About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

ABC falsely said McCain has never brought up Ayers, suggested McCain is separate from his campaign

August 26, 2008 6:06 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: ABCNews.com falsely asserted that an Obama campaign ad questioning why Sen. John McCain is "trying to link [Sen.] Barack Obama to radical Bill Ayers" is "incorrect in insinuating that John McCain himself has brought up Ayers," adding, "[I]t is in fact McCain's campaign that has sought to use the Ayers association against Obama." In fact, McCain himself brought up Ayers unprompted during an April interview on ABC's This Week. Further, ABCNews.com gave no indication that McCain has repudiated or in any way distanced himself from his aides' comments linking Ayers to Obama.

25 Comments

An August 25 entry on ABCNews.com's Political Radar blog falsely asserted that an Obama campaign ad -- which includes an announcer saying, "With all our problems, why is [Sen.] John McCain talking about the '60s, trying to link [Sen.] Barack Obama to radical Bill Ayers?"-- "is incorrect in insinuating that John McCain himself has brought up Ayers." In fact, "McCain himself ... brought up Ayers," unprompted, during an April interview on ABC's This Week. The post also said: "[I]t is in fact McCain's campaign that has sought to use the Ayers association against Obama," suggesting that McCain is somehow not responsible for what his campaign says. Reporter Tahman Bradley gave no indication that McCain has repudiated or in any way distanced himself from his aides' comments linking Ayers to Obama.

In the August 25 post, Bradley reported that "the Obama campaign is using a new television ad to take on the issue of Obama's association with a 1970s radical who bombed the Capitol and Pentagon" and that the ad is intended to "accuse Sen. McCain of raising the Ayers issue in the presidential campaign." Bradley then reported, "The spot is incorrect in insinuating that John McCain himself has brought up Ayers." But during an April 20 interview on This Week, after host George Stephanopoulos asked McCain whether Obama "shares your sense of patriotism," McCain replied, "I'm sure he's very patriotic, but his relationship with Mr. Ayers is open to question." McCain then persisted in criticizing Obama about Ayers during the interview.

After falsely asserting that McCain has not "brought up Ayers," Bradley continued: "[I]t is in fact McCain's campaign that has sought to use the Ayers association against Obama, and McCain spokesman Brian Rogers did so again upon learning about the ad." Bradley quoted Rogers questioning Obama's judgment for associating with an "unrepentant terrorist," which is a recurring talking point from McCain's campaign. On August 20, Rogers referred, in a statement, to Obama's "relationship with the unrepentant terrorist William Ayers," and on May 18, spokesman Tucker Bounds commented that "when Barack Obama was beginning his career in politics he was launching it at the home of William Ayers, an unrepentant domestic terrorist."

From the April 20 edition of ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos:

STEPHANOPOULOS: Do you have any doubt that Barack Obama shares your sense of patriotism?

McCAIN: I'm sure he's very patriotic, but his relationship with Mr. Ayers is open to question. And that --

STEPHANOPOULOS: Why?

McCAIN: Because, if you're going to associate and have as a friend and serve on a board and have a guy kick off your campaign that says he's unrepentant, that he wished he'd bombed more. And then, the worst thing of all, that I think really indicates Senator Obama's attitude, is he had the incredible statement that he compared Mr. Ayers, an unrepentant terrorist -- an unrepentant terrorist, with Senator Tom Coburn. Senator Coburn, a physician who goes to Oklahoma on the weekends and brings babies into life.

Comparing those two, I mean, that's not -- that's an attitude, frankly, that certainly isn't in keeping with the overall attitude of the American people --

STEPHANOPOULOS: Senator Obama said --

McCAIN: -- and it's very insulting to a great man, a great doctor, a great humanitarian. To compare him with a guy who says in -- after 2001, I wish we had bombed more? I had a reconciliation with the anti-war movement. One of the great experiences of my life was to get to know and love David Ifshin. I had a reconciliation with the Vietnamese, when we normalized relations. But how can you countenance someone who was engaged in bombings, which could have or did kill innocent people?

STEPHANOPOULOS: Senator Obama says he was eight years old when that was happening.

McCAIN: But he became friends with him and spent time with him, while the guy was unrepentant over his activities as a member of a terrorist organization, the Weathermen. And then to compare him with Dr. Tom Coburn who spends so much of his life bringing babies into this world -- that in my view is really -- it borders on outrageous.

