Ignoring Palin's video message, CBS reporter claimed McCain campaign "prove[d]" Palin has "no connection" to Alaskan Independence Party
SUMMARY: CBS' Nancy Cordes reported: "Today, the McCain campaign released her voter registration records to prove Palin is a lifelong Republican with no connection to the [Alaskan] Independence Party." But Cordes did not note that Palin addressed the AIP's 2008 state convention in a video message in which she said the group "plays an important role in our state's politics," that she reportedly addressed the party's convention with a video message in 2006, that the McCain campaign has acknowledged that Palin "visited" the AIP's 2000 convention, or that her husband reportedly was a registered member of the party.
On the September 2 edition of the CBS Evening News, discussing "reports" that Gov. Sarah Palin "participated in Alaska's Independence Party [AIP], which has called in the past for the state to secede from the union," CBS correspondent Nancy Cordes reported: "Today, the McCain campaign released her voter registration records to prove Palin is a lifelong Republican with no connection to the Independence Party." But Cordes did not note that Palin addressed the AIP's 2008 state convention in a video message in which she said the group "plays an important role in our state's politics," that she reportedly addressed the party's convention with a video message in 2006, or that the McCain campaign has acknowledged that Palin "visted" the AIP's 2000 convention. Further, in a September 2 post on his ABCNews.com Political Punch blog, ABC News senior national correspondent Jake Tapper reported that Gail Fenumiai, director of the Alaska Division of Elections, "says that Palin's husband Todd was a member of the AIP from October 1995 through July 2002, except for a few months in 2000."
According to its website, "The Alaskan Independence Party can be summed up in just two words: ALASKA FIRST!" [emphasis in the original]. The website further states that the party's "goal is the vote we were entitled to in 1958, one choice from among the following four alternatives: 1) Remain a Territory. 2) Become a separate and Independent Nation. 3) Accept Commonwealth status. 4) Become a State." The website asserts that "[t]he call for this vote is in furtherance of the dream of the Alaskan Independence Party's founding father, Joe Vogler." As TPM Media's Greg Sargent has noted, in a 1991 "interview that's now housed at the Oral History Program in the Rasmuson Library at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks," Vogler asserted: "The fires of hell are frozen glaciers compared to my hatred for the American government. And I won't be buried under their damn flag. I'll be buried in Dawson. And when Alaska is an independent nation they can bring my bones home."
In a video message to the AIP's 2008 state convention -- available on the party's website and highlighted on the website's front page -- Palin asserted that the AIP "plays an important role in our state's politics" and said she "share[s] your party's vision of upholding the constitution of our great state." Palin stated:
I'm Governor Sarah Palin and I am delighted to welcome you to the 2008 Alaskan Independence Party Convention in the golden heart city of Fairbanks. Your party plays an important role in our state's politics. I've always said that competition is so good, and that applies to political parties as well. I share your party's vision of upholding the constitution of our great state. My administration remains focused on reining in government growth so individual liberty and opportunity can expand. I know you agree with that. We have a great promise to be a self-sufficient state, made up of the hardest-working, most grateful Americans in our nation. So as your convention gets under way I hope that you all are inspired by remembering that all those years ago, it was in this same city that Alaska's constitution was born. And it was founded on hope and trust and liberty and opportunity. I carry that message of opportunity forward in my administration, as we continue to move our state ahead and create positive change. So I say good luck on a successful and inspiring convention. Keep up the good work, and God bless you.
Further, on the September 2 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, host Wolf Blitzer reported that Palin also "sen[t] a video to this party's convention in 2006." In a September 1 post on Political Punch, Tapper reported that McCain campaign spokesman Brian Rogers "says that Palin didn't attend the AIP convention in 1994, 'but she visited them when they had their convention in Wasilla in 2000 as a courtesy since she was mayor.' "
From the September 2 edition of the CBS Evening News with Katie Couric:
CORDES: After yesterday's revelation that her 17-year-old daughter is pregnant, questions are flying about how much the McCain campaign knew about other issues like the probe into Palin's firing of her public safety commissioner, or reports that she participated in Alaska's Independence Party, which has called in the past for the state to secede from the union.
MARK CHRYSON (former chairman, Alaskan Independence Party): All I know is she was at the convention in '94 with her husband and several hundred other people.
