About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Ignoring Palin's video message, CBS reporter claimed McCain campaign "prove[d]" Palin has "no connection" to Alaskan Independence Party

September 03, 2008 5:41 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: CBS' Nancy Cordes reported: "Today, the McCain campaign released her voter registration records to prove Palin is a lifelong Republican with no connection to the [Alaskan] Independence Party." But Cordes did not note that Palin addressed the AIP's 2008 state convention in a video message in which she said the group "plays an important role in our state's politics," that she reportedly addressed the party's convention with a video message in 2006, that the McCain campaign has acknowledged that Palin "visited" the AIP's 2000 convention, or that her husband reportedly was a registered member of the party.

53 Comments

On the September 2 edition of the CBS Evening News, discussing "reports" that Gov. Sarah Palin "participated in Alaska's Independence Party [AIP], which has called in the past for the state to secede from the union," CBS correspondent Nancy Cordes reported: "Today, the McCain campaign released her voter registration records to prove Palin is a lifelong Republican with no connection to the Independence Party." But Cordes did not note that Palin addressed the AIP's 2008 state convention in a video message in which she said the group "plays an important role in our state's politics," that she reportedly addressed the party's convention with a video message in 2006, or that the McCain campaign has acknowledged that Palin "visted" the AIP's 2000 convention. Further, in a September 2 post on his ABCNews.com Political Punch blog, ABC News senior national correspondent Jake Tapper reported that Gail Fenumiai, director of the Alaska Division of Elections, "says that Palin's husband Todd was a member of the AIP from October 1995 through July 2002, except for a few months in 2000."

According to its website, "The Alaskan Independence Party can be summed up in just two words: ALASKA FIRST!" [emphasis in the original]. The website further states that the party's "goal is the vote we were entitled to in 1958, one choice from among the following four alternatives: 1) Remain a Territory. 2) Become a separate and Independent Nation. 3) Accept Commonwealth status. 4) Become a State." The website asserts that "[t]he call for this vote is in furtherance of the dream of the Alaskan Independence Party's founding father, Joe Vogler." As TPM Media's Greg Sargent has noted, in a 1991 "interview that's now housed at the Oral History Program in the Rasmuson Library at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks," Vogler asserted: "The fires of hell are frozen glaciers compared to my hatred for the American government. And I won't be buried under their damn flag. I'll be buried in Dawson. And when Alaska is an independent nation they can bring my bones home."

In a video message to the AIP's 2008 state convention -- available on the party's website and highlighted on the website's front page -- Palin asserted that the AIP "plays an important role in our state's politics" and said she "share[s] your party's vision of upholding the constitution of our great state." Palin stated:

I'm Governor Sarah Palin and I am delighted to welcome you to the 2008 Alaskan Independence Party Convention in the golden heart city of Fairbanks. Your party plays an important role in our state's politics. I've always said that competition is so good, and that applies to political parties as well. I share your party's vision of upholding the constitution of our great state. My administration remains focused on reining in government growth so individual liberty and opportunity can expand. I know you agree with that. We have a great promise to be a self-sufficient state, made up of the hardest-working, most grateful Americans in our nation. So as your convention gets under way I hope that you all are inspired by remembering that all those years ago, it was in this same city that Alaska's constitution was born. And it was founded on hope and trust and liberty and opportunity. I carry that message of opportunity forward in my administration, as we continue to move our state ahead and create positive change. So I say good luck on a successful and inspiring convention. Keep up the good work, and God bless you.

Further, on the September 2 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, host Wolf Blitzer reported that Palin also "sen[t] a video to this party's convention in 2006." In a September 1 post on Political Punch, Tapper reported that McCain campaign spokesman Brian Rogers "says that Palin didn't attend the AIP convention in 1994, 'but she visited them when they had their convention in Wasilla in 2000 as a courtesy since she was mayor.' "

From the September 2 edition of the CBS Evening News with Katie Couric:

CORDES: After yesterday's revelation that her 17-year-old daughter is pregnant, questions are flying about how much the McCain campaign knew about other issues like the probe into Palin's firing of her public safety commissioner, or reports that she participated in Alaska's Independence Party, which has called in the past for the state to secede from the union.

