About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

AP's Fournier counts the "I's" in Clinton's speech, but her focus was often outward

August 27, 2008 6:43 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: In an AP "analysis," Ron Fournier asserted that Sen. Hillary Clinton's convention speech, which he described as "laced 17 times by some variation of the pronoun 'I,' " was part of the "bill" Sen. Barack Obama had to pay for Clinton's agreement to "end[] her historic bid for the presidency in a manner that, however messy, still left Obama in a stronger position than Kennedy left Jimmy Carter in 1980, when the Massachusetts senator extracted platform concessions and shrank from the traditional unity show at the final gavel." In fact, Media Matters counted 21 instances in the speech in which Clinton used "I." But in at least 13 of these instances, Clinton was not focusing on herself and was instead making one of three points: her support for Obama's election; the importance of the 2008 election; and who really matters in this election.

20 Comments

In an August 27 Associated Press "analysis," Ron Fournier asserted that Sen. Hillary Clinton's August 26 speech at the Democratic National Convention -- which he described as "laced 17 times by some variation of the pronoun 'I' " -- was part of the "bill" Sen. Barack Obama had to pay for Clinton's agreement to "end[] her historic bid for the presidency in a manner that, however messy, still left Obama in a stronger position than [Ted] Kennedy left Jimmy Carter in 1980, when the Massachusetts senator extracted platform concessions and shrank from the traditional unity show at the final gavel." Fournier gave no explanation for his apparent view that the number of times Clinton used the pronoun "I" in her speech was an indication of the "price" she exacted from Obama. And while Media Matters for America actually counted 21 instances in the speech in which Clinton used "some variation of the pronoun 'I,' " contrary to Fournier's suggestion, Clinton's focus in most of those instances was not on herself, but on Obama and the election. Specifically, in at least 13 of these instances, she was making one of three points: her support for Obama's election; the importance of the 2008 election; and who really matters in this election.

In three instances, Clinton used the pronoun "I" to express support for Obama. For example, she said: "I'm here tonight as ... a proud supporter of Barack Obama" and "I cannot wait to watch Barack Obama sign into law a health care plan that covers every single American."

Clinton also used the pronoun "I" to call attention to how important she believes this election is. For instance, she stated, "I haven't spent the past 35 years in the trenches, advocating for children, campaigning for universal health care, helping parents balance work and family, and fighting for women's rights here at home and around the world ... to see another Republican in the White House squander our promise of a country that really fulfills the hopes of our people."

In eight instances, Clinton used the pronoun "I" to call attention to the people she believes really matter in this election. For example, she stated, "I will always remember the single mom who had adopted two kids with autism," and "I will always remember the young man in a Marine Corps T-shirt who waited months for medical care."

The following are all the instances Media Matters identified in the speech in which Clinton used the pronoun "I":

