About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Ignoring evidence to the contrary, NY Times' Brooks claims Palin made "mortal enem[y]" of Stevens

September 02, 2008 8:24 pm ET

SUMMARY: David Brooks wrote that Gov. Sarah Palin "made mortal enemies of the two people [Sen. John] McCain has always held up as the carriers of the pork-barrel disease: [Rep. Don] Young [R-AK] and [Sen. Ted] Stevens [R-AK]." Brooks' characterization of Palin and Stevens as "mortal enemies" is undermined by substantial evidence, including a joint Stevens-Palin press conference in July in which Stevens said he has "never known of any animosity between" them and Palin said she had "great respect" for Stevens, as well as Palin's previous service as co-director of a 527 organization bearing Stevens' name.

68 Comments

In his September 2 New York Times column, David Brooks wrote that Gov. Sarah Palin is "a woman who risked her career taking on the corrupt Republican establishment in her own state, who twice defeated the oil companies, who made mortal enemies of the two people [Sen. John] McCain has always held up as the carriers of the pork-barrel disease: [Rep. Don] Young [R-AK] and [Sen. Ted] Stevens [R-AK]." Brooks' characterization of Palin and Stevens as "mortal enemies" is undermined by substantial evidence. For example, in a July joint press conference, while Stevens acknowledged "comments made [by Palin] about my earmarks" and "the [federal corruption] investigation," Stevens said he has "never known of any animosity between" them; similarly, Palin said she had "great respect" for Stevens. Further, Palin previously served as co-director of a 527 organization bearing Stevens' name; Palin ran advertisements during her 2006 gubernatorial campaign that featured Stevens endorsing her; while Palin was mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, she reportedly hired a lobbying firm to secure earmarks for the town, and the account was handled by Stevens' former chief of staff; Stevens has endorsed her 2008 vice-presidential bid; and Stevens' campaign website contains several pictures of Palin with Stevens.

Brooks wrote:

When McCain met Sarah Palin last February, he was meeting the rarest of creatures, an American politician who sees the world as he does. Like McCain, Palin does not seem to have an explicit governing philosophy. Her background is socially conservative, but she has not pushed that as governor of Alaska. She seems to find it easier to work with liberal Democrats than the mandarins in her own party.

Instead, she seems to get up in the morning to root out corruption. McCain was meeting a woman who risked her career taking on the corrupt Republican establishment in her own state, who twice defeated the oil companies, who made mortal enemies of the two people McCain has always held up as the carriers of the pork-barrel disease: Young and Stevens.

However, Brooks ignored several facts about the relationship between Palin and Stevens.

"Great respect" for Stevens

During a July 2 joint press conference about Stevens' energy plan, Palin and Stevens were asked about a possible "rift between" them. Stevens said during his response: "I've never known of any animosity between the two of us at all. We are each free to make comments about what the other does and every once in a while she'll say I'm stupid and that, that, prob -- she may be right." Palin responded, "I've never said that." She went on to say, "I have great respect for the senator and he needs to be heard across America, his voice, his experience, his passion needs to be heard across America so that Alaska can contribute more. I again have great respect for him and I agree there's a big difference between reality and perception regarding our relationship." Stevens added: "If you object to this first edition of the Sarah-Ted Show, I hope it'll continue."

From the July 2 press conference:

JASON MOORE (KTUU reporter): I'd just like to hear from each of you how you feel about the other. I think there is a sort of perceived rift or perception in Alaska there's a rift between you two. The governor's made some statements against some of your earmarks. She said at the time your house was searched that you needed to tell Alaskans more about what's behind that. You haven't exactly had glowing endorsements of AGIA [Alaska Gasline Inducement Act]. What do you two think about each other, and describe your relationships.

PALIN: You can go first.

STEVENS: Well, you know, I -- I -- I don't really object to the comments made about my earmarks. I think that, you know, they -- they're part of a period of need. I'm not sure -- with the money that's coming into the state, I don't think we're going to get many earmarks in the future. We -- we developed our earmarks in a period of need and found a way to bring these federal agencies in here through the Denali Commission and other things like that. I don't object to people objecting to that. I think the investigation is another matter, and I do think that she -- the governor had every right to say what she did. I didn't take any umbrage about it --

PALIN: Thank you.

STEVENS: -- I never talked to her about it at all. I -- I wish I had her -- her freedom to speak about it, but I don't. You know, it's -- it's there, it's continuing, and that's all there is to it. But as far as getting along, hell, I don't know if you know it, when [former Gov.] Frank Murkowski was first elected, this lady and I and the mayor of Cordova, Margie Johnson, traveled around the state for two weeks. We've known each other for a long time and worked together for a long time. I've never known of any animosity between the two of us at all. We're each free to make comments about what the other does, and every once in a while she'll say I'm stupid and that, that, prob -- she may be right.

PALIN: I've never said that.