MARK CHRYSON (former chairman, Alaskan Independence Party): All I know is she was at the convention in '94 with her husband and several hundred other people.

CORDES: Today, a senior official close to the vetting process told CBS News those concerns are either unfounded or were dismissed during a long examination that started way back in May, when they began compiling dossiers on 21 possible picks. Palin's was 40 pages, single-spaced. Eventually that list of 21 shrank to just six. Palin and the other finalists were asked to provide even more personal data. Today, the McCain campaign released her voter registration records to prove Palin is a lifelong Republican with no connection to the Independence Party. And it blamed the Obama campaign for stirring the pot on all this, something that campaign strongly denies.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by DAWUSS (September 03, 2008 5:48 pm ET)
         

      So who will it be that decides to grill her about that?

       

      Anyone?

       

      ... but of course, we're not supposed to look at that, we're supposed to look at her family values, her many qualifications, and just flatout idolize this girl.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by carlileb5935 (September 03, 2008 5:56 pm ET)
           
        Hey, she's a mom.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by DAWUSS (September 03, 2008 5:59 pm ET)
             

          And according to Jeff Christie, "... she's twice the man Barack Obama is."

          I don't know if I wanna' know how he would have been able to find that out.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by snoopy (September 03, 2008 7:37 pm ET)
               

            But according to noleftturns and his little sister POV that attack is justified because it only deals with the issues. Palin being questioned for her patriotism because she joined a group who wants to dissolve the union is a personal attack because it's personal.

            That's why we'll be hearing them call Obama a n!@@#r soon because it's only dealing with issues...

            Report Abuse
        • Author by doggone-ga (September 03, 2008 6:12 pm ET)
             

          "Hey, she's a mom."

          So is Mrs. Dugger - and with 3 times as many children she MUST be three times as qualified!

          Report Abuse
        • Author by shaggles (September 03, 2008 6:33 pm ET)
             

          Yeah.  Moms are off limits.  Look how easy the right were on Cindy Sheehan.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by ultrasanktpauli (September 03, 2008 7:33 pm ET)
             
          hey don't be so sexist...
          Report Abuse
    • Author by mefirst (September 03, 2008 5:50 pm ET)
         
      i've heard a little about this story, but didn't have all the details.  obviously she knew what this party was all about.  alaskan independence party sort of sums it all up.  what really disturbed me was the video of her saying our iraq policy was "god's policy".  i guess that all buys into the theory that god wanted bush to be president.  praise the lord and pass the ammunition. 
      Report Abuse
    • Author by carlileb5935 (September 03, 2008 5:54 pm ET)
         

      All the Mc campaign "proved" is that Palin has always been registered Republican.

      But it doesn't prove her non-membership in the AIP. Anyone can be continuously registered in one party, yet periodically supportive of another.

      How many Reagan Dems are still registered as dems? I know lots.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by rtwmd1230 (September 03, 2008 5:57 pm ET)
         
      Off subject but TOO GOOD not to mention: go to Huff Post to hear Peggy Noonan and Mike Murphy caught off camera totally slamming Palin.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wesley (September 03, 2008 5:58 pm ET)
         

      mmfa issues howling protests when Obama is linked to a controversial church...or a former terrorist...and then have the dishonesty to try and promote this non-story.

      Palin clearly stated "competition is so good, and that applies to political parties as well. I share your party's vision of upholding the constitution of our great state".