CORDES: Today, a senior official close to the vetting process told CBS News those concerns are either unfounded or were dismissed during a long examination that started way back in May, when they began compiling dossiers on 21 possible picks. Palin's was 40 pages, single-spaced. Eventually that list of 21 shrank to just six. Palin and the other finalists were asked to provide even more personal data. Today, the McCain campaign released her voter registration records to prove Palin is a lifelong Republican with no connection to the Independence Party. And it blamed the Obama campaign for stirring the pot on all this, something that campaign strongly denies.















So who will it be that decides to grill her about that?
Anyone?
... but of course, we're not supposed to look at that, we're supposed to look at her family values, her many qualifications, and just flatout idolize this girl.
And according to Jeff Christie, "... she's twice the man Barack Obama is."
I don't know if I wanna' know how he would have been able to find that out.
But according to noleftturns and his little sister POV that attack is justified because it only deals with the issues. Palin being questioned for her patriotism because she joined a group who wants to dissolve the union is a personal attack because it's personal.
That's why we'll be hearing them call Obama a n!@@#r soon because it's only dealing with issues...
"Hey, she's a mom."
So is Mrs. Dugger - and with 3 times as many children she MUST be three times as qualified!
Yeah. Moms are off limits. Look how easy the right were on Cindy Sheehan.
But didn't you hear, The Left Declares War on God!
All the Mc campaign "proved" is that Palin has always been registered Republican.
But it doesn't prove her non-membership in the AIP. Anyone can be continuously registered in one party, yet periodically supportive of another.
How many Reagan Dems are still registered as dems? I know lots.
mmfa issues howling protests when Obama is linked to a controversial church...or a former terrorist...and then have the dishonesty to try and promote this non-story.
Palin clearly stated "competition is so good, and that applies to political parties as well. I share your party's vision of upholding the constitution of our great state".
Palin once again demonstrates her belief in the rule of law and the constitution...and her willingness to work with other interest groups...and that really burns mmfa...because she's conservative, principled and right.
Wesley... The point is that the CBS reporter claimed McCain campaign "prove[d]" Palin has "no connection" to Alaskan Independence Party. This "non-story" points out that "no connection" fails to mention the address expressing sympathy and the membership of her husband in the group.
Now if you are so outraged about this, I suggest you tell sean Hannity to lay off all his venom about obama's paster and his wife, whose controversial remarks, according to you must be merely an example of "competition is good" in politics.
I mean, get real here. I have yet to hear anything about Obama, his pastor, or his wife encouraging parts of the United States to leave the union. I especially like the part when Palin told the AIP, "So I say good luck on a successful and inspiring convention. Keep up the good work, and God bless you."
I wonder how sean hannity will spin and/or ignore this!
I'm curious what makes this Alaska independence party think that if they go their own way, Russia won't try to reclaim them.
What total idiots-- oh, I forgot, Palin's got that National Guard command experience.
Don't give Putin any ideas ;)
"Palin clearly stated "competition is so good, and that applies to political parties as well. I share your party's vision of upholding the constitution of our great state"."
Tell me, why would you have anything to do with a bunch of un-American separatists? Would you tell them you "share their vision" about anything? If she was involved in this because she wanted to socialize or something, then she shouldn't be sending them video messages twelve years later.
Palin associated herself with these people. Party members say she was a member, whether she changed her registration or not. If she doesn't sympathize with their radical cause, then she's the dumbest person on earth for pretending like she does, and then putting herself in the spotlight for everyone to see it.
Desperation is a lousy cologne, and your lame excuses simply reek of it.
Ironically, we should be shocked, just shocked that obama has not surrounded himself with politically safe people his whole life. Actually Obama seems to be the product of a sophisticated environment of different ideas and visions. He lived out of the country, he was a community organizer, he went to an Ivy league school. For that segment of our country that fears any complex ideas of society and economy, this is unacceptible. For the conservative media clowns, their hysteria about Obama reflects their hysteria over the fact that our country is filled with "exotic" ideas and viewpoints.
Now we have Palin, who, has not always surrounded herself with political safe people. However in the right wing context, unless you are in the clan or a neo nazi, anything goes: right makes right. There is plenty of tolerance for crazy ideas as long as they are conservative. Unlike the supposed politically correct left where there is a lot of contention among various issues, among the right extremism is normal. So if Palin pals around with successionist and promotes creationism, no problem. Once ideas are coded as conservative, they are wonderful and safe no matter what. See, that way everything remains simple.
Is she only right on this, Wesley or in general?
Do you consider the Iraq War to be "a task from God?"
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080903/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_palin_iraq_war;_ylt=Agqowbo6XOk1KSNtr5hJEqfCw5R4
What about a plan for a $30 billion oil pipeline? Is that worth praying for?
