August 18, 2008 9:50 pm ET)
                     

                  How is this inconsistent with the mission statement?

                  Nice job agreeing with Tommy long after he abandoned his criticism, by the way.

                  Report Abuse
          • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (August 18, 2008 9:34 pm ET)
               

            marital failure. 

            Marital Failure? John McCain didn't have freaking marital failure, HE HAD AN AFFAIR WITH AN 18 YEARS OLD CHILD while he was still married to his wife. That first wife who was disfigured in a terrible car crash that required six months of life saving surgery that left her confined to a wheelchair and forced to use a catheter. That wife who McCain didn't even respect enough to wait until their divorce was final BEFORE taking out a marriage license to marry his rich child bride to be.

            McCain should tell the truth, he's no different than John Edwards, Bill Clinton and Eliot Spitzer, except he's still a Senator AND he's STILL running for president.

             

            Report Abuse
      • Author by BottleBlonde (August 18, 2008 6:00 pm ET)
           

        Summary: On Reliable Sources, the Houston Chronicle's Julie Mason said of Sen. John McCain's statement that his "greatest moral failing" was "the failure of my first marriage": "I think McCain really did something extraordinary when -- the way he answered that question. ... So he put it out there, he acknowledged it. And he sort of inoculated himself against it." Howard Kurtz similarly said: "McCain has acknowledged that he was not faithful in his first marriage, but not necessarily before a national television audience." In fact, McCain has repeatedly "acknowledged" his responsibility for the breakup of his first marriage in his memoir, in interviews, and "before a national television audience."

        Media Matters reports when conservative misinformation happens. In this case, the information that's not accurate or reliable is that John McCain doesn't deserve credit for his becoming honest and opening up on this occasion. Being open and honest is a good thing. Admitting to one's errors is something that most people think makes you look more honest and believeable. Being honest is a good thing, but he didn't just become 'honest' on this issue. Of course, his 'honesty' on this issue is very limited - all he'll say is that the breakup of his marriage was his fault. Well, duh, we already knew that  - he got a marriage license before he was even divorced! He shouldn't get much credit at all for his previous admissions, and he should get no credit for this time because it's nothing new.

        One commentator said that he did something extraordinary by opening up about this topic. Likewise, that's not true. He didn't do anything extraordinary, and so when his behavior is described in more glowing terms than what his behavior actually represents, that's conservative misinformation. It makes him look better than he deserves to look.

        When the other commentator said was that in an uncomfortable and widely-seen venue, on national TV, John McCain came clean for what may have been his first time in that venue. However, it wasn't his first time to come clean, not even on that venue! He doesn't deserve praise for finally doing something admirable if he's already done it before!

        Report Abuse
        • Author by tommy (August 18, 2008 6:14 pm ET)
             

          "He doesn't deserve praise for finally doing something admirable if he's already done it before!"

          I love it Sue, when you say something that you had no intention of really saying.  Never change! LOL!

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (August 18, 2008 6:40 pm ET)
               
            Tommy thinks he deserves praise for yet another attempt to derail a thread with inanity, even though he's done it many times before.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by rtwmd1230 (August 18, 2008 7:13 pm ET)
               
            Bottleblonde's comment is completely accurate.

            McCain has stated many times that he was responsible for the failure of his first marriage. It is very clearly misinformation to characterize as "extraordinary" his repeating something he has said many times in the past.

            If he says it again every day this week, will it be "extraordinary" every time he says it?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by BottleBlonde (August 18, 2008 10:42 pm ET)
               

            "He doesn't deserve praise for finally doing something admirable if he's already done it before!"

            I love it Sue, when you say something that you had no intention of really saying.  Never change! LOL!

             

            • - tommy / Monday August 18, 2008 6:14:05 PM EDT

            What in the world are you going on about?

            First off, you show how scary I am to your status quo when you call me by your oh-so-feared nemesis' name.

            Secondly, I said exactly what I wanted to say. John McCain doesn't deserve praise for what he admitted. Why doesn't he deserve praise for it? Why, because he has already admitted it. He admitted nothing new, and since he didn't admit anything new, he deserves no praise for it. It is good to admit that it's your fault if you're the one who cheated on a spouse and wrecked a marriage, but if you've admitted it before, it's not extraordinary when you do it again.