STEPHANOPOULOS: He also pointed out that he and Mr. Ayers have a very loose relationship. They live in the same neighborhood; there was an organizing meeting many, many years ago, he says, in his house and he says, frankly, I don't agree with these comments that Mr. Ayers made.

McCAIN: Doesn't agree with them? Does he condemn them? Does he -- would he condemn someone who says that they're unrepentant and wished that they had bombed more, and compare him to a doctor, one of the great humanitarian, in my view, one of the greatest spokesperson for the rights of the unborn in America?

STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, you say he should condemn these comments.

McCAIN: Sure.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by IRONY 101 (August 26, 2008 6:13 pm ET)
         
      I am so sorry I ever held any respect for John McCain...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (August 26, 2008 6:13 pm ET)
         
      I am so sorry I ever held any respect for John McCain...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by dbeden4153 (August 26, 2008 6:16 pm ET)
           

        Irony, I'm sure that you, like me, respected the 2000 McCain...but sadly, he is no more, and has bowed to the party masters.

        Oh, and he's a POW, did you know that?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (August 26, 2008 6:26 pm ET)
             
          I still respect him for his service to this country, both as a Navy aviator, and as a Senator, but the Presidential McCain, I can't stand.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by dbeden4153 (August 26, 2008 6:52 pm ET)
               

            I agree.  And it's not that he's a Republican...hell, I'm an Independent (and was for Obama before Iowa,) it's that he doesn't even know what he stands for anymore, except for more war, and specifically a restart of the cold war.

            Ok, I take that back, he does know what he stands for, it just wasn't the same thing he stood for two years ago.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by wookie (August 26, 2008 9:51 pm ET)
                 

              >>I agree.  And it's not that he's a Republican...

              For me it is. McCain was only acceptable in 2000 when he went against many in his party. Even at that his moderate maverick tendencies were overrated.  The GOP will always put up war happy, bible thumping corporate stooges and we will all pretend we didn't expect it. 

               

              Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (August 26, 2008 7:06 pm ET)
               
            In my opinion, everything about John McCain since he got hooked up with the Hensley family is tainted. Dirty money...and dirty politics. McCain is a fraud.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by snoopy (August 26, 2008 7:13 pm ET)
               
            Not me. He cheapened it by overusing it as an excuse for everything. When you treat your service disrespectfully, you don't deserve credit for serving. Wasn't that the crux of the right's argument against Kerry?
            Report Abuse
        • Author by NiceguyEddie (August 27, 2008 11:49 am ET)
             

          Count me in as a big Booster of McCain 2000, and as someone who feels betrayed by McSellout 2008.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (August 26, 2008 8:04 pm ET)
           

        I too am sorry I held any respect for John McCain...

        He's disgraced himself beyond all recognition.  Sadly, he's at the point where his actions are--quite frankly--dishonorable. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by MickD (August 26, 2008 9:58 pm ET)
             
          It seems his true essence has emerged, and it is sadly just another cynical Repub power grab. He is allowing his campaign to be hijacked by the Rove standard.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (August 26, 2008 6:50 pm ET)
         

      On the positive side, Obama is hitting back hard. He's successfully got that piece of crap ad pulled from several stations and has released a conterpunch as well.

      But if the former POW McCain wants to keep playing childish games, I think he needs to explain his ties to felon Jim Hensley. Consider some of the facts here:

      Jim Hensley vs. Bill Ayers

      Felony Convictions: Hensley 1, Ayers 0.

      Comment: In 1948, Hensley was given a six-month suspended sentence for falsifying liquor records to conceal illegal distribution of whiskey against post-war rationing regulations. Ayers has never been convicted of a felony.

      Connections with Organized Crime: Hensley 2. Ayers 0.

      Comment: Hensley and his brother were the owners of Ruidoso Downs racetrack, along with "silent partner" Clarence "Teak" Baldwin who had been banned from any ownership role due to illegal bookmaking activities. Long-time business associate Kemper Marley, Sr. was also connected with organized crime.

      Illegally Acquired Liquor Licenses: Hensley 1, Ayers 0.

      Comments: Hensley acquired a liquor license in Arizona despite the fact that he was not allowed to have one due to being a felon.

      Killings Connected With: Hensley 21,000, Ayers 4.

      Comment:
      While neither Hensley nor Ayers have personally murdered anyone, both were heavily involved with organizations that caused the deaths of others. For Ayers, that organization was the Weatherman. For Hensley that organization was Anheuser-Busch. In 2007, Arizona reported more than 700 alcohol-related deaths. Conservatively putting the average number of alcohol-related deaths in Arizona at 400, Hensley has been responsible for the deaths of more than 20,000 Arizonans. And while Budweiser cannot be blamed for each death, it is clearly a gateway drug to harder types of alcohol, thus culpability is Hensley's.