  • I ... I am so honored to be here tonight.
  • You know, I'm -- I'm here tonight as a proud mother, as a proud Democrat ... as a proud senator from New York ... a proud American ... and a proud supporter of Barack Obama. [Support for Obama]
  • I haven't spent the past 35 years in the trenches, advocating for children, campaigning for universal health care, helping parents balance work and family, and fighting for women's rights here at home and around the world ... to see another Republican in the White House squander our promise of a country that really fulfills the hopes of our people. [Importance of this election]
  • Tonight, I ask you to remember what a presidential election is really about. [Importance of this election]
  • I will always remember the single mom who had adopted two kids with autism. [Who really matters in this election]
  • I will always remember the young man in a Marine Corps T-shirt who waited months for medical care. [Who really matters in this election]
  • And I will always remember the young boy who told me his mom worked for the minimum wage, that her employer had cut her hours. [Who really matters in this election]
  • I will always be grateful to everyone from all 50 states, Puerto Rico and the territories ... who joined our campaign on behalf of all those people left out and left behind by the Bush administration.
  • I ran for president to renew the promise of America, to rebuild the middle class and sustain the American dream, to provide opportunity to those who are willing to work hard for it and have that work rewarded, so they could save for college, a home, and retirement, afford gas and groceries, and have a little left over each month.
  • Most of all, I ran to stand up for all those who have been invisible to their government for eight long years.
  • Those are the reasons I ran for president, and those are the reasons I support Barack Obama for president. [Support for Obama]
  • I want you -- I want you to ask yourselves: Were you in this campaign just for me, or were you in it for that young Marine and others like him? [Who really matters in this election]
  • Democrats know how to do this As I recall, we did it before with President Clinton and the Democrats.
  • And I cannot wait to watch Barack Obama sign into law a health care plan that covers every single American. [Support for Obama]
  • And I know what that can mean for every man, woman, and child in America. [Who really matters in this election]
  • I'm a United States senator because, in 1848, a group of courageous women, and a few brave men, gathered in Seneca Falls, New York, many traveling for days and nights ... to participate in the first convention on women's rights in our history.
  • I have seen it.
  • I have seen it in our teachers and our firefighters, our police officers, our nurses, our small-business owners, and our union workers. [Who really matters in this election]
  • I've seen it in the men and women of our military. [Who really matters in this election]
  • I want you to think about your children and grandchildren come Election Day. [Who really matters in this election]

From Ron Fournier's August 27 AP article, "Analysis: A perfect night for Clinton, Obama?":

Behind the scenes Tuesday, the Obama and Clinton camps struck a tentative deal that would allow some states to cast votes in a roll call before somebody -- possibly Clinton herself -- cuts short the tally and asks the convention to nominate Obama by unanimous consent. This was her price for ending her historic bid for the presidency in a manner that, however messy, still left Obama in a stronger position than Kennedy left Jimmy Carter in 1980, when the Massachusetts senator extracted platform concessions and shrank from the traditional unity show at the final gavel.

But she did extract her price.

The bill came due Tuesday. The crowd. The applause. The promise of a vote Wednesday, and a speech laced 17 times by some variation of the pronoun "I."

"You never gave up," Clinton told her delegates, a phrase that so perfectly fits her. "You never gave up. And together we made history."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by newzhound (August 27, 2008 6:50 pm ET)
         

      Sen. Clinton's speech was designed to satisfy those who supported her.  She spent time discussing their collective accmplishments so her delegates would feel they received their property recognition.

      Then it was time to throw that collective support behind Sen. Obama.  And she did an outstanding job of that.

      It was a great speech!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Sueelldd (August 27, 2008 6:53 pm ET)
           
        Agreed, it was a great speech despite what many on the right were saying this morning.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Eric Jaffa (August 27, 2008 6:53 pm ET)
         

      I'm glad we have Media Matters to point out how bogus Ron Fournier's articles can be.


      Report Abuse
    • Author by Eric Jaffa (August 27, 2008 6:57 pm ET)
         

      The AP should label Ron Fournier's "Op-Eds" as "Op-Eds," instead of labelling them "Analysis."

      The word "Analysis" makes these opinion pieces sound more scientific than they are.

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by DAWUSS (August 27, 2008 7:11 pm ET)
         
      Will someone count the "I"s used in the Republican Convention?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (August 27, 2008 7:48 pm ET)
           

        I will, right after I count the "POW's".

        BTW, got an advanced copy of McCain's acceptance speech:

        Report Abuse
        • Author by IRONY 101 (August 27, 2008 8:01 pm ET)
             

          REPORTER 1: Senator McCain, was it fair to equate Barack Obama's celebrity with that of Paris Hilton?

          McCAIN: I spent five and a half years in a plcae called the Hanoi Hilton...I know something about Hiltons.

          REPORTER 2: Senator, with the NFL season getting under way would you care to make a prediction about who is going to win the Super Bowl?

          McCAIN: My friend, when I was locked up for five and a half years I couldn't watch the Super Bowl. Some of my fellow brave American POWs and I painted roaches like football players and had our own Super Bowl until the guards caught us...

          REPORTER 3: Senator McCain, would you like to tell the American people what it was like being held as a POW for five and a half years?