      Palin once again demonstrates her belief in the rule of law and the constitution...and her willingness to work with other interest groups...and that really burns mmfa...because she's conservative, principled and right.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by eb (September 03, 2008 6:21 pm ET)
           

        Wesley... The point is that the CBS reporter claimed McCain campaign "prove[d]" Palin has "no connection" to Alaskan Independence Party.  This "non-story" points out that "no connection" fails to mention the address expressing sympathy and the membership of her husband in the group.

        Now if you are so outraged about this, I suggest you tell sean Hannity to lay off all his venom about obama's paster and his wife, whose controversial remarks, according to you must be merely an example of "competition is good" in politics.

        I mean, get real here.  I have yet to hear anything about Obama, his pastor, or his wife encouraging parts of the United States to leave the union.  I especially like the part when Palin told the AIP, "So I say good luck on a successful and inspiring convention. Keep up the good work, and God bless you." 

        I wonder how sean hannity will spin and/or ignore this! 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (September 03, 2008 6:26 pm ET)
             
          If her husband is indeed a member, isn't that newsworthy? I mean, imagine the outrage if it came to light that Michelle Obama was or had been a member of the Communist Party, or the Black Panthers?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by eb (September 03, 2008 6:29 pm ET)
               
            Hannity and I think Rush have already made a big big deal about remarks Obama's wife has made that are not patriotic enough for them.  I can confidently say they will gloss over this Alaska Independence stuff. 
            Report Abuse
          • Author by carlileb5935 (September 03, 2008 6:57 pm ET)
               

            I'm curious what makes this Alaska independence party think that if they go their own way, Russia won't try to reclaim them.

            What total idiots-- oh, I forgot, Palin's got that National Guard command experience. 

            Report Abuse
      • Author by Brabantio (September 03, 2008 6:51 pm ET)
           

        "Palin clearly stated "competition is so good, and that applies to political parties as well. I share your party's vision of upholding the constitution of our great state"."

        Tell me, why would you have anything to do with a bunch of un-American separatists?  Would you tell them you "share their vision" about anything?  If she was involved in this because she wanted to socialize or something, then she shouldn't be sending them video messages twelve years later.

        Palin associated herself with these people.  Party members say she was a member, whether she changed her registration or not.  If she doesn't sympathize with their radical cause, then she's the dumbest person on earth for pretending like she does, and then putting herself in the spotlight for everyone to see it.

        Desperation is a lousy cologne, and your lame excuses simply reek of it. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by eb (September 03, 2008 7:54 pm ET)
             

          Ironically, we should be shocked, just shocked that obama has not surrounded himself with politically safe people his whole life.  Actually Obama seems to be the product of a sophisticated environment of different ideas and visions.  He lived out of the country, he was a community organizer, he went to an Ivy league school.  For that segment of our country that fears any complex ideas of society and economy, this is unacceptible.  For the conservative media clowns, their hysteria about Obama reflects their hysteria over the fact that our country is filled with "exotic" ideas and viewpoints.

          Now we have Palin, who, has not always surrounded herself with political safe people.  However in the right wing context, unless you are in the clan or a neo nazi, anything goes: right makes right.  There is plenty of tolerance for crazy ideas as long as they are conservative.  Unlike the supposed politically correct left where there is a lot of contention among various issues, among the right extremism is normal.  So if Palin pals around with successionist and promotes creationism, no problem.  Once ideas are coded as conservative, they are wonderful and safe no matter what.  See, that way everything remains simple.

           

          Report Abuse
      • Author by friedbergboy1422 (September 03, 2008 6:55 pm ET)
           

        Is she only right on this, Wesley or in general?

        Do you consider the Iraq War to be "a task from God?"

        http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080903/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_palin_iraq_war;_ylt=Agqowbo6XOk1KSNtr5hJEqfCw5R4

        What about a plan for a $30 billion oil pipeline?  Is that worth praying for?