STEVENS: No, I just --

PALIN: And I -- I have great respect for the senator, and he needs to be heard across America. His voice, his experience, his passion needs to be heard across America so that Alaska can contribute more, so that we can be producers, so that we can help lead the rest of the U.S. I, again, have great respect for him, and I agree there's a big difference between reality and perception regarding our relationship.

UNIDENTIFIED REPORTER: Governor --

STEVENS: If you object to this first edition of the Sarah-Ted Show, I hope it'll continue.

Co-director of 527 bearing Stevens' name

The Washington Post's Matthew Mosk reported on September 1 that Palin served as one of three directors of a 527 organization, named Ted Stevens Excellence in Public Service, Inc., "until June 2005, when her name was replaced on state filings." From Mosk's post on the washingtonpost.com blog The Trail:

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin began building clout in her state's political circles in part by serving as a director of an independent political group organized by the now embattled Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens.

Palin's name is listed on 2003 incorporation papers of the "Ted Stevens Excellence in Public Service, Inc.," a 527 group that could raise unlimited funds from corporate donors. The group was designed to serve as a political boot camp for Republican women in the state.

The stated purpose of the 527, according to its 8871 form, filed with the Internal Revenue Service and signed March 19, 2004, is "[t]o increase the number of Republican women in elected offices and in appointed governmental and political positions, including advisory and regulatory commissions through training and education."

2006 gubernatorial endorsement

During her 2006 gubernatorial campaign, Palin ran an ad featuring Stevens endorsing her candidacy. In the ad, Stevens said that Palin represents "a new vision, new energy. ... When you go to vote, don't go to vote alone. And you'll help Sarah become the next governor of Alaska, which we all want to see." From the ad:

STEVENS: We have a state that needs new management.

(Text on screen: Senator Stevens Speaks About New Leadership)

STEVENS: These two people represent a new generation. And they represent a new vision, new energy. They represent the kind of people who ought to come along and take our places.

And that needs a new agenda for all of us to get behind. Think of this: When you go to vote, don't go to vote alone. And you'll help Sarah become the next governor of Alaska, which we all want to see.

ANNOUNCER: Frugally paid for by Palin/ [Lt. Gov candidate Sean] Parnell, new energy for Alaska. 245 W. 5th, 99501.

Mosk reported that "[s]hortly after Palin was announced as McCain's vice presidential pick, the ad was removed from her gubernatorial campaign web site. It remains available on YouTube." Indeed, a Google cache of Palin's website "as it appeared on Aug 29, 2008 16:47:35 GMT" shows the text, "Senator Stevens Speaks About New Leadership" and a disabled link to the Stevens commercial under the headline "View Sarah's Commercials!" From the Google cache:

The Anchorage Daily News reported in an October 31, 2006, article that "Stevens OK'd the new ad," referring to the ad featuring Stevens' endorsement of Palin, and quoted a Palin spokesperson asserting that the ad is "a big deal." From the article:

Palin spokesman Curtis Smith said Stevens OK'd the new ad, which shows the influential senator talking about Palin and running mate Sean Parnell at what the Palin camp said was a recent GOP shindig in Fairbanks.

"We have a state that needs new management. These two people represent a new generation," Stevens says in the commercial.

He's wearing a vest made of fur and what looks like an ivory bolo tie while standing next to Palin and Parnell. Soaring music plays in the background. The [Tony] Knowles [D] camp criticized the look and sound of the spot as fuzzy.

"Think of this -- when you go to vote, don't go to vote alone, and you'll help Sarah become the next governor of Alaska, which we all want to see," Stevens concludes in the commercial.

Smith said he isn't aware of any plans for Rep. Don Young or Sen. Murkowski to appear in Palin ads, though he called Stevens' endorsement an asset.

"It's a big deal to have one of the most respected political figures in Alaska history to stand up and say, 'Hey, this is the one.' "

Earmarks for Wasilla and former Stevens chief of staff

Washington Post staff writer Paul Kane reported on September 2 that "Palin employed a lobbying firm to secure almost $27 million in federal earmarks for a town [Wasilla, Alaska] of 6,700 residents while she was its mayor, according to an analysis by an independent government watchdog group" and that Wasilla's account was handled by former Stevens chief of staff Steven W. Silver, whom Kane described as a member of Stevens' "inner circle." From the Post article:

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin employed a lobbying firm to secure almost $27 million in federal earmarks for a town of 6,700 residents while she was its mayor, according to an analysis by an independent government watchdog group.

[...]

As mayor of Wasilla, however, Palin oversaw the hiring of Robertson, Monagle & Eastaugh, an Anchorage-based law firm with close ties to Alaska's most senior Republicans: Rep. Don Young and Sen. Ted Stevens, who was indicted in July on charges of accepting illegal gifts. The Wasilla account was handled by the former chief of staff to Stevens, Steven W. Silver, who is a partner in the firm.

Palin was elected mayor of Wasilla in 1996 on a campaign theme of "a time for change." According to a review of congressional spending by Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisan watchdog group in Washington, Wasilla did not receive any federal earmarks in the first few years of Palin's tenure.

Senate records show that Silver's firm began working for Palin in early 2000, just as federal money began flowing.