            You'll try almost anything to attack people like Barbantio and me for no good reason, with illogical arguments and personal attacks. It's too bad that instead of being simply out to argue for the conservative position, you're so directed to mislead with distortions, distract from the topic that's being discussed, and demean others.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by TrueDemocrat4377 (August 18, 2008 6:14 pm ET)
         
      Hopefully we can all get past the politics of personal destruction and all agree that what happens between a man and a woman is private.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mnichol7588 (August 18, 2008 6:44 pm ET)
         
      i e-mailed ms. mason and let her know how pathetic that performance (big smile on her face as she did it) was....obama is supposed to come up with new moral failings to satisfy her?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mary59 (August 18, 2008 7:29 pm ET)
         
      We love to examine the moral failings of other people. On election day, a voter's greatest moral failing will be to pull the lever for McCain after living through the disastrous years of Bush/Cheney and a Republican-controlled Congress. McCain will indeed continue the same policies: continue to let the oilmen run the economy, rising deficits and debt to China and India, jobs shipped overseas, corporations avoiding taxes and rewarded for setting up tax shelters, trying to gut social services and safety nets for the poor, the widow and the orphan.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MickD (August 19, 2008 9:14 am ET)
           
        Mary, this is exactly what I say to my father regarding the match-up. How can the Repubs get into the WH after the last eight years? Why would anyone morally pull that R chain? 
        Report Abuse
    • Author by evil pollyanna (August 18, 2008 7:35 pm ET)
         

      From Pages 13-14 of Worth the Fighting For: "I had used my professional advantages well since I had come home from war and was building a decent reputation for myself in the navy."

      Why don't they ask McCain about the FOUR F-14 Fighter Jets he CRASHED before he was either SHOT down or CRASHED the FIFTH plane? Didn't McCain, being such a Hotshot PILOT with a habit of crashing planes, scare the bejesus out of the FLIGHT DECK Crew, who had to see his planes off & wave him in again?  My SON was on a NAVY Aircraft Carrier and worked on the F-14's, now de-commissioned of course.  If the PILOTS of ANY of the Jets recklessly endangered the Flight Crew, why would the NAVY allow him or her to keep FLYING? Wouldn't he/she at the LEAST have been grounded, & an INVESTIGATION made?  It just sounds STRANGE!! I know McCain's DADDY was a bigshot ADMIRAL in the Navy, I guess he pulled strings for his BOY McCain, probably pulled strings so McCain, almost at the bottom of his Naval Academy class, got to be a JET PILOT anyway, even though he wasn't really qualified? What a PATRIOTIC Admiral, too, if MY son was crashing Fighter Jets left and right, I would have been having a serious TALK with him, you can BET!

      McCain likes to JOKE about DRINKING and REHAB; was that the reason he crashed so many times?  Was he a heavy DRINKER in the NAVY?  Why hasn't the News Media asked to see his COMPLETE Military Record?

      Reminds me of the strange gaps & oddities in GEORGE W. BUSH's Texas National Resort Guard Record,  the missing time, etc.  The Dan Rather "MemoGate" was a red herring designed to throw the News Media and Democrat's off, and shut down any further investigation of Bush's record, before MORE bad stuff came out.  Some people were saying Bush looked DRUNK in the Photos of him at the BEIJING Olympics, he sure LOOKS drunk, or hopped up on something making him all happy & wobbly. McCain will be just a THIRD TERM deja vu of BUSH, Jr. only SCARIER.

       

       

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by donaldmaddog5642 (August 18, 2008 11:52 pm ET)
         
      Nobody has commented about the new twit in town, Julie Mason. She stamps MeSame as some kind of hero for saying he was responsible for the failure of his first marriage.

      Then says that Obama was "disingenuous" for commenting on his early drug use. What the hell did she mean? As an obvious McCain supporter, she has made a bit of a

      mark as a loyal intern for giving Obama the back-hand and a back-slap to Old Johnny.

      Subtle?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (August 19, 2008 12:35 am ET)
           
        BVD's, you're going to post here again when you're sober, and you may not remember these comments. Somebody will remind you.It will be for your own good.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (August 19, 2008 1:10 am ET)
           

        MMFA is MMFA stands for Media matters for fagots.

        LOL

        Yet you find time to visit. Are you lonely?

        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.