        What about her earmarks?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by ultrasanktpauli (September 03, 2008 7:36 pm ET)
           
        Palin once again demonstrates her belief in the rule of law and the constitution...and her willingness to work with other interest groups...and to use her elected position to even out family disputes. And to run a shell game with her pregnancy.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by roundhouse (September 03, 2008 7:55 pm ET)
           
        You hypocrite, jerk, wes. You were on the forefront of the Jeremiah Wright and William Ayers junk and now you have the temerity to whine about Palin, whose husband was a member of the AIP, hanging out with secessionists.

        Dishonest punk. Maybe next time you come along talkin' smack you'll remember what it feels like to be on the receiving end. Nah. Doubtful.

        I know cons like you are used to being on the offensive and having your way with defensive liberals but you need to realize that the days of the wishy-washy left are behind us.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 03, 2008 11:41 pm ET)
             

          Hey Roundhouse, was it you that asked yesterday if W's speech was written by rinohunter? Whoever it was, I got a good laugh out of that, and was reminded of it tonight with the speeches of Giuliani, Romney and Palin.

          I hear Rush & Sean and see Fox news, read some of the wingnut posters at this site, and I'm just amused, thinking their strange neighborhood of make-believe is restricted to an extreme fringe. Then I turn on the convention of one of the major political parties of our country, and I hear essentially the same views, the same perceptions of reality, and the same effortless lying, and it's suddenly not as funny.

          It's really difficult to understand how this is a viable party in the 21st Century. 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by roundhouse (September 04, 2008 11:32 am ET)
               
            Yeah, I asked that. Associating the left with "angry" and torture is common fare for these derelict thugs. What do we expect? Bush is well known for his phantasms and McCain has cocooned his campaign with a horde of Rove protege's. Expect worse to follow.

            The righties seem to think they own property rights to hardball politics or something. They seem to believe, as Snoopy points out, that character assassinations like the Muslim smear are issues oriented while exposing a family values hypocrite is character assassination. Hey if they didn't want family values front and center, they shouldn't have built it into their Party platform. But it's officially silly season now, so I'm not surprised by the wingnuts. They're not used to being engaged by lefties on the cultural front, so they piss and moan about the utter unfairness of it all. Whatevs.

            I was listening to Mike Malloy listen to Sarah and Julie's speeches, so I didn't catch all of the bs. I can guess what they were saying though, their various iterations of elitist, weakling, socialist, unpatriotic, terrorist sympathizing baby killers is just so predictable. Oh yeah, drill, drill, drill.

            I would be truly elated if they would just come out say what they are really for: War, forced conception/birth, corporatocracy, slave labor and domestic police state. They'd probably still woo their base and get a few indendents, too, like Joe Lieberman.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by open_mind (September 03, 2008 10:50 pm ET)
           

        It looks like you miss the point entirely, Wes.  If it was okay for the media to go after Wright, Michelle, Ayers and all of that, why is the husband or the pregnant daughter off limits now?  The Republicans set the precedent here, why is it suddenly "no fair" when the tables are turned?

        MMFA has the correct point here.  It would not be an issue at all, if a precedent wasn't already established.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by wesley (September 03, 2008 11:58 pm ET)
             

          OM,

          That wasn't my point at all. mmfa squealed like a pig under a gate with repeated articles about Obama's past associations being misrepresented...and then they turn around and do the same thing with Gov.Palin and the AIP.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Brabantio (September 04, 2008 12:24 am ET)
               

            The fact that Palin never changed her registration doesn't prove that she doesn't have any connections to the AIP.  It's misinformation, and it was rightly exposed as such.

            Her association with a secessionist fringe group is a valid concern, by the way.  This shouldn't be a point of contention.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by roundhouse (September 04, 2008 11:38 am ET)
               
            Whatever, wes. You were out there giving aid and comfort to the Wright/Ayers smears while legitimizing the attacks on Michelle Obama's patriotism. So don't act innocent.

            Buck up and take your medicine.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by lakuip (September 04, 2008 1:16 pm ET)
               

            MMFA doesn't agree with the press misrepresenting past associations.  This article is consistent with that stance.  They are misrepresenting Palin's association with the Independence party, claiming she wasn't in it.  

            Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (September 03, 2008 6:00 pm ET)
         

      Saw it on FDL, AA and POV are giving them hell right now somewhere.

      Her book banning issue has yet to suface in MSM. Should I hold my breath?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by onionhead (September 03, 2008 6:29 pm ET)
         

      Here's a quote that might help explain Palin's rise to power: 

      "Alaska--a place where you can't be too fat or too drunk. Where nobody says things like: 'Let's see your high school equivalency certificate.'"

      Homer Simpson, The Simpsons Movie

      Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (September 03, 2008 7:08 pm ET)
         

      If you look closely, when you scramble the letters of her name and her message..........you get -----

         S A R A H P A L I N...........R I C K  S A N T O R U M

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Craig (September 03, 2008 7:32 pm ET)
           
        Sharia Plan ?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 03, 2008 7:47 pm ET)
             
          Whoa, Craig, I was not familiar with the anagram machine. Good for a quick alias. I'm Bunker Riot, & my co-worker is Pretty Gay. I think I came out ahead on that one.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Brabantio (September 04, 2008 12:08 am ET)
               

            I burn toker

            One Turk rib

            Nuker orbit

            Ore burn kit

            Outer brink

            Broke, in rut

            Biker or nut?

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 04, 2008 1:05 pm ET)
                 
              Gee, Brab. Now I'm not so gung ho on "Bunker Riot". "Burrito Ken" is still in the running , too.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 03, 2008 7:35 pm ET)
           

        Thanks POW. I'd been working all day and could only come up with anal sharpi.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by princeofwheels (September 03, 2008 7:43 pm ET)
             

          Let's just say that mine is an "ARTISTS RENDITION".

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 03, 2008 7:57 pm ET)
               
            Aha! Your real name is Snot Irritants Die !
            Report Abuse
            • Author by princeofwheels (September 03, 2008 8:01 pm ET)
                 
              That is my given name in my homeland....POW is actually WOP...and being Italian, it fits.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by princeofwheels (September 03, 2008 8:05 pm ET)
                 
              I've been working on an angram for JJ....the best I found after two painstaking hours is..... JJ
              Report Abuse
              • Author by eweston8542983 (September 03, 2008 8:35 pm ET)
                   

                I think you've got it.

                On the other hand, you ain't the only fushilinger artsy fartsy media matters maniac. Any one wandering about Kingston Wa. Sept 13th 5-8PM feel free to drop by The Kingston Art Gallery in downtown. I'll be the featured 3D arteest this month. Hopfully the piece I just epoxied some carbon fibre to will be ready. If not the rest of the group will be throwing me into the bay!

                Report Abuse
                • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 04, 2008 7:54 pm ET)
                     
                  I'm not planning on being anywhere the PacNorWest anytime soon, EW. Got ex-pat OC comrades in Skedaddle & Bothell, I'll tip them off.
                  Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (September 03, 2008 8:56 pm ET)
         

      How pathetic! Republicans don't even know who they are nominating for VP!

      RNC Co-Chair: We are proud to be nominating Sarah PawlentyBy: SilentPatriot @ 11:30 AM - PDT  

        I don’t know what scares me more: That Ann Davidson doesn’t realize she screwed up, or the thought of a hybrid Republican VP candidate.

      video_wmv Download | Play  video_mov Download | Play  (h/t Heather)

      “We are holding a convention that will nominate a Republican woman governor, Sarah Pawlenty, as our next Vice-President.”

      Nicole adds: Yeah, she’s well known in her party

      Report Abuse
    • Author by wzwriter (September 04, 2008 6:33 pm ET)
         
      I was looking at those voter registration records, and noticed that they had her party affiliation listed as "R" (Republican), and the date of her original registration being 1982.  But they do NOT indicate whether or not she changed party affiliation between then and now.....
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.