In fiscal 2000, Wasilla received a $1 million earmark, tucked into a transportation appropriations bill, for a rail and bus project in the town. And in the winter of 2000, Palin appeared before congressional appropriations committees to seek earmarks, according to a report in the Anchorage Daily News.

Palin and the Wasilla City Council increased Silver's fee from $24,000 to $36,000 a year by 2001, Senate records show.

[...]

The Palin earmarks came when Stevens was chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee and Young was a senior member of the House transportation committee.

In hiring Silver, Wasilla found someone who was a member of each lawmaker's inner circle. Silver has donated at least $11,400 to Stevens's political committees and $10,000 to Young's reelection committee in the past decade, according to Federal Election Commission records.

2008 vice-presidential endorsement

After Palin was announced as Sen. John McCain's presumptive running mate, on August 29, Stevens released a statement with the title, "Stevens Strongly Endorses Governor Palin." The release quoted Stevens stating: "I have known and worked with Sarah for over a decade - from her service as Mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, in her role as president of the Alaska Conference of Mayors, and most recently as our Governor. She is attentive to her job and family, brings people together, and is able to make tough decisions." The press release:

Stevens Strongly Endorses Governor Palin as Vice Presidential Candidate

Senator Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) today applauded Senator John McCain's selection of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin as his Vice Presidential running mate on the Republican ticket.

Senator Stevens said: "It's a great day for the nation and Alaskans. Governor Palin has proven herself as a bright, energetic leader for our State and will bring the same energy to the Vice Presidency. She will serve our country with distinction - the first Alaskan and first woman on the Republican ticket. I share in the pride of all Alaskans.

"I have known and worked with Sarah for over a decade - from her service as Mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, in her role as president of the Alaska Conference of Mayors, and most recently as our Governor. She is attentive to her job and family, brings people together, and is able to make tough decisions.

"Governor Palin's knowledge of energy issues will be critical as she and Senator McCain begin their path toward the White House. It is now clear: there is only one presidential ticket, McCain-Palin, that can and will deliver a comprehensive energy plan - one that will include development of Alaska's resources and reducing our dependence on foreign oil."

Upon learning of Senator McCain's selection, Senator Stevens offered his congratulations and support to Governor Palin and her family.

2008 Stevens re-election website

Stevens' re-election website features several pictures of Stevens with Palin. For example, Stevens' photo gallery features a July 3 photo of "Senator Stevens with Governor Palin at the opening of the Perseverance Trail." From his website, accessed on September 2 at 11 a.m. ET:

Another photo features Stevens "cutting the ribbon on the Perseverance Trail" next to Palin. From his website, accessed on September 2 at 11 a.m. ET:

Media Matters for America previously noted that on the August 29 edition of PBS' NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, Brooks asserted of Palin: "She's evangelical, but she's pretty progressive on gay and lesbian issues." Brooks offered no evidence for his assertion, which is undermined by her reported position on benefits for same-sex couples.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by oscar the grouch (September 02, 2008 8:31 pm ET)
         
      For someone who is being portrayed as the weakest VP candidate in generations, there is certainly a lot of space being devoted to Mrs. Palin on this website and other "progressive" blogs. I would think that the progressives would be happy to see such a "weak" team, rather than stir up controversy that may result in her being replaced with a "stronger" candidate this week.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (September 02, 2008 8:37 pm ET)
           
        Oh, I don't know. Let's say she gets dumped. What's that say about McCain? He'll be painted as:

        pandering to the right wing and it will stick effortlessly

        weak at vetting

        a poor judgement of character

        someone so desperate to win he tried to pick a candidate to win, not a candidate to lead

        Basically, he'd be toast.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by NiceguyEddie (September 03, 2008 11:09 am ET)
             

          He's toast now.  This pick will backfire.  It really already is.  It's insulting to everyone who's actually cares about women's issues.  She a joke.  Bush'41 survived the flap over Quayle mainly due to Reagan's popularity and the relative weakness of Dukakis as a candidate.  McCain has to OVERCOME Bush's UNpopularity and he's facing the strongest, most inspiring Deomcratic opponent since Kennedy.  Butter him now, he's TOAST.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by mefirst (September 02, 2008 9:08 pm ET)
           
        he's stuck with her, oscar, one way or another, even if he replaces her. 
        Report Abuse
      • Author by ultrasanktpauli (September 03, 2008 12:00 am ET)
           
        Oh no, she's like a train wreck. It just gets worse and worse as you look...you know you shouldn't, but you have to.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by open_mind (September 03, 2008 8:38 am ET)
           

        Oscar,

        Personally, I would like to see the strongest tickets possible as an American voter.  At one time not so long ago, I was leaning towards McCain.  If what's-her-name is replaced, I may consider voting for him again.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Lorelei (September 03, 2008 8:44 am ET)
             

          As American citizens we should ALL want the strongest best candidates on BOTH sides so who ever wins we still have strong leaders.