What about her earmarks?
berg,
We'll see.
Very well could be.
Certainly...if you're of the persuasion.
Looks good at this point.
Does that help you?
That does, Wesley, thanks. What do you make of her so aggressively pursuing earmarks and McCain's criticism of her town receiving them in the past?
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-earmarks3-2008sep03,0,2482434.story
Dishonest punk. Maybe next time you come along talkin' smack you'll remember what it feels like to be on the receiving end. Nah. Doubtful.
I know cons like you are used to being on the offensive and having your way with defensive liberals but you need to realize that the days of the wishy-washy left are behind us.
Hey Roundhouse, was it you that asked yesterday if W's speech was written by rinohunter? Whoever it was, I got a good laugh out of that, and was reminded of it tonight with the speeches of Giuliani, Romney and Palin.
I hear Rush & Sean and see Fox news, read some of the wingnut posters at this site, and I'm just amused, thinking their strange neighborhood of make-believe is restricted to an extreme fringe. Then I turn on the convention of one of the major political parties of our country, and I hear essentially the same views, the same perceptions of reality, and the same effortless lying, and it's suddenly not as funny.
It's really difficult to understand how this is a viable party in the 21st Century.
The righties seem to think they own property rights to hardball politics or something. They seem to believe, as Snoopy points out, that character assassinations like the Muslim smear are issues oriented while exposing a family values hypocrite is character assassination. Hey if they didn't want family values front and center, they shouldn't have built it into their Party platform. But it's officially silly season now, so I'm not surprised by the wingnuts. They're not used to being engaged by lefties on the cultural front, so they piss and moan about the utter unfairness of it all. Whatevs.
I was listening to Mike Malloy listen to Sarah and Julie's speeches, so I didn't catch all of the bs. I can guess what they were saying though, their various iterations of elitist, weakling, socialist, unpatriotic, terrorist sympathizing baby killers is just so predictable. Oh yeah, drill, drill, drill.
I would be truly elated if they would just come out say what they are really for: War, forced conception/birth, corporatocracy, slave labor and domestic police state. They'd probably still woo their base and get a few indendents, too, like Joe Lieberman.
It looks like you miss the point entirely, Wes. If it was okay for the media to go after Wright, Michelle, Ayers and all of that, why is the husband or the pregnant daughter off limits now? The Republicans set the precedent here, why is it suddenly "no fair" when the tables are turned?
MMFA has the correct point here. It would not be an issue at all, if a precedent wasn't already established.
OM,
That wasn't my point at all. mmfa squealed like a pig under a gate with repeated articles about Obama's past associations being misrepresented...and then they turn around and do the same thing with Gov.Palin and the AIP.
The fact that Palin never changed her registration doesn't prove that she doesn't have any connections to the AIP. It's misinformation, and it was rightly exposed as such.
Her association with a secessionist fringe group is a valid concern, by the way. This shouldn't be a point of contention.
Buck up and take your medicine.
MMFA doesn't agree with the press misrepresenting past associations. This article is consistent with that stance. They are misrepresenting Palin's association with the Independence party, claiming she wasn't in it.
Saw it on FDL, AA and POV are giving them hell right now somewhere.
Her book banning issue has yet to suface in MSM. Should I hold my breath?
Here's a quote that might help explain Palin's rise to power:
"Alaska--a place where you can't be too fat or too drunk. Where nobody says things like: 'Let's see your high school equivalency certificate.'"
Homer Simpson, The Simpsons Movie
If you look closely, when you scramble the letters of her name and her message..........you get -----
S A R A H P A L I N...........R I C K S A N T O R U M
I burn toker
One Turk rib
Nuker orbit
Ore burn kit
Outer brinkBroke, in rut
Biker or nut?
Thanks POW. I'd been working all day and could only come up with anal sharpi.
Let's just say that mine is an "ARTISTS RENDITION".
I think you've got it.
On the other hand, you ain't the only fushilinger artsy fartsy media matters maniac. Any one wandering about Kingston Wa. Sept 13th 5-8PM feel free to drop by The Kingston Art Gallery in downtown. I'll be the featured 3D arteest this month. Hopfully the piece I just epoxied some carbon fibre to will be ready. If not the rest of the group will be throwing me into the bay!
How pathetic! Republicans don't even know who they are nominating for VP!
RNC Co-Chair: We are proud to be nominating Sarah PawlentyBy: SilentPatriot @ 11:30 AM - PDTNicole adds: Yeah, she’s well known in her party