CNN's King, Blitzer selectively cited poll showing less support for Obama among Clinton backers
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
SUMMARY: On Late Edition, Wolf Blitzer and John King both cited an August 15-18 Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll in which 52 percent of Sen. Hillary Clinton's supporters said they will support Sen. Barack Obama, but neither noted that an August 19-22 Washington Post/ABC News poll found that 70 percent of Clinton supporters "back Obama," according to the Post.
On the August 24 edition of CNN's Late Edition, host Wolf Blitzer and chief national correspondent John King both cited an August 15-18 Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll in which 52 percent of Sen. Hillary Clinton's supporters said they will support Sen. Barack Obama, but neither noted that an August 19-22 Washington Post/ABC News poll found that 70 percent of Clinton supporters "back Obama," according to the Post. An ABCNews.com "analysis" of the poll similarly stated that "70 percent of [Clinton supporters] are for" Obama.
King asked Sen. Evan Bayh (D-IN), "Where has he [Obama] failed?" King then cited the finding in the Journal/NBC poll that "almost half of Hillary Clinton's voters at this moment in time say they are not prepared to vote for Barack Obama." Blitzer later referred to the Journal/NBC poll in an interview with Terry McAuliffe, who was national chairman of Clinton's campaign, saying: "That's almost half, right there, who aren't ready to commit to Obama. There's frustration, there's anger among a considerable chunk of Hillary Clinton supporters." Neither King nor Blitzer mentioned the Post/ABC poll.
Earlier, on the August 24 edition of ABC's This Week, Post columnist George Will also cited the Journal/NBC poll. But in response, host George Stephanopoulos mentioned the Post/ABC poll, saying, "[O]ur poll shows that only three in 10 aren't for him." Similarly, on the August 24 edition of Fox News Sunday, host Chris Wallace said many of Clinton's supporters "are still mad. You've got this Wall Street Journal poll that shows only 52 percent now support Obama." Obama senior adviser Robert Gibbs responded, "Well, let's be honest, Chris. The Washington Post and ABC came out with a poll today that shows more than -- it shows 70 percent of Hillary Clinton voters supporting Barack Obama, the highest water mark since she suspended her campaign in June."
From the August 24 edition of CNN's Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer:
KING: But, Senator, help me understand. What would your advice be to Barack Obama? Where has he failed? If you look at a poll today -- latest NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, for example -- 21 percent of Hillary Clinton's voters in the primaries, those blue-collar Democrats, say they will vote for John McCain. Twenty-seven percent say they're undecided. That is almost half of Hillary Clinton's voters at this moment in time say they are not prepared to vote for Barack Obama. What is he doing wrong?
BAYH: Well, I think our convention will give us a big opportunity to reach out to those people. Hillary, as you know, is going to be 100 percent for him. I spoke to her last night. She wants to do whatever she can to help him get elected, because she knows that he is the right change for America, too.
[...]
BLITZER: You've seen that Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll that asked Clinton supporters what their inclination is right now. Fifty-two percent of them said they'd support Obama. Twenty-one percent said they'd support McCain. Another 27 percent are still undecided. That's almost half, right there, who aren't ready to commit to Obama. There's frustration, there's anger among a considerable chunk of Hillary Clinton supporters.
McAULIFFE: And I think, Wolf, for a lot of them, they were hoping that Hillary would become the vice president, so I think they were waiting to see the announcement. Now that Senator Biden has been picked, now we move forward to the general election, and I think we're going to be able to bring all those folks in as we move in to the general election.
Clearly, people are disgruntled with where George Bush has taken this country, and they know the stark differences between having a President McCain and a President Obama. And all the people who supported Hillary -- it was about health care, it was about fighting for our children and education, and it's going to be a stark difference as we head into the fall. So I'm very confident that the people will come in. It's going to take time, but you know what? Wolf, you know as well as I do, it was a 17-month primary campaign. It was very close. Hillary got 18 million votes. It's going to take some people some time, but in the end, we're all going to come together. We're Democrats; we want to take this country in a new direction. Senator Obama's pick today was Senator Biden -- was spectacular. He adds so much to the ticket, and I think it's a dynamite ticket.