          Too bad this is not the case on the repub side:  They choose to crap on the very idea of what it takes to be president and vice president.  They choose religion over the constitution, they choose cronyism over leadership, they choose a state that is close to Russia, rather than leadership.  They choose one that does not even know what the veep job consists of.  They choose this knowing that this person could well become the leader of this country.

           

          Report Abuse
          • Author by NiceguyEddie (September 03, 2008 11:11 am ET)
               
            IOW, they played to WIN not to lead.  And they have shown themselves to be Republicans before Americans. 
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Lorelei (September 03, 2008 11:38 am ET)
                 

              They played to their base, certainly.  They played to win, certainly.  But as far as playing as Americans for good leadership, my opinion would be no.

              As a woman, she is, as far as I know, fine.  As the next in command to this country, with all we have learned about her in the past WEEK, she is no commander in chief.

              We all know what she stands for.  Is that for all americans?  or just republican americans, or just religious republican americans that beleive in creationism, abstinence, cronyism, etc, etc, etc.  

               

              Oh yeah and being close to russia and all, I would call that relationship into question too, she might be a sleeper!  Har.

               

              Report Abuse
    • Author by edenscape246494 (September 02, 2008 8:33 pm ET)
         

      all that needs to be said about wingnut Palin

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/02/palins-church-may-have-sh_n_123205.html

      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (September 02, 2008 8:39 pm ET)
           
        Let me add:

        "The allegations that Gov. Palin was a member of (the) Alaska Independence Party are false. She's never been a member of the Alaska Independence Party," said McCain spokesman Brian Rogers.

        Found that a moment ago on raw story. Wow!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by carlileb5935 (September 02, 2008 9:27 pm ET)
             

          Gee, that's means it's a lie...

          As is the Stevens disavowal. Palin was not only close to the guy, she was an actual protege. She was plucked out for attention 6 or 7 years ago, when she was small-fry, and propelled into this state position.

          In other words, she's an obvious partisan hack, part of the Alaska Repub machine. She didn't come out of nowhere. 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by snoopy (September 02, 2008 9:51 pm ET)
               

            She has no business speaking in churches claiming her christianity and love of God. She's definitely a false profit.

            BTW, speaking of churches, we need to know why she doesn't know anything about the racist preacher who's church she attends ever since she moved to Wasilla. He's made outrageously racist and zionist rants, why isn't she denouncing the guy? He even ate at her table...

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Cheney2012 (September 03, 2008 1:44 pm ET)
                 
              Ah...do you even know what a False PROPHET is?  I doubt it since you don't know how to spell it.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by DAWUSS (September 02, 2008 10:23 pm ET)
               
            Well Grampa McCain HAD been watching her for several years, according to that recent interview...
            Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (September 03, 2008 9:33 am ET)
           
        It looks to me that Ed Kalnins's sermons in that church should be receiving the same amount of scrtiny as Jeremiah Wright's sermons have in past months.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by proudconservative (September 03, 2008 4:51 pm ET)
           

        Escapefromeden,

        Gee, let's contrast and compare.  We have a woman asking God to protect our soldiers and guide our country's leaders....

        "Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right. Also, for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending [U.S. soldiers] out on a task that is from God," she exhorted the congregants. "That's what we have to make sure that we're praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God's plan."

        Sounds just awful evile, doesn't it? 

        Compare that with comments from Obama's minister, (which he never heard during his 20 years of attendance), of America as ameri-KKK, 9/11 as our 'chickens coming home to roost' or the cry of 'god damn america, not God Bless America'.

        Yeah, that's the basic decency and love we need to hear more of to show how we love our country Rev. Wright.

         

        Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (September 04, 2008 7:55 am ET)
             
          Is Rev. Wright running in this election?

          No one should ever be elected to any office anywhere when they claim to know the mind of God.

          God doesn't choose sides when countries go to war.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by edenscape246494 (September 02, 2008 8:34 pm ET)
         
      after watching that video I cringe to think she could be a heartbeat away from the nuclear football
      Report Abuse
    • Author by 1st Republic 14th Star (September 02, 2008 9:57 pm ET)
         
      Brooks is so wrong, so often, on matters so basic that a simple Google check will disprove him, that a reasonable observer can only conclude that he's lying on purpose.  If there was any kind of quality control going on at the NY Times, Brooks would be out of work.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by deeznuts (September 02, 2008 10:45 pm ET)
         

      They're such "mortal enemies" that Palin was hand-picked to run Stevens' 527 group.

      The name of the group?

      You're gonna love this...

      ...

      ...

      ...

      wait for it...

      ...

      ...

      "Ted Stevens Excellence in Public Service."

      I kid you not.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 03, 2008 12:51 am ET)
           

        But that Stevens/Palin exchange above (at the press conference) was pretty brutal. I didn't know if both would come out alive.

        USA ! USA! USA!USA ! USA! USA!USA ! USA! USA!USA ! USA! USA!

        Oh, sorry, I still have the Goop convention on, and I got caught up in the mindless jingoistic chanting.It's contagious!

