Contradicting his own book, Freddoso claimed "there's nothing" in Obama's record indicating he is a "reformer"
SUMMARY: On Fox News' America's Election HQ, David Freddoso claimed: "Senator [Barack] Obama says that he is a reformer, an agent of positive change. And looking at his record, though, in Chicago, Springfield, and Washington, I found that he is absolutely -- there's nothing in his record to bear out that claim." However, in Freddoso's recently released book, he specifically credited Obama with two "real accomplishment[s] ... in the name of reform" -- the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006, and a 1998 Illinois ethics bill.
On the August 25 edition of Fox News' America's Election HQ, conservative author David Freddoso claimed: "Senator [Barack] Obama says that he is a reformer, an agent of positive change. And looking at his record, though, in Chicago, Springfield, and Washington, I found that he is absolutely -- there's nothing in his record to bear out that claim." However, in Freddoso's recently released book, The Case Against Barack Obama (Regnery), Freddoso specifically credited Obama with two "real accomplishment[s] ... in the name of reform" -- the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006, and a 1998 ethics bill outlawing political fundraising on Illinois state property and barring lobbyists from giving gifts to state legislators.
As Media Matters for America documented, Freddoso gave conflicting accounts of the 1998 ethics bill in The Case Against Barack Obama. On Pages 30-31, Freddoso characterized the bill as "relatively harmless." However, on Pages 93-94, Freddoso wrote:
Obama's reform record is not a complete wash. His most notable accomplishment in Washington was the bill he co-sponsored with Republican senator Tom Coburn, the conservative junior senator from Oklahoma. The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 -- also known as "Google for Government" -- helped expose to the sunlight the congressional practice of "earmarking," in which members of Congress direct federal spending to parochial projects -- swimming pools, bridges to nowhere -- that often have no national importance or congressional authorization.63 Coburn and Obama's bill, approved over the objection of some of Capitol Hill's worst porkers, really was a small victory for open government and bipartisanship.
This was a real accomplishment for Obama in the name of reform -- the second such accomplishment of his career after the Illinois ethics law.
From the August 25 edition of America's Election HQ:
BILL HEMMER (co-host): What is your case against the senator from Illinois?
FREDDOSO: Senator Obama says that he is a reformer, an agent of positive change. And looking at his record, though, in Chicago, Springfield, and Washington, I found that he is absolutely -- there's nothing in his record to bear out that claim, that, in fact, the idea that he's a reformer is a great lie.















That's because their answers for all the worlds' problems are rather simplistic:
saw come these internet tubes"..
Funny how things come full circle...watch for McCain to start talking tough about the Russians...or Russkies. It'll be Dr. Strangelove all over again.
BTW, I heard the former POW was at it again last night talking about his POW experience in response to a question about how many homes he owns...but, you know, the former POW doesn't like to talk about all that POW stuff.
Uh... depended on the breaks.
He already has been talking tough about the Russians. Sounds like the republicans want to start up the cold war again. Got to have another "enemy" to take away from what's happening in the US since the republicans have been running the joint. You know, "OH LOOK! OVER THERE! THE RUSSIANS ARE COMING ACROSS THE BORDERS AGAIN! IT'S 1968 ALL OVER!!! WE MUST STOP THE RED HOARD!"
Anyway, it does appear that republicans seem to hold up the democrats as god like in their divinity to "change" things in such a short amount of time during their Senate tenures. Heck, I'm sure that they have multiple term senators right now who have done little to nothing. Of course, they also ignore Obama's time doing neighborhood organization as well, which they like to make fun of, but it was something that he was exceptional at, and he did make changes in people's lives that were for the better, and made a direct impact. If that's not a positive change, or something good that he's done, I'm not really sure what was.
"Sounds like the republicans want to start up the cold war again"
Isn't that the ESSENCE of being a conservative? That you can only look to the past, never the future?
"As long as you learn something from it"
Oh, sure...but if you ONLY look to the past, and don't also look to the future...then you AREN'T learning anything from the past.