From the August 24 broadcast of ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos:
COKIE ROBERTS (ABC News political analyst): I think that a lot of -- the media loves this story because it sort of keeps the fight going. And the Republicans love this story. And the fact that they were actually putting out ads saying "Hillary didn't get it" is showing you how much it's working to -- they think it's working to their advantage.
STEPHANOPOULOS: And Obama --
WILL: The Wall Street Journal/NBC poll shows that only half of the Hillary supporters say they're now supporting Obama, and one in five say they are supporting McCain.
STEPHANOPOULOS: But what an opportunity for Barack Obama. I mean, look at this: He's coming into this convention -- in our poll shows that only three in 10 aren't for him. He's only getting 79 percent of Democrats. If he does one thing in this convention, if he unifies the Democratic Party, he will have -- I know David Axelrod doesn't want to say it -- he'll have a 12-point lead.
From the August 24 broadcast of Fox Broadcasting Co.'s Fox News Sunday:
WALLACE: Why shouldn't Clinton supporters be angry?
GIBBS: Look, I think Clinton supporters are united in the thing that unites all the people in this convention. We need change; we can't have more of the same. I think it's a better question that's directed to the McCain campaign. They know that that ad is demonstrably false. They know that Hillary Clinton is supporting Barack Obama.
WALLACE: But wait a minute. He did-- she didn't get an interview. She didn't get consulted on the pick. She had 18 million supporters. A lot of them are still mad. You've got this Wall Street Journal poll that shows only 52 percent now support Obama --
GIBBS: Well, let's be honest --
WALLACE: I mean, I don't have to tell you, the party is not united.
GIBBS: Well, let's be honest, Chris. The Washington Post and ABC came out with a poll today that shows more than -- it shows 70 percent of Hillary Clinton voters supporting Barack Obama, the highest water mark since she suspended her campaign in June.
There's no question that people have -- people had strong feelings about their nominee. We had a race that was unparalleled virtually in this party. We went from beginning to end. We have the strongest party. We have the most enthusiastic voters. Look, I think the process that went on was a fair process that came up with as good a pick -- and the best pick that we could possibly have. I'm interested seeing how John McCain conducts this process.

















What else is new?
Well...we've just learned that John McCain is a former POW. The reason this was not previously disclosed is because John McCain doesn't like to talk about it. ;>)
Now, be fair! John McCain only talks about being a Former POW whenever he opens his mouth...
Apparently he opened his mouth again yesterday...
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12754.html
mKKKain talking point summary:
NOUN VERB POW
Well then, let's change the subject to take note of this right wing racist who openly admits he's gonna make fake passes to the DNC convention so he can infiltrate it and create a disturbance! Maybe it's someone we know who posts here? =0
The polls are crazy...the USAToday/Gallup poll out today showed that 23% of those polled didn't even know who Joe Biden is. Amazing...
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-08-23-biden-poll_N.htm
23% never heard of Joe Biden...
Hannity did was trash him for his "arrogance".
His "i have a higher IQ" statment justifies it though.
When he was a POW, John McCain often passed the time thinking about how when he got out he wanted a simple woman who would stay home and do the cooking and cleaning...
Yep, he wondered if they belonged to a union or whether he could just find an illegal alien and pay her cash under the table...
When he was a POW, John McCain often passed the time thinking about how when he got out he wanted a simple woman who would stay home and do the cooking and cleaning...
And have $100M and seven homes for him to live in while attacking his political opponent as elitist...
And have $100M and seven homes for him to live in...
The former POW firmly believes in the power of prayer... and the Lord sent Cindy and all of her bounty to him. ;>)
Don't watch much Hannity because I can't stand his weasel partner.