        Report Abuse
        • Author by princeofwheels (September 03, 2008 4:50 am ET)
             

          I couldn't sleep so I am up early, getting everything ready because tonite, Princess Sara arrives. Or is she now the Messiah? Some in Alaska may  refer to her as Medusa?

          Let's hear her out before they decide to dump her.

          And hecj with Lieberman. No particular reason...just the heck him.

          I used a bad word and had to change it, SORRY.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by nerzog (September 03, 2008 9:03 am ET)
               
            I heard an NPR reporter refer to Liebermann as a "one time star of the Democratic Party". When was he ever a "star"? I don't remember much excitement about his VP run.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (September 03, 2008 7:41 am ET)
         
      That's a pretty amazing stretch, even for Brooks, mostly because, as others have said, it's not so hard to disprove what he wrote, or what the McCain campaign has been telling us about Palin.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (September 03, 2008 8:38 am ET)
         
      All this "reformer" stuff is nothing more than a fig leaf so that the few remaining Republican Moderates can recite the talking points without feeling compelled to run home and hang themselves. They've lost their party to the non-thinkers, and you can see that realization in their faces as they tell reporters how excited they are about Whatshername.

      After listening to much commentary, I'm not so convinced that this was a bad move. The advantage Obama had after the Dem Convention was enthusiasm. Grampy was never going to excite the GOP base, so Karl Rove picked someone who would. Whatshername is a card carrying Troglodyte. She's a Fundamentalist Nutbag baby factory who likes to shoot small animals. She comes across as the Uberwife, and she's perfect for the gap-toothed Republican base. If she can't win the blue collar Hillary women, she'll get their husbands.....because she looks like the school teacher in a porn movie.

      It's BRILLIANT!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Lorelei (September 03, 2008 8:50 am ET)
           
        that must be why mccain calls her his "running mate and soul mate"
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Lorelei (September 03, 2008 8:51 am ET)
             

          sorry, but on a different thread I just found the "soul mate" thing really really strange.

           

          your post enlightens my idea of why mccain likes her so much, lol. 

          Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (September 03, 2008 8:52 am ET)
           

        McCain's VP choice, Sarah Palin, has also been rumored to have tried to ban books from her towns library. Here's a list of books she's alleged to want removed from the library shelves.

        It's a little strange that she wants to ban the work of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, but not the work of John McCain.

        A Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess
        A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L’Engle
        Annie on My Mind by Nancy Garden
        As I Lay Dying by William Faulkner
        As I Lay Dying by William Faulkner
        Blubber by Judy Blume
        Brave New World by Aldous Huxley
        Bridge to Terabithia by Katherine Paterson
        Canterbury Tales by Chaucer
        Carrie by Stephen King
        Catch-22 by Joseph Heller
        Christine by Stephen King
        Confessions by Jean-Jacques Rousseau
        Cujo by Stephen King
        Curses, Hexes, and Spells by Daniel Cohen
        Daddy’s Roommate by Michael Willhoite
        Day No Pigs Would Die by Robert Peck
        Death of a Salesman by Arthur Miller
        Decameron by Boccaccio
        East of Eden by John Steinbeck
        Fallen Angels by Walter Myers
        Fanny Hill (Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure) by John Cleland
        Flowers For Algernon by Daniel Keyes
        Forever by Judy Blume
        Grendel by John Champlin Gardner
        Halloween ABC by Eve Merriam
        Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone by J.K. Rowling
        Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets by J.K. Rowling
        Harry Potter and the Prizoner of Azkaban by J.K. Rowling
        Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire by J.K. Rowling
        Have to Go by Robert Munsch
        Heather Has Two Mommies by Leslea Newman
        How to Eat Fried Worms by Thomas Rockwell
        Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain
        I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings by Maya Angelou
        Impressions edited by Jack Booth
        In the Night Kitchen by Maurice Sendak
        It’s Okay if You Don’t Love Me by Norma Klein
        James and the Giant Peach by Roald Dahl
        Lady Chatterley’s Lover by D.H. Lawrence
        Leaves of Grass by Walt Whitman
        Little Red Riding Hood by Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm
        Lord of the Flies by William Golding
        Love is One of the Choices by Norma Klein
        Lysistrata by Aristophanes
        More Scary Stories in the Dark by Alvin Schwartz
        My Brother Sam Is Dead by James Lincoln Collier and Christopher Collier
        My House by Nikki Giovanni
        My Friend Flicka by Mary O’Hara
        Night Chills by Dean Koontz
        Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck
        On My Honor by Marion Dane Bauer
        One Day in The Life of Ivan Denisovich by Alexander Solzhenitsyn
        One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest by Ken Kesey
        One Hundred Years of Solitude by Gabriel Garcia Marquez
        Ordinary People by Judith Guest
        Our Bodies, Ourselves by Boston Women’s Health Collective
        Prince of Tides by Pat Conroy
        Revolting Rhymes by Roald Dahl
        Scary Stories 3: More Tales to Chill Your Bones by Alvin Schwartz
        Scary Stories in the Dark by Alvin Schwartz
        Separate Peace by John Knowles
        Separate Peace by John Knowles
        Silas Marner by George Eliot
        Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
        Tarzan of the Apes by Edgar Rice Burroughs
        The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain
        The Adventures of Tom Sawyer by Mark Twain
        The Bastard by John Jakes
        The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger
        The Chocolate War by Robert Cormier
        The Color Purple by Alice Walker
        The Devil’s Alternative by Frederick Forsyth
        The Figure in the Shadows by John Bellairs
        The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck
        The Great Gilly Hopkins by Katherine Paterson
        The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood
        The Headless Cupid by Zilpha Snyder
        The Learning Tree by Gordon Parks
        The Living Bible by William C. Bower
        The Merchant of Venice by William Shakespeare
        The New Teenage Body Book by Kathy McCoy and Charles Wibbelsman
        The Pigman by Paul Zindel
        The Seduction of Peter S. by Lawrence Sanders
        The Shining by Stephen King
        The Witches by Roald Dahl
        The Witches of Worm by Zilpha Snyder
        Then Again, Maybe I Won’t by Judy Blume
        To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee
        Twelfth Night by William Shakespeare
        Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary by the Merriam-Webster Editorial Staff
        Witches, Pumpkins, and Grinning Ghosts: The Story of the Halloween Symbols by Edna Barth