          McCAIN: No...I don't like to talk about it.    ;>)

          Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (August 27, 2008 8:34 pm ET)
         
      You can't even parody this its so ridiculous. Although they should have counted all of the I's inside her other words.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (August 27, 2008 11:54 pm ET)
           
        Good catch, Wookie. Those "Sleeper I's" are the sneaky ones. And did you notice how many times she used her "eyes" when looking around? I like a good speech given in the third person plural.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Winski (August 27, 2008 11:25 pm ET)
         

      Ron Fournier needs to fired immediately.

      He can go over to Fox where he belongs as just another smear talking head...As more and more stations/publications drop AP services it won't be long before AP goes the way of UPI..Buh..bye... please turn out the lights when you are gone...

      Report Abuse
    • Author by LarryE (August 28, 2008 12:41 am ET)
         

      I just sent this to AP:

      Okay, this has gotten ridiculous. Ron Fournier's treatment of the Democratic presidential primary and convention has gone off the rails. "Analyzing" Hillary Clinton's convention speech based on how many times she used one of the most commonly used words in the English language - the pronoun "I" - was in the truest meaning of the phrase just silly.

      That is especially true since in that same speech, Clinton used the word "you" 24 times - and that is not counting any "thank you"s or "you know"s or the time she quoted Harriet Tubman. The simple fact is that Ron Fournier is dragging down the once high regard in which AP was held. And that is a true shame.
      My expectation of receiving a reply: zero.

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by LarryE (August 28, 2008 12:43 am ET)
           
        Interesting: The blockquoting worked on the preview but not on the post. So just to be clear, the text of the email to AP ran from "okay" to "shame."
        Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (August 28, 2008 12:49 am ET)
         
      Megyn Kelly at FOX says that if you substitute "Nancy Pelosi" for "I" in every sentence it makes Nancy Pelosi look really power hungry.  ;>) 
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (August 28, 2008 7:55 am ET)
         
      I wonder if we should count the number of Karl Rove's backside prints there are on Ron Fournier's nose...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (August 28, 2008 7:57 am ET)
         
      If you change all the I's into "John McCain", then the speech was a total failure, because she didn't mention being a POW once.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (August 28, 2008 8:48 am ET)
         
      Perhaps he would find it more appropriate had she used the royal "we"? And, of course, we all know that the podium is facing Mecca.

      This is a perfect example of the petty, peevish, dishonest campaign to which the Republicans must resort to even have a chance of shoehorning McGrampy into the White House. The Bush Mafia know that they must win in order to retain control of the Justice Department. Otherwise, every last slimey one of them could face criminal prosecution, once somebody bothers to investigate the past 8 years. If Obama wins, the White House shredding machines will be running 24/7 over the Christmas Holiday.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (August 28, 2008 9:43 am ET)
           

        Shredding machines? Yea, that too...

        Most likely, Dick Cheney already has David Addington researching the legality of a pre-emptive pardon...or finding a foreign country to grant him political asylum. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (August 28, 2008 9:57 am ET)
             
          Yeah, I forgot about that. Didn't Halliburton move it's headquarters to Dubai? No doubt Dickless Cheney has a corner office waiting there. I'm guessing that there will be a mass NeoCon exodus out of the country, much like the sudden flight of Ex Nazis to Argentina after WWII.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by puttforever4682 (August 28, 2008 2:26 pm ET)
         
      Associated Press is picked up by local newspapers all over the country.  This allows the misinformation therein to be widely disseminated.  Unless one is a real internet follower of the news, it would appear impossible for the less dedicated news follower(voter) to get the objective truth.  The Democrats really have to overcome not just McCain but the MSM who are in the tank for him.  My friends sometimes ask me questions about the news stories but it is nearly impossible to set everyone straight.  I do not think dems can overcome the worst president ever with this media.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

  • Associated Press
    Associated Press

    The Associated Press
    450 W. 33rd St.
    New York, NY 10001

    Main Number
    +1-212-621-1500