About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Contradicting his own book, Freddoso claimed "there's nothing" in Obama's record indicating he is a "reformer"

August 25, 2008 8:53 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: On Fox News' America's Election HQ, David Freddoso claimed: "Senator [Barack] Obama says that he is a reformer, an agent of positive change. And looking at his record, though, in Chicago, Springfield, and Washington, I found that he is absolutely -- there's nothing in his record to bear out that claim." However, in Freddoso's recently released book, he specifically credited Obama with two "real accomplishment[s] ... in the name of reform" -- the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006, and a 1998 Illinois ethics bill.

20 Comments

On the August 25 edition of Fox News' America's Election HQ, conservative author David Freddoso claimed: "Senator [Barack] Obama says that he is a reformer, an agent of positive change. And looking at his record, though, in Chicago, Springfield, and Washington, I found that he is absolutely -- there's nothing in his record to bear out that claim." However, in Freddoso's recently released book, The Case Against Barack Obama (Regnery), Freddoso specifically credited Obama with two "real accomplishment[s] ... in the name of reform" -- the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006, and a 1998 ethics bill outlawing political fundraising on Illinois state property and barring lobbyists from giving gifts to state legislators.

As Media Matters for America documented, Freddoso gave conflicting accounts of the 1998 ethics bill in The Case Against Barack Obama. On Pages 30-31, Freddoso characterized the bill as "relatively harmless." However, on Pages 93-94, Freddoso wrote:

Obama's reform record is not a complete wash. His most notable accomplishment in Washington was the bill he co-sponsored with Republican senator Tom Coburn, the conservative junior senator from Oklahoma. The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 -- also known as "Google for Government" -- helped expose to the sunlight the congressional practice of "earmarking," in which members of Congress direct federal spending to parochial projects -- swimming pools, bridges to nowhere -- that often have no national importance or congressional authorization.63 Coburn and Obama's bill, approved over the objection of some of Capitol Hill's worst porkers, really was a small victory for open government and bipartisanship.

This was a real accomplishment for Obama in the name of reform -- the second such accomplishment of his career after the Illinois ethics law.

From the August 25 edition of America's Election HQ:

BILL HEMMER (co-host): What is your case against the senator from Illinois?

FREDDOSO: Senator Obama says that he is a reformer, an agent of positive change. And looking at his record, though, in Chicago, Springfield, and Washington, I found that he is absolutely -- there's nothing in his record to bear out that claim, that, in fact, the idea that he's a reformer is a great lie.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Graydogs (August 25, 2008 8:58 pm ET)
         
      Sort of makes you wonder if they even right their own books doesn't it....either that or are they such compulsive liars, they have lost the ability to know what they have said and written.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Graydogs (August 25, 2008 8:59 pm ET)
           
        Write, not right .......dang another type-0
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mary59 (August 25, 2008 11:44 pm ET)
             
          Their books aren't right, whether they write them or not. ;-)
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Graydogs (August 26, 2008 12:00 pm ET)
               
            I completely agree.....They probably have an entire staff of writers (and I use that term lightly) making it up as it goes along, and one of the reasons none of these "writers" can keep their lies straight when confronted by the truth.When I hear these guys interviewed, it often sounds like they have no idea whats in the book.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (August 25, 2008 9:03 pm ET)
         
      Two threads in one day in which Barack Obama is called a liar...by people who, until recently, I had never heard of. Do you think there are some wannabes out there trying to establish careers by attacking Barack Obama?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Graydogs (August 25, 2008 9:22 pm ET)
           
        Well if career seeking wannabes were to come forward with anything true or false about McCain, the media wouldn't give them the time of day....so I guess 15 minutes of fame requires mud slinging at Obama....sad isn't it.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by SFnomad (August 25, 2008 9:37 pm ET)
           
        Mann Coulter got her start doing the same kinda think against President Clinton.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mary59 (August 25, 2008 11:49 pm ET)
             
          I posted her bio on an earlier thread...she was raised by wild horses, then was adopted by Richard Mellon Scaife, who brought her into his creepy mansion to write tabloid pieces about the Clintons.  Naturally she became the wing-nut dream girl, and cranks out dull personal appearances after every stupid, ill-conceived book is preposterously concocted.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (August 26, 2008 12:19 am ET)
               
            I think the real point here is that Obama failed to fix everything in the world during his Senate career. Remember, the rightys hold everybody else to much higher standards than they do themselves.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (August 26, 2008 1:35 am ET)
                 

              That's because their answers for all the worlds' problems are rather simplistic:

              Strangelove McCain

              Report Abuse
              • Author by worrierking (August 26, 2008 7:42 am ET)
                   
                "Well I've been to one world fair a picnic and a rodeo and that's the funniest thing I ever

                saw come these internet tubes"..
                Report Abuse
              • Author by IRONY 101 (August 26, 2008 7:48 am ET)
                   

                Funny how things come full circle...watch for McCain to start talking tough about the Russians...or Russkies. It'll be Dr. Strangelove all over again.

                BTW, I heard the former POW was at it again last night talking about his POW experience in response to a question about how many homes he owns...but, you know, the former POW doesn't like to talk about all that POW stuff. 

                Report Abuse
                • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (August 26, 2008 8:08 am ET)
                     
                  Gentlemen, there's no fighting here, this is the War Room!"
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by worrierking (August 26, 2008 8:42 am ET)
                     
                  But the former POW John McCain, if he's elected, is not saying we wouldn't get our hair mussed. But he does say... no more than ten to twenty million killed, tops.

                  Uh... depended on the breaks.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by magnolialover (August 26, 2008 8:58 am ET)
                     

                  He already has been talking tough about the Russians. Sounds like the republicans want to start up the cold war again. Got to have another "enemy" to take away from what's happening in the US since the republicans have been running the joint. You know, "OH LOOK! OVER THERE! THE RUSSIANS ARE COMING ACROSS THE BORDERS AGAIN! IT'S 1968 ALL OVER!!! WE MUST STOP THE RED HOARD!"

                  Anyway, it does appear that republicans seem to hold up the democrats as god like in their divinity to "change" things in such a short amount of time during their Senate tenures. Heck, I'm sure that they have multiple term senators right now who have done little to nothing. Of course, they also ignore Obama's time doing neighborhood organization as well, which they like to make fun of, but it was something that he was exceptional at, and he did make changes in people's lives that were for the better, and made a direct impact. If that's not a positive change, or something good that he's done, I'm not really sure what was.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by doggone-ga (August 26, 2008 10:27 am ET)
                       

                    "Sounds like the republicans want to start up the cold war again"

                    Isn't that the ESSENCE of being a conservative?  That you can only look to the past, never the future?

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by magnolialover (August 26, 2008 12:58 pm ET)
                         
                      I must add, that there is nothing wrong with looking at the past. As long as you learn something from it. Apparently, that is the major problem with a lot of right wingers. Those that don't learn from past mistakes are doomed to repeat them.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by doggone-ga (August 26, 2008 2:55 pm ET)
                           

                        "As long as you learn something from it"

                        Oh, sure...but if you ONLY look to the past, and don't also look to the future...then you AREN'T learning anything from the past.

                        Report Abuse
    • Author by wzwriter (August 26, 2008 12:12 pm ET)
         
      And there's nothing in David Freddoso's record that indicates we can believe anything he says.  He's a serial liar.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.