        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (September 03, 2008 9:01 am ET)
             
          There you go. I have a question for Whatshername: In matters of law, which takes precedence.... the Bible or the Constitution? I'd love to hear her answer.

          This column sums it up pretty well for me.

          http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gale-walden/why-sarah-palin-scares-me_b_122733.html

          The same idiots who voted for President Numbnuts.... twice.... will run slipping and sliding in their own drool for a chance to put the Troglodyte Princess in the White House.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (September 03, 2008 9:51 am ET)
             
          Assuming that she even read the list, it's pretty scary. Not only that the usual "dangerous" books like Huckleberry Finn and Catch-22 are there.... they always are. The really scary one is "The Living Bible". Whatshername must be one of those idiots who think that Jeeeeezzzzzuuuuussssss spoke King James English.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Brabantio (September 03, 2008 9:59 am ET)
             

          The Catcher in the Rye is one of my personal favorites, and James and the Giant Peach was my favorite as a kid.  What's her problem with that one, that two nasty old women get run over with an enormous piece of fruit?  Does that evoke some bad memory or something?

          Some of these I at least somewhat understand.  But My Friend Flicka?  That list is almost hard to believe, even for a radical like Palin.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by open_mind (September 03, 2008 4:12 pm ET)
               

            I personally have read a great deal of those books (Catch 22 and Huck Finn being my absolute favorites).  I know that reading those books expanded my mind and helped make me a liberal.  Perhaps Palin thinks if she can stop people from reading these great books, she can prevent that dastardly scourge of liberalism from ever breaking out in Wasilla!

            Report Abuse
        • Author by tbone (September 03, 2008 10:21 am ET)
             
          Proof, or at least a link, please.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by worrierking (September 03, 2008 10:28 am ET)
               
            No proof. I used the words alleged and rumored.

            Here is a link to the Time article that mentions her inquiring about banning books and her attempt to have the librarian removed from her job.

            http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1837918,00.html
            Report Abuse
            • Author by tbone (September 03, 2008 10:36 am ET)
                 
              Then where did you get the list?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by worrierking (September 03, 2008 10:48 am ET)
                   
                I did a Google and a Yahoo search.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by DougReese (September 03, 2008 11:25 am ET)
                     
                  I searched too. The best I could do was this, from a librarian website. The guy who posted it there gave no link, however.

                  This looks very much like the kind of thing that was done to Obama over and over again.

                  http://www.librarian.net/stax/2366/sarah-palin-vp-nominee/

                  Doug Reese
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by BillJ-MN (September 03, 2008 11:42 am ET)
                     

                  I only saw that list on a librarian website discussion area.  One person put it out there and several contributors tried to find out where he got his list.  He hasn't responded.

                  From the articles I read, it doesn't look as though they ever got into a discussion of specific books.  The librarian in Wasilla never let it get that far.  It seems to be fairly clear, though, that there was an attempt to fire her that was withdrawn in the face of public support.

                  Report Abuse
    • Author by Lorelei (September 03, 2008 9:01 am ET)
         

      If someone in power would feel it his or her duty to "protect" people from what they might read I would find that repugnant and antithetical to everything we, as a free nation, stand for.  Such people seek to implement their own agenda and simply cut off any access to critical thinking and intellectual freedom.  

      Let us not forget that bookburing has been the hallmark of repressive and fascist regimes since books were invented.  If you can't read about it you won't be able to garner any new ideas will you? 

      open.salon 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (September 03, 2008 9:21 am ET)
           
        It's all about those "new ideas".

        This subject should be the deal breaker for every American. The Republicans are using their wedge issues of abortion, guns and their evangelical religious beliefs to energize their base and divide the country.