      Divorces: Hensley 1, Ayers 0.

      Comments: Like his son-in-law, Hensley divorced his first wife after having an affair and remarrying. Ayers has been married to Bernardine Dohrn for nearly 40 years.

      Abandoned Children: Hensley 1, Ayers -1

      Comments: Hensley abandoned his first child, Kathleen Portalski. Ayers and Dohrn raised two of their own children and adopted a third.

      As anyone can see from the plain facts, Jim Hensley was far more dangerous man than Ayers has ever been, and profited wildly from his illicit activities. It is time for John McCain to stand up and explain his ties with the felon Jim Hensley.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by dbeden4153 (August 26, 2008 6:57 pm ET)
           

        "On the positive side, Obama is hitting back hard. He's successfully got that piece of crap ad pulled from several stations and has released a conterpunch as well."

        which is funny, because the right-wing (Michelle Malkin, at least) has tried to paint him as stifling free speech.  Really, go read her post about it (I'm not going to link to Malkin, in the sake of not posting profanity,) she thinks its about free speech, instead of violating election laws, which it is about, btw.

        But people, don't worry, Obama will win.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by my4cents (August 26, 2008 9:50 pm ET)
             

          "But people, don't worry, Obama will win."

          I am not that sure. The McCain campaign has sunk to even lower levels than Bush's. In the gutter, nothing can be certain.

          Obama is far better qualified than McCain for the President job but the lapdog media, Mccain campaign, and people's gut reaction to fear mongering (however misplaced they might be) are points to consider. 

          Report Abuse
        • Author by NiceguyEddie (August 27, 2008 11:59 am ET)
             

          she thinks its about free speech, instead of violating election laws, which it is about, btw.

          And isn't McCain largely personally responsible for getting many of the relevant election laws at work here passed in the first place?

          Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (August 26, 2008 7:03 pm ET)
           
        Did you mention that Jim Hensley, the convicted felon father-in-law of the former POW, was a front man for Kemper Marley, Meyer Lansky's reputed man in Arizona? And that Hensley's Budweiser distributorship was a reputed payoff to Hensley by Marley for taking the prosecution for him? Did you mention that Jim Hensley is the one who got McCain involved with Charles Keating? Did you mention that McCain worked for Jim Hensley? Did you mention that it was Jim Hensley who paid for McCain to get into politics? As I might have said earlier, without Jim Hensley John McCain today would probably be a crazy old dude still getting into bar fights. Cindy McCain's money is dirty money... John McCain is a scumbag...
        Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (August 27, 2008 11:57 am ET)
           

        Your Anheiser-Busch numbers are beyond over the top.  Neither "alchohol" "beer" or "hard liquor" kills anyone, nor is the "gateway" remotely legit.  Each person is responsible for their own actions.  (How are we supposed to legalize marijuana if you think like that?!) ;)

         Otherwise, very interesting piece!  Good work!

        Report Abuse
    • Author by ukobserver (August 26, 2008 7:34 pm ET)
         

      I mentioned the Bush Family bank/Nazi connection to a friend at work as we were watching "The World at War" documentary series over lunch. His reply was "Well that explains a lot!!" 

       

      It took me a few minutes to regain composure.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by onionhead (August 26, 2008 7:42 pm ET)
         

      I have to say "WITH" on this one. 

      I mean, how is ABC News supposed to remember what was said on their own program?  MMFA acts like ABC is supposed to organize and keep track of information given on their own program.  I don't get it; does MMFA think that ABC News pays people to do research or something?

      Does MMFA also think they are supposed to remember McCain, a presidential candidate, saying this about Obama, another presidential candidate?:

      "the worst thing of all, that I think really indicates Senator Obama's attitude, is he had the incredible statement that he compared Mr. Ayers, an unrepentant terrorist -- an unrepentant terrorist, with Senator Tom Coburn."

      Do you really expect them to remember McCain talking about Obama being in cahoots with "an unrepentant terrorist"? I bet ya McCain doesn't even remember saying that. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (August 27, 2008 11:49 am ET)
         

      This is hilariously funny.  Even if McCain hadn't directly referred to Ayers (which he obviously did) how can Obama be guilty by association with Ayers while at the same time McCain is not hel responsible for statements by his campaign.  It's giving me a headache trying to figure that one out.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.