If Alan Colmes is a "weasel" do you think it was just by accident that FOX hired a "weasel" to be Hannity's liberal foil? Hannity's show is about as contrived as John McCain interjecting references to himself as a former POW into everything... If John McCain really didn't like to talk about it, he wouldn't...
Moon, that was Chris Wallace's(I think it was him, I get the TV wingnuts all mixed up) concern trolling point today, that the only real "game changer" would have been HRC. He then said that some would have loved her, some would have hated her.Meaning it could have been a complete wash, and he had no idea what he was talking about.
The other lame attack by the righties (at this point anyway) is that Biden doesn't mesh with the "change" theme of Obama's campaign.They've been hammering the "inexperience" angle so hard for the past few months, that now their "helpful advice" seems to be that Obama should have chosen somebody less experienced than Biden. So they could continue with the bullshlt they'd become comfortable with.heh heh.
That's why I like watching Fox and the rest of the screwed up media. They're so flipping lazy when things don't fall into the cute little fantasies they've manufactured, it makes them nuts (more than usual).
All of the issues Hillary supporters claim to care about will go to hell if McCain wins. There is no logical reason for them to jump ship and vote for Grampy.... it would be a classic case of cutting off your nose to spite your face.
If McCain wins due to childish Hillary defectors, the Democratic party will be FUBAR.
You must remember that the average voter - even a Dem one - is fundamentally stupid. 30% of Hillary supporters are willing to pull the R lever. And McCain putting out new ads touting this 'PUMA' thingy will have an effect.
People are so damned STUPID. ANYONE who is willing to cross over and vote for McCain DESERVES to get screwed big time. And that is what will happen.
Imbeciles...
I was amazed at the poll that said 23% had never even heard of Joe Biden, despite the fact that he was a candidate for President just a few months ago. No doubt, these are the same people who can't name either of their U.S. Senators, can't find Iraq on a map, and believe that our system of government is based on the Bible.
Why would a Hillary supporter vote for McCain?
Some Hillary supporters are conservaive Democrats or moderate Republicans who are more hawkish on perceived national security issues. Some are still supporting the maverick who no longer exists in reality. The reasons for their wavering are varied, but it's too simplistic to label them childish. The party has to work to win them back, but it can be done. I think it's significant that Lilly Ledbetter is one of the speakers on opening night. Her case and the proposed legislation that followed highlight one of the real differences between the candidates - one issue that should matter to the Hillary supporters. It just needs to be emphasized, and I think it will be tonight.
I find it hard to believe that many "conservatives" genuinely supported Hillary, given the way she was savaged by conservatives during the 90s.
And, if anyone thinks she would have fared any better than Obama as a target of the RNC/Karl Rove Big Lie machine.... they're simply out of touch with reality.
Listening to 'Big Eddie' right now - he just had two callers - Hillary supporters - on who said that the new Gramps PUMA ads have pissed them off to the point where they will definitely cast their votes for Obama. One of the callers stated that he is disgusted by McCain using Hillary as a tool against Obama.
Looks like this ad will backfire on Gramps...
The Rasmussen Gallup Contribution
Check it out, Rasmussen polls are being very deliberate with their attempt to assert John McCain is catching up and moving ahead of Barack Obama during the Democratic convention. It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out the polls are leaning right — far right.
RealClearPolitics example my point; there is a deliberate attempt to make it look like the Democrats are loosing the election. This is done in two ways:
It is hard to get a true unbiased account of the polling averages. I thought SurveyUSA was a good pollsters. But. when you look at how low their numbers are for Obama, you can’t trust no one. This point is shown in an Oregon poll.
What bothers me the most is none of the talking heads will say some of these polls are bias. When it comes to Gallup and Rasmussen, they seem made for CNN commentators. Behind every statement they make, there is “the lastest” Gallup poll to back it up. Sometimes I feel like I am being soften up for the big ripoff in November.
Joseph