        Democrats need a wedge issue and this book banning should be it. Let's see who is for and who is against the free and open exchange of knowledge.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (September 03, 2008 9:22 am ET)
         
      For a real WTF? experience, check this out, from Face The Nation:

      ++++++++++++++++++++++++

      "With all due respect again to Governor Kaine, he's been a governor for three years, he's been able but undistinguished," Rove said. "I don't think people could really name a big, important thing that he's done. He was mayor of the 105th largest city in America."

      Rove continued: "So if he were to pick Governor Kaine, it would be an intensely political choice where he said, `You know what? I'm really not, first and foremost, concerned with, is this person capable of being president of the United States? What I'm concerned about is, can he bring me the electoral votes of the state of Virginia, the 13 electoral votes in Virginia?'"

      +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

      This man has balls so big he needs a wheelbarrow to carry them around.

      If the Democrats don't make a commercial out of this, they're idiots.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (September 03, 2008 9:29 am ET)
           
        Regarding the quote above, I'd bet that Karl had already settled on Whatshername before he said this. This guy scares me.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Lorelei (September 03, 2008 9:34 am ET)
         

      Ya might not like this either..

      It turns out she[palin] had a somewhat different approach. If a small-town mayor ever ruled with an iron fist — it was Palin. Eleven days after taking office in 1996, she mailed letters to each of the city’s top managers requesting that they resign as a test of loyalty.........

      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (September 03, 2008 10:11 am ET)
           
        Yes, I've heard about that. It would seem that this "Hockey Mom" is also a ruthless politician. That won't matter to the Troglodytes. She invokes the name of Jesus with ease, so that's all they care about. I think they knew, in the deep recesses of their reptilian brain stems, that Puddinhead George just paid lipservice to his "faith". Whatshername is the real deal.... she attends a church where people speak in tongues.

        The Republican party has jumped the shark.... or they're on the verge of obliterating the Constitution. We'll see which....
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Lorelei (September 03, 2008 11:43 am ET)
             
          Methinks you got that wrong, they ARE the shark, and they are eating the constitution.  Its a feeding frenzy.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by proudconservative (September 03, 2008 4:59 pm ET)
           

        Didn't Bill Clinton as ALL of the attorneys in the Justice department to resign when he took office?  Nothing to do with any investigations in his background of course!

        Didn't Obama challenge his mentor from the Illinois legislature by taking her to court over signatures petitioning her placement back on the ballot?

        Gee, sounds like politics is a tough business, even at the mayoral level.  We just can't have tough, formidable women running around trying to compete in that arena though.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Graydogs (September 03, 2008 11:11 am ET)
         

      I'm afraid it's going to take more than lies from David Brooks to save Sarah Palin. Part articles from the Alaska press are surfacing that makes her look about as "un-Christian" as you can get. Her own words are going to kill the McCain/Palin ticket.

      WHY isn't the MSM discussing her "un-Christian" behavior as shown in the news article below???? All we hear are her family values, and how she has taken on other Rebulicans as a reformer. When they do have to address this, I am sure the right wing "spin" will end up here.

      This article from the Ankorage Daily News (adn.com) shows a lot about Palin's REAL Christian values............

      Palin's responses on radio talk show very unbecoming

      DAN FAGAN
      COMMENT

      Published: January 27th, 2008 01:12 AM
      Last Modified: January 27th, 2008 01:38 AM

      The governor's appearance on KWHL's "The Bob and Mark Show" last week is plain and simple one of the most unprofessional, childish and inexcusable performances I've ever seen from a politician.

      Anchorage DJ Bob Lester unleashed a vicious, mean-spirited, poisonous attack on Senate President Lyda Green last week while our governor was live on the air with him.

      When we played the tape on my show the day after it happened, we received 130 calls. Even some Palinbots were disgusted.

      The Daily News posted the recording on its Web site and it fired up bloggers.

      The Fairbanks Daily News-Miner editorial writers demanded the governor apologize. The Juneau and Ketchikan papers also ran the editorial.

      The Daily News opinion page addressed the governor's gaffe. They wrote "She came off looking immature herself, almost high-schoolish. It was conduct unbecoming a governor."

      It was conduct unbecoming a human being, never mind a governor.

       The governor's office eventually tried to spin the public relations disaster, releasing a statement reading, "Governor Palin was caught off guard by Bob Lester's reference to Senate President Lyda Green."

      I don't buy it. Early on in the conversation before Palin started to crack up, Lester referred to Sen. Green as a jealous woman and a cancer. Palin, who knows full well Lyda Green is a cancer survivor, didn't do what any decent person would do, say, "Bob, that's going too far."

      But as the conversation moved on, Lester intensified his attack on Green.

      Lester questioned Green's motherhood, asking Palin if the senator cares about her own kids. Palin laughs.

      Then Lester clearly sets the stage for what he is about to say by warning his large audience and Palin. He says, "Governor you can't say this but I will, Lyda Green is a cancer and a b----." Palin laughs for the second time.

       What were teenage boys thinking when they heard the governor laugh at someone being called a b----? How about the teenage girls who look up to Palin. What did they think when they heard her laugh?

      But there is more. Lester then describes Green's chair as big and cushy. A clear reference to the senator's weight. Palin laughs a third time. She's just having a grand old time.

      Palin was clearly enjoying every second of Lester's vicious attack on her political rival.

      But it gets worse.

      Lester asks Palin point blank: "Do you have any idea of what you did, to make Lyda Green dislike you, hate you?" How does Palin respond? Does she do the right thing? What you would expect from a mature leader, a governor and say, "Bob, Lyda doesn't hate me."

      No, she responds like a 13-year-old and says, "Um, you know once and a while I try to figure that out but I can't figure that out."

      The Palin camp says the governor did call Green and apologize. That was the right thing to do. But the governor's statement shows the apology a half-hearted one.

      The statement in part reads: "The Governor called Senator Green to explain that she does not condone name-calling in any way and apologized if there was a perception that the comment was attributed to the Governor."

      But there's strong evidence Palin did condone Lester's name-calling. At the end of Lester making fun of Green as a mother, calling her a cancer, twice, and saying she has to go; after calling the senator a b----, making fun of her weight, and accusing Green of being jealous and hateful; after all of that, Lester ends the conversation offering to visit Palin.

      How does Palin respond? "I'd be honored to have you."

      The statement released by the governor's office also called Palin's action bad judgment.

      But bad judgment is when you stay up late the night before a big test, order steak at a Chinese restaurant or wear blue jeans to a black tie affair.

      What the governor did was wrong.

      Not only did she sit by and watch a decent public servant get thrashed in front of tens of thousands of people, she actually enjoyed it.

      This is our governor, for goodness sake.

      Our leader. I wonder.

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Lorelei (September 03, 2008 11:48 am ET)
           
        Yep, VP, Commander in Chief material in the republicans eyes.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (September 03, 2008 12:36 pm ET)
           
        Sounds like the perfect running mate for McCain.  She laughs when the DJ calls the president of the Alaska senate a bitch and when someone asks McCain "How do we beat the bitch?" (referring to Hillary Clinton) he responds "Good question."  I guess they really are soul mates.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by historygeek001 (September 03, 2008 12:38 pm ET)
           

        Graydogs--

        Why isn't the MSM talking more about Palin's "Christian" values and everything else?  They're the MSM.  Don't look to them for much actual reporting.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Graydogs (September 03, 2008 1:30 pm ET)
             
          It was a rhetorical question...I knew the answer. ;-)
          Report Abuse
          • Author by historygeek001 (September 04, 2008 3:13 pm ET)
               
            I kinda thought you did...I just get intensely frustrated with the incomplete and inaccurate coverage.  Too many "news" organizations are not actually news organizations.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by Lorelei (September 03, 2008 11:51 am ET)
         

      more....

      According to the Mudflats blog in Alaska,

      This is from Ed Kalnins, the senior pastor of Wasilla Assembly of God. Palin attended here for most of her adult life, until her new affiliation with a similar church in the state's capitol, Juneau:

      What you see in a terrorist — that's called the invisible enemy. There has always been an invisible enemy. What you see in Iraq, basically, is a manifestation of what's going on in this unseen world called the spirit world. … We need to think like Jesus thinks. We are in a time and a season of war, and we need to think like that. We need to develop that instinct. We need to develop as believers the instinct that we are at war, and that war is contending for your faith. … Jesus called us to die. You're worried about getting hurt? He's called us to die. Listen, you know we can't even follow him unless you are willing to give up your life. … I believe that Jesus himself operated from that position of war mode. Everyone say "war mode." Now you say, wait a minute Ed, he's like the good shepherd, he's loving all the time and he's kind all the time. Oh yes he is — but I also believe that he had a part of his thoughts that knew that he was in a war.

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (September 03, 2008 12:06 pm ET)
           
        I thought that to be the type of Christian that this guy is, you got to accept Jesus?

        Every day I see more evidence that the religious right has rejected Jesus and have created a new one in their own image.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Lorelei (September 03, 2008 12:20 pm ET)
             

          Yes, I would have to agree with that, they no longer follow what the bible and their Jesus had to say to them.

           Goes in one ear, runs around looking for brain, can't find it, sits there while it gets more and more distorted by the abnormal formations in their skulls that once functioned as a brain.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (September 03, 2008 12:27 pm ET)
         
      Palin has made a mortal enemy of the truth.  But then as Stephen Colbert pointed out the truth has a known liberal bias.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by leatherhelmet (September 03, 2008 3:52 pm ET)
         

      Hillary and Obama are mortal enemies, yet HRC supports Obama now, at least they have an agreement.

      McCain and Bush are mortal enemies, yet Bush now has come out in support of McCain.

      Palin and Stevens may be mortal enemies but politics for all its evils forces some people to work together. 

       

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Max Dharma (September 04, 2008 12:29 am ET)
         

      Palin's got more spine than BO ever will.. experience too!

      haha

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.